"'This is a horrid combination of human experiences, and eating.'"
"Which are normally the most compatible bedmates."

...well...discussing Pam Anderson...a woman who gives rise to little talk of depth but a quite a few snickers...so here's an innuendo that was inevitable....

You want that brest extra crispy?

-- B

The problem i have with peta(and I know a few people who dig them)is the lack of knowledge with ecology and common sense i suppose. I have been shamed by them. however i have done more for the environemnt and wild beasts than most of them.
They seem to mass most of their activism towards the domesticated beast. I mean I love my mut. cats are an ecological dillema if u are a hunter or bird lover you will know what i am talking about. as an example domestic cats destroy the poults of turkeys. entire popualtions can and are being desimated by irresponsible cat owners. also songbird popualtions. Peta tries and blocks folks from exterminating the ferrel cat popualtions. they try and enact laws that protect the irrespopnsible behavior. Then they lambast the private cattle ranchers and farmers who own large areas of habitat for wild beasts and critter. wihout these private landowners I would hate to see the state of our wildlife populations and open spaces. Basically they do not focus enough on wild ecosystems or creatures. they instead take the short site approach and focus on the individual beast. Mostly domesticated. There is a tremendous imbalance between functioning life support ecosystems and domesticted dpendent systems on the planet. Peta needs to focus on protecting these critical systems. The domesticated beast NEEDS to be sluaghterd and eaten. I am biased tho. in my world we would all be eating natural wild protiens and the buffalo would still be the migrating grocery store. LOL.
yeah pam is absolutely gorgeous! and we all need to be aware of our actions. there are consequences and they do need to be minimized or erased. but isnt that what evolving and advancing knowledge is all about? I think god would not aprove of alot of things we as a human species are doing to the gifts he so graciously gave us. Like with the free range and caged beasts. in the bible it is said "fill the earth." Not OVERfill it!

"This is a horrid combination of human experiences, sex and eating."
Which are normally the most compatible bedmates.

Do you think the The poor old Colonel,could possibly be behind this whole charade. Boosting two sagging carriers?

How's the KFC stock been these days Beckerkin?

Hot ain't the word! But the point is, the sexual aggression she invites is wrongly associated with the literal appetite for fried chicken!

This is all natural passion, on both accounts, but Peta Pam wants us to separate them, and feel terrible about eating chickens.

This is emotionally impossible. This is a horrid combination of human experiences, sex and eating.

Exellant!True NDN Ironey
Another example why up until the 1900'S "Entertainers" slept in the Hotel broom closets while on tour.

Regardles of Race.

But I still think Pamula is pretty "HOT".

"...in no way diminishes the barbarism of the chicken industry"

Leave aside the economics of farming (large or small scale), and the notion of cost-per-saleable animal for a second...would somebody tell me how one anticeptically and "humanely" deal with a creature raised for the express purpose of killing and eating?

We're supposed to let them amble around freely, risking disease and costing a fortune, making the critter less and less affordable for those who produce and those who consume the bird. Priced any of that "organically grown" food down at Snoot 'N' Simper Markets lately?

Remember: when EVERYTHING consumed (once upon a time not long ago) was "organic" -- because you grew it or knew the guy who did -- chickens did indeed shuffle around the farm yard fairly freely.
...then, Mr. Farmer would wring the little blighter's neck. Humane?

You raise it, you kill it, you eat it. Mind you, the ENTIRE point of PETA's campaigns against KFC, etc. ad nauseum, is to browbeat us all into giving up meat entirely...and milk...and anything else which pricks THEIR sensibilites.

It'd make a bit more sense if these professional mourners would instead begin to wail and be offended (on queue) for cruelly treated children...such as those lured and raped by homosexual predators, one of which just got away with probation and no jail time.

...but, then, that'd mean breaking ranks with their homosexual friends. It'd mean that the "save the world from the people in it" lobby would be unravelling. Bad precedent, no?

-- B

How

Seems that cruelty is part of the set up here on earth, if not to animals, then to humans. Under the curse of death come a wide variety of ills.

Emotionally, I just can't mix a concupiscent but fake sex appeal with the affections of chickens and the grossness of the slaughterhouse.

The whole thing is vomitable.

Well said, though, Ray.

While I am no supporter of PETA, I think that we're being a little too hasty with the ultimate point here. Simply pointing out the fakeness of Pamela Anderson and the freakishness of the far-left animal rights groups in no way diminishes the barbarism of the chicken industry. One can hold that all of the Creater's creation has an integrity of its own, including animals used for food, without being afraid of being categorized with the left. Just because an idea or issue is promulgated by loony leftists doesn't diminish the idea (at least part of it?) outright.

Its getting weirder and weirder every day! LOL. Now I can understand that potatoe lingo there. Well the only thing i really have to say is u are what u eat. sh** in sh** out. silcon in silicon out. so from some one who stays away from all dog food stores (including the chain grocery store) I do once and awhile eat at KFC. I know, its weird but at least they give u something that at least seems like a whole piece of chicken. Man I wish big boobs would join the nature conservancy instead and help out ranchers and local rural communities keep their lands and livlihoods and these areas they own that provides critical habitat and ecosystems in tact(thats real humane treament saving their homes). They instead are being driven to have to work at a KFC! Pam get your priorities straight. PETA has very little ecological professionals. although they did have a good goal in the beginning. I dont know anymore tho.

MarkJ--she had her silicone removed? This I didn't know. Behind the times. Sorry. From her most recent photos, I'd assumed she had even more implanted. Afraid I'm incredulous.

I reacted to some sick feeling if mixed emotions. The fake sexual appeal, combined with the gross cruelty to birds. It was a horrible experience, at least as it registered in me. It's this combination of the visceral, in such perfect irony, that caught my instincts.

Yeah, I didn't mean to hurt her feelings. She's not a thinker. She probably feels she's doing something right. I'm sure that's a precious novelty. We should grant her that, and encourage more in that direction.

Thanks for posting a blog that made me laugh, and think, again. I'm still trying to figure out conscupiscent, but, hey, learning is a life-long journey. When liberal entertainers stray from entertainment into social commentary, they inadvertently provide the best comedy!

"Personally, I don't care about how chickens are treated, but I am against cruelty to animals in general so I think her point is not ridiculous on its face as you seem to think."

If she was truly serious about wanting to stop cruelty, she'd disappear from public forums. She's an affront to her profession...and one might make the argument that she's an affront to her species. She's as deep as the average birdbath, and PETA's use of her only goes to prove that they're about as worthwhile...not that anyone was wondering.

She can choose what she wants. We're also free to choose to slam her as a media phenomenon, whose only talents were surgically installed and then surgically uninstalled.

But, in her defense, her heart bleeds purpule Kook-Aid for poultry. Can you hear the violins?

-- B

I own stock in KFC stock symbol YUM. Now if someone wants to see read bloodshed try to get in my way when extra crispy is served. The buttermilk biscuts are as good as the chickens.
I am a peaceful man at heart but woe onto the PETA person that puts their hand in my bucket, they might just come back missing fingers. Even the sweetest dog will go postal if you mess with its food.

This is about the worst posting I've read on your site, Dr. Yeagley, and I've been reading it and enjoying it for at least a year.

First of all, there is nothing ironic about a woman who has large breasts (she no longer has silicon implants, by the way, so referring to her as the "silicon kid" is unfair) objecting to cruelty against animals. She CHOOSES to make whatever modifications she wants to her body; the chickens do not. That is a critical difference. She is objecting to a fellow creature being treated cruelly. Personally, I don't care about how chickens are treated, but I am against cruelty to animals in general so I think her point is not ridiculous on its face as you seem to think.

Second, what is the big deal about the fact that the woman once had breast implants and may have had collagen injections in her lips? Women have been trying to improve their sex appeal since time immemorial. Suppose she only wore makeup - would that disqualify her from making any comments as well, or is it OK with you if women use some makeup? Can they still have an opinion on something and be taken seriously if they only wear makeup?

Suppose Ms. Anderson had never had breast implants. Would you take her objections to animal cruelty seriously then? Or is any large-breasted woman automatically disqualified from taking a public stand on any issue where the word "breast" might be involved? How stupid is that?

Your post, with all the puns about breasts and obsession with Pamela Anderson's physical features, is really beneath you.

"Having a baby is generally regarded as a loss of figure."

Only in America, it is.

Hey, she looks like she came from a chicken ranch!

But, I don't know that she's advocated the preference for dark meat vs. white meat. We'll leave that to Hillary and the "plantation."

And Bodvar, I feel sure Pammy knows she's bein' used. It's free publicity, after all.

Not that I personally care, but maybe she would be better at advocating condoms and clean needles to protect all those "innocent" folks from her Hep C.

Personally, Pamela can get as Moonbatty as the wants. I don't care what she thinks about chickens or chickens' breasts. I don't think most guys are thinking about chickens' breast when they look at her, either. It reminds me of the cartoon from the "Farside"; A dog listening to it's master, rebuking it for something. Blurb over mans head, "Bad dog, don't pee on the carpet... Blurb over dogs head, "Blah, blah, blah..." I'm picturing that is the reaction she gets, mostly.

What angers me is the impossible standard her and the likes of Demi Moore, Nicole Kidman, et al., set for the rest of us human females. I get this unkind joy whenever I see a pic of one of these fems without makeup and the daily coifure. Ever wonder why Pamela Anderson is only seen wearing sunglasses? There are 2 things that will ALWAYS show a woman's age. Her eyes and here hands.

Boy, 4 hours daily with my personal trainer, my own personal nutritionist, makeup artist, stylist and someone to clean my house and I'd be just as gorgeous!

I apologize for ranting. (Tucks tail and returns to corner.

Bodvar - you da broccoli bomb!

This seems to be a sincere attempt on Pamela's part to upgrade her image and show us all what a serious citizen she truly is. I feel very sad that she doesn't see the irony so well pointed out by Dr. Y.
:-%

PS - South Park did a great treatment of PETA - showed them all cozied up with animals, living in sin and breeding half man/half beast offspring - truly disturbing....

There was a young guy recently, a local coordinator for PETA's efforts against KFC, who changed his name legally to "KentuckyFriedCruelty.com". I wonder if the ladies at the DMV refer to him as "Mr. Dot-Com". It takes all kinds...unfortunately, we're been over-served with folks of the immature and the self-righteous varieties.

Pamela Anderson...boy oh boy...right up there with Schweitzer, Einstein and Mother Theresa as an intellectual and a humanitarian.

I wonder if she's aware that she's being USED by PETA...then again, she's probably used to being used. It's been profitable in most circumstances I'm sure she's encountered, I don't doubt, while it may be philanthropic in this one instance.

I'm hoping, one day soon, to organize a slick protest taking up the cause of exploited and ed root vegetables, slaughtered everyday without reference to their feelings on "veg-farms" nationwide. Perhaps it will raise the consciousness of the vegan community who daily trample on the rights of the humble potato, the oppressed yam, and I'd even throw in advocacy for the noble broccoli, just because I like saying "broccoli".

"Don't boil us, bake us, fry or braize,
We don't want your hollandaise!" What'ya think?!

...then again, I might be able to get Pamela on-board for some face-time. After all, I'd then be advocating on behalf of a species she could relate to.

-- B

Katherine, she's a slave to appearances. Having a baby is generally regarded as a loss of figure. I don't understand how her type of professional woman can ever consent to ever having a baby, though they do, often, in fact.

It is as if they aren't really a woman unless they HAVE the baby. Never mind motherhood. Just the complete female body function of having the baby.

All the more ironic that they support abortion, and related enterprises, eh?

Oh, yes. They will never support any protest of the use of animals to prepare cosmetics. Once in a while they protest furs, but, never anything connected with their bodily sex appeal.

Thank you for your comments!

.... yet these same pornographic icons screaming about chickens rights promote the slaughter of unborn children and the use of human embryos in laboratory experimentation. You will NEVER hear Pamela Anderson nor her fellow celebrity-porn icons protest against partial birth abortion (the most barbaric form of abortion), human embryos being grown in laboratories-experimented on-then destroyed, the use of collagen from dead prisoners skins, and aborted fetuses in cosmetics, and the selling of aborted fetuses, to name just a few, or other such barbarisms committed against their fellow HUMAN BEINGS! Oh, I forgot, Pamela Anderson is made of silicon. I guess that means she doesn’t qualify as a human being.