David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
The Wall Street demonstrations are lauded as “revolution” by the anti-American media. They are already complaining about not getting news coverage, as though they are a persecuted group. As the radical Democrats attempt to mimic the violence of the Middle East and the overthrow of dictators for worse tyranny, and the authenticity of the Tea Party, the news business luxuriates. The ignorance of history, the social immaturity, and the repeated denigrations created by ’60′s radicals are all still very much alive. Leeches and parasites are always as sure as their hosts.
The usurpation of words, like “revolution,” the sophomoric misapplication of terms, concepts, and simply the blind indulgence in unfocused emotion in slogans like “hope and change,” all indicate a most intelligent anti-American fervor aflame in the naive and naturally but stupidly rebellious youth. The over-grown juveniles in charge of this destructive foment are themselves yet seeking more validation of their pathetic extravaganza of the ’60′s. And the news business luxuriates.
The accusations against Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry are neurotic. Negro candidate Herman Cain fell into the classic racial position to be expected from one whose race is his only distinction. “Insensitive,” cried Cain–the man whom, like “Barak Hussein Obama,” the media will not examine. Cain is wholly non-vetted. Rick Perry because he is Republican, and “Southern,” is crucified, while Democrat career racists like ex-Klansman Robert Byrd are lauded to this day. Cain disqualifies himself completely by identifying with liberal, Democrat racism. He’s out of the picture, unless Republicans want to imitate the errors of the Democrats–which they seem continually wont to do. Another Negro candidate, just to prove they’re not prejudice? This is not the way to select leadership. And the news business luxuriates.
Of this GOP group pictured, the media, which will not vet Cain, presents him as the most innocent. This is obviously to promote someone who will simply not be elected. Notice how the media has abandoned Michele Bachmann altogether.
Perry’s rock, the “Niggerhead” rock on the hunting acreage is a most laughable issue. But the irony is so intense that it is painful. There is nothing denigrating about the world “nigger.” Never was, never has been, and, technically, never will be. The offense is a projection of offense created by power-grasping Negro “leaders” promoted by white Oedipal liberals. It is another case of word-robbing. Theft of meaning. If a word’s meaning is determined by how it is used, then language is impermanent, and therefore finally meaningless. (I have a communications professor who taught, “Words don’t mean. People mean.” I say, words are all we have to mean with. If words don’t mean, then we are meaningless.)
Now, a black man has every right and responsibility to look out for his own, and to use his influence to uplift and improve the lot of his people. But, to use the public office of a white nation to do so is inappropriate and destructive to the nation. To think that a black man can lead white America is the epitome of sophomoric immaturity, the zenith of ivory tower theory, and the end of common sense.
That the lessons of history are unlearned, or even unread, is abundantly clear. Even the greatness of America cannot afford to waste history. The grandeur of this country cannot sustain nonsense, for long. This is the presumption of youth, used youth, useful idiots, to promote the idea that Communism is preferred, that chaos, violence, and “revolution” are superior methods. People that promote Communism, ignorantly or knowingly, have no memory. They are infantile. They are willfully naive. They are simply without character. There is no strength in them. Self is unbridled and desperate. And the news business luxuriates.
That a society would repeat the same errors, in the full blaze of recent history, shows the full self-contradictory and narcissistic nature of the society. What did their leader say? “You can’t keep repeating the same actions, and expect different results.” This was Obama campaign rhetoric. And it is the precise course of action the Democrats, and apparently Republicans, pursue.
America is the last bastion of hope for the Communists, and the last opportunity for the white Oedipal liberals. If they can make it work here, if they can succeed in taking over all the resources of the country made the greatest by the opposite values of Communists, then the triumph of the least fittest is assured, and the thought of Richard Hofstader’s Social Darwinism (1944) is demonstrated. It is not the survival of the fittest, but of the mass of inferior quality. Like insects, the surviving sector of the species is that which reproduces most rapidly, and most mindlessly. The human species that survives is the one most in touch with fear, sex, and violence. The most immature. These are the most reproductive.
20 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Oct 4, 2011 at 2:28 pm
As a side not, I personally would never, ever use the word nigger to hurt the feelings of a Negro. I’ve seen it done, for real, in person, when I lived in the south, though. Man to man, white man to black man, face to face. Nigger just meant inferior, not to be respected as equal. Something like that.
While I have no sense that the word originally has any meaning other than designating a race, and I don’t feel particularly worried about the use of the word, at all, but, I take no pleasure in offending a Negro. Something would be wrong with that.
But, look at this:
Sherri Shepherd Blasts Barbara Walters over N-Word Use on The View
Hyper-drama. Negroes can use the word nigger, and even call each other nigger. But, if a non-Negro, especially a white person, even thinks the word, it is a mortal sin.
Whoopi Goldberg used the word first on Monday’s broadcast while quoting presidential candidate Herman Cain. Walters repeated it in context of their conversation, though she told her co-hosts, “It’s very hard for me to say. … The fact that I just said it now gives me chills.”
“Chills.” Imagine that. What righteousness!
2 Pamela K. // Oct 4, 2011 at 3:26 pm
I think Barbara Walters should have asserted herself better in this situation. Sherri Shepherd was clearly out of line with her accusation about the way Barbara said the dreaded “N” word”. Ms. Walters was using the “N-word” as a topic of discussion, not a racial slur. Why was it okay for Whoopi to say it and not Barbara, because Whoopi is black? Who really has the problem with race here? Is Sherry implying that the “N-Word” is exclusive to and can only be said correctly by blacks?
I think Whoopi also mentioned the removal of the “N-Word” from the book, “Hucklberry Finn”. This is ridiculous. It is all about ruining a classic piece of American literature and changing history in order to pacify ignorance.
3 Pamela K. // Oct 4, 2011 at 3:44 pm
As a postscript to #2 I would like to add that if schools across America are pulling “Huckleberry Finn” off their library shelves and classroom reading lists than they should have to pull Alice Walker’s “The Color Purple” off the library shelves and off the reading lists because this novel also contains the “N-Word”.
4 David Yeagley // Oct 4, 2011 at 4:15 pm
As I said, I really don’t see anything wrong with the word at all. But, if modern Negro people have been trained to believe that it means horrible, horrible things, and that they feel it is their ultimate power over the white man–to forbid his use of that word, on penalty of death, then I don’t know what to say about the Negro. Not a fine specimen of character.
But, this is how the white oedipal liberal has trained him. It’s part of a bigger picture, I’m afraid.
The word “black” is what offends me.
5 Pamela K. // Oct 4, 2011 at 4:50 pm
If you don’t mind me asking, what is it about the word, “black” that offends you? Is it because someone like Barack Obama can say and do anything he wants without being called on the carpet by the media because he is black, while someone like Hank Williams Jr, a white man, can’t speak his mind without being literally tarred and feathered and run out of town by the self-righteous media, or at least side-lined by ESPN for his offensive remark?
http://www.ajc.com/sports/williams-apologizes-for-hitler-1193930.html
Whatever happen to the right to freedom of speech?
6 David Yeagley // Oct 4, 2011 at 7:38 pm
When I was young, even as child, I remember that the very worst, most hurtful thing you could even think toward or about a Negro was “black.” You never, ever called them “black.” I can remember a whole lot of adults used the word “nigger” without even giving it a second thought. It was the term.
Actually, the term was “colored.” A Negro was referred to as a colored man. That was respectable and acceptable. Again, “black” was the absolute anathema, verbally.
So, I never thought of that word.
Rather suddenly, in the ’70′s, the Negro leaders (no doubt carefully coached by the white oedipal liberals of the day) decided to one the word “black.” Since it was the most offensive, the most hurtful, the most egregious, they decided to make it theirs, with pride.
I just don’t accept people changing words like that, trying to control me, my feelings, my words.
“Negro” is the only consistent, enduring word, with historical grandeur. I respect that term. American Negroes don’t really know their tribal origins, or they might be called that, too.
7 David Yeagley // Oct 5, 2011 at 11:10 am
Wall Street protesters are definitely not like the Tea Party, in any way.
‘You’re a Bum, Jew’: Jewish Man Berated by Wild Wall St. Protester, Told to ‘Go Back to Israel’
A number of YouTubes featuring this same young man. It’s called, Becoming a Star!
Even in the most Left-wing fantasized criticisms of the Tea Party, they never came up with anything, any example, like this. The Tea Party has been very dignified. The Left street people are always rabble-like, for some reason. High on emotion, slogans, and low on data and info.
8 David Yeagley // Oct 5, 2011 at 12:50 pm
OccupyWallStreet was started by adbusters.org, a Canadian socialist/anti-capitalist group, with deep anti-Semitic intents.
MoveOn.org is backing OccupyWallStreet. That would be George Soros.
Communists Party USA is behind it.
Unions are contributing.
All this has been obvious from the start. Same clientele. Inexperienced, restless, immature youth, led by worn-out hippies from the ’60′s.
9 Maharishi of Mayhem // Oct 5, 2011 at 1:21 pm
If any of those stinking Metrosexual Hippies come to my house, I may be forced to offer them a a physics lesson on the scatter pattern of a 12 gauge shell. Just sayin…
10 Maharishi of Mayhem // Oct 5, 2011 at 3:53 pm
One of the main complaints of these stinking leftist hippie parasites is that they are overwhelmed with “student loans.” Since when is anyone else responsible because some queer loser took out $200,000 in debt to attend her lesbian girls college to study “Marxist Poetry?” Here’s my answer…You see, Butch, the reason that you are in debt, and can’t get a job is because you are an irresponsible scumbag.
If Bloomberg had any testicles at all, he would send in the water cannons to dispatch this infection of syphilitic vermin.
It’s over. Liberalism has won. They call it “Progress.” I will be calling it “target practice.”
11 Pamela K. // Oct 5, 2011 at 5:59 pm
Perhaps these Marxist-instigated, “Occupy Wall Street” protesters should focus their fury on one of their own kind:
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=15915
Multiply this idiot by the tens of thousands of other “entitlement class” idiots ripping off the system and you will understand why our country is so screwed up!
12 Greg H // Oct 5, 2011 at 6:08 pm
I have lived in Texas for the last 30 years and I have never heard of this rock before. If the name on this rock is so important then why hasn’t the press reported on it before. If they did I missed it. I’m no Perry fan at all but this is a joke. This is just racial politics in the USA today. Of course Cain pondered to the black voters. I’m not surprised at all.
13 Asaph // Oct 5, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Most people I know rooted for Hank Aaron. He got death threats and all, but he ended up breaking the Babe’s record and nobody fell apart.
Bill Cosby was America’s favorite comedian for years.
I was pretty certain Perry was going to be the nominee. Who knows what lies ahead? But Cain is resonating with people and they obviously have no problem with the thought of a total black man becoming president.
I don’t believe Cain’s skin color is the only thing setting him apart from the rest. The rest act like politicians. Cain does not. The rest are careful with their words (well Bachmann not so much). Cain just states his convictions, regardless of “gotcha” politics and PC police.
He’s addressed the protesters straight on.
He may take the whole pie. Who knows? I don’t see him making a mess of things the way Obama has, and Bush before him, and Clinton before him, and Bush senior before him.
Of course, all things considered there’s little he will do to help, either, as long as incumbents remain in Congress.
14 Asaph // Oct 5, 2011 at 6:45 pm
I’ve had opportunity to listen to Hannity the last couple days. He’s had people involved with or supporting the protesters on. While it’s obvious the bulk of protesters are what they are, nonetheless, I’ve heard things that sound correct to me. Tax loopholes allowing the corporations to pay zero taxes. Bail outs. Schools charging tuition rates that have gone up 150%. For what? Hannity just plays the broken record of who pays taxes. Fine. That does not address much of what these protesters are fed up about.
I believe in free markets. I don’t believe anybody can define “greed.” But a tax code filled with loopholes? Yeah. Tuition rates shooting through the roof when higher education costs have not? Why?
The bottom line is Washington, though. I don’t hear any of these protesters holding politicians feet to the fire.
Ultimately people are trying to bring down the nation. You have to wonder when the civil war begins?
15 David Yeagley // Oct 5, 2011 at 10:30 pm
Asaph: I don’t believe Cain’s skin color is the only thing setting him apart from the rest. The rest act like politicians. Cain does not.
This is quite true.
I’m just wondering if Cain talks like he talks simply because he doesn’t know any other way. I mean, he’s never been in politics. He’s never held an elected office. He has no experience in bureaucratic procedure. You can’t just be a successful businessman and that makes you qualified to be president.
The man hasn’t been vetted in the slightest, either. Government is not a business. As far as I can see, he has absolutely no qualifications for the presidency. (Col. West might.) Romney and Perry know what they’re doing. No, it does not follow that either would be able to make radical changes to the sinking ship…
I just think Cain would be wholly ineffective. People are just riding on the fact that he is not a politician, and that he’s black. And that he ran a pizza joint. These things do not a president make.
16 Maharishi of Mayhem // Oct 5, 2011 at 11:45 pm
O Grand Sultan of the Blogosphere, I must disagree with your position on Cain. Actually, I find his approach refreshing. No, being a CEO does not necessarily make you qualified to be president. But in truth, I don’t believe that being a politician qualifies you to be president either. It just means that you are more skilled at prostituting yourself than the average guy. Look at Brobama. He is nothing but a political whore. No qualifications, never earned an honest dime, plagiarism, falsehoods, and the like. Perry and Romney are just polished whores of the Republican variety. I have no faith in either of them.
The truth is that a candidate is never qualified for the presidency, but the presidency either qualifies or disqualifies the candidate.
I am to the point that I would readily give a “Regular Joe” a shot at steering this ship rather than handing it over to a bunch of political scum. Cain is a mathematician that used to calculate missile paths and detonation points. The only thing that Brobama calculates is how many Newports he can smoke on the South Lawn before someone calls on him to tell another lie.
I think that we need an amendment to the Constitution that only allows a President to serve (1) four year term. Get in done in Four, cause your’e out the door. This would eliminate a president from being in “campaign mode” for 4 years like our current Liar in Chief.
Give em Hell, Cain. Smile at their face and kick em in the groin. And while your at it, toss a large one in the oven with double cheese, black olives, and onions! I will enjoy a slice on my way to the polls.
So it shall be written, so it shall be done.
The Maharishi has spoken.
17 wyoman // Oct 6, 2011 at 3:00 am
To eliminate anyone from consideration for public office, including the presidency on a basis of race is unfair to both the individual and the country. Cain has a very impressive resume. Is he qualified to be president? I don’t know. I have not picked a candidate to support yet. His reaction to the sign in question was a mistake. He should have waited and got the facts first. However I do not think one mistake disqualifies a candidate. If it does we will have no one left in the race. I personally am tired of all the political correctness. The acceptable term for an American negro has changed so many times in the last 60 years or so of my memory that I am never sure what is in fashion at the moment. My belief is the attitude of the person uttering the word is the issue rather than the word itself.
18 Asaph // Oct 6, 2011 at 7:00 am
I must agree with M&M. No one is qualified to be President of the Free world. And more than half of those who made it to the office denigrated it with either global policies or personal failings, or both. So discounting any man to be president is moot.
I have never seen any list of job qualifications for POTUS. Where is that list? All I ever hear about Romney is that he is “presidential.” What kind of cosmetic nonsense is that?
Cain is a patriot. Cain is constitutional. Cain exudes common sense. Cain knows money. Cain has known hardship.
Romney is a conservative democrat in Republican clothing (which makes no difference these days anyway). He’s a typical politician. Perry is a fake. He is just as much a fake as George Bush. Why Christians cannot see that is amazing to me. I lived in Texas. Perry is a political fake, just like Romney.
Paul is too weak a personage, too verbally soft. He will not state things plain and cannot articulate well, despite wild support he has. Put him in Romney’s body and he’d shoot to the top and stay there.
Bachmann is not a world leader-type. She’s a supporter, not a leader. Not in the highest sense POTUS needs to be. She’d make a good VP, learn, grow, and be ready if necessary.
Santorum will not resonate, because he cannot resonate with voters. He’s too hyper, too young, and as I understand it he lost his last election bid. Not a good record going in.
Huntsman – may as well be a democrat.
Newt – totally damaged goods, however sharp he is on a lot of issues. You cannot play nice with Pelosi on a couch and expect ground swell support from patriots.
Palin is out. Christie is out (thankfully). No one else is coming in. There’s your menu. Did I miss anyone? If Cain is not the best reasonable choice to put aside typical politics in America, of what is being made available by that party, who then? I’d vote for a decent third party candidate in a heartbeat, but they would not win. Obama would by default. The other parties are kept out by the game played by the two others. That, in itself, shows the size of the corruption.
If Cain can stay potentially uncorrupted by the process and DC pressures, I do not logically see anyone doing any better than an outsider such as him. He will completely eradicate Obama in a debate. He would have support of ground swell when no one wants to cooperate with him (which would be the case right out of the box). Romney would get no such support. Nor would Perry. And they will just continue everything that is disgusting about DC. Same with the others because they are all OF DC.
I hope Cain pulls it off.
19 Asaph // Oct 6, 2011 at 7:03 am
Now, if Cain turns out to be hot air… time will soon tell.
20 Maharishi of Mayhem // Oct 6, 2011 at 10:55 am
If I were Herman Cain, I would welcome the vetting process. The guy worked for the Department of the Navy as a ballistics mathematician developing weapons systems for ships and aircraft. You do not get a job like that without having a “Top” Secret, or above (yes, there is “above” top secret) Clearance.
That, already makes him more qualified “on paper” than the “Great Pretender” who occupies that office right now.
Yeah, he’s a “Brother,” and that might rub some of us Southern Boys the wrong way. However, he has proven himself in the arena of hard work and capitalistic ideology. Brobama, on the other hand, has never worked hard, nor is he a fan of capitalism.
I say that we shake up the status quo and send a non-beltway bandit to the White House.
You must log in to post a comment.