David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
by David Yeagley"/>
Anders Behring Breivik is currently on trial over his lethal attack on Norwegians when he killed eight people with a car bomb in Oslo on July 22, 2011, and then shot 69 at a Labour Party summer youth camp. The trial began Monday, April 16, 2012.
“I acknowledge the acts, but I do not plead guilty. I did it in self-defense,” he responded to the judge who asked for his plea.
Breivik attacked those whom he held representative and responsible for the inimical, nation-destroying influences eating away the heart of Norway and Europe in general. The media calls him an “anti-Islamic fanatic,” and “anti-Muslim,” rather than a Norwegian patriot, or a defensive, pro-white racialist, or a European cultural preservationist. The litigation process, of course, rests on whether or not Breivik is sane or insane. There are different penalties for either condition.
Bodvar Bjarki, mythical Norwegian hero, who often
fought in the form of a bear, here in his last battle.
“Karki’s Last Stand,” Louis M. Moe, artist (d. 1945).
Breivik prefers exoneration or execution. Nothing in between will do, for insanity would totally undermine his purpose in the attack. Being declared “delusional” would erase the meaning–or certainly any validity in his motivation.
In Breivik’s passion one does hear the distant thunder of the great Norwegian warrior, Bodvar Bjarki. Ah, that was a day when war was honorable, when destroying the enemy was noble and heroic. Today, The white oedipal liberals in charge of the world teach that to resist the enemy is unkind and bad. In the instinct of latent homoexuality, the white leaders proclaim the darkies triumphant, and make every arrangement to allow them to bury all things white and descent–particularly Christianity. The whole ‘open door’ policy which allows murderous, barbarous Islam to enter and destroy any nation is the perfect expression of the “delusional” white liberals.
Anders Behring Breivik, standing for Norway, and for Western Christian Civilization?
Therefore, Breivik’s action cannot be accepted as noble, but insane. It is wholly condemned, insane or not. And even in the mind of the sympathetic, Breivik’s act has to be less than noble, since there was no battle, but slaughter of non-combatants. This is the element of weakness in his own defense position, really. And yet, how could he battle? The people of the white Christian nations are not ready to rise up as an army. Governments can easily put down any individual, or small group of individuals. Breivik was essentially suicidal, laying down his life for a grand cause. But, even that act will not be permitted. There is no death penalty in Norway, and the longest sentence is 21 years. This man would rather die. That at least sounds more heroic.
Breivik says he is a member of the Knights Templar, a modern version of the Medieval order of warriors devoted to preserving Christianity and its western civilization.
Prosecutors want to completely discredit Breivik, moving toward the sanity position, by saying there is no such modern Knights group that Breivik belongs to, and therefore he has not motivation but premeditated murder. He represents no deep conspiracy or any organizational effort.
As BadEagle.com observed before, it doesn’t really matter what Breivik’s mental condition is. He dramatically expressed concern over his country, his race, and no doubt his religion. His drama was simply lethal, whereas others limit their expression of the same concerns to words.
Sometimes, heroes are not recognized as such until long after. In the case of Breivik, his expression is so plagued with modernity–and all the professional ambiguity inherent, he will not likely be considered anything but a dangerous, delusional mass-murderer. His actions (of killing 77 non-combatants) will not be associated with anything reasonable, or even important. In the rush to condemn the monstrous immediacy of Breivik’s act, the Norwegian court will surely disallow the justification of any effective action against the destruction of European Christian civilization.
As noted before, Breivik’s actions speak infinitely louder than any words to be spoken about them. If ahead of the game, if psychotic, his actions may represent the only solution to the invasion of Islam. No one can admit this openly. But, so far, no words have effectively stayed the black tide of Islam. And many words imply submission.
47 responses so far ↓
1 BrockTownsend // Apr 18, 2012 at 6:46 pm
Well said and posted.
2 Sioux // Apr 18, 2012 at 7:25 pm
Way to lighten it up!!!
Breivik declared war on the internal enemies of his country, and he appears to stand alone. What does one do with all that rage when your country is being destroyed by so-called fellow citizens? Where do the patriots go when no one is following the law/rules any more???
Ann Coulter had an interesting column today about how gun control laws were originally written to keep guns out of the hands of America’s Blacks. She wrote about Robert Williams who wrote the book “Negros with Guns” What Ann failed to report is that Williams wrote the book in exile in Cuba in 1962. After I read his story, I couldn’t help but agree with his assessment of America at that point in time and the ineffectiveness off pacificism.
Is 50 years too long to wait for justice? How long is too long? Jefferson said every 20 years is about right.
3 David Yeagley // Apr 18, 2012 at 7:50 pm
The world seems off track, with no hope of recovery. We believers take it that this means Jesus is on His way! At least, that’s the psycho-sociological construct available for us to believe. A wonderful alternative, eh?
Of course, in the mean time, we always do whatever we can to make this world as healthy as possible, given the givens.
It doesn’t matter what Breivik says, or what others say about him, professional opinion or other. The message of his action, in and of itself, is overwhelming. It’s do or die.
4 Thrasymachus // Apr 18, 2012 at 8:14 pm
What does one do, when the invasion and colonization of one’s nation-state is considered normal and healthy? If society believes this, then the dissenter is automatically labeled “insane.”
All we distant “observers” really know is the legality and illegality of the matter in hand.
———————————————-
By modern liberal standards, the American Indian would be thought “insane” for fighting the European invasion, whereas I regard it as natural and heroic. There’s a parody of white liberalism on this very subject on You Tube. It is actually using strong irony to mock the Whites, and only the Whites, but it could be painful viewing for an American Indian, as it was not produced for a white viewership and by no means with the brilliance of a William Shakespeare.
5 Thrasymachus // Apr 18, 2012 at 8:16 pm
“as it was not produced for a white viewership and by no means with the brilliance of a William Shakespeare.”
Woops! Correction: “As is was intended for a white viewership,” to show them how evil and hypocritical liberalism is.
6 Sioux // Apr 18, 2012 at 8:36 pm
I don’t believe Jesus would condone what Breivik did – Thou Shalt not Murder…not even the creeps who are ruining your country. Guerilla warfare has no rules, however. That’s why we’re doomed. The Patriots want to play by God-given moral rules.
7 Thrasymachus // Apr 18, 2012 at 8:57 pm
Here’s an opinion piece on this subject:
The Political Ideas of Anders Behring Breivik by Kevin MacDonald
8 David Yeagley // Apr 18, 2012 at 9:11 pm
Great piece by MacDonald.
Sioux, I don’t feel that Jesus would condone or approve, either. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world.” John 18:36.
Yet, the Lord did a good deal of exterminating over the centuries. Correcting a nation is a bit different from correcting a child.
I can’t forget the story of Jehu. Of course, who is God’s nation today? That’s the question. And how does one nurture, defend, and protect it?
9 Thrasymachus // Apr 18, 2012 at 9:50 pm
It would seem that, Biblically speaking, any Christian nation should have the right to nurture, defend, and protect itself, in the same way that Israel has the right to be a Jewish state.
Can anyone imagine any Muslim nation opting for non-Muslim immigration?
What people with any national history and deep roots in its native soil should NOT protect itself? It’s a basic human right of every historical people!
10 David Yeagley // Apr 18, 2012 at 10:08 pm
I have to agree. It seems appropriate, horrible as war is. If you are not willing to defend–to the death–what you have, it will be taken from you.
The problem today is, nationhood is so ill-defined, so nebulous, it is difficult to invest your heart in. A nation has become like a business, that’s all. Only, so large, it is impersonal. Race used to keep it personal. But, mixed population make it ideological, theoretical, and something very hard to die for.
We die for the race, the trees, and the home. For the concept of the government?
11 Maharishi of Mayhem // Apr 18, 2012 at 10:26 pm
The guy is the ultimate wimp.
It takes no courage to walk in and mow people down when you have the firepower and they don’t. What it takes to so something like this is to be possessed of a demon.
My attitude has always been that the best warfare is Mano-a-mano. Two human beings in all out, balls to the wall combat is the ultimate adrenalin rush. No, it is usually not fair. Someone is always bigger, faster, more skilled at fighting, etc. However, there are equalizers. The less talented can pick up a stone, a stick, etc., and make things a little more fair. Then, the aggressor must worry that they may not be victorious.
However, when the aggressor is armed to the teeth and goes about assassinating unarmed kids, then where is the courage? Where is the message.
These kooks that pull this kind of stuff based on political motivation would be much more convincing to me if they would attempt to go up against someone that is armed….like a SWAT Team, etc. Then, it might be interesting. But to kill kids like this is just cowardice. No balls or glory IMHO.
12 agrneydgrl // Apr 18, 2012 at 10:51 pm
I just love this site. You make me dig deep. Very interesting take on this situation. I wish that the citizens and leaders of this county fought for our county like the people did when the pilgrims invaded THEIR country.
13 agrneydgrl // Apr 18, 2012 at 10:54 pm
The r sticks on my computer and sometimes I don’t catch it.
14 Maharishi of Mayhem // Apr 18, 2012 at 11:09 pm
How many “Muslims” did this scumbag send to meet Allah in his murderous rampage?
I was under the impression that these were not Muslims that he assassinated.
Why didn’t he direct his rage against the Haji’s instead of innocent kids?
Nationalism, race preservation, and all of this other crap mentioned here means nothing if we resort to being cowards.
So, is the answer to Muslim immigration to resort to the murderous and cowardly methods of the Muslim terrorists?
Let’s not stoop so low as to paint this lowlife as some sort of patriot or defender of his country.
He is a coward that deserves to be on the end of a rope.
15 nettles // Apr 19, 2012 at 6:57 am
Being turned into a monster by hate is not the way to go
Sad thing ,while this man is punished those on the left who are responsible for allowing murderous aliens into the country will walk freely. And they have blood on there hands as surely as this extremist.
I know there is a moment when it is right ti kill and to die fighting. I pray we all will know it when we see it.
16 WHEELER // Apr 19, 2012 at 7:03 am
Dear Dr. Yeagley,
Have you forgotten Samson? Where the Spirit of the Lord descended on him to cause battle against the Philistines? Or when King Saul commanded David to get him 100 foreskins which David set out to do and accomplished?
Brevik is a Bodvar Bjarki. The man put his money where is mouth is. The establishment must be worried about lone wolves and lone wolves must there be.
Much of what Xenophon writes is Spartan teaching. Xenophon writes that “evil people must always be traitors to their country”. This is predicated upon the principle that Like begets Like. The Spartans understood this principle and this is why virtue was commanded and taught throughout the state to her citizens. “To be good” must be taught.
What you see is that in Western culture this has been lost. There is no Virtue anymore and no morals are being taught. That people are raised amoral. Diversity and Tolerance have replaced the Ten Commandments. The Left is Evil. The Left can not help but be traitors. And what we see is Treason being committed across the board everywhere. White Liberals committing Treason for Good is not Evil and Evil, good. It is a Law of Nature.
The penalty of Treason is Death.
17 WHEELER // Apr 19, 2012 at 7:09 am
The purpose is strike terror into the Leftist parents and that camp was an indoctrination center. He did not attack per se unarmed kids, he attacked an indoctrination center that spewed multiculturalistic Hate propaganda.
We shoot mad dogs don’t we?
Do we remember at the siege of the Carthusian town in France? The guy asked of his commander, how shall we determine Catholic from heretic? The king replied, “Kill them all. Let God sort them out.”
Everything was put to the sword.
Much how the Hebrews put to the sword men, women, AND CHILDREN to the sword. The Hebrews, Jews included, committed around 10 genocides or more in the OT. Why were children killed along with the adults? Because they carried the disease. Why should Brevik’s actions be no different from the Hebrews? Except he had a few adults and many children. The Left is the Canaanites of old.
18 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:16 am
Whew! What a discussion!
Maharishi–you make a strong point, but, I don’t know how it fits into the bigger picture. Like I said, I don’t think it matters what Breivik thought. The action speaks to the preservation of nations–and there is a threat!
In “Breivik: A Breviloquent Directive,” I presented an example of a soccer player who attacked a referee–who had refused to enforce the rules.
I think it applies here. Our nations are not protecting us from Muslims, but encouraging Muslims to take over. Therefore, the onus lies on our national leaders.
19 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:20 am
agrneydgrl, this one’s a particularly difficult subject. So, you’re “native?”
We were too nice, as well. Plus, deeper than that, we did not think racially. Not only did the Navajo not know about the Iroquois problem with the new whites, they probably didn’t care. Indians are the most independent people in the world. It is still true today.
I blame the “spirits,” frankly. Worthless, deceiving waste machines, they are. I curse the spirits.
20 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:23 am
Wheeler, the war is very high. Yet, visceral. Either Breivik is insane, or uniquely high minded, able to grasp and sustain the universal reality.
To act on it? This means he denied any distractions, such as the details of normal living. He was beyond himself, and focused on the higher concerns.
21 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:37 am
Norwegian killer used computer wargames to plan attack
Getting lost in the details now? The devil is in the details, they say. Losing the bigger picture always creates bigger disaster in the bigger picture.
22 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:40 am
Plan was to behead former PM, kill everyone on Utoya island: Breivik
Confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik planned to capture and decapitate former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland during his shooting massacre on Utoya island, he said Thursday.
Mr. Breivik told a court in Oslo that he planned to film the beheading and post the video on the Internet. Mr. Brundtland had already left the Labor Party’s youth camp on Utoya when Mr. Breivik arrived on July 22, after setting off a bomb in Oslo that killed eight people.
“The plan was to behead Gro Harlem Brundtland while it was being filmed,” Mr. Breivik told the court.
23 Quartermain // Apr 19, 2012 at 9:03 am
If it hasn’t happened already, what the odds the Norweigan are going to clamp down on indigenous Norweigans out of fear of another Brevik coming along?
Do the so-called Norweigan socialists understand the problems they have created with allowing large scale Muslim and black immigration? The crimes and racial tensions that result from it.
The authorities will definately label Brevik insane because they can’t acknowledge their own insanity in creating the conditions which lead to this incident.
Right now this is only the simmer so to speak, before things come to a boil.
24 Maharishi of Mayhem // Apr 19, 2012 at 9:26 am
This is the most insane blog that I have ever read on this site.
So, because some nationalistic whack decides that he is upset with a political policy, he decides to become judge, jury, and executioner.
And all of this comparison to Biblical history for justification is outrageous and sinful.
Yes, God did allow things to happen as recorded in the OT. The thing we are missing is that WE are NOT God! God does things from a pure motivation. We, no matter how right and correct we think we are, never rise to to that level.
So, I want all of you who want to pat this nut-job on the back should think about something. When some athiest walks into your church and shoots the place up, just remember that he is protecting his belief that there is a conservative Christian invasion that is threatening his well being.
I am not pro-Muslim, in fact, I think that Islam is the greatest force of evil that we now face. However, are we to become the slaughtering weapon to destroy innocent people just because they do not agree with our same position? Is that was the liberals are forcing us to become?
Since when do we condone murder?
Is there no common sense attached to this situation? Is this blog’s purpose only to allow a bunch of egg-heads to justify murder?
Not very well thought out I am afraid.
25 nettles // Apr 19, 2012 at 9:55 am
I have to agree with MM. Except for that last remark.
I think these comments are well thought out. But we are more than intellect and emotion.
Gods will be done. Not My will be done. And sometimes the captain goes down with the ship.
26 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 10:06 am
If the government is destroying your nation, have you no right to condemn your government, and, by force if necessary, do something about it? What if the American Revolutionaries listened to the Loyalists among them?
All the freedoms of America, even freedom of religion, cost powder! A terrible price has to be paid, else it’s gone.
The victims of Breivik’s slaughter are far less than that price.
What about all the victims of Islamic suicide murderers? Who continues to allow them to do this? White liberals.
How do you get at white liberals? What do you do? Nothing?
Maharishi, you’re the one who spares no means of ridding the nation of the black problem. So, would you also deny any action against the white liberals who have created that problem. Just curious.
I used to give a speech, “Can a Christian Pull the Trigger?” Yes, but not for Christ. Only for the freedom to worship Christ in peace. The price for that little luxury is powder!
The church does not defend itself. That is not Christian. It is not a nation, a race, or a political theory, really. It is a voluntary brotherhood.
Nations cost blood. That’s the difference. All kinds of blood, for all kinds of reasons.
My point is that Breivik’s action speaks louder than his words, or anyone else’s about him. There is sense in what he did. There is meaning.
I obviously wouldn’t have done it, or I would have done something like it already, here, in America. I just don’t operate that way. But, I’m not writing his act off as senseless. It wasn’t. He may be insane, but, his act was not. Not in the bigger picture of the Muslim invasion.
He took action against those who represented the betrayal of European white Christian nations. That’s simple enough, no?
I think the OT and the NT are simultaneous, in many ways.
27 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 10:26 am
Breivik planned to do to the white liberals what they are letting Muslims do to whites.
from the article I already quoted above:
Plan was to behead former PM, kill everyone on Utoya island: Breivik
Confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik planned to capture and decapitate former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland during his shooting massacre on Utoya island, he said Thursday.
Mr. Breivik told a court in Oslo that he planned to film the beheading and post the video on the Internet. Mr. Brundtland had already left the Labor Party’s youth camp on Utoya when Mr. Breivik arrived on July 22, after setting off a bomb in Oslo that killed eight people.
“The plan was to behead Gro Harlem Brundtland while it was being filmed,” Mr. Breivik told the court.
This is perfect sense. This is not madness. I think morality is even involved. Immoral acts done for moral reasons–this is the issue. It is philosophical. It is indeed beyond our ken.
But, it is not insanity.
28 Maharishi of Mayhem // Apr 19, 2012 at 10:50 am
“Maharishi, you’re the one who spares no means of ridding the nation of the black problem. So, would you also deny any action against the white liberals who have created that problem. Just curious.” DY
Ah, yes, those pesty blacks. I was wondering if you would call me on that.
Yes, my opinions are strong about the “Black” problem in this country. The low-living, welfare leeching, crotch-grabbing, and criminal thuggery attached to this race are horrible.
The solution though, is not to shoot a bunch of black kids because I am mad at the liberals that have created this problem.
Do I feel that this country will one day face a race war in which I may have to “stand my ground” against violence from the darker side…Yes, I believe that.
Do I feel that one day, the U.S. military is going to draw down on U.S. civilians and that we might have to decide whether or not to fight back? Yes, I believe that.
But at this point, do I believe that we should be the initiator of hostilities? No, I do not.
Should we be prepared mentally, emotionally, physically, and with proper arms and means? Yes, I believe we should.
Before I give my final thought, I will concede, as Nettles pointed out, that my statement that this was “not well thought out,” was incorrect. It is well thought out, I just disagree. Isn’t that white of me?
Now, consider this. If we stoop to this level, it is going to be difficult for the cause at large. Right now, there are many Americans who are preparing for the worst. They are stockpiling food, guns, ammo, and praying that this can all be solved at the ballot box. I, too, have a desire that it can. My gut says it won’t, but I can pray.
The difficulty will arise when crackpots start blowing up abortion clinics, shooting kids, targeting schools, and political events. Then, the Gubment will stoop in with heavy handed authority and cut our testicles off.
We have to be smart, not unwise.
And, as much as I do not like it, we must admit that it is God that allows evil to thrive for a season.
Let’s not run ahead of Him.
29 Sioux // Apr 19, 2012 at 11:06 am
Wow- this is a good discussion.
I recall God ordering Saul to wipe out all the Amalek men, women and children and animals and to burn all spoils – which Saul failed to do and lived to regret not following God’s orders. We are natural-born equivocators, aren’t we, when it comes to taking orders from a higher authority.
From what I have read Breivik is not a Christian, and he wasn’t inspired by God for his actions. Breivik is a nationalist/culture warrior not God’s warrior to be clear. So, can you succeed without having “God on your side” ? Or is Breivik hiding his true beliefs so as to not take anyone down with him. As Dr. Y says, Let My Actions say it All.
Regarding any kind of solidarity among Indian people in the USA, why would we expect that? Did/Do the white tribes of old Europe get along? Everything is tribal – the EU tried to kick that out of their member nations, and it hasn’t worked at all. Or broadbrushing Blacks as a monolithic tribe that shouldn’t be hurting their “own people.” I doubt that comes into anyone’s mind when crimes are committed.
We just need to find what common ground we all have as the ending point, not the starting point. Once we go beyond common ground, that’s where the heavy hand of govt. comes into play forcing wealth redistribution, ongoing wars, taxation for endless entitlment spending, etc.
30 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 11:45 am
MM The solution though, is not to shoot a bunch of black kids because I am mad at the liberals that have created this problem.
Breivik didn’t shoot a bunch of Muslim kids. He shot white, Norwegian youth in a liberal training camp–preparing to be Muslim-loving anti-Norwegian liberals–who would want a Muslim as king, the way white liberals wanted Barry Soetoro (bro’bama).
And he didn’t initiate hostilities. The Muslims have been attacking Europe for a few decades now, blowing up white people at every opportunity–when they can’t overcome by indiscriminate baby making and immigration, and overcome by outnumbering the white voters in their own country (Norway).
31 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 11:56 am
Here’s an interesting piece, on how everyone, liberal and conservative, thought the “mass murder” in Norway was Al Qaeda.
Seeing ‘Islamic Terror’ in Norway April 19, 2012
Of course, Muslims are the largest minority in Norway (nearly 5%), and naturally feign deep historical roots in the Norway(!). (The Wiki article is interesting. Notice the breakdown of Pakistanis, Somalis, and other Third World losers.)
No liberals mention the epidemic of Muslim crime in Norway (and Sweden)–crimes committed by Muslims darkies against native white women there.
Get a load of this report from Oslo (hat-tip, Robert Spencer): Norway: Muslim rapist tells victim that in Islam, women have no rights
32 Quartermain // Apr 19, 2012 at 12:19 pm
Has any member of the left ever had any sympathy for crime victims due to their policies?
I don’t think so. Their sympathies are with the criminals being victims of whatever.
Liberalim or should I say the desires of the left to recreate the world in their own image tends to lead to death.
This article by Robin of Berkeley illustrates the left’s mindset:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/the_left_and_their_good_victim.html
33 Sioux // Apr 19, 2012 at 5:16 pm
No Jew is safe in France – many are leaving due the attacks on them by the muslims. This is happening in other European countries, too, (pacificistic Sweden) – no one in authoriity in any of the EU countries has the will/desire to deal forcefully with the muslims – just keep letting them in the country and then transfer them to prison after they murder and rape.
34 Quartermain // Apr 19, 2012 at 5:57 pm
I think the EU countries allow and even encourage the influx to come in to break down their own citizens, like the government has been doing over here in the U.S.
35 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 6:14 pm
Why is this to their advantage? Why would a government want to destroy the nation over which it presides?
36 zephyr // Apr 19, 2012 at 6:30 pm
any country that signed on to UN Agenda 21 doesn’t WANT to be a country–they want to be part of a “global village”.
37 Quartermain // Apr 19, 2012 at 6:31 pm
I suppose that maybe they want cheap labor.
Maybe they see nationalism as an obstacle to their global vision.
Maybe multiculturalism actually means a multitude of culture for a global consumerist where anything goes.
People without a culture are easier to control and seduce.
We touched on this in the previous post of Michigan pigs on evil in high places.
38 agrneydgrl // Apr 19, 2012 at 6:56 pm
I think that the higher ups want Canada, the US and Mexic to become like the European Union. We will be the North American Union. Have you noticed in some commercials they say “the best car in North America” instead of the best car in the US. I have not only heard it in car commercials but others as well.
39 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm
Excellent observations, all.
AngryGirl, I have not noticed that “North America” car ad. I will watch for it. How sick. Can’t they at least say, “in the world?” Or, would that be to arrogant a thing to say for America–the most powerful nation the world has ever seen?
40 agrneydgrl // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:04 pm
Getting off the point somewhat, are any of you aware of the company SCYTL? Talk about corruption of our goverrnment, This is one of the biggest. Evidently, our votes are going to be counted by a Spanish Co, in SPAIN. We will have no recounts. One of the owners of this co donated money to Obamas last campaign.
41 David Yeagley // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Spain was the main contractor for that super-highway project from Mexico thru the US to Canada. (And China was going to provide the lighting.)
42 agrneydgrl // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:26 pm
And Rudi Guilleiani workes or worked for a co that was representing this Spanish co. As far as the NAU is concerned, I think that is one of the reasons they do nothing about the immigration mess. Our gov and Canadian gov are trying to coordinate our troops to patrol the outer borders of our combined countries, not individual borders.
43 agrneydgrl // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:27 pm
China providing the lighting with their poisionous light bulbs
44 Sioux // Apr 19, 2012 at 8:51 pm
The New World Order folks have to make a mess of all the Nations so that we peasants will beg them to stop the CHAOS and bring peace to the land…Michael rowed the boat ashore, Alleleuia!
45 agrneydgrl // Apr 19, 2012 at 9:05 pm
AMEN
46 David Yeagley // Apr 21, 2012 at 10:14 pm
Just so you all know, our discussion was noted:
Discussion Worth Reading
People look at this site. Something to remember, always! Thanks to you all for your meaningful, hear-felt responses.
47 silaada // Aug 22, 2012 at 1:20 am
Happy to finally find a blog without a politically correct muzzle.
Nidal Malik Hassan killed 13 and wounded 32 others in Fort Hood shooting. Nobody is disputing his sanity, only his “displays of violent Islamist extremism” were mentioned. The public worldwide was informed that he was praised by co-radicals and described as: “Mujahid brother” as a “pioneer, a trailblazer and a role-model”. His sanity? Well, he is classified as a terrorist, an Islamic “freedom fighter”. And let’s not forget he was an army’s own psychiatrist!
Anders Breivik killed 69 in Utoya, 8 in Oslo.He is “classified” as a crazy person, not a “freedom fighter”; he openly says that he wanted Norway to remain in the hands of the indigenous people of Norway. If Hassan is a “sane” terrorist why Breivik is not? If we hear about radical islamists supporting Hassan’s actions, why we do not hear about Breivik’s supporters? What about the guy who set himself on fire (the very day of Breiviks’trial) in protest of islamisation of his country? Why don’t we hear all the truth? If we don’t hear all the truth we hear bullshit.
Many people both in Turtle Island and Europe are fed up with islamic supremacists and some are desperate. Btw. Greedy politicians do not live in muslim neighbourhood and they muffle protests of the “commoners” who have no other choice. Muslims pour into countries as “immigrants” who from the git go demand that entire nations adapt to them not vice versa, or (laughable) as “political refugees”. A refugee is someone who escapes from a regime, not someone whose intention is to install it in another country. Our soldiers are sent to “fight radical islam” and then when they come back home it’s to discover that 2 mosques were built in your neighbourhood. A cornered animal is a dangerous animal.
You must log in to post a comment.