It’s all about sex. It’s about white women and black men. That’s the extreme compassion preached by the Democrat Party. It is also the ultimate weapon in the war on women. The liberal media has used this lethal weapon against American culture for some time.
The latest offensive is blue-eyed blonde Kelly Ripa’s new co-host for ABC’s “Live With Kelly:” the giant Negro Michael Strahan. The NFL star replaces the famous Irishman, Regis Philbin–the nice Catholic boy from the Bronx (and graduate of Notre Dame).
This is Democrat America. This is Liberal America. Get used to it. The media is in control. ABC’s Kelly Ripa and Michael Strahan. It is racist propaganda, very much like Nazi propaganda.
It’s all about sex, race, and religion. Democrat policy is against race (against preserving it), against religion (unless it is anti-American), and the easiest way to destroy any such social, cultural establishment is through sexual relations. Thus, that which is most sacred is used to undo all that is based on it. It is epitomical inversion (in the Freudian sense.) Democrat policy is against family, against marriage, and especially against the Judeo-Christian religion. The Democrat war on the Bible is preeminent. Ask Rev. Bishop E. W. Jackson, who is calling for all Christians to leave the Democrat Party.
Regis Philbin, nice Irish Catholic boy from the Bronx.
The liberal feminist philosophy is also a great affront to womanhood, though much more complex, subtle, and contains some perfectly logical tenets. I got an ear full of them at Yale Divinity. Theology seminary being the last stronghold of male profession on the American campus, the kind of women that showed up were often less than traditionally “feminine” or “attractive.” In other words, many were down-right mean and frustrated. But, their “theology” about being attractive was captivating. Administrator Joan Forsberg told me that a woman should have the right to decide what kind of woman she wants to me, without feeling bad about it. That made perfect sense.
But, in the greater context, I just saw it as an academic justification for an aggressive professional competition–in the name of “equality”–at the expense of traditional romance. It was a kind of anti-sexual tenet. Men were weak and silly for being “attracted” in the first place. Angry women, women angry at men, angry at God, this was the foundation of feminism, as I perceived it, anyway.
Women’s rights means the right to murder their own offspring, and very much regardless of the man’s opinion, as if the man’s part in fertilization is not only unequal, and less important, but completely irrelevant.
The Democrat Party is very much a party of angry white women. (Should we say, hurt white women?) They are certainly a powerful force in it. The Judeo-Christian religion, which give patriarchal responsibility to the male, is anathema to the liberal feminist. The angry white women see the Republican Party as the party of rich white “middle-aged” males, whom they secretly crave, but are unable to procure for themselves.
The liberal image for the white woman is therefore a woman who delights in non-white males, particularly black males. This is the really the fundamental if not final assault on the American culture, indeed on Western culture as a whole. It is the most powerful attempt to divide humanity–to divide women from men. It isn’t really about sex, but the use of sex to destroy race. Removing the basic elements of nationhood, such as uniformity of race, religion, and sex (marriage between a man and woman), is the universal, Communist, and now Democrat approach to society.
The Democrat Party wants a different kind of society, one without natural aversion, without natural differentiation, without the most basic discriminatory discernment, without natural psychological defense mechanisms, and ultimately, without natural affection. The Communist Democrats want more than control of production in society. They want control over reproduction.
And they want to call Republicans Nazis!
Nancy Pelosi and her constituents compared the Bush Republicans to Nazis in 2009.
Sexual energy is of such a construct that it can well express latent hostility in the woman, and overt anger in the male. See, Robert J. Stoller, Sexual Excitement (Simon & Schuster, 1979); Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontaents, ed. Strachey (1930; rpt. Norton, 1961). But, civilization is about sublimation, or self-control. Indeed, Plato theorized that only through self-mastery was one ever be a free man, and thus worthy to be a “citizen.” See, The Republic (esp. Bk. III).
The Democrat Party, however, much like Islam, fosters the lower nature of humanity. It indulges the carnal desires of self. When a national institution sanctions what already exists, or what tends downward, that institution becomes wildly popular.
Note, the Muslims planned to be first on the agenda at the 2012 Democrat National Convention—with prayer for Sharia law! (Apparently this did not turn out as planned.) This is perfectly logical and normal. It should strike no one as particularly progressive or outrageous. It is a common approach to society–particularly to American society and the intent to undo it forever.
We seem numb to these invasions. They have been gradual, yet steady. We have been neurologically habituated to the irritating displeasure. At this point, however, it is abundantly clear that the Democrat Party stands for everything un-American, and anti-American. They are shouting it from the roof tops, at the top of their lungs.
Yet so far, no Republican in Washington has used the word “impeach” in reference to pretender in office. A major Republican win in 2012 therefore cannot be seen as a major change for the better, but only an emergency tourniquet. Unless Romney has some plan not yet revealed (or even hinted), the changes will not likely be fundamental, or any to radical at all.