David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Women with Special Needs: The women of China have declared themselves unequal. Li Tingting has declared woman have special needs. The city of Guangzhou has witnessed the un-aborted birth of this revolutionary movement: women need more toilets. “Equal waiting time,” is the slogan. Women are angry because they have to wait in longer restroom lines than men. In March, TingTing will take her demands to Beijing, to the government. She wants the number of women’s toilets increase by 50% nationally. The new slogan? How about, “Tee-tee for Tingting!” “More Time for TingTing.” Curious, there is no discussion about why women take longer in the restroom than men. That would be unfair. That would be politically incorrect, especially since China’s birth policies have resulted in a population expected to number 30 million more men than women by 2020. and it is already estimated that already some 16 million Chinese women are married to homosexual males. Why, the statistics are downright intimidating to any objections to Tingting’s Tee-tee protest. Whatever happens in that women’s bathroom, the vastly outnumbered Chinese women need more time, and therefore 50% more toilets in the country–and that’s just to reach equality of waiting time! (Here’s an interesting commentary from an American male. Not completely accurate, but, an important perspective.)
“Occupy Men’s Toilets,” Li Tinting’s protest of the fact that women need more women’s toliets–so they don’t have to wait so long in line. No discussion of why women take longer in the toilet. And, there are far less women in China than men.
PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) has apparently slaughtered 95% of the animals in its care in 2011, or some 27,000 innocent beasts. (Where’s PETA Pam on this one? That girl falls down on the job at every other turn, or so it seems. Perhaps if the public were fed these sacrificed pets in some form of fast food, Pammy would be protesting.) Apparently, a larger portion of the $37 million a year budget is spent on advertising (with celebrities like Pamela Anderson) than on caring for the beasts. Such a shame. And to think, the PETA people mean so well.
Three black women beat up a man in south Boston’s Forrest Hill station of Jamaica Plain (a dominate black area). Now, the verbal report is very careful to hide the racial identity of the persons involved, although, the accused could not avoid revealing theirs in front of cameras. The three women are Negro. The man’s racial identity is carefully concealed, indicating that he is probably white, or certainly not black. The entire report is cast as a homosexual incident, a “hate” crime. The problem is that both the accused perpetrators and the victim all claim to be homosexuals. So, sex trumps race, in this case? What caught the attorney’s crafty, greedy eyes is the notoriety of the homo-against-homo nature of the incident. Clearly the women are claiming they are homosexual simply as a defense. The male perhaps really is homosexual, and perhaps did make some abrasive remarks to them, which may have been incited by the women. In any case, attorneys and media faithfully provide us with ever-refined entertainment. Sex (gender and/or orientation) is more important that race. That’s the lesson this time around.
Brobama (a.k.a. Bari Shabazz, Barry Soetoro, Barak Obama, etc.) is calling on the black churches of America to support him. Why? Because he’s black, and apparently for no other reason. And, as Paul Joseph Watson points out to clearly:
Imagine if Ron Paul announced a national campaign called ‘Whites for Ron Paul’ – he’d be vilified as a racist. And yet Barack Obama has done the equivalent of precisely that with his launch of ‘African Americans for Obama’.
The program urges black Americans to volunteer their time by making calls, organizing events and going door to door in their neighborhoods encouraging other African Americans to vote for Obama.
Not only is Obama playing the race card in an attempt to pressure black Americans into voting for him, he is also violating the separation between church and state.
It is a totally racist approach to politics. It is worse than a Marxist class struggle approach. No one has any choice about what race he is born as. He can and often does have an effect on his socio-economic status, however. Obama would simply deny the Negro any opportunity for self-respect based on personal effort; rather, he encourages the mass race vote for for the benefit of the few, like himself. This is the antithesis of his profession to care about the middle class, and to disdain the unfairness of the elite. This is why he is rightly labeled the alien, lying black African Communist Muslim traitor. The predicament that he has willfully placed himself in will not allow him any other identity.
25 responses so far ↓
1 Thrasymachus // Feb 26, 2012 at 9:15 pm
Re: China. It might be helpful to remember that Carl Jung postulated that human beings are latent bi-sexuals at birth. Provided normal child-rearing (i.e., the instilling of cultural norms), then, the tendency to prefer the opposite sex will naturally be overwhelmingly ascendent and homosexual development comparitively rare. I raise this issue because it could well be that the extreme imbalance in population between the sexes in China may actually be fostering homosexual issues in Chinese males, thus accounting in some measure for the 16 million figure cited above.
Also, we may note, in a nation with approximately 3 billion persons, the 16 million number is in an entirely different relation (i.e., of homosexuals per capita) to the entire Chinese population than the same number would be in the U.S.
2 David Yeagley // Feb 26, 2012 at 9:20 pm
The Chinese government is averse to increased population, and the female infant is not prized. They have encouraged the diminution of the female gender in an attempt to curb the population. And we have to remember that the ethos of the ethnos is not religious, not God-fearing. The lower nature rises to the time, without restrain and harnessing.
The 16 million figure is women married to homosexual males, not the number of homosexual males in China. I didn’t get a figure for that. Not sure we can trust any of these figures, really.
3 Thrasymachus // Feb 26, 2012 at 9:41 pm
At to PETA: I am perfectly willing to eat meat — provided that other people run the slaughter house!
If I had personally to attend to the killing of an animal to be eaten, I most likely would lose all interest in eating it — provided, of course, that I’m not literally starving! However, this aversion to killing, say, a goose, does not cover fish. I have fished quite a few times and for some odd reason feel no guilt in preparing fish — except that I would not use the smaller fish, which I’d throw back into the water.
Also, in the case of a goose or a turkey, etc.: if the fowl has already been killed, then I’d have no difficulty in carving it up for cooking it. But ending a healthy living bird’s life would sorrow me some.
4 Maharishi of Mayhem // Feb 27, 2012 at 11:09 am
Oh, yes, the Great Brobama, King and Lord of all imbeciles has done so much to bring this country together.
Touted during his campaign as a “unifer,” a “messiah” figure who would bring the country together.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
This pathetic OREO has done nothing but increase hatred and violence between the races. The country is more divided than ever.
After the Magic Negro was innigurated, a friend of mine held the door for two elderly black women who were walking into a store. He got no customary “thank you, sir,” or anything that a civilized human might say in such a situation. No, what he got was, “you better get used to it.” The gorillas have come out of the trees.
The fake election (if you are not eligible, then the election results are fake) of Brobama has brought the baser and more animalistic instincts of the black race into a more realistic light. The fact is, that no matter how much money you throw at the “black problem,” they stay the same. The Gubment gives them free birth control and abortion through Planned Parenthood and they still breed like rabbits so that they can latch on to the government tit known as WELFARE. The Gubment gives them free college through grants and uses Affirmative Distraction to allow them access to schools and programs that they are not intellectually capable of succeeding in. In return of the favor, most blacks who go to college do not graduate because they are 1) intellectually unable to discipline themselves to a lifestyle of academic rigor and 2) they are unable to shelve their primal mating and violent instincts in or order to achieve long term benefits for themselves.
Now, Brobama’s answer is: let’s get the “African Americans to Support Brobama” campaign in full swing.
Poor blacks…they are so deceived by their elitist Negro handlers. Just think, if you go to college, you might get to bounce a ball, score a touchdown, or impregnate a white woman. Many black men measure success by how many times they have been to prison and how many “babies mommas” they have (white baby mommas are the real trophies).
Ah, the Black American Dream!
Join me as we chant…
Fo mo years…fo mo years….fo mo…
5 David Yeagley // Feb 27, 2012 at 3:42 pm
Well, I put “Women, Animals, and Race” as the title. I suppose I could have put “Women, Animals, and Negroes.” But, I was trying to be subtle. We’re talking about dependents here, and the strange notion that the dependent should rule over the independent. The weak should dictate to the strong. The servant should rule over the king. That’s what’s happening. Before long, “a child shall rule them.” And “woe unto that land whose king is a child.” Something like that.
6 Asaph // Feb 27, 2012 at 4:51 pm
Do you mean “king?”
7 Thrasymachus // Feb 27, 2012 at 10:46 pm
Helping the Negro:
Your Taxes at Work!
8 Thrasymachus // Feb 27, 2012 at 11:04 pm
“The weak should dictate to the strong. The servant should rule over the king.” — D. Y.
Ha! Having used — in jest, really — the name “Thrasymachus,” it is only fit for me to mention that the argument in Plato’s Republic of said Thrasymachus was that “justice is the interest of the stronger.”
Socrates demonstrates that the justice requires that the stronger serve the interests of the weaker — though not at all in the sense in which liberalism has put this into practice. Indeed, Plato was against using medicine to prolong life in anyone who had an incurable illness. In this sense, Plato believed that the “incurably weak were not fit to live.” So the context is radically different from the seeming-analogous concepts of modern liberalism.
Plato stressed the full participation to the common good of every member of a civilized society — the city-state.
9 Maharishi of Mayhem // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:04 am
A closer look at Brobama’s theology…I dare not call it faith.
Interesting, that original sin is considered “whiteness.”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/is-obama-a-true-christian/
10 Prayer Warrior // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:08 am
What bothers me is why is Obama allowed to make this video-deliberately targeting African Americans-and asking them to vote for him solely on the basis of his skin color?
Can you imagine the uproar if Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum made a video appealing solely to white voters and asking them to support them, not because of their knowledge and experience in politics or their character as a person, but only because of being white like them? The liberal news media would freak out and literally call for the offending candidate’s head on a platter. But it’s okay for Obama to do it because he is a black man? Does anyone dare call this hypocrisy? I do! This is the whole problem with our country. Because Obama has been allowed by the white liberal social media to use race as a bully pulpit we are more divided as a nation than ever before. But we have to give credit where credit is due here. Obama is doing exactly what he was put into office to do, which is to fundamentally change and destroy America.
The 2008 vote was an emotional vote for thousands of black people who voted for Obama and he was counting on their emotions to sweep him into office. Now, like many disillusioned white voters, they are seeing that Obama is no better because he’s black or half-black and that like white voters and other minorities who voted for him in 2008, they’ve been duped by his false promises of hope and change. Let’s just hope that in these four years that have passed, most voters, black and white, are not only older, but a lot more wiser when they go to the polls this November. The future of our nation depends on it.
11 Thrasymachus // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:05 pm
This is the reason why Thomas Jefferson wrote the following passage:
“Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [i.e., the Negroes] are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.” – Jefferson’s Autobiography
If Jefferson be right, then the liberal policy regarding Negro equality which the U.S. is determined to follow at all costs simply will lead to a break-down of the system and the society.
It isn’t that we deem the Black Man personally “inferior” to the White Man. It is, rather, a truism that the race instinct in Man makes a political equality incompatible with the freedom each race naturally requires to be self-governed.
12 Thrasymachus // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:10 pm
And here is what Jefferson had to say on religious freedom that is to say, freedom of belief:
“Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion…” — A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom
13 Thrasymachus // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:11 pm
Here’s a bit more of what Thomas Jefferson said would result from the liberal policy the U.S. has adopted and now practices:
“It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the State [instead of colonizing them]? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites, ten thousand recollections by the blacks of the injuries they have sustained, new provocations, the real distinctions which nature has made, and many other circumstances will divide us into parties and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.” –Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Va., 1782.
14 Thrasymachus // Feb 28, 2012 at 9:32 pm
One may wonder, Why the Jefferson quotes?
Well, Dr. King informed us that he (King) was here to reveal to us “the true meaning” of our national creeds.
So, to verify this, one is compelled to examine the writings of the man — Jefferson — who is the greatest author of those creeds and who gave them utterance and made them widely known. What did Jefferson really intend to teach the American people? Does Jefferson’s teaching agree with that of Dr. King?
In the light of our current political crisis, these questions seem most relevant. After all, the crisis is the direct result of putting Dr. King’s interpretation of America’s creeds into practice.
15 David Yeagley // Feb 28, 2012 at 11:11 pm
“habits of hypocrisy and meanness”
To get along with other people, even some race situations, we have to be hypocrites. Sometimes I think hypocrisy is one of the fundamental requirements of being “civilized.” You have to control how you really feel.
And even when you willingly choose a better way, that doesn’t really erase the real feelings underneath–which led you to choose a better way.
16 David Yeagley // Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 pm
Reagan I believe suggested to give Negroes the whole state of California…
I remember my father commenting on that, when he read it in the paper.
Blacks don’t want to be separate. They want integration. They want mix. At least, the American blacks. I think that is specifically true of American blacks.
17 Eagle Bear // Feb 28, 2012 at 11:50 pm
This comment is about Clappers, Blacks, and Native Americans.
ONE Clappers: These are the malleable people more likely to vote for Barry. When he speaks, they clap. They appear brain dead as for thinking figuring out consequences or logic. No need for Alinski tactics on Clappers; they are his mesmerized operatives who are completely oblivious to Obama’s multi faceted attack to bring destruction on this country. They contribute to downfall.
TWO Blacks: I don’t know why any Blacks would vote for O. Rather than to help their high employment rates, he shows his obsession with Hispanics and promotes visas and protection for illegal aliens. His actions clearly give the shaft to unemployed Blacks because of flooding in foreigners who take jobs.
THREE Native Americans: I don’t know why Native Americans would vote for O. I know that NA has too often meant Non Applicable instead of Native American. And did O ever get such strong Indian support because of his alluring campaign promises! American Indians were no longer I for invisible. They were to be represented by the great O, the great god of fairness and an environmentalist god as well. O’s sleight of hand is that he is allowing the United States to be flooded by people from all over the planet. As a result, Native Americans will be pushed from unapplicable and invisible to vanishing in importance. O has already virtually destroyed the Iroquois contribution to the Constitution. His top priority is allowing everyone in possible from all the countries south of the border. All these extra people are destroying our eco system, displacing animals from habitats, and increasing populations, increasing crime, and destroying the American way of life. Cities can not afford to replace outdated crumbling sewer systems. They can not afford water treatment facility updates. (So O invites the world.) Inhabitants on this land, who are descendents from a thousand generations, mean zilch to O. And as for being an environmentalist, he is raping the Earth Mother. I don’t know why one Indian would vote for him due to his inevitable actions to cause all this damage. However, I am sure he has Kaylyn Free’s vote. I will stop here and not get into other categories. I am drafting a letter to send to all the tribes about this immigration issue. If American Indians would band together on this immigration issue, others would listen. I think activation of this untapped power could make one of the greatest deterrents to wake up Americans to defend this country against the lawless, criminal, evil, anti American who probably does not even have citizenship, who is destroying our country.
18 Thrasymachus // Feb 29, 2012 at 12:20 am
“I am drafting a letter to send to all the tribes about this immigration issue. If American Indians would band together on this immigration issue, others would listen. I think activation of this untapped power could make one of the greatest deterrents to wake up Americans to defend this country against the lawless, criminal, evil, anti American who probably does not even have citizenship, who is destroying our country.” — Eagle Bear
Excellent idea!
Your entire post is right on target; every word rings true. The American Indian tribes can appeal to the United Nations that their rights are being crushed by U.S. domestic policy — specifically the anti-genocide statements. The universal rights stated in the U.N. charter demand protection for the tribes and for their ethnic interests. Claim your rights! Demand that they be respected and honored and realized!
19 David Yeagley // Feb 29, 2012 at 10:42 am
EB: I know that NA has too often meant Non Applicable instead of Native American.
Good one!
EB: As a result, Native Americans will be pushed from unapplicable and invisible to vanishing in importance.
Another good one.
The only Indians that even vote are the liberal-trained professional protesting puppets of color. We know how they vote. The only Indians that, as a tribe, seem to support Obama are the Crow, and I am quite sure that there is a casino money laundry connected with that very corrupt tribe. This is the only Indian people Obama has ever acknowledged, and early on, in his 2008 campaign. It is fraud, in my opinion.
Indians are not part of the national conversation. There aren’t enough of us to count. And we’re invisible because of foolish paid protesters who want to remove all Indian images from public view. AIMsters from the late 60′s and 70′s. They ruined the Indian image for all of us.
I’ve tried for ten years to turn that around. No conservative support. No media interest. Indians are already worthless in politics.
If you want to curse America, you might get a half-second of media time. Even the protesters have become useless.
Sounds like you’ve been reading BadEagle.com. My appeals to the U.N. have not been effective yet. I have an attorney involved now.
20 Prayer Warrior // Feb 29, 2012 at 10:52 am
I can hardly believe that President Reagan would offer black Americans the state of California. The Gipper was probably the least favorite president of black Americans, particularly liberal black Democrats who have demonized President Reagan as a racist and no friend of black people. This was not true. Reagan just refused to play the Race Game that the Democratic Party has been playing and keeps right on playing, which is basically placating black Americans and other minorities at the expense of the rest of us.
Reagan slashed the budget for HUD and did away with many government giveaway programs which of course angered the Democrats because these programs were implemented by them to deliberately keep the black people down and “in their place”.
If anything, Reagan was the best friend black people or anyone who believes in being a responsible and accountable citizen of the United States ever had in the White House.
Unlike his VP George Bush, Reagan was not born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He came from average people and had to make his way in the world. So he had a great admiration for Americans who created lives for themselves and their families through determination and hard work. His theory was why should these same law-abiding, hard-working American tax payers be burdened with supporting people who are slothful and greedy and refuse to work and feel they are entitled to sponge off Uncle Sam through numerous Democrat-created subsidy programs?
That’s how Reagan thought. And if that makes him a racist, well, I guess I am one too!
21 David Yeagley // Feb 29, 2012 at 10:56 am
Reagan appointed more blacks to government positions that all the presidents in history–combined. Bushes continued that trend, too.
“Black Caucus” in DC? What about Irish Caucus. Italian Caucus. Or just White Caucus. If these are disallowed, then black weakness rules–through the hand of white oedipal liberal weakness. This is all sociopathological.
22 Prayer Warrior // Feb 29, 2012 at 11:27 am
The Black Caucus is a racist organization made up of primarily liberal black Democrats who hate white people and attack citizen organizations like the Tea Party Movement, falsely declaring that the Tea Party wants “to lynch black people from trees.”
It just shows you how much they know about the Tea Party. “T.E.A.” is an acronym for “Taxed Enough Already” and the motive of the Tea Party is to restore responsible and accountable leadership in Washington DC that is based on the tenets of our Constitution. There are many black Americans who support the efforts of the Tea Party. Of course, groups like the Black Caucus call these blacks “traitors” or “Uncle Toms” once again showing their ignorance about the character from Harriet Beecher Stowe’s most famous book.
Uncle Tom was an American hero. He was not a cowardly racist like the members of the Black Caucus. Their whole existence is rooted in, and motivated by hate.
23 Thrasymachus // Feb 29, 2012 at 2:24 pm
Domestic policies certainly can be genocidal, according to United Nations Convention:
“Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide
Adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.”
Convention on Genocide
“Article 2
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
24 David Yeagley // Feb 29, 2012 at 4:40 pm
As I published in three articles back at the end of last September, this Article 2, (1948) together with quotations from the Declaration on Indigenous Rights (2007), are the substance of my formal complaint to the UN.
Eagle Bear, if you want, perhaps we should create an internet petition.
The USCCR, which induced the NCAA to remove Indian images, based its date on personal emails! I was told many of these were duplicated. Yet, this was counted as valid evidence that Indians disapproved of images. This was basically a lie that liberals got by with. Another in a long list.
25 Dr C // Feb 29, 2012 at 8:38 pm
Very interesting line on China. My understanding of why there are so many more men than women is because traditionally the men take care of the parents when they are old. The daughters go to the husbands family. So they often kill infant baby girls as they are only allowed to have one child and they want a boy to take care of them.
Communism hasn’t totally usurped tradition.
As for removing Indian images-
Totally asinine to think Indians would be offended to be associated with winning. “If you’re going to tell a lie tell a Big lie”.
You must log in to post a comment.