David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Today on Oklahoma radio (KTOK 1000), Chris Wilson said that many people witnessed Cain’s sexual harassment of a female worker in Crystal City, Virginia. It was inevitable that the story would come out. Here is his testimony, as revealed during an interview (podcast) with Mike Mullins on “Mullins in the Morning,” November 2, 2011 (reported by Jerry Bohnan):
Oklahoma political consultant Chris Wilson says if the woman behind the reported sexual harassment complaint against GOP Presidential hopeful Herman Cain is allowed to speak publicly, it’ll be the end of Cain’s run for the White House.
Interviewed today on KTOK’s Mullins in the Morning, Wilson, of Wilson-Perkins-Allen Opinion Research headquartered in Washington, D.C. explained he was a witness to the incident. “I was the pollster at the National Restaurant Association when Herman Cain was head of it and I was around a couple of times when this happened and anyone who was involved with the NRA at the time, knew that this was gonna come up.”
Wilson described the woman as a low level staffer who was maybe two years out of college. “This occurred at a restaurant in Crystal City (Virginia) and everybody was aware of it,” he continued. “It was only a matter of time because so many people were aware of what took place, so many people were aware of her situation, the fact she left—everybody knew with the campaign that this would eventually come up.”
Wilson said for legal reasons, he can not discuss details of the incident. “But if she comes out and talks about it, like I said, it’ll probably be the end of his campaign.” The consultant said Cain is digging himself a deeper hole by challenging the woman. He also believes it has put the Restaurant Association in a position where it will have to release the woman from her confidentialilty agreement. “If she talks about it, I think it’ll be the end of his campaign.”
Chris Wilson is partner in Wilson Perkins & Allen, a political consulting firm with offices in Oklahoma City, Austin, TX, Washington, D.C., and Sacramento, CA.
If the campaign crashes, will it be because Cain is black? After all, no kind of illicit or immoral behavior on the part of Bill Clinton kept him off the campaign or out of office. For that matter, no such political dishonestly ever kept Barry Soetero down. He’s still running, despite is non-demonstrable identity. We don’t even know who he is.
Or, is there any difference between a Republican conservative black man and a liberal Democrat black man? What is the difference?
Again, the Cain thing is the biggest test of blackness yet. Will Cain’s blackness save him? Will guilt-ridden white conservative people honor black skin beyond bold-faced lying? Is voting for a black man’s skin more important than his lack of honesty, integrity, and basic honor?
What does exalting blackness accomplish? Who is bettered? What is improved?
Michael Steele, Chairman, Republican
National Committee (2009-2011)
All accused black political figures have resorted to the same skin defense. Michael Steel, former Chairman of the Republican Party, said black men are held to a higher standard. That was in reference to the sex & money scandal he faced. Any criticism of any black person, for anything, is now turned into racism. The defense has turned self-idolizing. Lipstick Alley’s poll said 91% of people felt the standard for beauty is higher in blacks! Black men are held to a higher standard in the work place! So, any disapproval or rejection of any black person, for any thing, is not only racial discrimination, but profound admiration!
It’s just like the time in the late ’60′s when radical black leaders decided to own the word “black.” Prior to that time, the worst possible word to use in reference to a Negro was not “nigger,” but “black.” So they picked the most offensive word, and decided they’d be proud of it. Unashamed, they would own it.
So the expectations of black people are now much higher than for any other race! With the help of desperate white conservatives and indulgent white liberals, black people are now the most highly spiritual, gifted members of the human race. We’re all so terribly devastated when black people don’t live up to those superior standards, those lofty, heavenly expectations!
Obviously, these race relations are abject. There is no crossing the divide. There is no healing of the breach. Thousands of years of integration has not erased racial differences. There are yet continents of race. Reality speaks louder than ideology.
Sharing the same religion has not delivered humanity from racial tension. Humanity is divided, by divine appointment. The way in which we related to that divide demonstrates our religion. One thing is certain: the attempt to ignore, overcome, or eradicate race is not part of the religion of the Bible. The invitation to morality, the call to spirituality, is given to all. There is no hint that the religion of the Bible is designed to destroy race, or to dissolve nations. That kind of globalism is identified as Satanic.
32 responses so far ↓
1 Thrasymachus // Nov 2, 2011 at 5:43 pm
When a man or woman marries and begets children, this is a propagation of his or her genes. This is the ONLY way anyone can keep their physical entity present in this ever-changing world.
As human beings, we are all falling apart, from the moment we reach the peak of our youth (say, age 30). Reproduction is given so as to keep our physical organism present in this world. (See Shakespeare’s Sonnets on this subject.)
Therefore, the selection of a partner in reproduction is of the utmost importance, and discrimination is essential. If one chooses someone who is so very different from oneself, the personality vanishes into oblivion and authentic reproduction is not accomplished.
This is why I believe that miscegenation is not a particularly good idea or practice and do not wish to see it normalized. Miscegenation is a deliberate rejection and spurning of one’s own ancestry and biological heritage. Definitely not my cup of tea.
2 Pamela K. // Nov 2, 2011 at 6:15 pm
“Make Mine Freedom”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY&feature=player_embedded
I think the message of this classic cartoon, which was considered “over the top” back in 1948, is still relevant to the state of our nation today.
Times might change. Human nature? Nope!
3 Asaph // Nov 2, 2011 at 6:40 pm
In the primaries, yes, Cain’s campaign will be over. And No, his skin color will not save him. Conservatives hold all people to a higher standard.
If Cain was the nominee, or POTUS he might escape, but not in the primaries. If he came clean from the beginning, maybe. Not now.
Interesting turn of events.
4 Maharishi of Mayhem // Nov 2, 2011 at 10:01 pm
“So the expectations of black people are now much higher than for any other race! With the help of desperate white conservatives and indulgent white liberals, black people are now the most highly spiritual, gifted members of the human race. We’re all so terribly devastated when black people don’t live up to those superior standards, those lofty, heavenly expectations! “David Yeagley”
Dr. Yeagley, the liberal white establishment certainly views it this way. Since the 1960′s, they (the Dems) have thrown billions of dollars at this “race” through welfare, affirmative distraction, and other measures, that it felt would raise them out of the abyss. However, it has not helped.
The White Messiahs feel betrayed when the black is not able to shed his skin to become a more refined kind of animal like his white masters.
Not all buy the fact that we have helped the blacks with all of the money, welfare, and false accolades.
Please consider the words of Larry Elder, himself black.
“Good motives aside, white condescension does more damage than good. White condescension says to a black child, “The rules used by other ethnic groups don’t apply to you. Forget about ‘work hard, get an education, possess good values.’ No, for you, we’ll alter the rules by lowering the standards and expecting less.” Expect less, get less. (Black Radio Host/Author Larry Elder)
So how do we raise the black man above his inherent tendencies to be base and immoral? Is it possible? Do they even desire it?
Cain is done.
5 David Yeagley // Nov 2, 2011 at 10:07 pm
Oh, yeah. A third woman wanted to file a harassment accusation against Cain.
Third worker says Cain harassed her
Is there going to be a string of these women? Hey, remember how everyone wanted to fawn over the great black Tiger Woods? All those accusations turned out to be true, did they not? And none of them were black women.
6 David Yeagley // Nov 2, 2011 at 10:10 pm
Cain is trying to accuse other Republican candidates for “leaking” the story, as the conservatives call it.
What’s to leak? Like, it was supposed to be buried, hidden, or secret? These great conservative defenders of blackness are really disappointing me, not because they’re think they’re trying to give equality to a black man, but because they’re being so obviously overreaching about it.
This Cain matter is showing conservatives at their very worst. How utterly disappointing.
7 Maharishi of Mayhem // Nov 3, 2011 at 7:05 am
Am I alone in thinking that there will be more accusations?
Is this the end of the “Godfather?”
What about the Pizza???
8 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 9:10 am
Being perfectly honest…
Perry Pollster Worked for Restaurant Association at Time of Cain Allegations
Pollster Tony Fabrizio says he never heard of sexual harassment allegations.
Weekly Standard 11-2-11
Who Are Herman Cain’s Accusers?
ABC News 11-2-11
Denunciations of accusers apparently falsely-based bravura.
This matter is a long way from over. If the public prefers blackness, it will end in Cain’s favor. If the public prefers truth, this matter is not going away. It will end in Cain’s disadvantage.
There is now LEAK of any story. That is defense jargon. Just because it never made headline news, just because the public never new about it, does not mean it was ever private. The use of the term by the Cain-ites simply proves that they all wanted it hidden. They wanted the fact that it ever happened to be forgotten completely. No one “leaked” anything. The use of this term is a confession of culpability.
9 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2011 at 9:28 am
If you are a male boss and walk into the office and see that your female secretary is wearing a new outfit and you say,
“Wow, that new dress looks really nice on you.”
You are guilty of sexual harassment.
At least in the warped and twisted society we live in today.
Again, this has less to do with skin color no matter how much the conservative talking heads want to keep harping on the “race issue”. This is all about dirty politics as usual. Furthermore, I would like to add that although Cain is popular, I am still not sure who I want to support for our next president.
But to be truly be fair and balanced here, we have to look at the facts:
Cain was the proverbial long shot, whose sudden, meteoric rise among the masses has obviously ticked someone off. Otherwise, why didn’t his ‘accusers’ come forward when Cain initially tossed his hat into the ring and decided to run for the Republican nomination several months ago?
May be Cain would be wise to switch parties and become a Democrat. Then his alleged sexual misconduct would be lauded by the MSM, their defense of his actions dismissed with a resounding,
“After all, boys will be boys!”
or worse,
“This is the work of a vast right-wing conspiracy.”
The hypocrisy is revolting.
But then Cain would be breathing the same privileged air of Bill Clinton, and his accusers would be laughed at, and discredited, becoming the butt of disgusting jokes spewed by equally repulsive liberal skanks like David Lettermen or Bill Maher,. These women might even be accused of being “delusional” or worse, “stalking” instead of being touted as “victims” and handsomely paid off by whoever is behind this disgusting smear campaign.
By the way, isn’t that what the Dems and the MSM also have in common? Raising the level of how to both create and destroy “victims” to an art form?
10 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 9:32 am
Very good points, Pam.
I think the accusers got no traction when Cain was basically just another businessman. Now that he has limelight, their accusations finally mean something.
If we make the whole thing a “feminist” issue, or a sexual harassment issue, then I say two things:
1) if the woman wants the attention, it is flirting. If she doesn’t, it is harassment. It’s her call. This power was given her by white male liberals, basically. Women’s rights. (And they need such rights! Indeed.)
2) I want to know the ethnicity of the accusers. Were they white women, or black women? This is a critical factor, seems to me.
11 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2011 at 10:34 am
According to different reports I have heard, Cain’s harassment of one of the ‘victims’ took place at a restaurant and was witnessed by several other people.
What could he possibly have said or done in a public setting that would later be misconstrued as sexual harassment?
Could it have been, say, a reprimand, to an employee who was spending too much time at the bar and had become loud and obnoxious?
Or, could Cain have offered to buy one of his female employees a drink, which could later have been deliberately misinterpreted in the crafty mind of an attorney as a sexual overture?
Or, may be someone cried harassment after being fired?
I suppose anything is possible. But on your points, I would just like to add this: What if one of these women was the aggressor in this situation? For example, I have always had my suspicions about Dr. Anita Hill, the woman who claimed she was being sexually harassed by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. I personally believe that she was actually stalking and harassing him and he rejected her advances. Later, when he was tapped by President George H.W. Bush for the Supreme Court, Hill, aided by unknown liberal conspirators with big bank accounts exacted, or tried to exact her revenge against Thomas’ rejection and perceived humiliation of her. She actually humiliated herself.
I don’t know if you know this or not, but Hill was born and raised in Oklahoma. In 1992, an unnamed “women’s group” started a nationwide fundraising campaign and were later given matching state funds to endow a professorship for Hill at the University of Oklahoma Law School. However, some of your more conservative-minded legislators at the time were obviously smart enough to read between the lines of this plan to compensate, ” poor victimized Ms Hill” and strongly opposed the measure. They also introduced a bill to prohibit the university from accepting out of state donations to the special chair for Ms. Hill. She eventually resigned from the school. But Anita did not have to worry about finding any future employment. Her political connections have since landed her a cushy little job as a professor of social policy, law and women’s studies at the prestigious Brandeis University’s Heller School for Social Policy and Management.
Brandeis is considered a major liberal think-tank is it not?
12 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2011 at 11:01 am
More Liberal Hypocrisy Exposed In The Case Of The Tweetin’ Weiner
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-fayetteville/herman-cain-and-the-case-of-the-distracted-weiner?mid=51
13 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 11:28 am
Just heard Megan Kelly interview Cain’s campaign manager (the smoke, Mark Block). He was manipulative, skirted questions, virtually lied or at least contradicted himself. She caught him on it, and all he kept saying was, Let’s get on with the campaign. The American people aren’t interested in this silliness.
The manager justified their accusations against Perry, and even when those proved to be completely wrong, he not only would not confess and apologized, but justified the baseless accusations.
So, there you have it. The American people are please to have a dishonest campaign manager, for a dishonest and fumbling candidate (who happens to be black), and let’s just get on with the show.
The candidate is apparently a spend thrift, like Michael Steele was, and like Obama is.
What is it about black men and spending money recklessly. Power? Prestige? All the superficial expressions of such?
Conservatives handling this Cain business are turning out to be as disappointing as any Democrat ever was. This it the Cain effect, I’m afraid.
14 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Rush Limbaugh referenced the most recent PajamaMedia piece on Cain (which makes all the accusations sound even more true). Limbaugh however questioned why the media has demanded the NRA investigation results that supposedly (“allegedly”) cleared Cain of all culpability.
This is the wrong question. Limbaugh should ask, Why hasn’t the NRA offered the settlement results to the media?
See how one’s predisposition seems to control one’s point of view. Objectivity is fairly fantastical. Maybe even non-existent. Rush is one of the leading professional conservative talkers who has defended Cain from the start–because Cain is black, no doubt.
Conservatives have deeply failed in this whole matter. They have depended on ideology, and not reality.
15 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 12:41 pm
News is coming in “fast and furious” as is were.
One of the Cain accuser women apparently got a payout of $45,000.
Cain, do us a favor and step down! You’re a combination of Tiger Woods, Barry Soetoro, and Michael Steele. It ain’t gonna work, bud.
The other woman got $35,000.
Cain initially professed innocence and worse, unawareness:
Speaking midday Monday at the National Press Club, Cain continued to plead ignorance: “As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any kind of settlement. I hope it wasn’t for much, because I didn’t do anything. But the fact of the matter is, I’m not aware of a settlement that came out of that accusation.”
16 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 1:34 pm
Here’s a written story about Mark Block’s interview with Megan Kelley earlier today.
Cain campaign drops claim that Perry aide leaked harassment story
When they were essentially proven wrong, the Cain people (Block) said they were glad they were wrong–because they were all such good friends. But, after publicly accusing Perry and his campaign, Block and the Cainites didn’t dare apologize. Why, that would be too much.
You don’t ax a black man to apologize, right?
17 Maharishi of Mayhem // Nov 3, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Dr. Yeagley,
I do not often correct the spelling of other people, but I believe the correct spelling is:
“Acks”
Of course, this depends on whether you are on the Hood in the East or West Coast coasts.
Thanks.
18 Kris // Nov 3, 2011 at 4:28 pm
David:
I’m rather disappointed in all of the comments on this site, not to mention your own appraisal and commentary on Herman Cain. Why is his campaign over? There is no documentation, no evidence, no names or individuals making accusations of any sort that is credible. Just snide, noxious innuendo coming out of Politico, a known left-wing biased media machine. That is what destroys reputations, lives and conservatives allowing their imaginations to run wild…where is all the evidence that Herman Cain is who the left accuses him of??? Please let me know, because I don’t believe any of this…that you allow the leftist media to dictate what you are choosing to believe is bad enough. But allowing them to get away with the false premise completely escapes me. It seems to me Bill Clinton was always excused for his presumed sexual escapades…and you’re believing what hasn’t even been proved…as I said, I’m very disappointed in your conclusions…who are the women and where are they???? We’ve had four days of nothing but innuendo and no written documentation, nothing…no names, nothing…and you bother to write an article about it??? Why? They still haven’t come up with anything…again..I was around when Clarence Thomas was given his unique anal exam decades ago…unbelievable and provably false…why jump the shark on this, like Politico…????
19 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2011 at 5:38 pm
Yet another problem:
Jesus’ Name Ruled “unconstitutional”
Find out how and why in the above-linked article.
20 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Kris, I’ve been reading a lot more than Politico.
They say where there’s smoke, there’s fire. It is simply not all smoke. There are real people who have come forward. Real facts have come out. There were complaints, there were settlements. There were witnesses. Cain tried to lie his way out of all that, even after knowing it was going to come up. He as been fumbling from the start of this (and on other topics). This is just bad.
And there are reports of financial recklessness. Spending unreasonably, lavishly, foolishly, just like Michael Steele, and Barry.
I suppose I simply don’t feel a desperate obligation to defend Cain, especially having looked into his former associations.
Frankly, the only candidate that impresses me is Bachmann. Gingrich is rising, because of his knowledge, not his record.
Cain is a player, at best. Not presidential material at all. So, maybe I am prejudiced, in that sense. I don’t want to see another unqualified individual muck up the White House. This has to end sometime, or there is no hope.
Do you think it’s going to be Romney and Perry? Make you nervous? Does me.
21 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2011 at 5:59 pm
The whole problem is that the U.S. is suffering from a major Identity Crisis. There is no longer a clear and definite American “Self-Image.”
It follows that if we do not know exactly what America is anymore, it will be impossible to govern her.
Moreover, every Black who as held a major office, be it Mayor of Detroit or the U.S. Presidency has not know how to deal with public finances and governance issues.
There is not a major city in the U.S., or a nation in the modern world, that has been run successfully by the Negro.
22 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2011 at 7:07 pm
“In a column last year about a study confirming that 70 percent of people of all races harbored an unconscious preference for white people over black people, [. . .]” — Newsweek Magazine
(See here.)
Now, I think that this means that seven out of ten people — of ALL races — feel SAFER among Whites than among Blacks.
How, then, is it “democratic” to place Blacks in power — when even Blacks themselves feel safer among Whites?
23 Asaph // Nov 3, 2011 at 7:53 pm
David, I find it interesting you believe Limbaugh is defending Cain. Having had the opportunity to listen to Limbaugh some in the last few weeks and all I have heard him do on the Cain situation is show the MSM for the vast hypocrites and low-lifes they are.
Like I stated earlier I do not believe he will survive this (nor should he) if it proves true in the most negative scenario. As yet it is quite possible this is all smoke and no real fire. The MSM desperately wants fire and can’t produce it.
It’ll play out soon enough.
24 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2011 at 9:03 pm
I think if Cain was smart he would follow the advice of Jay Sekulow of the American Center For Law & Justice and hold a press conference to present his side of this sordid story to the news media and then get on with his campaign.
I agree with Kris. Where are Cain’s accusers? Why is one woman allowed to “speak” through her attorney? If these women are telling the truth about Cain then why should they not come forward and allow the world to see their faces?
25 trubolotta // Nov 4, 2011 at 6:25 am
Several years ago, I received a call from my boss requesting I apologize to a female coworker for “sexual harassment”. My reaction was quite blunt; “What the hell are you talking about?” He related the details of the allegation and said that the other person involved, a squishy liberal friend of mine, had apologized. All I could say was “what a load of crap” and told him exactly what had transpired. It seems my accuser was more offended by my choices in talk radio than anything that was said during the alleged “incident”. As far as I know, that was the end of it but I could be wrong. If my company entered some agreement with my accuser, I would have no way of knowing. I do know I became something of a folk hero with other employees for refusing to bend to a liberal scammer trying her hand at extortion.
I can sympathize with Cain because I know how it works. The person in my case was a dismal failure at her job, abused her expense account and the privilege to work at home. A “sealed settlement” would have been her ticket out with a monetary reward and concealment of her poor performance. I have to wonder about Cain’s accuser. The suggestion that Cain is being defended because he is black is ludicrous.
Everything presented thus far is nothing but innuendo. Wilson’s claim he witnessed something but can’t talk about it is pure BS. What did Wilson see that he claims is so damning? Did he sign onto a confidential agreement? He was apparently a consultant to NRA and not an officer or employee. How convenient he can’t talk about it but can allege something happened. This is the crap we are supposed to buy into?
It isn’t Cain’s color but his position in the polls that is motivating attacks totally lacking in substance. If there is any substance, where is it? Why is it always “if you only knew” Cain would be done? Who are these anonymous people the MSM keeps digging up with evidence so damning yet so invisible? The left is horrified by the idea of a Conservative bearing the Republican banner. A Conservative might actually start to dismantle the glorious bureaucracy that the left and establishment Republicans have worked so long to craft. Conservative deference to Cain is because of his beliefs, not his color.
26 David Yeagley // Nov 4, 2011 at 9:37 am
Good testimony there, trubolotta. There are always the weak who take advantage of the strong. Women needed protection, but it is the nature of law that there are as many unintended negative consequences as there are intended protections.
I see basically two things: 1) the NRA should come forward and state their case, in detail. 2) Cain has mishandled the accusations completely.
This is hard to recover from and to make progress beyond. The other records–about his careless, reckless, destructive spending (like that of Steele and Obama) need to be fully exposed.
It’s just vetting. A Republican Negro will have to bear the burden. A Democrat Negro will never have to. I just doesn’t appear to me that Cain can handle it, at all. The pressure is more than he can bear. He fumbles repeatedly. Unprepared, not knowledgeable, and slippery.
Perhaps our expectations have been driven too high, by the profound depravity we have seen in recent years. Maybe it’s just all a reaction, inevitable though it is.
27 trubolotta // Nov 4, 2011 at 10:10 am
Good points and I agree. It is part of the vetting process. I actually wrote a piece extolling the value of liberal media baiting to test Conservative and Republican candidates. Cain is clearly being tested and there is merit seeing how he handles it. If I object to anything, it is gleeful participation by Conservatives and Republicans to jump on the band wagon of baseless charges to promote their campaigns or favored candidates over Cain.
The media is doing a fine job of proving just how worthless they are. We should let them proceed without assistance. How Cain emerges should be left to Cain but not without taking the media to task for blatant fabrications.
28 David Yeagley // Nov 4, 2011 at 10:29 am
Cain should have demanded that the NRA come forward and display the story to the public. I just don’t think he handled the situation well at all, which, of course, leads to doubt about his ability to handle the kind of pressures concomitant with the presidency.
I’m quite sure he’s had enemies before, but, perhaps not at this level.
We don’t need “on the job training” for our president. Cain was never anywhere near high enough level in business to qualify. The common businessman bit is great, for what it is. It just doesn’t qualify a man for president.
Palin, in my opinion, had great ideas. More “common sense” quality than Cain. But, she didn’t have what it takes. You just can’t go by appearances, in any aspect of the human person.
I just think Cain is way, way out of his league. McCain would have been a good president–but he just had too many wrong ideas! It is some kind of administrative talent, organizational skills, ability to get things done.
A combination of things. You can’t just be an affirmative action figure head, or even appear to be such. You have to have the goods. I just don’t see it in Cain. I see a pleasurable fellow, with fatherly personality, with a sense of humor. A common man, indeed. But these things don’t automatically qualify for president.
29 David Yeagley // Nov 4, 2011 at 10:58 am
I want to know the ethnicity or race of the women who are accusing Cain.
30 Pamela K. // Nov 4, 2011 at 12:28 pm
One news report I heard last night described one of Cain’s accusers as “an extremely intelligent and articulate woman who does not want to become the next Anita Hill.”
If she’s so smart why didn’t she and these other women accusing Cain come forward when he first decided to run for the presidency?
I also heard another is making a million dollar deal with one of the news outlets-Politico, perhaps?- for the full scoop on Cain’s alleged harassment.
Whether you like Cain or not, this is beginning to look more and more like a classic case of greedy and selfish people trying to destroy a man’s reputation for money. Or the love of money, which is the root of all evil in this world.
31 David Yeagley // Nov 4, 2011 at 12:46 pm
Why does it take so long for the world to find out the truth about a matter like this? Why are simple facts so difficult to make public–when the whole matter is immanently public?
32 Pamela K. // Nov 4, 2011 at 1:05 pm
“Palin, in my opinion, had great ideas. More “common sense” quality than Cain. But, she didn’t have what it takes. You just can’t go by appearances, in any aspect of the human person.” -David Yeagley
That’s true, David, appearance can be deceiving.
But aside from her great physical beauty, I still believe that Sarah Palin would have made a great first female president. It’s just that the news media will not let her early resignation as governor of Alaska, among other deliberately misleading stories and outrageous lies about Sarah die anytime soon.
For those of you who do not know, shortly after she lost her bid for the vice-presidency in 2008, Sarah Palin returned to her job as governor of Alaska only to hit by numerous “ethic violations” filed against her by the Democrats, so many, in fact, that her personal legal bills climbed to $700,000. Instead of passing these exorbitant costs off to the Alaskan tax payers which she could have done, Sarah resigned as governor. And she’s still catching hell for it!
I have never in my life seen such unprecedented and disgusting attacks on a female running for public office as those launched by the mainstream American news media against Sarah Palin and her family. Even Obama chimed in with his “you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig” remark about Sarah and got away with it!
You must log in to post a comment.