Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

Jill Kelly, Victoria’s Secret Indian, Secession, and Gaza

by David Yeagley · November 18, 2012 · 12 Comments ·

Jill Kelly (Gilberte Khawam), Lebanese American, broker for
Muslim Brotherhood.

Jill Kelly. According to Debbie Schlussel, who seems always to know the inside Islam story, the infamous Jill Kelley is actually an Arab deal broker for the Muslim Brotherhood. Kelley (Gilberte Khawam) is a Lebanese “Christian.” Schlussel says, “Jill Khawam Kelley was the hand-picked lobbyist for Muslim nations and their agenda at Central Command.” Kelley is very protective of the Qur’an, of course, at the order of Gen. John Allen. This profound cooperation of high ranking American officials with America’s most deceitful and deadliest enemies is why the country has a Muslim in the White House, and why Muslims are freely attacking Israel.

Victoria’s Not So Secret Indian. Why on earth would American Indian liberals dramatically (and boringly) protest Victoria’s Secret, a woman’s lingerie company, for using a model with an American Indian war bonnet? And why would the company “apologize“? Cultural maturity will never evolve among American Indians as long as there are white liberal-trained, politically assimilated thin bloods poisoning Indian people with the thought that we are an oppressed minority. This is playing into the white oedipal liberal Communist hand, as these liberal Indians have been so carefully trained to do. White women have been putting on Indian war bonnets for at least half a century. It’s the sexiest thing they can do! Indians will object–while these same Indians are desperate to assimilate in every aspect of American popular culture possible? Indians thrive on pop entertainment, music, movies, etc. How can they then protest being part of it? Liberalism makes fools of Indians, yet again.

Secession. Alex Jones is calling for a 2nd American Revolution, based not on war, but secession–and secession not to destroy the Union, but to preserve it. He’s apparently ‘appointed’ former presidential candidate Ron Paul to be the leader. This could be interesting. This secession would be a financial re-arrangement, not really a political, or least of all “military” operation. It is similar, in a way, to what I proposed to my tribe when I ran for chairman. “Sell the Tribe” was my first platform point. I wanted private ownership, not government ownership. A private corporation, with a business model, would bring for more freedom and sovereignty to Indian tribes. Our land is “in trust,” meaning, the government owns it anyway. Wouldn’t the government be happy to without that measly 3 billion BIA budget to all the tribes? The 2nd American Revolution, if there is one, will be fought with reason and money, not guns.

The IDF assassinated the head of Hamas’s rocket program, Yahiya Abiya on Sunday afternoon in an airstrike. The assassination was directly ordered by Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz. Jerusalem Post.

Gaza. Muslims always say Israel is “unjust,” or, that it is unjust that the nation of Israel should exist. Why? First of all, is it just that any other nation exists? It is an inappropriate, sophomoric use of the word “just.” Secondly, unless a non-Jewish person has read Joan Peters’ From Time Immemorial (1984), he should not attempt to enter a discussion about the Middle East. There simply is no “Palestine,” and there are no “Palestinians.” This is a political fantasy, a “myth,” started in 1948 by Musa Alami. When the Jews re-entered the land, 68% of the Arab population in Arab-occupied “Palestine” had already migrated out, having never seen a Jew. The Arabs were from Syria and mostly from Jordan. It was perceived that the remaining Arabs could form a perpetual prick against Israel, therefore Syria and Jordan denied repatriation to their own people, their own “colonists.” With this kind of background, the tolerance of the Jews in Israel toward the foreign Arab population is beyond comprehension. The patience Israelis have shown the Arabs is ineffable. To annihilate Gaza would not seem “unjust.”

As the United States continues to devolve into a third world blob, as planned by white oedipal liberals and their alien, lying, black African Muslim Communist, now murderous traitor in the White House, Americans can only expect real injustice wreaked upon our own nation. The people have stupidly preferred it, being doped by their own covetousness and the empty government promise of free food, free housing, free money, free education, and free sex.

To secede from this nonsense, indeed, is a healthy thought.

UPDATE: Native American Month? I say Ugh! New article in

Posted by David Yeagley · November 18, 2012 · 1:02 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Arab · Bad Eagle Journal · Conservatism · Jews · Liberalism · Politics · Race · Sovereignty · White Race · Women

Read More Journal Posts »

12 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Thrasymachus // Nov 19, 2012 at 6:06 am   

    We readers of Bad Eagle would all do well to keep this lesson in mind:

    What is America’s True Form of Government?

    I know that it has been helpful to my understanding of our current plight.

  • 2 David Yeagley // Nov 19, 2012 at 11:54 am   

    John MacManus is a great man. I’ve met him a couple of times, and heard him speak. A “semper fi” man, he his. Great video.

    Now, on the matter of military and government, this is an unaddressed issue. The military is to protect the nation, and presumably the government. In the case of Benghazi, it apparently did neither.

    If America has any security, it is incidental, by proxy, circumstantial, and generally by convenience. Just like law enforcement–it happens as circumstances allow. Sometimes those circumstances are principally financial.

    These are troubled times, indeed. Who’s in charge? This is a real, legitimate, vital questions. Our government presently uses intentional confusion to escape responsibility, and to allow the demise of American.

    Obama and kindred will opt for the global powers, not American nationalism.

  • 3 Ellendra // Nov 19, 2012 at 11:57 am   

    “The 2nd American Revolution, if there is one, will be fought with reason and money, not guns.”

    I hope you’re right, but I meet very few people willing to reason things out anymore. And judging from the murder sprees that follow things like the Trayvon Martin headlines, it’s already being fought with guns.

  • 4 Bonus Gift // Nov 19, 2012 at 12:17 pm   

    Slight corrections, the 2nd American Revolution, if fought, will be fought with whatever is handy.
    Sioux: Liked the Barnhardt series. Not big on her dislike of Ron Paul, or other absolute statements without as much backing as her other points; but did enjoy her primary moral points and certainly her outrage over Muslims in the West.

  • 5 David Yeagley // Nov 19, 2012 at 3:06 pm   

    Muslims intentionally make themselves entirely unwanted, and don’t care. In fact, they use the resentment they created as the fuel to fire their aggressions.

    In Iran, I was told that Islam does not believe in war as an initiative. The Muslims make the offer of Islam to the unbelievers. If it is resisted, then they are justified and commanded to war.

    It other words, it’s an offer we daren’t refuse.

    We’ll see about that.

  • 6 Thrasymachus // Nov 20, 2012 at 7:30 am   

    “Indians thrive on pop entertainment, music, movies, etc.” — DY

    I am saddened to learn of this.

    What drives me to conservatism, above all other things, is the need for a healthy and wholesome general culture.

    When I see my own people acting like culturally degenerate buffoons, I feel so alienated. The prevailing pop culture is not health for anyone, including the blacks.

    This is why school segregation by race is essential. In integrated schools, serious culture has to take a back-seat to a “democratic” all-inclusive cultural menu. Even solid black schools used to pursue the European culture! With integration, all this is lost, as it goes against the very grain of what integration really means.

  • 7 David Yeagley // Nov 20, 2012 at 9:44 am   

    Integration generally means dilution, and destruction of something. I do think it is more often a negative experience than positive. But, that depends on what one’s values are.

    I think the people that push “the mix” are Oedipals. However, some people that want integreation are simply using it for manipulative purposes, to assert themselves. They want power over others, which power they would otherwise never have.

  • 8 Thrasymachus // Nov 20, 2012 at 1:00 pm   


    May I venture a guess? It was the wealthiest who benefitted most from forced integration. Middle Class and Working Class white children were pushed away from direct competition with the children of the very rich because of the levelling demands of integration. And the Black Community lost its status and cohesion as well, with the result that a majority of black children are now fatherless. This was a temporary advantage for the wealthy — not to have to compete with high I.Q. white children. Now, as Romney has demonstrated, it has nearly finished its course.

  • 9 Thrasymachus // Nov 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm   

    I hope that American Indians can build media that sustain their culture and traditions and give them an alternative to the cosmopolitain pop entertainment. The price of such culture-producing technology has come down and all things are possible. AINTN (American Indian Nations Television Network) or NATN (Native Americans Television Network). Local nations can have local branches of the network.

  • 10 David Yeagley // Nov 20, 2012 at 5:31 pm   

    Why, all it takes is millions of dollars. Or, the cooperation of an already established corporation, like Fox News. I’d even settle for CNN. We’re talking backers, not programmers. I would have to be the CEO!

  • 11 MaryMA // Nov 20, 2012 at 6:45 pm   

    Obama is a threat to the United States, and in fact all free peoples, and to those who aspire to freedom. As an aside, Mr. Yeagley, I’d been reading a different thread prior to this one, catching up so to speak, and I wanted to mention something to you, a user in a previous thread, posted some notice to churches to quit their territories, some in the US and Canada, and he or she referred to various indigenous tribes, but also Middle Eastern and the “Gaelic Nations”, which was a big tip off. The user, with the name otoccs is a Marxist front group, that seeks to peddle it’s nonsense, by hiding behind a veneer of speaking for indigenous peoples to attack Christian and Jewish faith. The acronym [ITCCS] stands for International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State. There’s nothing indigenous about them.

  • 12 David Yeagley // Nov 20, 2012 at 7:46 pm   

    Interesting, MMA. I’d not heard of that group. I know that all anti-American hate groups are more than anxious to solicit the validation of the American Indian.

    We made into Leftist mascots, you know. Our image is the Leftist imprimatur. No one could have more right to hate America than Indians, they think. Therefore, ours is the strongest moral imperative.

    I’ve tried my best to fight this for over 11 years now. Don’t know that I’ve accomplished much.

    The best path for Indians is American patriotism. Conservative, and ideal republicanism (small “r”). This is best.

You must log in to post a comment.