David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
by David Yeagley"/>
If the United Nations recognizes “Palestine” as a nation, then every American Indian nation is immediately recognized. American Indians have existed as nations centuries before the Jordanian, Syrian, and Arab political activists fantasized about creating a “Palestinian” nation for themselves.
Mahmoud Abbas, chief of the imaginary “Palestinian” Indians, makes his bid for an international “casino” operation in the land of Cana’an, better known as Israel.
“Palestinian” leader Mahmoud Abbas presented his bid for “Palestinian” nationhood, or statehood, to the United Nations today, Friday, September 23, 2011. It is a historic moment, in a sense. It was all brought about by the incompetence, immaturity, bad judgment and anti-Americanism of Barry “Obama” Soetoro, the lying black African Communist Muslim traitor in the White House. This, according to John Bolton, former U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations. (Well, at least the incompetence and bad judgment aspects.) This he told Megan Kelley on FoxNews today. He said everyone loses in this situation, and it all could have been avoided.
Of course, Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu imposed reality in the situation. This should suffice. And, I might add, it makes Indians wonder who, like Netanyahu, is saving American Indians from the disaster of United Nations recognition.
Netanyahu’s response to the Abbas bid for recognition.
However, I theoretically submit, if the United Nations does recognize some notion of “Palestine” as a people and a state, a nationality, then to be consistent, the U.N. must recognize every American Indian tribe as a nation. American Indians have long met such standards. This “Palestinian” fantasy is only about 60 years old! Indians have been nations for at least 600 years–ever since the White Man knew anything about them. To recognize any “Palestine” is a profound denigration of the American Indian. We are not “refugees.” We are defeated warriors. We are defeated nations. “Palestine” was never a nation.
But, that is what the Third World is all about, degrading American Indians. The Third World, directed by white oedipal liberals, has always been about ripping off Indians. Many Indian people don’t quite see that. The professional protesters, the career anti-Americans blinded the self-image of Indians, according to the white liberal’s will, so that Indians think they’re supposed to identify with all the darkies of the world, all the skins, all the non-white people–as if we have something in common. The Third World races are all considered “native,” in the American Indian sense. The non-white races have all been ineviscerably impacted in the bowels of world politics, forming some giant socio-economic constipation. It has created conscious delusions of grandeur and unmanageable related frustrations.
As noted before, BadEagle.com will be bringing before the United Nations a formal complaint of genocide in the matter of the removal of Indian images, logos, and monikers from American college and university sports teams. I have called this “virtual genocide,” but it isn’t just virtual. It is real. It meets the standards of the United Nations 1948 statement on genocide, Resolution 96 (I), (see esp. Articles II and III. The United States signed on, for better or for worse, in 1988. (The U.S. was the 98th nation to sign on.)
But, no, I don’t believe the United States intends genocide on American Indians. What the United States always wanted is for Indians to join society. I mean to say, I think America was always sincere on that point. However, the policies, the practices, and the politics, often fill the bill of the U.N. mandate against genocide, rather dramatically.
So, in my bid for either nationhood or restoration of Indian images, I have no malice toward the United States–but I have visceral resistance toward white oedipal liberals, and Third World darkies who are greedy of racial authority, and who are first to denigrate the American Indian.
The America Indian is on the bottom of the world, socially, culturally, and politically. In this, the darkies of the world have cooperated with the white oedipal liberal, anxious to rob the Indian of everything–even of his identity.
So, we’ll see. Again, there is no “Palestine.” There are no “Palestinians.” If the U.N. recognizes any “Palestine,” then the U.N. will manifest its utter disdain and denigration of the American Indian. That’s where we are, September 23, 2011. (If it refuses my complaint of genocide against American Indians, then the U.N. declares to the world its total and fanatical racism. It declares itself a mere social club for African appointees to pretend they rule the world.)
28 responses so far ↓
1 Pamela K. // Sep 23, 2011 at 2:37 pm
In December, 2010 Obama declared that he supported and would sign the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People.
He did not sign on to better the lives of American Indians or make it so they can reclaim land lost to their ancestors on this soil. Obama is a career politician. He will agree to anything and with anyone and has, especially if it will benefit him and the evil hierarchy of the Democratic Party.
Obama signed and supported this “declaration” for one reason. To help the “Palestinians” obtain statehood. The PA and Hamas are hoping to use this declaration to declare that the Arabs are the real indigenous people of the land of Israel.
Although George W. Bush refused to support this resolution, both he and Bill Clinton before him, forced Israel to give away more “land for peace” without expecting any reciprocity on behalf of the Arabs, especially their acceptance of Israel’s right to exist.
This “peace process” should really have been called a “piece process” with Israel being forced to give away more and more land, piece by piece, to their enemies. As a result, the ancestral homeland of the Jews, Judea and Samaria, are now surrounded on all sides by hostile Arab forces.
Liberal Indians who applauded Obama’s signing of the UN Resolution and equate the taking of the land of their ancestors here in America with the “occupation of Palestine” by Israel are seriously ignorant, as are many other people in this nation, of the true facts in this case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7ByJb7QQ9U&feature=player_embedded
2 David Yeagley // Sep 23, 2011 at 3:42 pm
Very important observation! Thanks for reminding us of that “indigenous” bit.
3 Mjazz // Sep 23, 2011 at 4:02 pm
I thought a lot of the Indian tribes were recognized as sovereign nations by the United States.
4 David Yeagley // Sep 23, 2011 at 4:11 pm
That’s the theory. We were given certain “dimensions” of sovereignty. Up til now, we had the power to decide who was a member of our tribes and who wasn’t. Until now, we were not taxed for tribal income. Until now, we resolve our own affairs amongst out own members.
But, essentially, it’s been a dual citizenship thing. Our leaders have repeatedly double-dealed with outside business and government until we’re dizzy with legal confusion, obfuscation, and embezzlement.
We’re sovereign, only in the sense that we signed treaties at a time when we were much more of a threat to the United States. We were much more powerful when America was so much younger, and underdeveloped. Wars were settled with treaties.
But, our land was put “in trust.” The United States manages it, and actually tells us what to do. All the other “welfare” programs were imposed upon us, until we are a mesh of inter-related funding programs. Tribes tap into all sorts of government programs.
This is handing over sovereignty, of course.
Sovereignty is a major issue, conceptually as well as legally and fiscally. Economic independence is what we need. We don’t have that. Most tribes would be instantly lost without the BIA, the government “treaty” agency, which has been ripping off tribal mineral and surface rights for generations. That’s what the Louise Cobell case was all about.
5 Mjazz // Sep 23, 2011 at 4:24 pm
After the signing of the Oslo Accords, attacks on Israelis increased. Barak offered Arafat 94% of what he wanted with the other 6% to be made up elsewhere. Arafat went back on his word and went to war after having pledged to resolve disputes through negotiation instead of violence.
When Israel withdrew from Lebanon they got missiles. When they withdrew from Gaza they got missiles. After Arafat stopped negotiating they got missiles from the areas that had been handed over to the Palestinian Authority.
A palestinian terrorist recently flashed the V for victory sign after knifing a Jewish family to death, beheading a 3 month old baby. Before that they fired a missile at a school bus, and more recently were throwing rocks at a 20 month old Jewish baby. The list is just about endless. They are light years away from having any of the qualifications necessary for statehood.
6 David Yeagley // Sep 23, 2011 at 4:29 pm
I’m thinking the average person has no idea of what it is to be a Jew living in Israel today. The intensity, the constant guard, the profound threat and hate. It is remarkable, really. We can only imagine.
7 Mario // Sep 23, 2011 at 7:06 pm
I would like to know Dr. Yeagley if the American indian were to decide to follow the Palestinian path of obtaining recognization from the UN what will it mean to the US? Would the entire tribes in the whole US will be real little countries, a real “indian country” without benefit of the US government? Would the little enclaves be considered american territories like American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the US VIrgin Islands? Where would the borders be of these little nations within the US, would it be boundaries pre-1492 or the current reservation territories? I am just wondering these questions, because if the Palestinians gain the recognition they want, more people will be try to do the same.
8 Pamela K. // Sep 23, 2011 at 9:49 pm
John Bolton On UN Legitimacy & The Vote For Statehood
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RXa0nMV8l8&feature=player_embedded#!
Personally speaking, I have said for many years that the UN is a big ugly blight on our soil. Since most members carry an unabashed hatred for America, the whole organization should pull up stakes and get out of here!
I’m sure Teheran and Pyongyang have vacancies.
9 frinkle // Sep 24, 2011 at 3:04 am
Mr Yeagley,
The past couple or so of blog articles you have done have been regarding these palestinian issues. I have a few responses to some of the points you raised.
One point you made was that you don’t feel like the palestinians are a real nation. What makes a people into a real nation, what requirements do you have for that? Yes the term palestinian is a recent creation however the palestinian people are a people who have experienced a collective situation for about a century and it seems like they have developed a feeling of solidarity with each other.
Personally I think the USA should pull out of the United Nations but I am confused as to why some in America would be passionately against palestinian statehood. Matters happening among the palestinians and israelis are happening an ocean away. Who cares what happens over there?
I am dismayed that the USA government has recently managed to pressure the cherokee into not being able to determine their tribal members. Hopefully the USA Indian tribes go to the UN to demand recognition as sovereign nations. The federal government is trying to make indian nations into being sovereign in name only. Hopefully the indians manage to regain their sovereignty from the evil USA government.
10 Mjazz // Sep 24, 2011 at 1:06 pm
Millions of Jews were crammed into cattle cars and upon arriving at their destination were told they could take showers, The showers actually turned out to be Zyklon B gas chambers, but we shouldn’t care because it was “an ocean away”?
11 frinkle // Sep 24, 2011 at 1:42 pm
OK Mjazz there is something you should realize. Palestinians are not nazis. There is a tribal war between the israelis and the palestinians. The USA should not be taking sides in this conflict.
12 Pamela K. // Sep 24, 2011 at 2:19 pm
On the contrary, the same murderous spirit that drove the Nazis to target and kill the Jews is the same antiChrist spirit that motivates the Arab enemies of Israel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47TBnRkhntI
I often see Israel as God’s ultimate litmus test, an indicator of which nations and peoples really love and believe in Him, and adhere to His Word, and those who have aligned themselves against Him.The Jews are in no way morally or spiritually superior to the rest of us. For reasons known only to Himself, God chose these people to bring salvation into the world through His Son, the Messiah Yeshua. Furthermore, I also realize that by the very words of his mouth, our current leader telling Israel that “they must return to the pre-1967 borders” has cursed our nation. There were no borders before ’67. There was and still is the 1949 Armistice Line, commonly known as the Green Line, which is an unrecognized international boundary, or better yet, where the Arab armies, that came against Israel in the 1949 War for Independence dropped their weapons in the sand and ran away when they realized Israel was kicking their butts. In reality it was God kicking their butts back across the desert sands. Obama declaring the Israelis must return to the ’67 borders is the long held viewpoint of their Arab enemies who have vowed to destroy Israel and wipe the Jews off the face of the earth. Obama’s ignorance and arrogance in the face of Almighty God has cursed both himself and America. And if you think the unprecedented violent weather, increasing lawlessness and economic woes have been bad in our country let Obama keep messing with Israel. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
13 frinkle // Sep 24, 2011 at 5:08 pm
Pamela,
If God is the one responsible for the victory of the Israelis then that means the Israelis don’t need America to give them billions of dollars in military aid. The Israelis should rely on God and not America. Right now they act like America is their God and they pray to America.
I am an American and I do not want my country involved in any way in the Palestinian-Israeli situation. I am forced to give charity to Israel through my tax dollars. If Americans want to give charity to Israel they should do so on their own through private organizations. Us Americans who don’t want to be involved shouldn’t be forced to give charity to them.
I am not against people giving to charity but charity should be voluntary. I resent my hard earned money be taken from me and given to people who I am not even biologically related to.
I don’t want America to be involved in any way. America needs to pull out of the UN and it needs to stop offering opinions on the Palestine-Israel situations and it needs to stop giving money to any foreign government. Period.
The money I work for is MINE.
14 Thrasymachus // Sep 24, 2011 at 6:06 pm
On September 17, 1796, George Washington warned us all to “Beware of Foreign Entanblements.”
Israel is intended to be “a homeland for the Jewish People.” They settled there to avoid miscegenation and to preserve themselves ethnically.
Now that is noble. But all other historical peoples yet existing must be given this same privilege. Scotland for the Scots, France for the French, the Netherlands for the Dutch, Sweden for the Swedes, etc.
I, for one, cannot condone any double-standards in this matter.
The Christian ministers who encourage our young white children and adolescents to marry Blacks (when they grow up), and, at the same time, insist that Jews are somehow exempt and therefore privileged to reject intermarriage with Gentiles offend me greatly.
Now let me be clear: I don’t want Islamic rule in Israel, nor would I force mixing in that land. But I do know a liberal Jew or two who believe that integration with Arabs is the solution there.
Yes, Israel has a right to exist. But so too does every long-established nation in Europe!
15 Pamela K. // Sep 24, 2011 at 6:31 pm
If US aid keeps Israel’s military strong, develop their weapons and helping thwart the continuous threat of terrorism against them and us coming from the Muslim world, as well as doing all of us a huge favor by taking care of Iran’s wacko dictator’s nuclear ambitions, than I do not mind my tax money going to support them. Israel is a great ally and friend to the United States of America.
However, I don’t like the fact that my tax dollars go to nations like Pakistan, a hot bed of anti-Americanism and terrorist training, and China, one of the worst violators of human rights in the world.
But before you complain about your money going to aid foreign lands, you ought to consider the enormous amounts of tax payer money wasted by our government leaders through outrageous pork barrel spending.
Here are a few recent examples:
A total of $3 million has been granted to researchers at the University of California at Irvine so that they can play video games such as World of Warcraft. The goal of this “video game research” is reportedly to study how “emerging forms of communication, including multiplayer computer games and online virtual worlds such as World of Warcraft and Second Life can help organizations collaborate and compete more effectively in the global marketplace.”
$35 million was reportedly paid out by Medicare to 118 “phantom” medical clinics that never even existed. Apparently these “phantom” medical clinics were established by a network of criminal gangs as a way to defraud the U.S. government.
The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism is paying researchers in China $2.6 million to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly on the job. The Wayne State University professor running the study says China has a HIV problem. Apparently the NIH believes this is a U.S. taxpayer responsibility, since it is also funding sex studies in Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania, Ivory Coast, Ghana and Nambia, among others..
Approximately $1 million of U.S. taxpayer money was used to create poetry for the Little Rock, New Orleans, Milwaukee and Chicago zoos. The goal of the “poetry” is to help raise awareness on environmental issues.
The National Institutes of Health was given $800,000 in “stimulus funds” to study the impact of a “genital-washing program” on men in South Africa.
YOUR money at work!
16 Thrasymachus // Sep 24, 2011 at 6:44 pm
It’s kinda odd that the website misspelled “entanglements”! I simply copied and pasted the title in the link, and I hadn’t noticed the misspelling.
In any event, 46 million Americans are now living in poverty! Why doesn’t our government try to solve that problem?
17 Kris // Sep 24, 2011 at 6:48 pm
Dr. Yeagley:
I do believe all Americans should be offended by this nonsense and BHO’s distain for all of us…it isn’t just the indigenous Native Americans who are angry…we all are…I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said…all Americans or least 80 percent of us, as far as I can see are furious with that fraud in the White House…and you do bring up some very good points…my knowledge, however, is sadly lacking with your dilemma as a Native American..I seem to know and understand Israel’s plight and situation in Middle East since this has been one of those boilerplate issues when we have Democrats in office…we are seeing some of the worst decisions ever made on every subject, made by this idiot in the Oval Office…so your continuing anger is of far longer standing than any of the rest of us…please enlighten me further…
18 David Yeagley // Sep 24, 2011 at 7:51 pm
Kris, I don’t expect to see Indians return to the former life. The world is forever changed. A reservation will never become a “reserve” for anything but some animal species. The old, free days will never return.
I know we all have the “Ghost Dance” in is. We all inevitably yearn for those past times. I think it is a special human thing to do.
I am concerned with what it means to be an Indian today, even in terms of our “image.” The professional protester, the corrupt casino gamer, the drunk, the profligate, etc. I don’t think we have a good image at all in these modern times. That’s why I see the warrior image as the most immediate thing to grasp onto as a positive image.
A warrior is not just a killer. A warrior is a protector, a provider, a responsible man. A hero. I think lot of us have lost our way on that one. We’re not so good at the white man’s ways (because we’re not really too interested); and yet we can’t go back to all our own ways.
What do we do? I say we have to accept new enemies. We have to make a living in new ways. If we do not recognize the new players, we can’t defeat anything. We on the sidelines.
Not much glory, or food, on the sidelines.
19 frinkle // Sep 24, 2011 at 8:25 pm
Pamela,
That is an interesting list of ways of money being wasted you posted and I oppose all forms of wasting money.
I see from your posts that Israel is something of importance to you. I don’t have a problem with that. However what I am saying is is that the USA government shouldn’t be the one giving money to Israel. Not everyone in America is a jew or christian zionist. Some of us have alternate religious beliefs. And those of us for whom Israel means nothing shouldn’t be forced to give it charity by our taxes.
20 Kris // Sep 24, 2011 at 9:21 pm
You’re absolutely, correct Dr. Yeagley..who do you perceive as the enemy, the new players? I have an answer, but I’m just wondering if yours the same one I have. And whether we should be joining forces in this endeavor…I see an enemy who is out to destroy those of us who aren’t them and it scares the hell out of me.. running away accomplishes nothing…standing up against them is the only alternative….I see them as bullies who can turn to violence, and murder. It is definitely something we as Americans need to address..
21 Asaph // Sep 25, 2011 at 7:33 am
I must admit there is sound spiritual logic in the fact that if Israel believes they are the chosen people and protected by Yah, then they have zero need for any nation’s intervention in their affairs, and certainly not their money when God owns all the silver and gold and cattle on a thousand hills.
This is all part of new world order agendas and it will play out as God allows it. If America were true to its own Constitution there would be no involvement in foreign affairs such as it is constantly engaging in, all at the behest of different political ideology and agendas. The only thing consistent is the inconsistency of it all.
America attacks Libya because of supposed human rights violations, but does not attack China, North Korea, Sudan or dozens of other nations with cruel and despotic regimes.
It’s a game. A huge NWO game for money, for oil, for territory, for food production, for ultimate population control.
In one sense Americans should be aghast at what the government has done to signed treaties between sovereign Indian peoples and the U.S. On the other hand as Indians keep throwing everything to the wind, staying in some odd middle ground of being Indian and being Americans, should it not be expected that the government will deal with them according to their own whims?
Palestinians are little more than refugees from other nations they left. They are squatters, if you will. But, where did North American Indians come from? Where did they leave to settle on this continent? If there is a major difference I cannot see it, other than the intrusion of time.
The question was asked, What makes a nation? Does it matter anymore? The United Nations is not about anything but global control, not global peace. So, if making squatters a nation benefits their agenda it will be done.
22 Asaph // Sep 25, 2011 at 7:35 am
“should it not be expected that the government will deal with them (Indians) according to their (US government) own whims?
Just for clarification.
23 David Yeagley // Sep 25, 2011 at 8:47 am
Squatters. I like it. Good term.
Strong squatters become new nations. In the old days, it depended on your own strength and initiative. Today, squatters have been led to believe that they have a “right” to be a nation.
All part of the “human rights” agenda, this new concept of “Give me what I want!”
24 David Yeagley // Sep 25, 2011 at 8:55 am
Kris, I have always believed that most Indians believe what I believe. There is simply no national voice, or national organization, or advocacy. I established the Bad Eagle Foundation, a 501c3, for this cause, but it has not developed as I had hoped.
Professional conservatives don’t really like talking about race, so, we can’t count on any support from big guns. I think the average white person probably supports the idea of conservative Indian efforts, though.
The new players are new ways of making a living, new kinds of ‘hunting’ and ‘killing’ skills. In a way, this is all assimilation, but, it is also survival. It doesn’t really require us to not Indian, but just to be additional kinds of things.
There are a lot of professional Indians out there, who are competent, intelligent, successful, and very talented. But, such a condition usually leads to being too busy to bother with political junkies. Too busy making a living, raising a family, accomplishing something. Hats off to them, indeed.
I’m just trying to help change the image from the drunk, the protester, and the gambler. We can do better than this. Many of us have.
I think American patriotism is our highest calling right now. That makes us valuable to the social environment in which we live. America needs us right now, desperately. That is my opinion.
25 frinkle // Sep 25, 2011 at 12:31 pm
A major problem with regards to the situations American Indians are in is that much of the American public, including elites such as judges and lawyers, do not have a firm grasp on American Indian sovereignty issues.
They just don’t get that these tribes are separate nations and they don’t understand the process of historical events that led to them being separate nations.
Also America has the habit of not respecting it’s own boundaries. Politically this country just loves to get involved with the affairs of foreign nations. It thinks it has jurisdiction over the entire world. George Washington even advised Americans not to get involved in foreign entanglements. And so this attitude also contributes to the federal and state governments thinking they can dictate what the indian does in his own nation.
We have a major problem in America with people just not taking the time to read through things and remember what they read and understand what they read. The usa government completely misinterpreted that cherokee treaty from the 1800′s when they decided that descendants of freedman with no cherokee blood could be citizens of the cherokees.
26 Thrasymachus // Sep 25, 2011 at 12:34 pm
“I think the average white person probably supports the idea of conservative Indian efforts, though.” — David Yeagley
I think so too, Dr. Y.
I am sure that if case of the conservative American Indian were properly explained to Whites, and they were empowered to vote “yea” or “nay,” they would vote for the things cherished and valued by the conservative American Indian Cause. The conservative American Indian would find satisfaction in political matters from us Whites.
I hear from Whites all the time the argument that “the American Indian was here first.” Whites understand this. And right-thinking Whites respect this fact and will be willing to do the right thing by the American Indian.
But the Federal Government is not run by right-thinking Whites. It is run by Liberals whose only rule is to rule out the exercise of any kind of “discrimination.” Hence the gross immorality of the times.
27 Kris // Sep 25, 2011 at 1:46 pm
Dr. Yeagley:
There are very few incidents of the Indian experience as you have stated, where I originally come from. The Northeast has very little to offer in terms of a well-known history in terms of the Indian experience. We have those Indians celebrated by the Mohegan Sun and Foxwood Casinos with a rather made-up history developed when they first came on the scene fifteen years ago. From what I understand, though, they number approximately 400 individuals who derive some benefit from their association with these casinos. But I also have read that the real owners are a consortium of wealthy entrepreneurs from Indonesia who use this as a way to invest their money and get a tax break. I’m not sure about the details, but I think that about covers another instance where native Americans are being used to advance an opportunity to make money and as a front, to demonstrate how compassionate wealthy white liberals actually are. We can throw our money away with impunity as long as it goes to a worthy cause or at least what we believe is such.
And then there are the Penobscot Indians of northern Maine..this is a sad and generally true story of the plight of Maine and citizens there in general. We now have an economic climate harmful to everyone from this part of the United States. My mother left me a camp (only open in the summer) near the Canadian border (Forest City) and close to an area encompassing Topsfield to Calais, Maine which most of the known members of the Penobscot Indian tribe reside. It is very isolated with few people except for those who enjoy being away from the clutter of humanity and big cities. Of course, Maine is not particularly well known for its many large population centers. There is, as you have stated, many a stereotypical view of the American Indian. And these economic conditions do not enhance the Indian experience as we have seen. It becomes difficult to get out from under when dependency becomes the staple of their own existence. A sad commentary to say the least. And the Indians in Maine are much worse off than most of us know or are willing to acknowledge.
There you have it; sad to say, I have very little knowledge of the Indian experience as such. I think I have to acquaint myself with the Ghost Dance and its spiritual significance as a belief system. I’ll get back to you on that. Thanks again.
28 Mjazz // Sep 25, 2011 at 10:07 pm
frinkle-
The world is a lot smaller than in George Washington’s day. Then it would take months for an army to sail over here and invade, Now a nuclear missile probably only takes minutes.
Israel is the only democracy and the only ally we can depend on in the region.
They make important modifications in the materiel they purchase from us suitable for warfare in the region, and provide us with important intelligence information.
They continually make advances in the fields of agriculture, medicine and technology that are helpful to all of humanity.
Aside from what benefits us, there is the moral aspect of the conflict. The goal of the Islamists is to kill all the Jews, not a tribal conflict about land. And for the record, there was a Nazi-Islamist alliance during WWII; one Imam said “We want to finish what Hitler started.”
You must log in to post a comment.