Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

Has the White Man Gone Soft?

by David Yeagley · May 20, 2013 · 12 Comments ·

Has the White Man gone soft today? Take it from a Comanche. Yes.

The United States military prides itself on its adherence to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Comprising reactions to the atrocities of World War II, the Geneva Convention is the Allied declaration new standards of conduct in war.

From the Geneva Convention, 1949. It professed to be about protecting civilians from the ravages of war. It turned out to
be more of a globalist downsizing of national power.

It is a wonderful thing, to reflect on human behavior, and to raise the standards as high as possible. But, when the enemy is a demon, you might have to become Satan himself to defeat him. It’s been done. Dracul (“the dragon) did it, in the 15th century. Holy Roman Emperor Sigismond of Saxony created the Order of the Dragon to fight against the invading Muslim Turks. Dracula (“son of Dracul,” or Vlad Ţepeş) was renown for unknown cruelty in Eastern Europe, but he drove the Muslims back to Istanbul.

But what about the United States? In the history of the country’s corporate armed efforts, has the Order of the Dragon ever loomed in the ranks?

The answer is yes. Many people do not know it, but, during the 19th century, 1823 to be exact, the state of Texas created such a sinister force. Stephen F. Austin called them “The Texas Rangers.” It was strong law enforcement agency, and later became as ruthless as any “savage” they faced. Indeed, the reason they were formed was to fight against the Comanche–the most feared and dreaded human force on the southern plains.

Evidently the Rangers were not so heartless in the beginning, when they faced a variety of outlaw opponents. But, when they later had to concentrate on the Comanche, they became more ferocious than any other legal enforcement agency in the history of the country.

Old Texas Rangers: They weren’t afraid of Comanches. They learned to fight like them. Today, American enforcement is commanded by law to fear Muslims. The Muslims take full advantage.

Essentially, they learned Comanche tactics (guerrilla warfare) and used them against the Comanche. Prior to this development, the U.S. military had enjoyed a finer reputation as dignified professionals (be that reputation justified or not). Fighting the Comanche destroyed all that fantasy, gentile image of law enforcement. Of course, the Texas Rangers were an elite Texas enforcement group, and not really part of the U.S. military. They were a state agency.

But the point is, they came to use the war tactics of them whom they despised. Yea, they became worse than the enemy, to defeat the enemy.

This can’t happen today?

Globalism tends to crush such aggressive defense. As in all “world treaties,” compromise and humanitarian standards tend to eliminate sufficient defense. The true aggressor is left with an open door, while his victims are chained to a liberal morality.

The lying Muslims always cry for “morality” when any of them are killed by Western forces, or by their own; yet their terror tactics are the most immoral of any ever known to humanity.

Muslims have learned to use Western morality against Westerners. The West, particularly America, cowers before moral accusation, worse than the Republican Party.

Timber Bluff, Comanche warrior.

Instead, the whole West needs to become like the Texas Rangers. If you want to defeat the enemy, you must annihilate him! Mercy is for the leftovers, not for the instigators. American enforcement never hesitated to encounter the Comanche. At least the Comanche knew when we were defeated. But why should the Muslims accept defeat, when they are allowed a free hand to destroy Americans? So why now whimper and whine about the terrible Muslims?

You insult me America. Every time. It is your lethal liberalism.

The white man has forgotten to be strong, but is quick to be weak–as some liberal tactic of political goodness. The white man must be “good.” Preoccupied with theories of goodness, the white man is handing the victory to bad beasts. To very bad, immoral “animals.” The white man’s goodness is becoming the foundation of evil in the world.

I say rather, Protect what’s yours. Don’t give away what you took from me. Fight for what’s yours. Make my day. Be brutal. Be ruthless. Be the victor.

Otherwise I can’t vote for you anymore.

Posted by David Yeagley · May 20, 2013 · 11:16 am CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Conservatism · Islam · Liberalism · Politics · Race · Western Europe · White Race

Read More Journal Posts »

12 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Tom T. // May 20, 2013 at 5:47 pm   

    You speak the plain truth, regrettably, but of course very well, so far as I’m concerned.

    I can add this piece for comment, hopefully by you, David.

    What we should emulate, and do, is above, at the least. And I agree with your earlier remark about deprogramming centers, as a specific possibility.

    Although I’m not advocating Vlad Tepes work in his successful resistance, necessarily, he and others, Martel, Sobieski, in history had well learned what you have put into this lesson post. From my own youth remembrances, I have never forgotten my first image of worst human violence, the whole movie-video segment, which occurred in “Exodus”, by Uris, of “Dove” the young Israeli fighter, being found on the hillside, with his neck sliced, bled dead, sunnah style, during the night while on settlement guard duty! I was less young, after.

    Many years passed, regrettably, before I was to learn the real significance.

    If battle must be engaged, effective, and intelligent, it must be against the enemy, not for the entertainment of others at home! War is hell. When war must be from time to time endured, it cannot be permitted to be less than 100% effective, which will always be the case with hands tied!

  • 2 David Yeagley // May 20, 2013 at 6:16 pm   

    Tom, you obviously have a lot more experience than I. I’m just blasting out feelings of profound frustration and indignation. I appreciate your level-headed response!

    I don’t think America is going to do anything anymore. That really hurts. It has become a national self-righteous liberal charity to allow enemies to prosper, and even let them kill Americans. This is “Christianity” for the Christ-less liberals. Very sick. Sociopathic.

    Because you have the ability to destroy another nation doesn’t mean you’re never supposed to!

  • 3 Quartermain // May 21, 2013 at 7:35 am   

    I think you are right on this. We have gone soft.

    Here is my 2 cents and a few thoughts on this.

    I think part of the problem lies in modern education. It has been dumbed down and continues to decline each generation. Soft brains lead to soft bodies.

    Another problem is the concept of collective White guilt, an evil concept cloaked in false moralism. This ties in with education.

    Another problem is the news and entertainment industry. It is run and operated by a hostile self-elected and self-proclaimed elite.

    Here is a link to an article about the effects of TV on the brain:

    Another is the political class is either hostile, aloof, or both.

    Another is globalism, a healthy national character might interfere with the corporate big wigs making more money.

    Those are a few of my thoughts, any way.

  • 4 Quartermain // May 21, 2013 at 7:45 am   

    Here is a post touching on the same subject:

  • 5 Thrasymachus // May 21, 2013 at 12:30 pm   

    Whites have indeed gone soft. But perhaps it is also a Freudian death wish. Whites are taught to feel so guilty about their historical sins, both real and invented, that they wish (as I see it) to free themselves of guilt through a form of suicide.

    There is one difference between the Comanche situation and that of Islam. (At least I think so. It may be that I have not given sufficient thought to this off-the-cuff opinion.)

    And that is: Islam is a system of thought that focuses on power and world-conquest. Islam, then, is a virus of the mind and spirit. Islam being a virus, it must be dealt with the way the human body (for example) and medical science deal with viruses.

    The Comanche were just defending themselves — which they had a natural right to do.

    Back when Whites invaded the “New World,” it was about conquest — about having new land in which to live. Therefore, those whose land was taken from them were indeed victims of an appetite for Lebensraum. In my opinion, the chief aim of Whites was not rule over the society or persons of other peoples, but simply a lust for their lands. I may be wrong, since I wasn’t there to see these events.

    I tell today’s conservatives that they are not what conservatives of the past were. They somehow don’t get it. Modern conservatives seem not to understand what it is they are trying to conserve. If it’s all just about having more money in the bank, then, sorry, I cannot vote for them either.

  • 6 Thrasymachus // May 21, 2013 at 12:39 pm   

    We Whites are routinely taught, around the clock, that it is the greatest sin possible to love our own people or have any kind of preference for them. Antidiscrimination is the watchword here, and “racism” the accusation. Given this, it is impossible for Whites to be anything but soft. We have nothing that we are entitled, according to this school of thought that I think is Liberalism (my “conservative” friends these days say that racial interests is not part of, and has no place in, being conservative — but since when?), to defend.

  • 7 Thrasymachus // May 21, 2013 at 12:45 pm   

    Woops! “Racisl interests ARE” (The grammar mistake resulted from a word substitution! I had first intended to say “racialism is . . . ” but then thought better of it.)

  • 8 Thrasymachus // May 21, 2013 at 1:21 pm   

    By “racialism,” though, I would only have intended to say “ethnic interests.” The meaning was not to include “race hatred”; it was simply about including ethnic heritage and culture — “whiteness” in this context — in the mix of those thing to be conserved.

    If free association and defending “whiteness” is now forbidden (as it officially is), then the White Man has not only gone soft: he will eventually go extinct.

    Some greater position than mere Conservatism or Liberalism now needs to be developed. A NEW position — not the fascism and errors of the past that brought about the tragedies of the Second World War.

  • 9 R. May // May 23, 2013 at 2:44 pm   

    Excellent stuff. Quoted, linked, and riffed on here:

  • 10 Has the White Man Gone Soft? // May 23, 2013 at 4:48 pm   

    […] […]

  • 11 Tom T. // May 24, 2013 at 3:54 pm   

    David, thanks for the compliment, but you flatter, and I feel not more experienced. I too have my own share of “feelings of profound frustration and indignation”, about these matters discussed and more.

    Neither humanity (pre-civilization), nor civilization(?) throughout the millennia, have ever lived in harmony, across the board, due to many reasons of conflict, disagreement and avarice. In consequence, many depths have been plumbed, in conflicts repeatedly, including the unmentionable (to the delicate) cannibalism. Even with the acknowledged imperfections of the source, I believe a good overview can be found, here:

    Islam has codified the practice of cannibalism along with every other act of global criminal behavior, against all, on a demonstrated level, and enshrined it all, most importantly the singular act, in a fraudulent “religion”, of an automatic death sentence for anyone who drops out and renounces the shahada. It is important to mohammadans, because without this “cap on the bottle”, most would drop out were it not the fear of death, and islam would scarcely exist. An excellent review, of this concept is accomplished by that heroic, among many ex-muslims, Nonie Darwish, here: In this, she also covers superbly, current mohammadanism thought on islam cannibalism, and more.

    The reality of both criminal mohammadanism supremacism, and the arabian supremacist beliefs, and that they both have the unimaginable arrogance, to put upon us, others too, of Western thought (and I very much include Jewish and Israeli thought) and valid accomplishments, makes me profoundly angry and indignant! This is the character of mohammadan’s history.
    Beyond that is the current fact, that the current 50 ongoing nations in war, are primarily fighting muslims! More on their character here:

    “It has become a national self-righteous liberal charity to allow enemies to prosper, and even let them kill Americans. This is “Christianity” for the Christ-less liberals. Very sick. Sociopathic.” Sadly so, I’ve seen for years.

    I think and hope American response to foreign and domestic infiltrators, and enemy, is of a “weather like” cyclical nature, cycles within cycles, wherein we will rise to the challengers, at the time they get to our low information populace, who are so busied with reality shows of entertainment, and so many self-indulgent diversions of non-reality escapism.

    “Because you have the ability to destroy another nation doesn’t mean you’re never supposed to.” Sadly, mohammadanism has never subscribed to that, nor ever can, as it is entered in the koran and hadith, to fight all, without ending, and they have been doing so for nearly 1500 years, so far.. Neither apparently has hussein, subscribed to that contention, the one, who bends all efforts to our Nation’s decline, and islam to rise. To we Americans, it’s not nice to mess with mother nature, nor our Constitutional Principles. Time will eventually come, and it could be messy, if later rather than sooner, for the awakening. And it could become a messy “broken arrow” event, certainly no pun, intended. Destroying nations is always an uncertain, highly risky, and surprizingly not predictable business, history shows, and much against the Western grain of civilization, where accommodation and negotiation have become the byword, for the non-pagans. Yes, that’s the rub: the good and the danger, of such a dangerous course.

    The proper solution for hussein, is impeachment and imprisonment, at the least, according to nearly half, in polls, but that is not likely practicable at the current development of knowledge. Many hope that time will lead to the compulsion, the inevitability, of such an end, to which who, what comes next? And yet all his documents, remain secreted. Strange, very singularly strange. Fully damning, and strange. A very grand conspiracy, with no dots to connect, no bread crumb trail, no more than one would find in a map of hidden footsteps of Harry Potter! A very low information populace, indeed. And his regime is arranging the security and military concept out of a Harry Potter story line, of the famous “one whose name we dare not speak”—nothing of the truth of islam allowed, as well, his favorites, the MB!

    And his biography book quote, here more accurately excerpted, “…in talking to arab and pakistani Americans…..they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” If the “political winds shift in an ugly direction.”, the President of America, is supposed to stand with Americans, not an enemy, no matter what.!

    And a mohammadan American, if he has not renounced both the shahada, and islam, is very much not ever a safe American, because sharia law, is one hundred percent incompatible with American law, as is the ideology itself, one hundred percent against Americans, commanding, and authorizing muslims to be eternally warring against Americans! That is the truth, the rub, and what is wrong with daring to call muslims, Americans.

    It is my sincere opinion, that the Nakoula imprisonment is an event of commission approved or encouraged by hussein, far worse than the Japanese internment that he called up as an example in his book, because Nakoula’s was a political imprisonment, in America, for a bald-faced lie, knowingly committed with the American President’s approval.

    Patience is difficult for many of us, who see much on the high information levels, because events have a timing of their own, and we can only sometimes affect the timeline, and always with hazard. But we can work to be ready and especially to direct others attention and knowledge on the facts and the truths. I am glad, at an older age, for every day, and every word, of bringing thoughts on the truths of realities facing civilization, which means the West, to the public.

    I do not look forward to messiness, if it shall come, and have hope of an earlier awakening, by the populace, of a less messy nature, should I still be around. Physical conflict is always to be avoided, and minimized, if possible. But history ultimately requires It, because men coming at arms, with evil desires in their hearts, have no other way to be dealt with. For eons, men have ultimately come at arms, even when mankind is sitting, enjoying, and dreaming, and it goes around, as we both regrettably know, from our histories, and equally know now we are mutually facing a far greater insidious persistent evil, a true godless devil that will accept no future for anyone.
    Unfortunately, it does seem a staggering challenge, given the socialist infiltrated school systems, and the government, equally so, with subversives, 5th columns, at all levels.

    Meantime, the ultimate enemy, evil islam, more so than discrete nations who certainly may wish us conquering harm and so act upon, is working to bring the frog to boiling, ever so slowly, including with hijra, mostly at this time.

  • 12 Tom T. // May 24, 2013 at 4:03 pm   

    I add, for accuracy, which is my goal in commenting, that my first comment here holds a story called “The land without muslims”, cited often by various web sites, has been refuted as considerably not accurate. Based upon the refutation, it appears somewhat not accurate. Some of the conclusions were accurate, for different reasons than cliamed, but mostly because Japan is much a monolithic realtively closed society, compared to the multi culti kumbaya general West, of the times.

You must log in to post a comment.