Obama Lie: It is profoundly true that Obama and his administration lied to the American people in the most intentional, blatant, and false way. They circulated an utterly fabricated story, knowingly, as though it were truth. They should all be impeached, fined, and jailed, as enemies of the people. The liberal crowd made a film against George W. Bush called “The Death of a President,” (hiding its American origins under a British front–showing how much we can trust the Brits). No liberals protested such hate speech. So, let us now have a film depicting at least the impeachment, fining, and imprisonment of “Barack Hussein Obama,” Susan Rice, Jay Carney, and everyone else–including news reporters, who created the “video” lie and promoted it. Surely, many honest Americans would want a more appropriate sentence for the crime of treason.
Trump Call: Donald Trump has released a video (now on YouTube) in which he offers “President Obama” five million dollars ($5,000,000,000) if the president will release all records connected with his education (grades, applications, etc.) and his passports. Such an offer mocks the lack of honesty the president has already displayed so very blatantly and defiantly. The man is not a natural born citizen of the United States, because the man he claims as his father (Barack Obama) was never an American citizen. Why this has been allowed to pass, and why Trump himself allowed it to pass, makes this latest offer a scoff, indeed. And the money going to charity is hardly an incentive for Barry Soetoro (“Barack Hussein Obama”). In a way, the offer mocks the whole idea of charity, too. It isn’t ‘blood money,’ but ‘truth money,’ paying someone to tell the truth. A bribe to be honest? Obama became president by lying. Why tell the truth now, for any reason? Liberals will no doubt soon protest this Trump card in full force.
Mourdock Remark: Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock found himself pushing the envelop of conservative views on abortion to the edge of the table, perhaps more dramatically than even Missouri U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin. Mourdock said, “I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.” He pleaded the cause with with a heartfelt burden. Naturally, the liberal media turned it into more of the Republican war–on women. Never mind the child. Damn the unborn. That’s the liberal position. Get rid of that thing, now!
Tough call. Liberals will have their victims (women alive, that can vote), regardless. The question of “legitimate” rape (i.e., was the woman actually raped), or the statistic indicating how many actually raped women actually become pregnant thereby, do not interest liberals at all. They want the unborn, and newly born, slaughtered, as population control, and they want old people eased out as quickly as possible. The party of death, the Democrat Party.
Coulter’s Quip: Ann Coulter slipped a quip that has exploded in the volatile, nitrate-natured liberal media. Jay Busbee offers a forcefully feigned intellectual response to Couler’s use of the word “retard,” that inspired Busbee to heights of cognitive manipulation and pricked platitude that has perhaps never before reached. Dylan Satbleford leaped into the act as well. Ann was on Twitter, mocking liberals for feigned intelligence:
I highly approve of Romney’s decision to be kind and gentle to the retard.
“If [Obama's] the smartest guy in the room, it must be one retarded room”
Special Olympics people have been taught, by liberals, to protest the use of the word “retarded,” which comes from legitimate psychological history, much as the word “Negro” (or even “nigger”) comes from actual history. But, John Franklin Stephens, a 30-year-old Special Olympics athlete with Down Syndrome, was inspired (or encouraged) to write an “open” letter to Coulter. Only a brilliant liberal would do such a thing, no doubt.
The point is, Ann is mocking the apparently consciously feigned intelligence of liberals, and neither she nor any other mature person would ever reprimand or deride a retarded person for being retarded. The remark pertains to the incredibly insulting stupidity liberals pawn off as reason, and worse, their even more insulting practice of blatantly lying, publicly, forcefully, and treasonously, to the American public. It is indeed difficult to find a word to describe liberal thought. (Would “demonic” be more appropriate, Ann? Are the liberals less offended by being called demonic than they are retarded? Perhaps “Retarded” should be the next title of your book. “Retarded, in the Liberal Sense.”) Reasonable people are quite weary of official Democrat lying, and especially that of the president and his administration. This perpetual prevarication isn’t as careful was that of the Clintons, but even more aggressive against the American people.
It is denigrating to us, and we are sick of it. We are frustrated by lying. We are tired of it. We are ready to rise up against it. But, until we actually do, we resort to words, and thus tend to fall into the liberals’ hands–who have usurped every meaningful word in American society, and made it serve every anti-American sentiment.