David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Unfortunately, the Negro in the White House has had a dire and deleterious effect on the world. It’s all about race, not economy. The Communist theory of equally distributed wealth only brings out the fact that class war, in every place where there are non-white people cohabiting white societies, the poor are in fact the darkies, the Negroes, the non-whites. Class struggle is race struggle.
Conservative talkers, ever fearful of talking about race, faithfully avoid its mention in connection with the riots across the globe. It seems that all riots are about socio-economic issues, not about race, even when racial groups riot against other races.
Yesterday Sean Hannity spoke the entire day, by radio and TV, about the riots in London, and carefully, passionately identified the riots as the result of liberalism. The expectation of government aid, the deep-seated dependency, the right to hand-outs–when denied, result in socially immature behavior, like, violence. “We’re getting our taxes back,” shouted a rioting looter. BadEagle.com brought out the fact that the rioters in Tottenham (London) were African, or, Negro. This fact, however, was discovered by research, not from media reports.
And now, today, Laura Ingraham is lamenting the complete abandonment of morality, but without any reference to Negroes making white people strip in the streets. It is a behavioral issue, not a racial issue, so say these careful conservatives. Even the BBC hid the faces of riotors, trusting that their beloved British accent would give the illusion that the knaves were white, not black.
All this, in spite of the fact that, in America, Negroes attacked white people at the Wisconsin State Fair, and in fact, the infamous Memorial Day beach closings in Chicago were caused by blacks attacking whites on the beach, and not because of heat or temperatures. The media completely lied about that, covering up the dramatic attacks and the fact that they were explicitly racial, blacks against innocent whites. Even the few news reports of “flash gangs” were careful not to make an issue of the fact that the gangs were black. That part of the story was all on personal cell phones and twitter accounts. Few professional news agencies are willing to call it what it is: black teens looking for trouble.
Chicago news likes to call it “flash mob” activity, or ‘wilding’ incidents. In the old days, in the South, it used to be called “pack niggers,” who, like wild dogs, went out to attack, to loot, to do violence–for the glory of it. (True it is, that kind of glory, itself, isn’t related to race at all.) But now days, educated liberals feel sophisticated to call is social frustration, or the pursuit of economic justice, or some other justified explanation that exonerates the packs from responsibility for their actions.
Katharine Birbalsingh
Veteran Hindu school teacher of London’s inner city system Katherine Birbalsingh posted a headline, “These riots were about race. Why ignore the fact?”
One might ask the question, What happens when Negroes are in charge, when Negroes are on the top of society? Do they behave differently then? Or, to put it abstractly, or politically correctly, what happens when the underprivileged, the economically oppressed class is placed in power (by liberals)? Well, we can first look at African countries like Somalia, Nigeria, and most importantly, South Africa. Enough said? (Or, let Ilana Mercer say it: Into The Cannibal’s Pot, Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa.)
Shall we indeed associate crime, violence, and vice with low socio-economic status? Does poverty cause sin? Here is a an interesting statement from a 19th century religious writer, Ellen G. White:
Nigh and afar off are souls weighed down by a sense of guilt. It is not hardship, toil, or poverty that degrades humanity. It is guilt, wrongdoing. This brings unrest and dissatisfaction. Christ would have His servants minister to sin-sick souls.
This is from a biographical narrative of Jesus, called, The Desire of Ages, (p. 822), published in 1898.
In other words, degradation is not measured in material things. For that matter, spiritual success isn’t, either. But, this certainly begs the question of cause in these riots and flash mobs of young blacks all over the world. And, too, obviously there are countries rioting that are not Negro countries, like Greece, and the rioters aren’t Negro. It is important to remember that. Racial prejudice is, at beast, a natural self-defense tactic, and never a position of policy making.
The same behavior can be manifested for different reasons, or for no reason at all. There is such a thing and vice–the thrill of sin. The exhilaration of violence. The satisfaction of blood. We’re talking about soul-less animal behavior. Indeed, worse than animal behavior. Animals kill to eat. Humans kill for pleasure. Satanic pleasure.
It’s too easy to call it socio-economic depression. It’s far too easy to explain it as frustration, want, or even envy, though these things are involved, no doubt. Actually, it is much more difficult to explain it that way. The easiest, simplest explanation, the scientific explanation, the “parsimony,” is just blood lust. Instant power. Power over other human beings. It is a very bodily, personal thing.
Gang behavior, itself, is the first concern of an ancient, wise Jewish father to all his wealthy sons, indeed, the youth of Israel:
My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not. If they say, Come with us, let us lay wait for blood, let us lurk privily for the innocent without cause: Let us swallow them up alive as the grave; and whole, as those that go down into the pit: We shall find all precious substance, we shall fill our houses with spoil: Cast in thy lot among us; let us all have one purse: My son, walk not thou in the way with them; refrain thy foot from their path: For their feet run to evil, and make haste to shed blood. Proverbs 1: 10-16.
One might have thought that sexual temptations would be the first concerns for the youth. But, no, it is gang behavior. This is Solomon writing.
In other words, gang behavior has nothing to do with wealth, or poverty. And it has nothing to do with race. It is a mind set, a power grab, an instant thrill of lawlessness and raw aggression. It is addictive, and compulsive.
The compassion young black people need isn’t money to buy things with. It’s the truth–about themselves. Those who have compassion for black youth need to tell them the truth. That would be the fatherly thing to do. That would be social parenting.
To Be Continued.
48 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 3:33 pm
I have to say, that “pack niggers” term is something I only heard, when I was young. I grew up in Oklahoma City. There was never anything like that here. There was nothing that would have been referred to as such.
There was a reputation, however, that blacks would never go one on one, or even two on one. It had to be 10 against one, if they were going to move on you. They had to have overwhelming numbers.
But, that was all talk. I never experienced anything of this nature as a child or youth. These are just things I heard about.
2 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 3:50 pm
UPDATE, Aug. 12: This video IS the original, one and only DAVID DUKE. I don’t follow the man, so I didn’t recognize him in the beard, and he has naturally aged.
Here is a video of Dr. David Duke–not the Louisiana (KKK) David Duke…
Obviously, I don’t agree with everything the man says. He could be the other David Duke! There are anti-Zionist comments in this video. This is a standard take in anti-Semitism: high up Jewish powers design to weaken the nations through immigration.
I disagree. Even if there is a demonstrable number of Jews who push immigration of this nature, for this cause, they could never do such a thing without the full cooperation of national parliaments and congresses.
3 Pamela K. // Aug 11, 2011 at 4:37 pm
Obama’s remark, “My grandmother was a typical white woman” during his campaign to be president should have been taken as a precursor of what life in America would be like under his forthcoming leadership. Intense racial hatred and resentment simmering just beneath the surface. We are more racially divided in America now than ever before. And I believe much of the responsibility for this is not so much Obama’s fault, but the fault of white liberals who allowed him to be put into the White House in the first place.
White liberal democrats knew all too well that for twenty years, Obama sat in the church of a man who spewed racial epithets against the white race from the pulpit every Sunday.
Yet, the problems of today have their roots in the not too distant past, reaching back into the counterculture of the 1960′s and the cry for social justice, part of which was the embracing of the Black Power Movement by white liberals.
It was the liberal white politicians and special interest groups that have created this problem, giving everything to the blacks in this country, and not so much as a means for them to be equal in predominantly white society, but more so because white liberals, who seethe with their own prejudice against the black race are also terribly afraid of them.
The “flash mob” situation in Philadelphia has since been quelled for the time being. Mayor Nutter finally rose up and threatened the unruly mobs of marauding black youths (and their parents) with fines of up to $500 plus jail time if they are out on the streets past curfew. However, the mayor’s edict is “a day late and a dollar short” form of justice, especially when you consider the thousands of dollars of damage incurred by these kids’ smash and grab melee and vandalism of center city stores. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see how long this delayed “justice” will prevail in the City of Brotherly Love.
4 Sioux // Aug 11, 2011 at 4:49 pm
It can be no accident that the Media hide the identity of perpetrators when they are a minority such as Blacks or Muslims. Harder to hide a hispanic name. I would call this criminal behavior when white people could be warned to stay away from areas that are “going feral” like State Fairs, beaches, malls, city streets, parks…hmm…
I heard Nutter tellilng the black yute to pull up their pants and fly right – no wonder you don’t get a job – you look like a thug gangsta and no one is going to hire you in their right mind.
5 Maharishi of Mayhem // Aug 11, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Blacks are animals and will never be tamed. The chains of the South were one of the kindest things that was ever afforded to this vile and horrid race of beasts. Lincoln, though a good man in many aspects, was dead wrong (no pun intended), when it comes to this amalgamated and vicious tribe of apes.
Any time that a black has a position of authority, the first thing that they do is to use that authority against whites. They also turn a blind eye to the lack of initiative, work, and morals of those in their “black packs.” Blacks who have risen to the top have only done so as a result of quotas or affirmative “distraction.”
Any time that blacks have something given to them, they tear it up. I have recently driven by some beautiful apartments that have electronic gates. These places would be “high rent” if I were paying the price. However, due to “Section 8″, the massive amount of no-account Boons that inhabit these places will likely reduce them to squalor in less than 2-3 years.
Unfortunately, the “Boon Culture” is infiltrating all races. I remember telling my daughter that if she even thought of bringing home a black that I would disown her…and I meant it. Interestingly, the older blacks felt the same way. I knew a black man who told his daughter that his rule was this…”If they can’t use your comb, don’t bring them home.” Unfortunately, white women have become the ultimate conquest for these gorillas.
Race warfare is coming. It’s one of the reasons that I have a .357 under my pillow at night.
6 Pamela K. // Aug 11, 2011 at 6:31 pm
“The compassion young black people need isn’t money to buy things with. It’s the truth–about themselves. Those who have compassion for black youth need to tell them the truth.” – David Yeagley
East Side High School Principal Joe Clark was one such inspiration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKtuy427rX0&feature=related
We need more brave men like Joe Clark in the world. Both Black and White.
7 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 9:43 pm
At the American Renaissance conference of 2011, there were two Jewish speakers, both of whom emphasized the conclusion that it has been an aberrant policy to lie to black people and say things to make them feel good–when they haven’t produced the goods. They were very frank about this failure in concept. Encouraging words are one thing. Lying about statistical or academic facts is another. One of the speeches was entitled, “Helping Blacks by Lying to Them.” It just doesn’t work.
8 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 9:45 pm
Pamela, I thought it was going to be a real story! But, it’s another Hollywood fantasy, alas! You had me goin’, big time!
9 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Maharashi, I think you should try to be a little more explicit. There is a certain poetic obscurity in your expressions… !!!!
10 zephyr // Aug 11, 2011 at 10:08 pm
Sioux–saw that sermon. Here’s the link:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/youve-damaged-your-own-race-philly-mayor-blasts-teens-flash-mobs/
Nutter’s message needs to be preached in more churches AND in the streets.
My favorite quotes:
“This nonsense must stop . . . if you want to act like an idiot, move. Move out of this city. . . . Parents, get your act together. You need to get hold of your kids before we have to.”
“We’re not running a babysitting service. Take care of your children—ALL of them.”
The last third of Nutter’s message is the most lively.
11 David Yeagley // Aug 11, 2011 at 10:30 pm
Jack Eisner, the Holocaust survivor I became personally acquainted with, described in his book The Survivor how that, when the Warsaw Jewish ghetto was formed, gangs multiplied. He was in one himself, while in his early teens and onward. It was about survival, they all said. I say it is also natural–particularly for young men.
12 Pamela K. // Aug 11, 2011 at 11:43 pm
Joe Clark is a real person.
The movie, “Lean On Me” is loosely based on this tough ex-Marine turned educator’s efforts to clean up drug-infested, crime-ridden Eastside High School in Patterson, New Jersey in the early 1980′s. And for the most part, he did make significant changes there.
Then President Ronald Reagan named Joe Clark a model educator and offered him a post in his administration as an education policy advisor. Clark, however, turned him down to remain principal at Eastside, where he stayed until 1990.
In 1995, he took another job as director of the Essex County Detention Center in his hometown of Newark, New Jersey working with teen-aged criminals from the inner-cities.
In his book, “Laying Down The Law” Clark shares his strategies and successes with his “pull yourself up by your own bootstraps” method of education with teachers and parents, but particularly with young people. His message is not only about striving to achieve the best education, but, more importantly, instilling a healthy sense of pride in yourself.
In his own words, the real Joe Clark once stated, “Every day, pride in self and school must be reinforced. Every day, the value of academics must be demonstrated.”
Joe Clark is considered controversial today because he is a black man who refused to be “victimized” or knuckle under to the liberal education system and play their game of exploiting black and other minority children for political and financial gains.
13 Paleocon // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:20 am
David, thanks for the link. Actually, the man in the video is THE David Duke.
14 Asaph // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:54 am
David, I’m wondering why you continue to listen to Hannity and Ingraham, et al, as they continue to get more and more establishment PC.
15 Asaph // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:30 am
Nutter’s message would show that the issue is not race at all.
“In other words, gang behavior has nothing to do with wealth, or poverty. And it has nothing to do with race. It is a mind set, a power grab, an instant thrill of lawlessness and raw aggression. It is addictive, and compulsive.”
That being the case why should news outlets mention the majority race of rioters?
16 Mario // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:43 am
Dr. Yeagley, your article is fresh air to the manure pile that the main stream media (MSM) has reported these riots/racial attacks. I have only seen two other online sources that mention the race of the attackers and that is Frontpagemag.com and Radiorodgers.com.
I no longer have the illusion that liberals are dangerous hypocrites to say the least. They cause the problems and then, as the cowards that they are, go and blame other people for the problems they created. To add insult to injury, they ask other people to pay (higher taxes or hidden taxes called fees).
I already have an idea what would happen if a white person defended himself especially with a firearm. That white person would have a background check that would make the CIA’s look childish. They will look at every website and magazine subscription to identify that white male as a KKK member or right wingnut.
Rememberthe white man, many years ago in the 80′s, by the name of Bernard Goetz who shot the black men in the subway in NYC? The MSM immediately change the story of a man defending himself from a group of black men that verbally threatened him with violence if Mr Goetz did not hand over his wallet. Instead Mr Goetz was portrayed as a vigilante and the NYC need to toughen gun control laws, provide jobs for black youth, and other liberal feel good talking points. No where did the MSM mentioned that there was at least 5 able body thugs against one middle age white guy. The race hustlers were quick to point out that the “victims” were black and that Mr Goetz was a danger to the public.
I would never go to live in an area where there are darkies (blacks/Hispanics/Arabs) who cause the neighborhood to be blighted. As a darkie myself, I already live in a neighborhood where it’s rough but not as violent as some other cities. I would break the law to protect myself (as carrying a concealed firearm) though the saying,” I’d rather be tried by twelve than carried by six”, no longer applies if the jury pool is made up of a bunch of liberals. You would be made to be the evil man in defending yourself at worst or be painted as a vigilante at best.
I just say Dr. Yeagley
17 Mario // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:51 am
PS- I meant to say on the second paragraph that ” I am under no illusion that liberals ARE NOT dangerous…”
Thank you for your I sight Dr. Yeagley.
18 Mario // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:54 am
Damn iPhone and it’s spell check
Thank you for your article and your insight Dr. Yeagley.
19 Pamela K. // Aug 12, 2011 at 8:18 am
Ann Coulter this morning On The 700 Club explaining Liberal-Instigated, Anti-Christian Mob Violence:
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2011/August/Ann-Coulter-Liberal-Mob-Endangering-America-/
20 zephyr // Aug 12, 2011 at 8:31 am
Nutter clearly chastises criminal black youth for being an insult to their race.
The issue may be violent behavior, but much of it IS predicated on race.
The cycle of violence and abuse in many black families creates intense anger and hatred among their offspring. Libs have convinced blacks that this anger should be “slavery” and race-based.
In reality, the anger and resentment exist due to abuse suffered at the hands of the mother and a cadre of (often pedophile) felon boyfriends who are equally abusive to the children.
The youth take their rage out on society in general, preferably white society, because that is what their community leaders, public school teachers, and, sadly, many churches teach them to do. Use of violence is reinforced at home on a daily basis.
21 David Yeagley // Aug 12, 2011 at 9:12 am
Thanks, Pam!
Ann really is a serious Christian. When I first met her, she expressed concerned for my faith. (I guess she assumed that, as an Indian, a heathen, I would need to be instructed!) May God bless her for that.
I’m sure she was absolutely delighted to be on CBN. First time!
22 Georgia // Aug 12, 2011 at 2:00 pm
Dr Yeagley, this is a very interesting glimpse into the war on culture in America (where liberals have pitted black against white) and the comments are enlightening as well.; However, and I do not want to make this about Coulter, but I don[t understand her brand of Christianity and her support of the same-sex agenda/war on traditional family in America. See WND article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=332441
23 Wyandotte // Aug 12, 2011 at 3:03 pm
This should strike you just right:
“Chief Seattle would be proud. The tribe he led in the late 1700s, the Suquamish, has made a giant leap toward equality by allowing and recognizing same-sex marriage. According to the Kitsap Sun,the Suquamish Tribal Council in Washington State voted Monday to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples on its reservation near Seattle, at the request of Heather Purser, a lesbian tribal member.”
Ever seen a photo of her? She’s about as Suquamish as I am.
http://www.datalounge.com/cgi-bin/iowa/ajax.html?t=10711108#page:showThread,10711108
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43996502/ns/us_news-life/t/indian-tribe-wash-approves-same-sex-marriage/
24 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 3:45 pm
We’re in the desperate racial crisis of today because, when strong white men spoke out against chaos in the past, they were chased off the stage of politics and the doors were shut to keep them out
Enoch Powell was a brilliant scholar of the Classics — a professor of Greek and Latin — and even a Brigadier General in the British military! A man of great accomplishments. He could easily have become Prime Minister, had he “played the game.” But he had the courage to tell the truth that multiculturalism can not work.
Powell on immigration: ‘until civil war comes’ (BRDCST 1977)
25 Georgia // Aug 12, 2011 at 4:12 pm
I think most Americans, who up until the last few years have been tolerant or of the “live and let live” mind are becoming increasingly disturbed by the disconnect between the negro culture in America and the white culture.
It’s been a dysfunctional relationship from the get-go..with a cycle of Victim-Rescue-Persecution.
I think young blacks are content to to partake in the mayhem, create what they percieve as fear in whites and generally “pay back” white society for their own failures.
And they didn’t get their free goodies from their messiah?
I know people who are other wise tolerant who are fed up.
When the government is forced to cut back on entitlements, we have had previews of what’s to come.
What I’m seeing on the news looks like something out of “Blackhawk Down”.
26 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 4:19 pm
Negroes will “rule” the USA about as well as Coleman Young “ruled” Detroit, or Marion Barry Washington D.C. They simply do not have it in them to govern. The Bible says that Negroes are not fit to rule. (Genesis 9:25)
27 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 4:37 pm
The last white man to speak out for his people was the late John Tyndall, who forebear, William, gave us the Tyndale Bible translation:
John Tyndall – Audio Speech, Part Two 4/4
28 Pamela K. // Aug 12, 2011 at 4:44 pm
When America goes belly up financially and there is no more money to supply beer and big screen televisions to those who have made careers for themselves collecting welfare and disability, will the Muslims move in with their vast sums of petro dollars to quell the ensuing nationwide riots?
As long as they can lay around on their lazy butts and watch dirty movies or frequent strip clubs and tattoo parlors, would the deadbeat “entitlement class” really care where the money to support their lifestyle is coming from? Scary thought.
29 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:08 pm
Pamela,
I think that the Islamists would not give their money “no strings attached.” If the Muslims did temporarily supply such money, they would require conversion to Islam before many days passed.
But you are on to something. The American currency will become worthless, just as once happened in Weimar Republic (Germany) — leading to Nazism. With worthless U.S. dollar bills, nations whose money has real value can buy up the country.
Ray Stevens – Obama Budget Plan
30 David Yeagley // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:10 pm
I still don’t understand the “value” of money. How is it determined? Why is some “valuable” and some not?
The rain, the crops, the harvests, the livestock, the minerals, those are the bases of value, no? How can the currency used to represent value, itself have or have not value?
31 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:27 pm
I’ve been told that the U.S. currency once was based on the “Gold Standard.” This meant that each printed dollar bill could be turned in for a certain amount of gold — based on a recognized and agreed upon international “worth.”
But in the last analysis, the value of money is purely arbitrary, as even those things deemed “precious” are deemed so for emotional, rather than objective, reasons.
Money is an agreed upon medium of exchange representing a value that is, ultimately, intangible!
32 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:30 pm
It has been theorized that those things — precious stones and metals — are counted as having worth because they appear to be imperishable and indestructible — and hence eternal and almost otherworldly.
33 Pamela K. // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:33 pm
I don’t understand the value of money, either.
If gold is worth $1800 an ounce but based on the dollar and US currency becomes worthless, how can gold still be considered a valuable asset?
34 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 5:35 pm
“How can the currency used to represent value, itself have or have not value?” — David Yeagley
My guess would be that it doesn’t have value in itself. Like an artistic masterpiece, it is granted value for psychological reasons. These are inherent in the human mind.
This is another — and in my view primary — reason for supporting nationalism. The value of works of art depend on the psychology of the peoples who are, or are not, inclined to treasure them.
35 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:09 pm
Here’s modern England (and eventally coming to an American city near you): anti-White and anti-Israel rioting:
So this is England!
36 David Yeagley // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:12 pm
I guess we’re all Negroes, in the end. Humanity is rising–like the flames of hellfire.
37 Pamela K. // Aug 12, 2011 at 6:38 pm
“Humanity is rising-like the flames of hellfire.”
It does seem like things are moving along rapidly towards some drastic conclusion in this world.
I think this is where our faith has to kick in, that regardless of the circumstances surrounding us, we have to remember to keep our focus on Jesus. We also should bear in mind that our Lord said His coming will be like a thief in the night, totally unexpected. However, unlike a thief breaking in to steal worldly possessions belonging to someone else, Jesus is only going to take what belongs to Him.
38 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 7:38 pm
A white British man speaks his true mind about Islam and Negroes. Millions of Whites feel this same way, but you’d never hear this spoken on television. (Humorously, he states that more languages are spoken in London than were spoken at the Tower of Babel):
Wake Up Britain
39 Thrasymachus // Aug 12, 2011 at 8:20 pm
Then, of course, there is the phenomenon of the Black Muslim.
No, a policy of multiculturalism will not create a safe world for Jews or anybody else.
In past times, white Christians have been led by ungodly and wicked men, all this to the hurt of Jews and Whites alike. There are still such would-be leaders. Religious insanity is part of what’s wrong with human nature.
There are effective ways of countering religious fanaticism. Importing Islam into the West is NOT one of them. Giving political power to Blacks is good for nobody — not even for Blacks. We must look at the world — i.e., human nature — as it is, not as we would like it to be. It is madness to act as if some ideal (thought up in some ivory tower) were the reality, when one can plainly see that the truth is otherwise.
40 annefromflyovercountry // Aug 13, 2011 at 12:17 pm
I like Anne Coulter, but in fact, there really was a loose confederation of states, and THAT, not what we have now (very obviously) was there to stop the mob, not to mention the gross snatching of liberties by various big money factions.
Northeast people are largely unaware of it, but even in relatively recent history of the 60s, MOST Americans were taught state songs, birds, flowers, flags, etc. We learned more state songs, for example, than those which were “national” (having to do with the land space as a whole). The states were like countries, and many still even have that sensibility.
The Northeast were always Central Planners, the way we have a Centrally planned economy now, of their devising. It’s obviously not “liberal,” but both the ‘right’ and ‘left’ are invested in Money collection from the people, and many catholic christians tend to model this after the Vatican (despite the protestant founders –catholics were not involved— often finding great distaste in this). This goes right over their heads.
To the catholics faction (the Orthodox is less involved in U.S., more obviously in eastern europe), the protestants are nothing more than ‘heretics.” They aren’t even really thought to have a “religion.” This is always greatly glossed over.
But in the white sub-groups, these federalist/vatican/ one-worlder factions are actually at odds with the founding populations in a great degree.
Nor do the Northern Europeans (the real founders of the u.s., strictly protestants)— have any real interest in muslims. The “crusades” and those “heroic” tales belong to the catholics. Hadrians wall meant Rome never touched the scotch-irish/ ulster-scots who made up half the american revolutionary army.
As always, as a white person, it’s annoying to have the small hegemonic hold of the Northeast completely misconstruing how so many white americans think and feel. I’ve never met anyone who shares miss coulter’s views in much of what she says, in regards to what she thinks the “right wing” IS.
41 annefromflyovercountry // Aug 13, 2011 at 12:33 pm
@ georgia “…but I don[t understand her brand of Christianity and her support of the same-sex agenda/war on traditional family in America…”
you are not alone. There is really a divide in the various white sub-groups that is rarely discussed for many reasons, especially on quasi-religious lines (prod, jew, catholic). These each have real logical conclusions for how the different groups see government.
The most generational protestants are very like their churches: de-centralized, elected people, not appointments, freedom of choice, your salvation often chosen, no power-heirarchy, keep it small and grow it local. no ornamentation in the churches, humility, no show, violence in defense only, etc., the people do no confessions (no reportage to power), no vicars, no secrecy.
the catholics are told they have the only true god (the founders are “heretics.”) this is associated with ‘crusades’ (slaughters of them). It’s heirarchical, big and showy like a cathedral, appointed not elected, emphasis on self-reports (confession) to PTB, secrecy of preisthood, etc.
jews are chosen to rule, in their own estimation and teaching.
it’s really 3 very different headsets, imo. One leads to “central planning styel communism” logically (jews, centrally bossing the masses); Or fascism, proper (which is very catholic)—very corporatist, top-down, heirarchical.
jews and catholics, in the white sub-groups have gotten much power since alliances in 60s— but now see to be breaking up. They have coralled the money in debt, now it’s about who gets to spend and allocate it. the “americans” are the ones who had their money lifted, in a sense, imo.
42 Mjazz // Aug 13, 2011 at 1:12 pm
In Matthew 24:7, speaking about the End Times, Christ says “For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.” The Greek word for nation is ethnos, which is where we get the word ethnic from.
43 Mjazz // Aug 13, 2011 at 1:20 pm
Maybe I cut that a little short. In other words, Christ was also speaking of a lot of the clashes along ethnic lines that we see today, as well as the countries that are warring.
44 Pamela K. // Aug 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm
In the book, ” The Vatican Empire” written in 1968, author Nino Lo Bello states, “While the Vatican has remained secretive about its fiscal policy, it has never believed that the investment of Church money was either illegal, objectionable in principle, or contrary to good conscience. In seeking to resolve the conflict between that which is to be rendered to God and that which is to be rendered to Caesar, the Vatican has developed its own special modus vivendi between the sacred and the secular. The view of the pope as a kind of chairman of the board may shock some readers. But let us remember that the Vatican is a remarkable, centuries-old institution, and that, when it comes to money, it is one that is fully in tune with the spirit of the times.”
Bello, also wrote:
“This writer foresees the day, perhaps a thousand years from now, when the Vatican will cease functioning as a religious institution and take up, on a full-time basis, the duties of a large-scale business corporation. The transition will not be as difficult to effectuate as one might suspect. For just as Catholicism will decline and eventually withdraw from the ranks of the major religions, so, too, will Church money find its way into nearly every area of the free world’s economy. Then, at last, the tycoon on the Tiber will shed the mantle of piety; then, at last, the Vatican will expose the full extent of its financial interests” (Nino Lo Bello, The Vatican Empire, p. 185-186).
In his review of the book, Hutton Gibson, father of actor Mel Gibson, had this to say,
“Is it not indeed impossible that a group in pursuit of a New World Order through control of global finance could succeed without control of the colossal Vatican Empire? Is it not indeed impossible that such a group would not draw and act upon this conclusion?”
45 Thrasymachus // Aug 13, 2011 at 3:40 pm
In his review of the book, Hutton Gibson, father of actor Mel Gibson, had this to say,
“Is it not indeed impossible that a group in pursuit of a New World Order through control of global finance could succeed without control of the colossal Vatican Empire? Is it not indeed impossible that such a group would not draw and act upon this conclusion?”
———————————————–
Interesting stuff!
“No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.” — Matthew 6:24
46 Thrasymachus // Aug 13, 2011 at 4:50 pm
How we all got to this point:
The deliberate Dismantling of Decency Morality and Respect
47 Mjazz // Aug 14, 2011 at 2:32 am
This is kind of interesting. After reading what David said about “How can the currency used to represent value, itself have or have not value?”, someone on Christian radio said something about the Federal Reserve and a book by G.W. Griffith, called, The Creature From Jekyll Island.
I found a talk by Mr. Griffith. About a third of the way down, one phrase in the article ties in with David’s question: The postal worker gets a check for $100 and he looks at this thing and he can’t imagine in his wildest dreams that that money didn’t exist two days ago anywhere in the universe. It’s spendable so he wouldn’t even care if you told him.
This statement at the end of the article sounds eery: Just waste, get rid of money, get rid of productive power to reduce our standard of living. A strong nation is not a candidate to surrender its sovereignty but a weak nation is. If America can be brought to her knees where she is struggling for survival, if people are hungry, if we have riots in our streets, then Americans could possibly be grateful for any assistance we could get from the UN.
48 David Yeagley // Aug 14, 2011 at 11:39 am
I think the basic observation to make here is that man’s inhumanity to man is the prevalent preoccupation at this time–at least in the media. It appears true in finance and politics as well.
Massive wealth among a very few; extreme poverty among masses; and the whole trend toward evening things out, a bit. That’s where we are.
What is the connect between the wealth of the wealthy, and the poverty of the poor? Are they at all related? I’m afraid, to some extent, and at the risk of sounding Communistic, the answer is YES, they are related.
But, I don’t think in the ways that we normally think of. There is definitely oppression in terms of wages. That’s the word of James 5:4, and many other texts. But does this justify unions? Violence?
Does this justify governmental coercion?
You must log in to post a comment.