BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Whites, Blacks, and Media

by David Yeagley · April 1, 2013 · 16 Comments ·

UPDATE II: Yeagley Interview, Part 2, April 2, 2010, Washington Times (Joseph Cotto).

UPDATE: Yeagley Interview, April 1, 2013, Washington Times (Joseph Cotto)

The “hundreds of teens” who mobbed pedestrians on Chicago’s downtown Magnificent Mile area were all black. American Negroes. No, there wasn’t any serious violence, but, it was terrifying to many normal citizens. There were three to four hundred black teens involved, representing several different gangs. It was kind of a show, actually; an multi-gang fest, with different gangs on display.

But, you have to look at the news photos to discover the racial element. Not one word about race in the reports.

Now, if white people act up, they’re immediately identified–in the headline–as Tea Party or White Supremacist (as if these groups are similar or related).

Are White Supremacists Killing Texas Prosecutors?” writes Peter Web for Yahoo News. This, of course, is presented with no evidence, no proof, but only suggestion. Never mind that. Uncertainty is always overcome by anti-white liberal forces (oedipal white liberals). If any white people were involved, they’re either supremacists, Tea Partyers, or Bible-thumping conservatives with guns.

White supremacist group suspected in killing of Texas prosecutor,” reads Maurice Richter’s Reuters report.

Well, who but white people would be involved in a white supremacist group? (Dave Chapelle?) But, the media likes to divide white people into only two classes: white supremacists and (white) liberals. The supremacists are low grade people, ignorant, violent, bitter, clinging to their Bibles and their guns. The liberals are of course elite, high class (like the OWS crowd), educated, righteous, and full of compassion and love.

This kind of intentional, dramatic contrasting, for political effect, is a hackneyed but effective Communist tactic, for sure.

One other possibly important note: the white supremacist elements and the Texas prosecutors’ murders in this latest news story are all in Kaufman County, Texas. This is exactly the county on which the recent horse slaughter news focused. Paula Bacon, former mayor of Kaufman, Texas, discussed the crime rate connected with the local horse slaughter house (since closed). It seems the crime rate goes up in a community with such a slaughter house, along with other alarming statistics. (This is worse than the Indian casino effect!)

Finally, I quote this comment from a concerned white people’s site. It regards a questionable character names Mark Martin, a Neo Nazi:

And why is it … that so many weirdos, pedophiles, dopeheads and overall scum find their way in to pro-White groups? Or is it just my imagination and we see the same proportions in society at large?

Very intelligent comment. I’d go on to say that groups whose agendas are relatively radical, offensive, or threatening to another group, tend to attract people who are prone to be radical, offensive, and threatening. But that is indeed an illusion, or a theoretical abstraction. Obviously, peace-nics and environmentalists can be some of the most violent of all activists, along with anti-abortionists. There’s plenty of violence to go around, assigned to any number of opposite groups. Once one group goes out an markets an offensive agenda, and behaves with social impropriety and immaturity, then every and any group, has to make just as much noise–or the media won’t cover them at all.

Media creates vicious circles and abject contradictions. Media makes communication virtually impossible. Media is ultimately about obscuring the truth, or so it seems.

UPDATE II: Yeagley Interview, Part 2, April 2, 2010, Washington Times (Joseph Cotto).

UPDATE: Yeagley Interview, April 1, 2013, Washington Times (Joseph Cotto)

Posted by David Yeagley · April 1, 2013 · 2:58 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Communism · Conservatism · Liberalism · Media · Negro Race · Politics · Race · White Race




Read More Journal Posts »

16 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 6:05 pm   

    If Whites are to survive and have a future, they will simply have to devote themselves quitetly to building community. No conspicuous — and especially no militant — radical agenda at this point. It will be nonviolent resistance to the loss of community that may get media attention. It will have to be almost Amish-like. Whites who simply refuse to play the game by the rules established and enforced by Liberals. White Survival will depend, in my opinion, on opting out of the “System.” As I see it, victory from within the System seems impossible. Of course, there may be some other way that has never occured to me. But, in all events, building community is key to survival.

    The same principle applies just as rigorously to the American Indian. He must opt out of the new multicultural agenda to survive.

  • 2 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 6:14 pm   

    Strange as it may seem, the wisdom from Ancient China is, from my point of view, applicable to the White Movement at this time (Note: uses ‘mystical’ language — not to be taken entirely literally at all times; requires careful interpretation!):

    Lao Tzu

    Chapter 63

    Act without action
    Manage without meddling
    Taste without tasting
    Great, small, many, few
    Respond to hatred with virtue

    Plan difficult tasks through the simplest tasks
    Achieve large tasks through the smallest tasks
    The difficult tasks of the world
    Must be handled through the simple tasks
    The large tasks of the world
    Must be handled through the small tasks
    Therefore, sages never attempt great deeds all through life
    Thus they can achieve greatness

    One who makes promises lightly must deserve little trust
    One who sees many easy tasks must encounter much difficulty
    Therefore, sages regard things as difficult
    So they never encounter difficulties all through life

  • 3 David Yeagley // Apr 1, 2013 at 6:16 pm   

    Very interesting comments, Thras. Just worded rather uniquely. Amazing, what words can say.

    I guess there is one difference in the Indian analogy, though. Indians truly never wanted to join the system, but, it wasn’t Indians who created the system, or Indians who were running it.

    How will the sincerely White opt out? Do they need a geographic (land) base? The “reservation” bit has certainly helped Indians stay together, as it were. Heavy tolls of another nature are part of that price, in the case of the Indian…

  • 4 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 6:54 pm   

    Geographic separation is necessary. Whites will have to abandon Rugged Individualism and voluntarily share wealth, so as to purchase land for themselves and other deserving Whites in currently predominantly white areas or states and build implicit — and eventually-to-be explicit — white communities there.

    Furthermore, these Whites will have to “turn off the tube” (I know, televisions no longer actually have a picture tube) — the MSM — and radically reject the pop culture and concentrate on nourishing the culture that is natural to them. God knows, we really do have the means, now more than ever before, to do this. Technology makes it possible for people to steep themselves in their own cultural inheritance as never before in History.

    Non-Whites will simply have to be made to feel unwelcome in these developing communities. Hasidic Jews are experts in doing this — creating their own communities. Whites will have to imitate them to some degree:

    “From our research and observations, the Hasidic Jews of Williamsburg do not interact with those outside of their community with some exceptions.

    We inquired them to answer some questions about their community. However, on many occasions, they rejected us. One of the reasons for this was because of a language barrier. The elderly Jewish men knew very little English, barely enough to tell us they did not understand why we wanted to talk to them.”

    Hasidic Jews

    As to the American Indian, he also will have to refuse to allow the U.S. Federal government to push him around, as, for example, in the case of being forced to accept Blacks as “authentic American Indians, and members of various nations.”

  • 5 Sioux // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:09 pm   

    I read about the “planned” wilding by the “kids” of Chicago. What did Rahm the Gay Blade have to say about terrorizing the tourists? How cool will it be when absolutely no one steps into the Windy City voluntarily for fun any more. Fools all of them who believe they can turn everything upside down without repercussion. But, as I have said numerous times before, this is all about CHAOS.

    We have been infiltrated/invaded here in Battle Creek – was at Walmart on Saturday afternoon, and I couldn’t believe my eyes – hardly anyone there who wasn’t foreign looking (hispanic, asian, in particular). Sanctuary City???

  • 6 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:17 pm   

    The ‘sharing of wealth’ mentioned in Post #4 is not a total, communistic method; rather, it is strictly voluntary, partial, and temporary, and about establishing a geographic land base — a new beginning. It is related to Christian charity in principle. The plan is a co-operative effort and must have build-in provisions for ensuring a prompt return to the economic system — laissez faire — of the American Founding Fathers.

  • 7 Sioux // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:27 pm   

    Thras, I am very concerned about like-minded Patriots gathering together in communal life for only reason. We would make an easy target for the drone strikes that are going to be used to take us out. But, I do love the fantasy – I have had such dreams myself….and then I get all paranoid….

  • 8 David Yeagley // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:35 pm   

    Voluntary white communities. What a novel idea! But, I can scarcely believe it has come to that. Whites putting themselves on “white reservations.” Incredible.

  • 9 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:39 pm   

    My feeling, Sioux, is that if God is on our side in this matter, He will help us and keep us from extinction. If our government actually plans on exterminating us, then it is of the first priority to make this fact known to all Americans. This would provide sufficient moral justification for an open declaration of White Independence fom the current regime and make clear to the entire world that we are RIGHT to decide to seecede from the U.S that has set its heart on our annihilation. The Jews are building the state of Israel as a Jewish nation. They are right to do this. Surely Whites, who are far more numerous than Jews, can also succeed in doing likewise.

    I am not terrified of the U.S. government. The military might come apart and refuse to carry out genocidal orders coming from a Black president.

  • 10 Thrasymachus // Apr 1, 2013 at 7:41 pm   

    “Voluntary white communities. What a novel idea! But, I can scarcely believe it has come to that. Whites putting themselves on “white reservations.” Incredible.” — D. Y.

    Yes, it’s the only way, so far as I can see. Whatever the costs, the rewards in the end will be worth the price to be paid.

  • 11 Sioux // Apr 1, 2013 at 8:34 pm   

    Well, I can knit, weave, sew, and am a good cook – so sign me up!

  • 12 Sioux // Apr 1, 2013 at 8:35 pm   

    Almost forgot: and I also know how to shoot a gun.

  • 13 Ellendra // Apr 1, 2013 at 9:22 pm   

    I’ve seen a few all-white communities. They weren’t communally owned, it wasn’t deliberate, and there was no rule keeping other ethnicities out.

    Unfortunately the people in those communities get dismissed as “red-necks” and “back-country hicks”. They’re the farming communities too small to make hiring migrants worthwhile, but big enough to live off of.

    Amazing the number of farmers with advanced college degrees that get brushed off as “dumb hicks”.

  • 14 David Yeagley // Apr 2, 2013 at 8:18 am   

    UPDATE: Yeagley Interview, April 1, 2013, Washington Times (Joseph Cotto)

    I think I’m against all immigration at this point. We need a moratorium, for maybe ten years. And we, as a country, should have first pick of whom we want. There should no longer be “open” immigration.

    We must also consider deporting welfare careerists.

  • 15 zephyr // Apr 2, 2013 at 10:11 am   

    Welfare careerists and all those who follow the false prophet Muhammad.

  • 16 Chato1 // Apr 3, 2013 at 7:47 am   

    Media in Chicago never mention it was Negro mobs responsible for all the attacks on white folks on Chicago’s North Michigan Ave. Summer of 2012 there were numerous such attacks by blacks in Chicago.

    http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/06/video-dangerous-black-mobs-infest.html

You must log in to post a comment.