The South is normally very patriotic. How they were seduced into voting for the slime-slithering newt (Newt Gingrich) is an amazing phenomenon. Ann Coulter says they seemed more impressed with witty word clips against Obama than with the prospects of actually beating him in 2012. With Newt, she said, you throw out the baby and keep the bath water.
So how did those grand old patriots of the South get snowed by the white-haired salamander? He’s not truly conservative at all. The only thing he has is a consistent record of double dealing and two-timing. At least Romney has made progress, politically. He has become more and more conservative. Newt has always been a profound moderate, jut like McCain. Newt, like his name, is a political amphibian, with very recent examples, like lobbying for home-wrecking, debt-exploding Freddie Mac and pocketing $1.6-8 million; like getting cozy with Pelosi over ‘global’ warming–supporting Al Gores “climate change” hoax and its job-killing intent. Need we mention his demonstrable inability to manage the most important human relationship–marriage? Yet we’re to believe he can manage the country? Sounds like another Clinton to me.
Three years ago, the majority of Americans elected an alien, lying, black African Communist Muslim traitor, and thought all would be well. Now it appears the notion that Americans might consider a twice-divorced conservative pretender, a true liberal, who can talk. Now we have a white boy, a transplant Southerner originally from Pennsylvania. He’s articulate, bright, clean…(but he looks like he might wear dirty socks). So, that’s it? You have to be able to out-talk Obama to win? You have to speak that Washington “dialek”? (As apposed to the Negro dialect.)
Who honestly thinks Barry Soetoro (Bari Shabbaz, Barak Hussein Obama, etc.) can talk? Who actually believes he has an IQ? This is a totally false fear Republicans have–that Obama is a deadly debater. He’s a entertainer, and mediocre at that. He’s black. That’s all. That’s what his presidency has all been about. It’s the only thing we know for sure about him, too.
And Newt is all about word-play. It will be a contest about who can lie the best, who can play with words.
Newt is a socialist, a two-bit money hound, and he lies about as often as Obama. He says whatever is needed, at the moment. But, the truth comes out in these manipulative moments. Consider:
This is only Newt’s most recent profession of Communism, that is, class warfare. (Newt calls is “classic populism.”) Playing the demagogue. Playing the people. Just like Obama and the Democrats play them.
How clearly does this have to be spelled out? He accuses Mitt Romney of abusing capitalism–simply because Romney is a successful business man, worlds above the lowly Newt. Newt is proving to be petty, immature, and obviously envious of Romney’s success.
Newt told Megan Kelly (FoxNews, January 10) that capitalism must be controlled. There are limits, “it must be fair,” and there must be equality. He implied accusations that Romney was unfair, inequitable, abusive, and bad.
This is Newt’s reaction to success, big success. This is also Obama’s repeated testimony. Success is bad. Big success is evil. These are the minds of envious, angry men, black and white.
And Newt thinks he’s going to be the next president!
He might be. Lying is the way in Washington. Immorality is immortalized. Bill Clinton saw to all of that. Yes, Newt fit in perfectly. He is the Republican Bill Clinton, the Republican Barack Obama.
Finally, I believe in repentance. I wouldn’t dare touch the subject of Newt’s public (Catholic) profession of repentance. However, I see no change in his political thinking or behavior, nor would I expect to. Political leadership is amoral at this point in our country. So, Newt, you drop the pious baloney, OK? Talk about transparency!