Header Image


Op-Ed Column

Islam: Libido Unleashed, on

by David Yeagley · May 16, 2013 · 7 Comments ·

Islam is Freudian libido unleashed. Under the robes of dark religion, the system of Islam glorifies the most naked, destructive passions of human nature. Libido–undefined sexual energy—is expressed in gruesome death. Among civilized people libido finds more tolerable expression through creative sublimation, such as art; but in Islam, sublimation is removed.

Islamic hysteria, or sexual perversion?

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), the famous Viennese Jewish psychologist, father of the “couch,” or “confessional” talk therapy, introduced a profound sexual theory in which libido explained what was formerly called mayhem and cannibalism. In The Future of an Illusion (1927), Freud suggests cannibalism, along with incest, was an instinct. Cannibalism, always involving mayhem, is directly linked to libido. In Totem and Taboo (1918), Freud describes various cases of incest, and suggests that sexual taboos develop precisely around the most powerful but self-destructive desires. (Civilization simply harnesses or re-channels these dreadful desires.)

But Islam glories in removing sexual taboos. The brutality of Islam, so unprecedented in modern times, is the studied absence of civilized inhibition.

What inspires such horrid Islamic acts of bodily dismemberment—the beheadings, the chopping off of body parts, the compulsive delight in blowing to pieces the human body, and the ghastly acts of cannibalism?


Barbarity we thought characterized more primitive man, in more primitive times. Tribal people have always relished the grotesque. Indulgent violence is part of what it means to be “heathen.”

But, according to Freud, barbarity is man, at any time, primordial, bizarre, and even mystical.

Cannibalism, as sexual desire, is the ultimate union of two separate entities. Union, the coming together of separate entities, is the object of all sexual desire. By cannibalism, two entities become one in the most literal way. (This union accounts for the thinly sublimated cannibalism of the vampire legend, and the everlasting popularity of the Dracula story.)

Mayhem is only the foreplay of cannibalism. Murderers who have eaten the bodies (or body parts) of their victims always dismember the body first.

Islam, world famous for mayhem, is also famous for cannibalism. The “religion” of Islam honors this very worst human denigration. (And Muslims accuse Jews of blood eating? This is simply projection, with an odd twist of impotence.)

Islamic abuse of women, the brutal beatings, killings, and dismemberings, are normative in Islam. On the other hand, the reward of the faithful is a harem of seventy virgins. Islamic reality and fantasy clearly exhibit psycho-pathological conflict and perversion.

Islam’s notorious terrorism—a suicidal pervert’s mass-murdering slaughter—is mayhem on steroids. Mayhem en mass. Delight in this practice is a clarion declaration of sexual perversion in the Freudian sense. The “lust for killing” (mentioned in The Future of an Illusion) is clearly sexual in nature—demonstrated by the nature of its exhibition: mayhem, or dismemberment. Islamic cannibalism is but the climax of the psychological perversion.

Islam may also involve supernatural influence. Normally, sexual desire is sublimated by religious energy and its cultural accoutrements. But, what today is called “radicalization” of a Muslim simply means the person is given to the libido unleashed, through the supernatural—expressed through long-established cultural modes.

But Freud warned the young Swiss psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) to keep sexual theory separate from the supernatural. Jung recalls a conversation with Freud in 1907 (in Vienna):

“My dear Jung, promise me never to abandon the sexual theory. That is the most essential thing of all. You see, we must make a dogma of it, an unshakable bulwark against the black tide of mud—of occultism.”

See, C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, ed. Aniela Jaffé, trans. Richard Winston (1961; rpt. New York: Vintage, 1989), p.150. Sex is more manageable than the supernatural.

So, the power of Islam is libido unleashed by the impetus of the supernatural. It is precisely belief in the supernatural, which unleashes the libido. It may be that all religion is liable for some degree of amalgamation with unleashed libido. Indeed, Freud says as much in Civilization and its Discontents (1929). Yet, Judeo-Christian westerners understand religion as a restraint. Ancient Hebrew religion involved animal slaughter (sacrifice) for food, but modern Judaism no longer has such a ritual. Christianity, on the other hand, aggrandizes the historical slaughter of one human being, for forgiveness, thus psychologically turning the libido on its head, and does finally allow religion to function as a restraint.

But Islam shows us how lethal libido is unleashed through belief in magic, in the context of barbarous cultural identity with historical, Collective support.

This article was published as “Islam: Libido Unleashed?” on, Wednesday, May 15, 2013.

Posted by David Yeagley · May 16, 2013 · 11:51 am CT · ·

Tags: Arts · Christianity · FrontPageMagazine · Islam · Op-Ed Columns · Paganism · Religion · Women

Read More Op-Ed Columns »

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Tom T. // May 16, 2013 at 11:16 pm   

    An excellent analysis, and construction, of what I’ve been thinking about this aspect of, for sometime. Lust and animal passions run at the surface and deep, in the classic tribal islamist. And the insecurity of them is so deep, it leads to this islamic perversion of life.

    The unimaginable unbridled barbarism butchery, and occasional cannibalism, the halal neck slicing and beheading bleed outs as execution, appeal to those unbridled passions of lust, unleashed.

    The rape jihad, of more adult females and males both, the pimping gangs, the child rape, the rape of the young girls below puberty, and of the boys of “pearly pre-pubescence”, and the child bride mass marriages, in isalmic countries is all so patently obviously connected to bagging their possesions of the herd of women they gather.

    Symbolically, the men tend to wear white or light colored dishdashas, the women tend to be in black, in the more purist, sharia enforced, islam countries. That white stands out as a supremacist cloak,as you wrote of on June 16. It is a black and white symbolic case.

    There is indeed much raw basic instinctive psychology at work, unleashed, by the madman mohammad.

    I and so many other observers, have on the web, seen so many, too many photos and videos of these principles, and stories.

    David, I think your analysis is excellent as a valid observation, but how does one put the unleashed of mo, back in the box?

    Most are brainwashed, many are deranged, with mental software stuck in a closed loop, with no branch out condition.

  • 2 wyoman // May 17, 2013 at 7:40 am   

    I was going to comment till I read Tom T’s response. He said everything I was going to say and more. Including the frustrating question “how do we deal with this?” Thank both of you.

  • 3 David Yeagley // May 17, 2013 at 9:02 am   

    Well, we could set up Muslim Anonymous deprogramming centers, advertise them highly, make public display out of it. A campaign, as it were.

    Tom, I’d forgotten about that white robe bit! Nice to know someone else not only reads but remembers!

    Islam is a tool in the world. Different governments use it, at will. The ultimate question would be how to deprogram Western elites.

  • 4 Quartermain // May 17, 2013 at 10:39 am   

    Off topic but pertinent to your last post:

  • 5 Tom T. // May 19, 2013 at 9:02 pm   

    It is very important to contribute this piece, as disturbing as all of islam for brainwashed unleashed raw zombie reality:

    I hope you can spot his contribution, David. It adds documentation, at least, and perspective, on a deeply evil existence!

    Tom T.

  • 6 Tom T. // May 19, 2013 at 9:03 pm   

    his=this, sorry.

  • 7 Even the Arabs Have Turned “Injun” » Choosing Life - God's Gift To The Unborn // Dec 9, 2013 at 12:08 am   

    […] was chosen by the school (80 years ago) rather than the modern image of the lying, murderous mayhem Muslim, the cruel, self-idolizing Islamic Arab so detrimental to all free nations, so intend on […]

You must log in to post a comment.