The infamous Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker Party) left nothing but horrible memories for the world. The dreaded Swastika evokes only the worst feelings in everyone. Why would anyone associate with this failed past, or seek to make it represent any kind of hope for the future?

Is Hitler to be considered a martyr for the white race? That would be the worst possible representation. Is Hitler to be honored as a hero, as someone who created great power? I knew a red-headed Jewish girl when I was an Emory University back in the late ’70’s. She once said, casually, “Well, you know, he was kind of…great.” She spoke of his talents alone, of course, his determination, and devotion.

Is this why anyone would consider Adolph Hitler a model–of anything? What exactly was he dedicated to? He was a most miserable, unhappy, angry man, in terrible health. He died friendless and alone. What is it about him anyone would want to emulate?

In the 1970’s, Ballantine Books (NY) published a serious of short, popular-styled history accounts called “Ballantine’s Illustrated History of the Violent Century.” The Editor-in-Chief of the series was Barrie Pitt. One of the books in the series was Hitler, by Alan Wykes. (War Leader Book No.3). It saw three printings by 1971. It provides no footnotes, no references, but only a compelling narrative, and a very short biblography of twelve books on Hitler. (I have several of these books in my own library, so I have confidence in Wykes’ narrative.)

Adolf Hitler, 1889-1945. The brief biography by Alan Wykes, in the Ballantine series, 1970.

Wykes believes Hitler suffered from syphilis, which he contracted in his early twenties–from a Jewish prositute, no less. It has become generally accepted in many circles, though Hitler carefully conceiled and/or destroyed all his personal records (much like the current president of the United States). Certainly, in the trends of biographical efforts, all major figures are subject to the latest theories of human behavior. There were numerous biographies of famous achievers claiming that they had syphilis, that they were Negro, that they were psychologically disturbed, etc. Whatever trend would sell the book. Wykes presents a powerful picture, however. One does get the impression that Hitler suffered finally neurosyphilis. Certainly, his was a case that involved latent syphilis.

In 1938, the Commander-in-Chief of the army was Heinrich Alfred Hermann Walther von Brauchitsch. General Brauchitsch reports that, when discussing the invasion of Czechoslovakia, Hitler “was like a man demented.” The High Command was resisting Hitler’s plans, and Hitler became maniacal.

“He was sweating and shrieking, there was froth on his lips, his speech was incoherent for many minutes. Only after a frightening storm did we make out that it was his “unalterable will to smash Czechoslovakia by military action in the near future.”‘

“Hitler often worked himself up into a state of frenzy,” says Wykes, when he made speeches, or held conferences. Wykes then admits, dispite the frustrations of the High Command over initial military decisions, Hitler was almost always right.

But the point here is that, in the end, Hitler was horribly wrong. His entire vision failed. He brought nothing but suffering upon the world. His ideology, his methodology, even his psychology, all proved profoundly mistaken. Is that not the evidence of history? Did he not fail? Should we not judge by the final outcome?

If anyone would venture down the Nazi path, he would have to willfully blind himself to a great deal of reality.

Perhaps the essential reality here is that the original Aryan race isn’t even German. It’s Celtic. The ancient, dominant white race was the Celtic people, whose 3,000-year-old bones have been found in the Far East, in Taklamakan, China.

Furthermore, it was the British who discovered the linguistic ties of sanskrit to all the western languages. Specifically, that would be Englishman Sir William Jones, in 1786. It wasn’t the Nazis. The superior race bit is a British thing, not a German thing, at least ideologically, or theoretically. Certainly, historically.

And who knows? Mabye even the Ainu, the indigenous people of Japan, have Celtic blood in them. They’re certainly ‘less than’ Japanese.

Ainu people, in traditional dress.

So, please, those sincerely white people out there, clean up the act. Drop the Nazi thing. It is a sad perversion of the vision. It is a distortion of the reality. It is everything that destroys. It is the weakest form of white-ism, basing its raison d’être on hatred for the Jews–one of the Caucasian peoples. The Nazi take on whiteness is worse than anything they accuse blacks of. It blames, but it also claims. It blames the Jews, but claims to be superior to them. Nazism is an indulgence of fear, not pride.

If there is any lesson at all, for the white race, to be learned from the Nazi regime, it is that the separate ethnicities of the Caucasian people must always be allowed their independence, their separateness, and their own preservation. If there is to be a revival of white pride, it is based on something quite other than a notion of global government. Globalism is the bane of nationality. World organizations are the natural antithesis of nationhood. Humanity works best in its separate pieces. It works even better when each piece understands its own value. Only the weak strive for international unity. Only the self-dissatisfied seek identity with others.

Let the Irish be Irish. Let the Czechs be Czech. Let the Germans be German. But, no one needs to try and steal the Celtic glory again. The English, or the “British,” as they insist, will do their own thing, in the end. But the English will never be Celtic, so that perpetual German/Anglo-Saxon/Norse feud can go on forever. Let them make their claims. History says the Celts were the original, dominant Aryan race. (Yes, I saw reddish-blonde hair in Iran, indigenous to Nayshabur.)

One seriously mistaken man.