BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

“Indigenous Muslims” of America: NOT. American Indians Protest

by David Yeagley · September 3, 2012 · 9 Comments ·

Are Indians really upset by the term “Indigenous Muslims?”

Are liberal American Indian protesters suddenly taking a nationalistic position? Are liberal Indian leaders going conservative on us now? Are Indians showing a streak of aversion to foreign religious and a relish for American national pride?

Why should American Indian leaders protest the use of the term “indigenous” by Muslims who were born here in America? as in the “Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs“, or, the BIMA? Indian leaders, deeply liberal more often then not, have been toying with terms for nearly half a century now. “Native” American, which is totally inaccurate; “First Nations,” a Canadian misnomer applied to American Indians; and even “Native American Indian,” are all faddish. The term “indigenous” has in recent decades been used to refer to the tribal peoples who are first known to have lived on the land where they still live today. That is the clear meaning of the world. It is geographical, as in zoology and botany.


White Wolf, ca.1880. Comanches, like all Plains
Indians, did not receive the white man with open
arms? Why would we receive Muslims, because they
didn’t have blonde hair and blue eyes
?

Furthermore, liberal Indian leaders have delighted to unite with all non-white, non-Caucasian “indigenous” people the world over in some giant brown bowel movement thought to strengthen the “native” bonds into some ineviscerable impaction of primitive values. The National Museum of the American Indian is pleased to include “indigenous” peoples of the Americas, who are not from the North American continent at all. Robert Redford’s Sundance Institute, under the careful racist nurturing of George Soros, has delighted in bringing Polynesians, Orientals, Africans, and even homosexuals under the famous “Native American Initiative” program, now called “Native Film.”

So what’s the problem? Why the protest now?

American Indians haven’t made a peep about the Hindu people coming here en mass and usurping the name “Indian” from our time-honored, war-bought name, American Indian, or just Indian. I have protested this many times, but liberal Indian leaders have been silent. You can’t even type in “Indian” on any search engine without an overwhelming list of Hindu things. This issue is a far more abusive affront to the identity of American Indians than the “indigenous” Muslim bit. No one thinks Muslims are in any way related to American Indians, ethnically or religiously.

Muslims born here should be called what? American-born Muslims? American-Muslims? Aboriginal Muslims?

Of course, to be born in a place doesn’t mean you are in fact indigenous to that place. Indigenous means to be of the original people inhabiting that place.

And Islam, the faith of Muslims, is a religion, not a race. It is the religion of Arabs, of Arabia, of the Arabian peninsula. They spread it to other peoples and nations. (What protesters really need to research is the origins of today’s Arabs. Are they really the descendents of Ishmael?)

But it is people who are “indigenous,” not religions. Indigenous peoples have their religions, and these might be referred to as indigenous religions, in the sense that they are the religions of indigenous peoples. But, Muslims, even if born here in America, are not indigenous, nor will they ever be. That’s plan enough.

However, in keeping with the liberal custom of usurpation of words, or robbery of meaning, the liberal Communist Democrats are simply doing everything conceivably possible to obliterate distinctions of people and religion. In the name of Communist equality, all people are the same, and all religion is the same. Muslims, whether Arab, Pakistani, or Hindu, are all “indigenous” to America, and deserve equality with the WASPS and the Indians.

Yes, it is outrageous that liberal Communist Democrats are such blatant racists. They even want to give credit to the Muslims for Columbus’ discovery of America! Indeed, they say Muslims were among the Indians before the the white Europeans. But, I say, the liberal Indian leaders and protesters whom the liberals duped into their political views deserve to be outraged by “Indigenous Muslims.” Indian leaders have earned this insult, with interest.

I for one have pointed these things out for a decade now. (Very few other conservatives have even mentioned the attempt of Muslims to usurp Indian honor.) I will not share Indian honor with any other people on this earth. But liberal Indian leaders are pleased to identity with all non-white people in the world. This is liberal racism, taught to them by white oedipal leaders, and followed gloriously by people like LaDonna Harris, a pioneer in the great brown movement–linking American Indians to every indigenous group in the world.

So, I have little sympathy for the offended Indians on this one. They deserve it. It is quite foolish, too, for them to protest the Muslim use of the word “indigenous” and let words like “Indian” and “native” go free in the currency of global liberalism.

Islam is here to stay, as long as white oedipal liberals are in charge. It is their strong tool to undermine American values. The liberal Communist Democrats are determined to “change” American into something it never was, nor ever meant to be. This is plain and simple.

Indians look silly protesting that, at this point. Would they have preferred the Muslims use the word “native,” or “aboriginal?” Native Muslims of America? Aboriginal Muslims of America? These Muslims are Muslims who were born here in America. They did not immigrate. Even if they are but second generation, they were born here. No, I hardly consider them American. They don’t know anything about America or about being American. Even deceivers like Ahmed Rehab, articulately seducing the ignorant white liberals into thinking he has an understanding of America, and even the American Constitution, will never be considered American by true Americans. People who attempt to use their ethnocentric adaptations of American values to clothe their own designs to destroy American values, are the lowest of the low. Many Muslim leaders, along with their liberal Communist Democrat colleagues are united in this sub-human enterprise. It denigrates human dignity beyond drug addiction.

And liberal Indian leaders protest their use of the word “indigenous?”

That’s like protesting the color of the arrowhead in your heart, or the kind of bullet that went through your head.

Posted by David Yeagley · September 3, 2012 · 11:52 am CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Arab · Asian · Bad Eagle Journal · Communism · Conservatism · Immigration · Islam · Land · Liberalism · Orient · Politics · Race · Religion · White Race




Read More Journal Posts »

9 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Following Him // Sep 3, 2012 at 1:45 pm   

    Hi Dr. Yeagley … very interesting, as usual. I have a comment of sorts, but it is of a personal nature, so I am sending an e-mail if you don’t mind.

    Love your work …

    Blessings from central Illinois.

  • 2 David Yeagley // Sep 3, 2012 at 2:14 pm   

    Race, religion, and sex. This is life! We got two out of three on this one.

    The liberals scooped up a few “professional” Indians back in the early ’70′s, and they made a liberal image for Indians. I’ve spent over a decade trying to change that. Don’t know that I’ve made a dent!

  • 3 silaada // Sep 3, 2012 at 2:51 pm   

    I find the term you used « robbery of meaning » very accurate. My ancestors, family members and friends died defending our identity, our honour.Culture is not innate, and it’s not enough to be born «indigenous» to be an Indian. (Btw.,We know who our relatives are and being « blood tested »by the descendants of our invaders is already an insult. It’s particularly hilarious when a « full blood » FBI appears among us and we are supposed to be stupid enough not to notice?) Entire families were sent to fucked up schools, given anglo- names, the descendants of the great warriors exterminated, the survivors were exiled and now we are to hear about “indigenous muslims”? El fuckiya Baraka! I’m furious to see the islamic jihadist being allowed to “rule”, his constant passive-aggressive crap-oeuvres. I think islam is not even a religion; it’s just a hate fuelled policy, supremacy of rage and frustration. I slam islam.In case you think I hate “American people” too, naah I have my Indian logic-I honour and love soldiers who defend my sacred land and I do like the whistle-blowers. I have very negative feelings to grass smoking hippie gutless wonders who invited BO stink, masqueraded corruption with rolls of red tape coming from their comfy arses .I hope fighting the islamic inspector gadget will help some white people understand better our pain and anger concerning governments and laws that were imposed on us. An optimistic note: Life of comrade Baraka will be short. It’s lose or die from people of honour. In case of an investigation his very own” islamic founders” are likely to pull the trigger before the bitch squeals.

  • 4 David Yeagley // Sep 3, 2012 at 3:59 pm   

    I think the reason I haven’t made a dent is because I’m as Indian as the next Indian. We just don’t see things the same way as the Western Europeans, and even when we get trained their way, we still come out Injun!

    I just think there are some very positive ways to see ourselves, even in our history with the US. We can’t alter history, or the tragedy thereof. But, we can shape our own future, to an extent, by different thinking. I just don’t think acting like white liberals is the way. It’s limiting.

    ‘Preciate your comments Silaada.

  • 5 “Indigenous Muslims” of America? NOT. American Indians Protest « The Mad Jewess // Sep 3, 2012 at 5:14 pm   

    [...] Right here [...]

  • 6 Esgaroth // Sep 3, 2012 at 9:35 pm   

    Dr. Yeagley, this sounds horribly akin to the myth that was promulgated by some British historians that it was the Welsh who established the first European (read = English) colony in the New World via a Welsh prince by the name of Madoc. There was a push, I believe in the 18th century to say that the proof lay in the Mandan tribe of Missouri, but much research and archaeology has debunked this myth. That the Muslims are now not only trying to rewrite American history but are using an old and largely forgotten myth to try and twist the truth around has been gobsmacked to say the least!!

    Best regards,

  • 7 Esgaroth // Sep 3, 2012 at 9:38 pm   

    *has ME gobsmacked…

    perview is my fiend

  • 8 David Yeagley // Sep 3, 2012 at 9:53 pm   

    Yes, I knew all along it was the Welsh! Those pesky Celtic Sabbath keepers of the, what, 3rd century AD? The Celts are the original human race, I think. They are Asian (Caucasus area).

    I’m not a Khazar theorist. I think Jews are Jews. But, they are only one line from Shem. I think the Celts go back directly to Adam!

    I don’t think Arabs are the descendents of Ishmael, either. Ishmaelites are a distinct ancient race from any “Arab” race. I think Mohammad used that theoretical race connection to validated the Arabs, and to enforce his unification.

  • 9 JollyGreen // Sep 4, 2012 at 11:17 am   

    I don’t want to offend any Indians, but I am convinced that the Irish are the indigenous people in Oklahoma.

    With all of the liquor stores and bars, I don’t see how a reasoned mind could draw a different conclusion.

    “In order to find his equal, an Irishman is forced to talk to God.” (Stephen the Irishman from the movie Braveheart)

You must log in to post a comment.

google

couk