BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Jew-Free Palestinian State? Yes!

by David Yeagley · September 19, 2011 · 10 Comments ·

A Jew-free Palestinian state is a wonderful idea! A salvific precedent! A new world order! It would then mean there could be an Arab-free Israel, a Albanian-free Serbia, a illegal Mexican-free America, a Muslim-free America, a Negro-free Cherokee Nation. This is what we’ve all been waiting for, right?

Wrong. The rest of us certainly aren’t getting it. No one else gets to exclude Jews, or whomever it is they want to exclude. Why should the non-existent “Palestinian people” be awarded such authority? This is not the way the world works. Racially homogeneous nations are generally those no one else wants to live in, for obvious reasons of privation, disease, immorality, and the generally depressed, miasmic social atmosphere.


“Palestinian” Ambassador to the United States Maen Rashid Areikat, reiterating his call for a Jew-free Palestinian state.

Of course, the political manipulators immediately tried to reverse, or at least moderate, Maen Rashid’s hardline expression. “Jews are welcome,” they say. What artfully meaningless words. (They must hire Obama as their spokesman when he leaves America.)

Though no one has ever demanded that American Indian nations must include non-Indians amongst their citizenship (until now, anyway), America itself is expected to accommodate all foreigners–even our deadliest enemies. Our traitorous government even encourages our enemies to come. Though it is not written in any nation’s constitution, and certainly not in America’s constitution, the universal concept is that any person has the right to live anywhere in the world he wants. There is no sanctity of land or nationhood. It’s all a political process, or a economic process.

Besides, Israel can’t afford to have a seething enemy next door. The Palestinians have proven completely untrustworthy, ever-willing to cooperate with any and all of Israel’s enemies. If Israel didn’t police the Palestinian ghettos there would be major military installations in every building, with innumerable missiles pointed at Israel. The whole Arab mind-set is profoundly and consistently violent against Israel.

Also, “Jew-free” implies that the so-called “Palestinians” are the rightful owners of the land. They aren’t. There is no “Palestine,” there are no “Palestinians.” This is a fabricated socio-political illusion. They people are mostly Jordanian, some southern Syrian, and a lot of imported Arabs and probably some Iranians with Arabic names–professional mercenaries. It is an infestation of anti-Jewish factions. “Jew-free”? They’re lucky there are Jewish authorities among them. They’d have all killed each other by now.

American Indian nations? They are based on blood. If you don’t have the blood, you’re not part of the people. It is an abstraction, a theory, to think that a nation is without blood. America has blood, originally. White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant blood. The language is English. I believe the people who created the country have the right to determine who their citizens are, or aren’t. Some people are more suited to being American than others. Each country should have the right to let in whom it will, and to exclude whom it will. That is the point of nationhood, is it not?

But America is terrible confused right now. We have an alien, lying, black African Communist Muslim traitor appointed as our president. This says it all, really. This is what happens when self-righteous white Oedipal liberals are in charge. Their purpose is to destroy the fathers’ behest. This they do by removing all laws and sense designed to protect the nation. They present themselves as loving egalitarians, but they are self-righteous coercivists. They don’t believe in freedom or equality, really. They believe in their own power to rule. That’s it all. This is manifested in parasitical deconstruction, behind the propaganda slogans of “reform,” “progress,” or “change.”

There will never be a Palestinian state. There is no “Palestine.” There are no “Palestinians.” The socio-political entity could only hope to be a Muslim conclave, or a small caliphate. But, as it stands, there is not enough unity in the ghettos to even conceive of that. They barely put a soccer team together, and that’s because they part of an international philanthropic effort–and they hired an Austrian coach in 2004 and 2006 (Alfred Riedl). It’s called nation-building by fad, trend, and not a little anti-Jewish philanthropy.

The land belongs only to they who are strong enough to take it and hold it. There is no other known human experience. This modern tampering with self-righteous coercivists who think they can determine who has the “right” to what is sheer arrogance.

No one has rights. One has either strength, or weakness. Indians were strong, once. America had to negotiate with Indians. I don’t say might makes right. I say might decides what’s considered right, and enforces it. In the case of America, the fathers decided the Bible was the basic standard of right and wrong. The Bible doesn’t really advocate closed borders so much as national standards. If you want to live in a nation, you become as that nation commands. You don’t try to make that nation like you, when you’re the foreigner. The integrity and existence of each nation depends on a uniform application of its laws. Leviticus 24:22 says it all:

Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country, for I am the LORD your God.

Posted by David Yeagley · September 19, 2011 · 8:17 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Arab · Bad Eagle Journal · Immigration · Islam · Israel · Jews · Land · Liberalism · Politics · Race · Sovereignty · White Race




Read More Journal Posts »

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 BrockTownsend // Sep 19, 2011 at 8:38 pm   

    Excellent once again and posted.

  • 2 Pamela K. // Sep 19, 2011 at 8:53 pm   

    ‎The Palestinian Myth

    “What is the root of the Arab refusal to the various offers of compromise, the refusal that the liberals among us refuse, in their blindness, to accept? Beneath the surface bubble the ancient myths, sabotaging all possibilities of a rational agreement. The Arab myth speaks of the supremacy of Islam over all other religions and nations….”

    http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=1131

  • 3 David Yeagley // Sep 19, 2011 at 9:00 pm   

    See? It’s about Islam, not nationhood. Nationhood is nothing to Islam. A manoeuver, a tool, a sword. An arrogant, and naive notion, to think that men will forget their nations.

    I believe in nationhood. I know it seems a fragile, even artificial thing. But, I believe God ordained nationhood. I think that is the Biblical testimony.

  • 4 Pamela K. // Sep 19, 2011 at 9:29 pm   

    Zahir Muhsein: Member of the Syrian branch of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, in a March 31, 1977 interview with the Dutch newspaper, Dagblad de Verdieping Trouw:

    “The Palestinian people does not exist. The
    creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

    Preamble of the Hamas Charter:

    ” Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it (The Martyr), Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).”

    I believe in nationhood too. I also believe that Obama better play his cards right in his meetings with PM Netanyahu and Abbas at the UN this week. The future of America as a nation hinges on our president’s reversal of his previous stand on Israel. However, I am not holding my breath. I’m afraid The Arrogant One is in for a very rude awakening.

  • 5 Pamela K. // Sep 20, 2011 at 8:09 am   

    Saudi Peace Initiative?

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/148086#replies

    How can the camel jockeys of Arabia promote peace when they do not recognize Israel’s right to exist?

  • 6 Thrasymachus // Sep 20, 2011 at 5:05 pm   

    “Islam is a political ideology.” — Geert Wilders

    Thus we see that there can never be a lasting peace in the Mid-East, apart from God’s rule of this world. — Θρασύμαχος

    Geert Wilders Warning to America

  • 7 Thrasymachus // Sep 20, 2011 at 5:09 pm   

    “[T]he universal concept is that any person has the right to live anywhere in the world he wants.” — Dr. Y

    Which, logically extended, would mean that any person has the right to dwell in whatever house he desires. Why should one person live in a house that costs millions of dollars while another lives in one that is priced only in the thousands?
    How is there “equality” in that?

    Land is to a nation — which is an extended family — what house and land is to a family.

  • 8 Asaph // Sep 20, 2011 at 5:10 pm   

    “I say might decides what’s considered right, and enforces it.”

    Not much hope for America, then.

  • 9 David Yeagley // Sep 21, 2011 at 9:54 am   

    As of today, I notice the superimposed “green” hi-lighted words in the text, containing advertising.

    I despise this, and do not know how it has become part of all BadEagle.com. Does anyone know anything about this? Who did this? How can I eliminate it?

  • 10 David Yeagley // Sep 21, 2011 at 10:32 am   

    I examined the links, by right click. Apparently, Google has done this.

    Advertising is like rape these days. No warning. No recourse. Media and mass communication is nothing more than an advertising vehicle. Sincere thought is utterly violated, denigrated, and irreparably cheapened.

    This is Google, by the way. And “textenhance.com,” and others. This is the nature of profiteering. It is about SELL. You are merely a target–for intellectual rape. If you “indulge” in media at all, you are raped.

    I think ratings come from sales data, not content of shows, or number of people that watch or listen. It’s how many products were sold.

You must log in to post a comment.

google

couk