BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Is the U.S. Constitution Passé?

by David Yeagley · January 7, 2013 · 6 Comments ·

On December 20, 2012 (last week), Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at the prestigious Georgetown Law Center Louis Michael Seidman was deemed divine by the anti-American, Communist-styled rag, New York Times. The NYT dutifully published his op-ed, “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution.” The Times propaganda process is always faithful to make moral sport of American social crises. No op-ed could have thrilled the Communist Democrats in Washington more.


Professor Louis Seidman, of Georgetown Law.

Seidman says that all the country’s problems are caused by the Constitution, “with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.” A most specious, sophomoric proposition, fully exemplary of academic inanity, the notion is based on a superficial, practically imaginary analogy, and represents quite the crippled syllogism. But, let’s give a clearer example. Seidman details:

Our obsession with the Constitution has saddled us with a dysfunctional political system, kept us from debating the merits of divisive issues and inflamed our public discourse. Instead of arguing about what is to be done, we argue about what James Madison might have wanted done 225 years ago.

The obvious but intentionally ignored truth is, Seidman’s proposition is for simply a different country. Utterly scoffing history, Seidman’s commentary pretends that the development of the greatest nation on earth had nothing to do with its Constitution, and that adhering to such a Constitution is now detrimental to the same country. This is juvenile thinking. This is childish, and willfully naïve. Such audacious pretense is always very dangerous, for it hides a terribly sinister intent. In this case, the intent is simply to change the country into a Communist society, as has been the dream of Democrats for nearly a century now. Such, a Communist country, is the alternative to the American Republic. To pretend that changing (or worse, discarding) the Constitution will not change (or worse destroy) the country is a fantasy appropriate only for the university campus–the first and longest held stronghold of raw Communism in America.

The fact that the liberals would suggest change while ignoring the obvious alternative they’re wanting to change things into, only shows how sinister they really are. It is an overt conspiracy. They have created the perfect oxymoronic conditions.

To the liberal, someone like Mark Levin is an orthodox nitwit. Levin is irrational and blind, or “obsessed” (to use Seidman’s term) with the Constitution. (And even Ann Coulter‘s humor-spliced conservative commentary earns for her no mollified diagnosis. Anyone who loves the Constitution is problematically old-fashioned, and in fact, blind.)

In a sense, patriots who love the Constitution are like Christians or Jews who actually believe the Bible. The Bible, of course, is much more than 2,000 years old, certainly. More like three, with Moses (even six, if we count oral tradition). That’s a lot older than the U.S. Constitution. But there is a similar regard for both the Bible and the Constitution among believers. We hold steadfast in faith to principles upon which greatness was achieved. We have faith that those principles are eternal, unalterable, and immutable. That’s why we cherish them. The alternative is destruction, and that rapidly.

Even American Indians are “obsessed” in the same way. We hold to our identity, no matter what the social sacrifice. And we do regard the Constitution with great reverence, for in the Constitution, as well as the Declaration of Independence, our identity as nations is preserved–with respect to the United States itself. The Constitution represents our standing before the United States government.


Ellen G. White, 1827-1915.

But, speaking of belief and faith, I must note, the Seventh-Day Adventist church (a 19th century American Protestant original) has always taught that the United States government will in fact trash the Constitution! In the words of a 19th century spokesman for the “orthodox” Christian denomination:

…our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government…

Thus wrote Ellen G. White, in 1885, in a series of Testimonies, Vol. 5, p.451. She also wrote, later,

Liberty of conscience, which has cost so great a sacrifice, will no longer be respected. In the soon-coming conflict we shall see exemplified the prophet’s words: “The dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Revelation 12:17.

These words are from The Great Controversy (1888), p.592.

It seems tragic that such prophecy would be revealed about the United States of America, but, this is the heritage of the Adventists. It is not an indictment of any one person, but of a government. The prophecy is ill. Not something to be hopeful about.

I for one have taken the position of patriotism, as long as it is meaningful with respect to the government. On Twitter, I made a remark about the country’s abject direction to some marines, and I implied that there was no hope through the political process. One of them got my drift, and said, “u can take that talk elsewhere…I will not engage in ur revolution bulls**t!” to which I replied, “So, you would turn on the American people, if the government told you to? Just asking. That IS coming, right?”

The Constitution is for the strong, and it encourages the weak to be strong. Liberals encourage only weakness and dependency. The Constitution created history. Liberalism is a parasitic response.

But the parasitic liberals, the reactionaries, have taken command. They are in command of the military. How shall the military protect the Constitution, if the government denounces it? How shall the military be loyal to the government? How shall the people be loyal to a past fantasy, or the present government which seeks to overthrow the foundations?

Sean Hannity today said, “Obama is on a rampage to destroy the conservative movement.”

But I say, it is Liberalism (Communism) that is the “movement.” Conservatism is the foundation. Conservatives seek merely to preserve the foundation. The “movement” against that is Liberalism (Communism, Leftism, Socialism, Progressivism, etc.) I say, don’t class conservatives with a social “movement.” We are not. We are the foundation. The “movement” is against us.

And it is apparently not stopping. It strengthens itself daily. Our government has indeed already repudiated the concept and sentiment of the Constitution. Its laws shall fail, and in rapid succession. And what will we have in place of it? Attempted tyranny.

Pat Buchanan says they’ll be an outright revolution if the government tries to take our guns.

This should all be very interesting.

Posted by David Yeagley · January 7, 2013 · 5:36 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Christianity · Communism · Conservatism · Guns · Liberalism · Politics · Religion




Read More Journal Posts »

6 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Bonus Gift // Jan 8, 2013 at 10:33 am   

    Minimally as evidenced by the constant communist attach on it, the answer to your largely rhetorical question is an emphatic no. Clearly even the cultural Marxists don’t believe that it is irrelevant if they keep trying to whittle it down by stealth and the frog slowly heating in the pot technique. Also, yes, Buchanan is right about a good number of people revolting if the commis currently in charge come after their guns, which is why they keep trying to whittle away with an “assault weapon ban” here and a handgun ban there, etc. Wouldn’t want to wake up the sleeping population. What is striking about the gun grab thing is that it may be the one thing that could wake up enough people.

    Regarding your comment upon attacks on traditions in general that have proven themselves to work in favor of utopias that never have (e.g., ignore or drop the Bible, the Constitution, American Indian traditions & Constitutional guarantees therein, etc. in favor of Marxist equality where some “animals are more equal than others”), that is possibly the singular approach of the communists since the so called ‘Russian Revolution’. For example, and possibly most importantly, the attach on the traditional nuclear family has been going hot and heavy in TV programming since I can remember. It has seemed to reach its endgame with the “same sex” is just another way of organizing a family meme. So now, and contrary to facts, it is just as good to have a biological pair of parents or adopted ones (as we are told they are all the same), one parent whether female or male (as we are told the sexes are all the same and, especially, not having a father is no big deal), or now homosexual parents of either “gender” (as we are told that gays are people too). If you object to any of the proven bad exemplars of Marxist equality doctrine A, B, or C, you are a “homophobic Nazi racist” scumbag of the worst kind (another cultural Marxist technique is to make it personal and name call as opposed to address the actual issue(s)). In spite of the traditional wisdom ingrained in something as simple as the family, It really is amazing how far down the road to national perdition we have traveled. To have largely lived through the almost complete dismantling of the family and much of the Constitution is rather sad and angering as I know the intent behind the people that have and continue to do it (i.e., regardless of their protestations to the contrary, their actions tell us the true story).

  • 2 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm   

    I think we have traveled the road so far because, in America, all things are marketable. Controversy is marketable. Lies, deception, are all elements in the mix. Poisonous elements, but, it’s a free market. This is what comes with freedom–the chance to lie, deceive, and make a profit.

  • 3 zephyr // Jan 8, 2013 at 3:04 pm   

    Since BG brought up the family issue, sharing the latest in marketing pure evil.

    Pedophilia, according to the UK’s _Guardian_, should be regarded as a civil liberty:

    “There is, astonishingly, not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.”

    http://m.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light

    Since when does “academic consensus” = truth???

    ” . . . paedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality.”

    ” ‘Adult sexual attraction to children is part of the continuum of human sexuality; it’s not something we can eliminate. . .”

    And this is what comes of relativism and the rejection of the Word of God. NOTHING is evil, nothing is sinful. Good/bad, right/wrong, evil/righteous simply don’t exist. The sky’s the limit. God help us.

  • 4 Bonus Gift // Jan 8, 2013 at 4:30 pm   

    zephyr:

    Good catch, yes, I missed pedophilia and related “sexual orientations”. Sure why not, everything is just as good as something else (i.e., except for two parent white Christian families). Evil, pure evil. I guess my mind is so conditioned and simultaneously disgusted that I cannot bring it out of my memory. Sure, everything is equal, but, again, of course some are “more equal than others.”

    As an aside, in my opinion, if you haven’t read Animal Farm you are really missing something. I had a coworker from Poland who defected just before the Soviet Union broke apart and we were talking about how the U.S. was turning communist/socialist/progressive/fill in the blank and I was surprised he hadn’t read Animal Farm. I bought him a copy and it is now one of his favorite books. Shoot even during Bush II we used to just laugh and shudder at the striking similarities between the communism/socialism/fill in the blank that he had known and what had happened to the U.S. Boy, back then I thought it would take much longer to get to this point; how naive was I?

  • 5 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2013 at 5:03 pm   

    Contradiction of God is always exciting. Thrilling. Daring. Greatly appeals to created beings–especially to those born in the great aversion, already resentful of God and authority. To noble-ize rebellion, to enshrine iniquity, this is big business. I’m beginning to think our biggest–at least in the way of entertainment, intellectual and bodily.

  • 6 Maharishi of Mayhem // Jan 10, 2013 at 1:55 pm   

    I knew this was coming. The Sodomite H*N*I*C is using all of his demonic minions to subject the American people.

    Put a fork in us, because as a country, we are done!

    The white race has become so pathetic and weak. The white male has become an effeminate metrosexual pukoid who is not worth even pissing on. These are the ones that have put Black Barry the Fairy back in office for another four years.

    Come and get our guns BRObama. I would rather spill my blood as a free and sovereign creation of God than to live under your tyrannical and satanic tyranny.

    P.S. The military is full of faggots, metrosexual wimps who only want college benefits, and dyke feminists who have severe cases of urinal envy. The military is weak, weak, weak. However, to keep their nice paychecks, they will kill your children, wives, husbands, and parents if told to do so. Just remember this….who is going to protect the families of military members when true patriots fight back?

    RED DAWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You must log in to post a comment.