Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

The Democrat Solution: Miscegenation for Angry White Women

by David Yeagley · September 4, 2012 · 31 Comments ·

It’s all about sex. It’s about white women and black men. That’s the extreme compassion preached by the Democrat Party. It is also the ultimate weapon in the war on women. The liberal media has used this lethal weapon against American culture for some time.

The latest offensive is blue-eyed blonde Kelly Ripa’s new co-host for ABC’s “Live With Kelly:” the giant Negro Michael Strahan. The NFL star replaces the famous Irishman, Regis Philbin–the nice Catholic boy from the Bronx (and graduate of Notre Dame).

This is Democrat America. This is Liberal America. Get used to it. The media is in control. ABC’s Kelly Ripa and Michael Strahan. It is racist propaganda, very much like Nazi propaganda.

It’s all about sex, race, and religion. Democrat policy is against race (against preserving it), against religion (unless it is anti-American), and the easiest way to destroy any such social, cultural establishment is through sexual relations. Thus, that which is most sacred is used to undo all that is based on it. It is epitomical inversion (in the Freudian sense.) Democrat policy is against family, against marriage, and especially against the Judeo-Christian religion. The Democrat war on the Bible is preeminent. Ask Rev. Bishop E. W. Jackson, who is calling for all Christians to leave the Democrat Party.

Regis Philbin, nice Irish Catholic boy from the Bronx.

The liberal feminist philosophy is also a great affront to womanhood, though much more complex, subtle, and contains some perfectly logical tenets. I got an ear full of them at Yale Divinity. Theology seminary being the last stronghold of male profession on the American campus, the kind of women that showed up were often less than traditionally “feminine” or “attractive.” In other words, many were down-right mean and frustrated. But, their “theology” about being attractive was captivating. Administrator Joan Forsberg told me that a woman should have the right to decide what kind of woman she wants to me, without feeling bad about it. That made perfect sense.

But, in the greater context, I just saw it as an academic justification for an aggressive professional competition–in the name of “equality”–at the expense of traditional romance. It was a kind of anti-sexual tenet. Men were weak and silly for being “attracted” in the first place. Angry women, women angry at men, angry at God, this was the foundation of feminism, as I perceived it, anyway.

Women’s rights means the right to murder their own offspring, and very much regardless of the man’s opinion, as if the man’s part in fertilization is not only unequal, and less important, but completely irrelevant.

The Democrat Party is very much a party of angry white women. (Should we say, hurt white women?) They are certainly a powerful force in it. The Judeo-Christian religion, which give patriarchal responsibility to the male, is anathema to the liberal feminist. The angry white women see the Republican Party as the party of rich white “middle-aged” males, whom they secretly crave, but are unable to procure for themselves.

The liberal image for the white woman is therefore a woman who delights in non-white males, particularly black males. This is the really the fundamental if not final assault on the American culture, indeed on Western culture as a whole. It is the most powerful attempt to divide humanity–to divide women from men. It isn’t really about sex, but the use of sex to destroy race. Removing the basic elements of nationhood, such as uniformity of race, religion, and sex (marriage between a man and woman), is the universal, Communist, and now Democrat approach to society.

The Democrat Party wants a different kind of society, one without natural aversion, without natural differentiation, without the most basic discriminatory discernment, without natural psychological defense mechanisms, and ultimately, without natural affection. The Communist Democrats want more than control of production in society. They want control over reproduction.

And they want to call Republicans Nazis!

Nancy Pelosi and her constituents compared the Bush Republicans to Nazis in 2009.

Sexual energy is of such a construct that it can well express latent hostility in the woman, and overt anger in the male. See, Robert J. Stoller, Sexual Excitement (Simon & Schuster, 1979); Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontaents, ed. Strachey (1930; rpt. Norton, 1961). But, civilization is about sublimation, or self-control. Indeed, Plato theorized that only through self-mastery was one ever be a free man, and thus worthy to be a “citizen.” See, The Republic (esp. Bk. III).

The Democrat Party, however, much like Islam, fosters the lower nature of humanity. It indulges the carnal desires of self. When a national institution sanctions what already exists, or what tends downward, that institution becomes wildly popular.

Note, the Muslims planned to be first on the agenda at the 2012 Democrat National Conventionwith prayer for Sharia law! (Apparently this did not turn out as planned.) This is perfectly logical and normal. It should strike no one as particularly progressive or outrageous. It is a common approach to society–particularly to American society and the intent to undo it forever.

We seem numb to these invasions. They have been gradual, yet steady. We have been neurologically habituated to the irritating displeasure. At this point, however, it is abundantly clear that the Democrat Party stands for everything un-American, and anti-American. They are shouting it from the roof tops, at the top of their lungs.

Yet so far, no Republican in Washington has used the word “impeach” in reference to pretender in office. A major Republican win in 2012 therefore cannot be seen as a major change for the better, but only an emergency tourniquet. Unless Romney has some plan not yet revealed (or even hinted), the changes will not likely be fundamental, or any to radical at all.

Posted by David Yeagley · September 4, 2012 · 2:19 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Christianity · Communism · Conservatism · Islam · Liberalism · Media · Negro Race · Politics · Race · White Race · Women

Read More Journal Posts »

31 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 4, 2012 at 3:34 pm   

    Here is some great “old” commentary entitled, “The Buck Negro.”

    Quite timely IMHO…

  • 2 David Yeagley // Sep 4, 2012 at 3:44 pm   

    Wow. I believe that’s worse than Charles Colcock Jones, The Religious Instruction of the Negroes in the United States (Savannah, 1842). Jones was a Presbyterian minister. In his day, they were still trying to save the Negro, in all moral responsibility and compassion. But, Jones says really terrible things, terrible realities. It is most unpleasant.

    His work was reprinted by the Black Heritage Library Collection in 1971.

  • 3 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 4, 2012 at 3:46 pm   

    The goal of all black males is to impregnate a white female (coal-hauler).

    This has been part of the plan for generations. The black knows that they do not possess the intellect to dispossess whites of power, so they stick to the only two weapons that they have….their propensities to both violence and animal sex.

    Michael Strahan is an Ebonics speaking moron. It will stroke the ego of every black male as they turn on the t.v.’s in their prison cells and see “Big buck Mike” up there oogling the white Barbie.

    We should have left the boons in Africa. They contribute nothing to society. They are takers, not givers; Destroyers, not builders. In fact, blacks, if required to pass basic skills tests that were administered fairly, would not be allowed entry into colleges and universities. Why pay for them to have sex for four years and not graduate (racking up thousands in free grants and student loans which they will default on), when we could put the money into more prisons (where they will end up anyway)?

    Boons are a cancer that will bring this country down. Their Czar has already done a whale of a job for the past four years.

  • 4 David Yeagley // Sep 4, 2012 at 4:19 pm   

    Well, there are simpler, less “offensive” ways of saying these things, perhaps. Rev. C. C. Jones addressed every concern of his day, and, I must say, the concerns are all the same. They haven’t changed, though he was wont to change them. It was his ministry, his mission.

    Basically, his book is an itemized polemic against every anti-Negro position taken in in the Anti Bellum world. He thought he could justify every position of care and compassion for the Negro, with positive result. It was the Christian’s duty to hope and plan for the uplifting of the Negro.

    But, aside from all that, how can we blame the Negro for any of this? It is the white liberal who is his master. Blame whites, not blacks.

  • 5 David Yeagley // Sep 4, 2012 at 5:31 pm   

    If one takes a position that the Negro is some deeply deformed mutation of the human race, then he cannot be blamed, or despised, for anything for which he is blamed and despised.

    In other words, one can’t say the Negro, or any other non-white race, is naturally antithetical to morality, or else he is morally innocent.

    Somethings amiss in the thought process here.

    I am familiar with various theories about the Negro race. If any of that is true, then he is completely amoral, and therefore innocent.
    Fault lies only in management–white management of him.

    If it is ill for the Negro to be anywhere, among any people but his own, then it is ill for whites (or others) to have brought him into foreign worlds, and to have kept him there.

    There was a time when European whites believed that the Negro had no soul. If that is the case, the Negro is wholly innocent.

    Obviously, none of this is true. Just limited in application.

  • 6 Sioux // Sep 4, 2012 at 6:34 pm   

    I truly am going to try to stick to the subject at hand before I go off in my typical ranting ways.

    When I checked my email this morning, lo and behold, there was the announcement about the new cohost for Kelly. Now, first off, I don’t give a rat’s ass about Kelly or her show. However, I am concerned with who the stay-at-home folks are going to be brainwashed by now that Queen Oprah has abdicated her thrown. So, I hit the link to find out who was anointed after the year-long search of the “best & brightest.” Amazingly, the story contained no picture of who was chosen, and I had never heard of the person named. Even before I googled, I just knew it was going to be a big black man. Praise to our PINO for lowering the bar so low for all comers. When my friend, who loves this show, asked me if I heard who was chosen, I said yes, but had no idea who this guy is. When she found out, she told me how many really talented persons had tried out and how interesting this is who got picked. To which I retort – Was he the best one? Isn’t this all about picking the black man to further dumb it all down for the white girls watching???? She had no answer. Geezo, Pizzo.

    As you say, Dr. Y – I don’t blame Michael Strachan – I blame the Leftie White Idiots who are destroying our culture via the Media. Don’t watch – it will destroy your brain…..

  • 7 David Yeagley // Sep 4, 2012 at 7:39 pm   

    Apparently the purpose of media is to lower standards of morality. Is that possible? I suppose the purpose is to make money. But why does that ultimately involve sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll? Or, sex, race, and religion?

  • 8 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 4, 2012 at 7:45 pm   

    Dr. Yeagley, as you have mentioned some of the approaches that certain clergy have taken to resolve the “Black problem,” perhaps you might be interested in some of the statements that your own church’s founder, Ellen White held. She seems to have been rather enlightened regarding how poorly equipped the blacks are to manage their own lives or those of others….

    “Opportunities are continually presenting themselves in the Southern States, and many wise, Christian colored men will be called to the work. But for several reasons white men must be chosen as leaders.” Testimonies to the Church, Volume 9, p.202.

    How about this on interracial marriage?

    “But there is an objection to the marriage of the white race with the black. All should consider that they have no right to entail upon their offspring that which will place them at a disadvantage; they have no right to give them as a birthright a condition which would subject them to a life of humiliation. The children of these mixed marriages have a feeling of bitterness toward the parents who have given them this lifelong inheritance. For this reason, if there were no other, there should be no intermarriagebetween the white and the colored race.” Manuscript #7, 1896

    Perhaps the aforementioned statement explains why BRObama is so angry….so the saying goes, that the most confusing day in Brown Town is “Father’s Day.”

    Well, the DNC (Definitely Negro Controlled) party has started their big party. I am sure that the whores and drug dealers are having a field day.

    The audience is filled with ugly white women (likely feminist lesbians) and a whole bunch of Silver Back Boons and Wetbacks.

    I would bet that at least 55% in attendance have open arrest warrants.

    Dr. Yeagley, we are screwed. I am hoping to emigrate somewhere…..Maybe Greenland?

  • 9 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 4, 2012 at 7:51 pm   

    I might add that the tone of the DNC is already quite angry.

    Dr. Y, why are liberals so angry? They have the power, and they have your money and mine to spend.

    Why are they so pissed off?

  • 10 David Yeagley // Sep 4, 2012 at 8:18 pm   

    They feel they have a “cause.” They feel they have a moral imperative. They feel they are out for “justice.” They feel they are righteous.

    They are the most intolerant, bigoted, racist, mean-spirited of all–at least when they talk.

    But, hey, that’s their leaders, their performers. Preachers, they are.

  • 11 Sioux // Sep 4, 2012 at 8:48 pm   

    As Dr. Savage maintains: The Lefties are mentally ill. To try to figure out these irrational people is an exercise in futility. Why are these folks so angry? I honestly don’t care any more. It has nothing to do with their so-called quest for social justice and righting all the wrongs in the world. That is pure bullcrap – it’s all about creating societal CHAOS & putting the last nails in our coffin.

  • 12 zephyr // Sep 4, 2012 at 8:53 pm   

    The thing that puzzles me about the Michael & Kelly show is how this will affect their ratings. When it was Regis and Kathy Lee, the only ppl I knew who ever watched it were white retirees, mostly women.

    And then came Kelly, who I’m sure they chose mainly bec they wanted to attract a younger audience.

    So . . . what are the current viewer demographics? I’m guessing the majority are still elderly white women. But then again, now that half the population doesn’t work, maybe there ARE tons of younger ppl. Certainly welfare mothers–and that will include a large number of black mothers–but I’ve never heard blacks rave about regis and kelly.

    Then again, half the time TV programming is NOT aimed at attracting the largest audience, but at “educating” the viewers.

    This attempt at “education” may well backfire on the network, as lib values so often do.

  • 13 zephyr // Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 pm   

    “I would bet that at least 55% in attendance have open arrest warrants.”

    Now THAT would be a great investigative journal piece! I’m sure the results would be shocking–well, maybe not shocking, but definitely a HIGH number.

  • 14 Thrasymachus // Sep 4, 2012 at 10:47 pm   

    I suppose the purpose is to make money. But why does that ultimately involve sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll?

    Sadly, there are talented people whose natural ambitions are destroyed by sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll. When a society maintains very high moral standards, such talented people can be more productive and thus more competitive. Sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll are natural fleshly appetites — and these are in competition with the intellectual interests and pursuits. These fleshly appetites must be subordinated to the higher activities of the mind. Therefore, these are the weak points in a society. If one wishes to plunder the society, these are definitely the points to attack.

    The attack is extended to encompass race and religion. Religion, when healthy, teaches self-control, cleanliness, personal industriousness, and the mastery of the spirit over the flesh.

    And race? These are deep waters. Racial malevolence used as a weapon to weaken a society is supremely cruel — yet it substitutes a seeming virtue for those virtues that have been destroyed: Tolerance. It amounts to tolerance of all that is destroying the society in the ethical domain. Racial tolerance becomes the basis for ultimate excuse-making. When the unnatural practice of wholesale miscegenation of Whites and Negroes is elevated to normalcy, the condition of Group Polarization and the Fad of Ethnomasochism sets up to usher in the final dissolution of the Founder’s Society.

  • 15 David Yeagley // Sep 5, 2012 at 9:05 am   

    Very good, Thras. Très bon!


  • 16 silaada // Sep 5, 2012 at 10:28 am   

    I met some decent people (all colors, mixed or “pure”), and unfortunately a great number of mean idiots –again entire spectrum of colors. I think that when people start to express resentment to a particular group/race it’s a coping mechanism that kicks in. We’ve been force-fed with “baby mama” reproduction styles, gay cult, islamisation, “commie easy come” tunes for too long. Some comply with trendy psychosis’ rules and seem to be lobotomized by media campaigns; these who think –suffer. Democrats have panic attacks if you mention values or order; the down low commander in thief proudly presents his fully complicit “beard” and Nancy Pelosi is the world creepiest taxidermy achievement. Grotesque.

  • 17 David Yeagley // Sep 5, 2012 at 3:13 pm   


    I went to a conservative Oklahoma political meeting today (OCPAC), and heard reports from participants in the RNC in Tampa. Deep disapproval of what happened. I did not like what I heard.

    “I’m feeling more Oklahoman then American these days!” the leader said.

    These are extreme times. The Dems have taken us there, but Repubs have let them.

    Confusing times. Inconsistent positions, contrary positions, lying positions. Hard to know even what to think, let alone to do.

  • 18 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 5, 2012 at 3:48 pm   

    The Democratic war on white men….

  • 19 Thrasymachus // Sep 5, 2012 at 4:59 pm   

    Dr. Y.,

    I don’t know what you personally think about Ron Paul. I only know that I’ve heard that he was unjustly denied recognition and representation at the RNC, proportional to his delegate count. Here, it is not strictly a question of whether one agree entirely with Ron Paul or not, it is about just representation of a man and his views when he has a considerable following.

  • 20 David Yeagley // Sep 5, 2012 at 5:26 pm   

    A couple of people at the OCPAC meeting were Ron Paul supporters, in fact. They simply claim that the RNC was not conducted in a fair, equitable, “American” manner. It was about concentrating power at the higher level. The grass roots folk are disenfranchised.

    I just think Paul needed to talk more about what it’s like to live without a leg or arm, after he’s amputated it.

  • 21 Publius // Sep 5, 2012 at 5:58 pm   

    Dr. Yeagley I totally agree with you yet you blame Islam. I detest Islam but you always let the real promoters of this stuff off the hook. Jews are the biggest pushers of miscegenation, antiwhite movies, multiculturalism, feminism (Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem). The ADL and ACLU attack every symbol of Christian morality.

  • 22 Sioux // Sep 5, 2012 at 9:01 pm   

    Publius, the marxist Jew is a Jew by birth, but they do not believe in God – they are atheists – they are their own gods just like Dawkins and Hitchens (how’s that Hell going for you,Chris?), and a of other atheists who are not Jews. Unless you believe in God, you aren’t a Jew –non-Jews should refrain from indicting the Jewish people for what the Leftist non-believers are perpetrating.

  • 23 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 5, 2012 at 11:07 pm   

    “Once you vote black you never go back.”

    Well, the Dummycrats are pulling out the racecard on campaign buttons…

  • 24 zephyr // Sep 6, 2012 at 8:08 am   

    Maharishi ~ just proves the absolute infantile thinking of the average Dem. Or perhaps this just makes it easier for them to vote–color-coding so they don’t have to read.

  • 25 David Yeagley // Sep 6, 2012 at 11:23 am   

    Publius, I’m aware of your popular position. However, I do not understand its purpose or efficacy. History shows that anti-semitism ends in disaster, regardless.

    Therefore, I delight in pointing out that there are a growing majority of conservative, “nationalist” Jewish people evolving in Western society.

    I don’t know what else to say about that.

  • 26 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 6, 2012 at 12:45 pm   

    “Or perhaps this just makes it easier for them to vote–color-coding so they don’t have to read.”

    This is true. I have seen ballots printed with color pictures of the candidates in past elections. I have also seen election officials go into the booth with young black voters and overhead the question…”which one is the Democrat? That’s who I want to vote for,” (translated from the Ebonics of “who gonna gib me da most food stamps? Thats who I be voting fo.”).

    I believe that their should be both competency and literacy laws before a person has the right to vote. And, if a voter is under retirement age, then they should have to produce a filed income tax return showing that they have paid taxes through earned income, not having received an “earned income credit” for never working, but just producing numerous niglets.

  • 27 Maharishi of Mayhem // Sep 6, 2012 at 12:47 pm   

    So much for my literacy laws on the spelling of “there” as “their.” Anyone else have one of those words that they never spell correctly even though they know how?

  • 28 Thrasymachus // Sep 6, 2012 at 1:03 pm   

    I hate to say it, but liberal social engineering — racial integration and multiculturalism — is destroying the country, and, barring a miracle, this train wreck simply cannot be stopped.

    Even with the possible election of Mitt Romney, the nation is only buying time. The Left will fight back all the harder, and, unless Romney has a plan to reverse the population changes taking place, the country will be Democrat-owned in the not-so-distant future.

    I’m sorry, but a nation simply cannot replace its native population with radically different stock and remain the same nation. (Can the Comanche people be replaced by Swedes or Somalis and remain the Comanche Nation?)

    The U.S.’s experiment in intentional government-mandated racial transformation spells certain doom for the Founder’s America. What may still be called the United States — even that remains to be seen — will simply be an entity foreign to what was established in the Revolutionary War. At best, it will be America in name only.

    The only question that remains to be settled is, Will this new entity prosper? Will the New America ever achieve economic success? All the available evidence shows that Americans everywhere are struggling simply to survive — and this situation is not likely to find a miracle cure.

    The whole experiment was based on the liberal faith that human nature can be transformed under government indoctrination. Just as the Soviet Union failed in this, so too will the U.S. The United States will go the way of the Soviet Union.

  • 29 zephyr // Sep 6, 2012 at 2:17 pm   

    Maharishi–I agree. No tax payments? Then no vote.

    Why should the Takers determine how the Providers’ money is spent? THAT is patently NOT fair.

  • 30 Thrasymachus // Sep 6, 2012 at 2:22 pm   

    USA – Main Street in the 40s: Rare colour photographs (Mail Online – UK)

  • 31 Thrasymachus // Sep 6, 2012 at 3:20 pm   

    This “Miscegenation for Angry White Women” can be traced back to Eleanor Roosevelt. She was perhaps the first prominent American to speak out strongly in favor of the intermarriage of the White and Black races as being the solution to America’s race problem. Just check the newspapers of the 1940s.

You must log in to post a comment.