BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Jews and White Supremacists

by David Yeagley · June 3, 2011 · 23 Comments ·

Are Jews and White Supremacists competitors? Are they quite similar in values, goals, and outcomes? Jews are certainly a very tiny minority in comparison to the numbers of white European and American Christians. In such an quantitative imbalance, how could the Jews be considered so threatening to White Supremacists?

The Christian religion. The Christian religion gives the Jews an advantage. Christianity is based on the Bible, on precisely the same moral, social values found in Torah, the Jewish sacred scriptures (i.e., the “Old Testament”). If there is an element in Western white Christian civilization that makes it ‘vulnerable’ to Jewish ambitions or aggressions (whatever those are), it is the Christian religion. It is the fact that the Jews can hold the white conscience to the fire–based on a standard the Jews have held for millennia. If Christians, individually or corporately, nationally or continentally, transgress the values on which white Christian civilization is based, the Jews have the most powerful weapon of all with which to combat such deviance: the Bible.

But, Jewish influence in the West, as we know it today, is not so obviously, nominally Biblical. Yet, “Liberalism” is the social, coercive dictation of the very heart of Christian values: love thy neighbor as thyself. (The difference is, precisely, coercion. Liberals coerce. True Christianity is wholly voluntary.) Liberalism professes to be about equality, compassion, caring, and saving others. This is Christianity. (By the way, it is also the heart of Biblical Judaism. “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,” Leviticus 19:18.)

If, however, private property, or “ownership” is the supposed basis of capitalism, then liberal “Communist” Jews need to take another look at at the 10th Commandment: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house…” Exodus 20:17. Ownership, human ownership, is of divine origin. A man can own things.

And, remember, Jews are white. Jews are part of the white race. That is perhaps an insufferable fact in the eyes of white supremists. But it is terribly important to point out here that not all people who love and honor the white race are anti-Semitic. Not all who wish to preserve the white race and its achievements are averse to Jewish people.

It has been my personal experience to have made statements that attract white supremisists, who later find out that I have a natural love for Jewish people. An American Indian who respects the white race is novelty enough; an Indian who loves the Jews is impossible.
So, I tend to get it from all directions. There is definitely a communication problem.


Filip Dewinter, Vlaam Belang Parlement.

I can say “American Indian,” and everyone knows I stand for the preservation of Indian people. All Indians do. But, if a white person wants to preserve the the white nations, he has a name problem. What do you call him? You can’t just say, “white person.” That doesn’t imply his social, political, or ethnic preference. There are white people who don’t seem to care at all about white people; there are white people who want to denigrate the white race; there are white people who disdain or “hate” all non-white peoples; there are white people who prefer the white race, who wish to love, honor, and respect it, naturally. Most discussions to not clearly distinguish between these four categories of white thinking.

Early this year, I spoke to the American Renaissance, in Charlotte, North Carolina. (There were two Jewish speakers on the program.) The special guest was Filip Dewinter, member of the Vlaam Belang Parlement (Belgium). This is the white preservationist wing of the Belgian parliament. (Vlaam Belang is Dutch for “Flemish Interests.” Mr. Dewinter interviewed me during the conference (February, 2011). Just now, that interview was published in the monthly Vlaam Belang magazine. (Press the “translate” button for English. Some facts about my accomplishments and ideas are lost in the Flemish translation, it seems. But not to worry. Message is clear enough. I have in hand the written written translation of Mr. Dewinters, and I will post it here, as I have time.) The Vlaam Belang interview is an international example of how nationalists and ethnic preservationists understand and identify with each other.

The surge of BadEagle.com traffic I noted has recently included not only the Vlaam Belang interview, but also this curious note in Cross-Currents, a conservative Jewish political web site: “Supporting Those Who Love Us Least,” by Yaakov Menken.

Conservative Americans love Israel — and are even philo-Semitic — to a surprising extent. The examples are legion; what struck me today was discovering that David Yeagley, a Comanche Indian and creator of “the sole voice of conservative thought among American Indian intellectuals” is also “a friend of Israel” with a “deep love for Jewish people.” Many defenders of Israel have said that Israel giving land “back” to the Palestinian Arabs makes about as much sense as the United States giving land back to the American Indian/Native American tribes; he offers a unique rejection of any parallel between Palestinians and American Indians that only an American Indian could write.

Whatever may have been true 50 years ago, today it is clear that in almost every area of uniquely Jewish interest, conservatives are far more likely to favor that interest than are liberals. This has given rise to another uniquely American phenomenon: a Jewish community which steadfastly supports those candidates least supportive of Israel and Jewish interests.

Menken takes the liberal Jewish community harshly to task for its anti-Zionist national interests, as well as its pernicious positions against the interests of Jewish people in general.


Rabbi Yaakov Menken

So, in a matter of a few days, my positions on ethnicity and nationhood have been reference by both Jewish and White nationalists. I find this reassuring.

I consider liberalism an outgrowth of Jewish survival techniques, as the Jewish communities of the diaspora faced their various cultural challenges. To fight for the rights of all races, religions, and minorities seemed to insure the survival of their own. But, indeed, these techniques have become social norms and laws, particularly in places like the United States. The obvious liability is that what begins as inimical, hostile minority races and religions can easily become gigantic national threats, as in the case of Muslims in Belgium, for instance. For this very threat, Vlaam Belang advocates the independence of the Flemish state!

Could Jewish people survive without the state of Israel? They obviously have, nearly two millennia. Israel doesn’t exactly represent a survival technique for the diaspora. So why does Israel exist? That is the question, and not, Does Israel have a right to exist? It is for Jewish people, obviously. Should all Jews live there?

If they should, then the same must be said of every other sector of ethnicities living outside their homeland. Those who believe in equality would have to support the deportation of millions the world over, if they advocate all Jews should live in Israel.

Finally, I say Jews and White Supremacists are much more alike than either is willing to recognize. This observation doesn’t offer any particular solution at the moment, but, perhaps it suggest some new lines of thought.

Posted by David Yeagley · June 3, 2011 · 2:24 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Indians · American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Christianity · Communism · Conservatism · Israel · Jews · Liberalism · Politics · Race · Religion · Western Europe · White Race




Read More Journal Posts »

23 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 2:54 pm   

    My opinions!

    “Should all Jews live in Israel?”

    Yes.

    “Should other peoples return to their homelands?”

    Yes, when these are known.

    The parallel is somewhat like Catholics and Baptists Many, on the basis of outward ritual, have assumed these to be the most opposite among Christian churches. However, on the doctrines concerning the Person of Jesus Christ, they are very close — perhaps identical.

    Jews discourage intermarriage between themselves and Gentiles. White nationalists discourage intermarriage between Whites and other races. Many Jews insist that Jews are NOT white, and many white nationalists are all too happy to agree.

    What is the solution? Recognition of these facts: The Jews will not survive if the White Race goes under — extinct. Like it or not, they are a part of it and its civilization, and if that civilization is ruined, the non-white world will not be favorable to Jews and Israel. If the Jews assist in the downfall of the West, they will be sawing off the very branch they are sitting on. Outside Israel, the intermarriage rate for Jews is over 70%!

  • 2 H2 // Jun 3, 2011 at 3:20 pm   

    Sir,

    “And, remember, Jews are white. Jews are part of the white race. That is perhaps an insufferable fact in the eyes of white supremists.” This is not correct. Jews are from the Middle East and are the brothers of Arabs -same father according to the Bible and Koran. There are physical differences that are obvious between Europeans and Jews. Jews are more genetically related to Arabs than they are to Europeans. So, when you define Jews as “white,” you imply that Jews are European in appearance when in fact, Jews are more Arab in appearance. Arabs are included in the US Census as White -an issue with the Arab community in America.

    -H2

  • 3 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 3:23 pm   

    Historically, the intermarriage rate between Jews and Gentiles in Europe was not so great because the Jews were not emancipated. However, since the Emancipation of the Jews, the miscegenation rate has been steadily climbing.

    Frankly, the Jewish Scriptures were co-creators or co-founders of Western Civilization! For Jews to undermine this civilization is to bring ruin on themselves.

    Like it or not, it is unlikely that the only descendants left to Abraham and Sarah in the modern world are some 16 to 20 million Jews. Jews represent Judah, not all Israel. This is, at least, what I believe.

  • 4 Pamela K. // Jun 3, 2011 at 3:58 pm   

    “And, remember, Jews are white. Jews are part of the white race. That is perhaps an insufferable fact in the eyes of white supremists.”- Dr, David Yeagley

    Not all Jews are white people. There is a book that can be found in most Judaic libraries about Chinese Jews from Kaifeng whose ancestors had come to China many generations earlier.
    These Jews arrived in China as silk merchants and populated cities along the famous Silk Route.
    The Book of Isaiah refers to these Jews in Chapter 49:12, “Surely these shall come from afar; look! Those from the north and the west, and these from the land of Sinim.” The word, “Sinim” according to the author of this book, in Hebrew means, “China”.
    Messianic Bible teacher, Sid Roth traveled to Kaifeng, China with a missionary team several years ago and met a Chinese Jew who took him to his family cemetery to show him twelve generations of his Jewish ancestors. Another Chinese Jew he met told him, “I am a Jew. I told my son he is a Jew, and he must live in Israel.” Since Roth’s visit that same man and many other Chinese Jews have immigrated to Israel.
    Then there are the ebony-skinned Falasha Jews of Ethiopia, the descendants of King Melenik I, the son of Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. They too, have made pilgrimages from Africa to live in Israel in recent years.

  • 5 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 4:40 pm   

    Yes, yes, there are “white” Jews and “black” Jews and “Asian” Jews!

    I’ve known about this Sid Roth (and other Messianic Jews) for decades.

    Just the fact that a person has a few Jewish ancestors does not make him or her a “Jew.” If so, then Elvis Presley and David Duke are also Jews.

    Roth is a liberal Jew — liberal in the sense of “race-denying.”

    These illicit ancient lineages, the results of fornication and forbidden marriages, do not necessarily count in the Biblical definition of a Jew.

  • 6 David Yeagley // Jun 3, 2011 at 5:06 pm   

    “Semitic” or “Semite” comes from the name of Shem, one of Noah’s three sons who lived through the Flood. The descendents of Shem are listed: Genesis 10: 21-31.

    If we’re going by the tradition division of the human species into thre groups, Caucasid, Negroid, and Mongoloid, that would be Shem (Caucasion), Ham (Negroe), and Japeth (Mongolian). That’s the traditional division.

    Certainly, Jews (Semites) are of a different branch of the Caucasoids than the Europeans.

  • 7 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 5:12 pm   

    Exactly right (post #6)!

    God, according to Jewish and Christian scholars alike, created the races in the wombs of the wives of Noah’s three sons. Even on A&E television, the Jewish Bible scholars gave this same testimony. I remember watching the episode about Noah and the Ark and learning, much to my surprise, that the religious Jews themselves held the very same beliefs as the traditional Christians about the origin of the races.

  • 8 Pamela K. // Jun 3, 2011 at 5:30 pm   

    The Word of God says,
    “But he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and true circumcision is of the heart, a spiritual and not a literal manner. His praise is not from men but from God.” Romans 2:29
    In other words, a true Jew walks in conformity to the will of God and is motivated by the Spirit of God. In turn, the Lord praises those whom have entered into and are walking in His Spirit, and honors His people, both Jews and Gentile alike who keep faithful to the covenant made with Abraham.
    What liberal Jews and white supremacists have in common is that they operate under a spirit of carnality or worldly mindset. They are looking at and judging the outward appearance of man. God, on the other hand, examines the color and condition of the heart of man.
    Those who operate under a spirit of carnality cannot discern spiritual things They might read the Bible and think they understand what is being said about Israel and the Jews and Christians and God’s divine plan, however, without the leading of the Holy Spirit, there an be no revelation of truth.

    The Word of God clearly states,

    “For what a person percieves, what passes through a man’s thoughts except man’s own spirit within him? Just so, no one discerns the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.
    Now we have not received the spirit that belongs to the world, but the Holy Spirit Who is from God, given to us that we might realize and comprehend and appreciate the gifts of divine favor and blessing so freely and lavishly bestowed on us by God. We are setting these truths forth in words, not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Holy Spirit, combining and interpreting spiritual truths with spiritual language to those who possess the Holy Spirit.” 1Corinthians 2:11, 12, 13

  • 9 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 5:55 pm   

    There is nothing wrong with appreciating the artistic creative work of God in the diversity of human beauty.

    Take living in China, for example. No matter how cute or beautiful the Chinese look may be, you will see only an endless population of Chinese there. Same thing in India — billions of dark-skinned Hindus.

    Now God created many beautiful colors of eyes and astonishing shades of color and texture in hair, as well as remarkable skin tones.

    I’m sorry, Pamela, but I also look on the outward side. I’m not God — I cannot see the inside of another human being — his “heart.” I cannot see the thoughts. I can see red hair, auburn hair, golden hair, all shades of brown hair, and black hair. I can see hair that is white but not from age. I can see green eyes, blue eyes, hazel eyes, etc.

    Frankly, I don’t really care exactly how God looks at his creation, since I am not personally omniscient. I delight in the subtle beauties of race and ethnicity, much the way a painter would who specializes in painting portraits.

    Yes, it is true that we do need to take a person’s character very seriously and not ignore the facts concerning it. But that has to do with the ethical side of life. When we are looking at the aesthetic side, we must also look for grace and beauty of character — and physical beauty. Sorry, but I refuse to throw away any part of God’s human creation in the name of “spirituality.”

  • 10 David Yeagley // Jun 3, 2011 at 5:55 pm   

    Well, I think the Lord has a hand in earthly affairs. The Bible says He rules the nations (the “ethnicities” in Greek). It can’t be a total waste of thought to try and understand the relationships of the nations. Maybe there can be some benefit or improvement. Not to in any way contradict what you just wrote, Pam.

    Ethnicities do exist, and will for eternity, apparently. Their arrangements and relations will certainly be under a different management then! Maybe nothing of significant good results from trying to suggest that kind of management here and now. I don’t know. Seems like it would, or might.

  • 11 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 6:33 pm   

    People naturally resent and oppose being ruled over by other races and nations.

    The American Indian refused, and rightly so, to allow the Whites to enslave him.

    Do we want Islam to enslave the West?

    Do we really want China to take over Washington, D.C.? To we Americans even want China to take over Taiwan? Were the people of Hong Kong better off under British rule or under Mainland China rule?

    Remember, God supernaturally changed the grandchildren of Noah, according to the traditional teaching, into the three dominant races. If God did this AFTER the Great Flood, it must have been done for some reason!

    We humans are not only spiritual beings. We also need food, clothing, shelter, and many things to sustain physical life. Race and ethnicity are part of that arrangement — part of the physical order of things in the world of nature. We should not despise the Natural Order as created by the Lord.

  • 12 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 6:42 pm   

    Was Martin Luther King Jr. a Christian?

    Paul Cohen writes:

    “In King’s writings you gave me to peruse, I find selections where he flatly denies the deity of Christ, His virgin birth, and His resurrection. Let’s look at one section (emphasis mine):

    “The last doctrine in our discussion deals with the resurrection story. This doctrine, upon which the Easter Faith rests, symbolizes the ultimate Christian conviction: that Christ conquered death. From a literary, historical, and philosophical point of view this doctrine raises many questions. In fact the external evidence for the authenticity of this doctrine is found wanting. But here again the external evidence is not the most important thing, for it in itself fails to tell us precisely the thing we most want to know: What experiences of early Christians lead to the formulation of the doctrine?

    The root of our inquiry is found in the fact that the early Christians had lived with Jesus. They had been captivated by the magnetic power of his personality. This basic experience led to the faith that he could never die. And so in the pre-scientific thought pattern of the first century, this inner faith took outward form.” ”

    Martin Luther King, Jr.– “Christian” Atheist
    Using Christ as a Lever to Move the World

  • 13 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 6:48 pm   

    Cohen further writes:

    And here’s what Paul said about what denying the resurrection means:

    “And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins!” (1 Corinthians 15:17 EMTV)

    And that’s exactly what I have said about King’s faith – it is worthless, nonexistent! To him Christ is not God, or the Son of God by miraculous birth, and has no power over death by His resurrection. That makes King a “Christian” atheist. He was still in his sins.

    “King’s preaching centered on his [i.e., Kings' own] moral ideals. Jesus Christ is not a moral idealist with a social agenda. He came to fulfill the Law, and now He requires that of us – to walk with God by His grace. He didn’t come to teach us how to exert moral ideals to get what we wanted from others, gathering en masse and demanding compliance through passive resistance. Show us in Scripture where He or any Hebrew prophet ever did such a thing. They never did; they spoke the truth and taught all men (the rulers and the ruled) to love their neighbors, not to organize themselves into divisive coercive forces in order to bend the will of others.”

  • 14 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 6:53 pm   

    Another quote from Paul Cohen:

    “King was a politician who used the pulpit to gather the masses to effect social change. That was his stated strategy and goal. It wasn’t a matter of faith to him, but of emotionally appealing to the senses of dissatisfaction, injustice, entitlement, and heroic camaraderie, by which he and his followers would bring the Kingdom of God (as they presumed it to be) to earth through human willpower and action.

    That wasn’t the Kingdom of God, however. Jesus said the Kingdom of God comes without observation, because it is within. King replied (by his actions), “Phooey on that hooey, let’s get ours now; you come and follow me, and we can make it happen.” ”

    If Dr. King’s “gospel” wasn’t the Christian gospel, whence came it? There will be no perfect ‘racial harmony’ until Jesus Christ returns and sets up His Kingdom, according to His rules. — Θρασύμαχος

  • 15 Pamela K. // Jun 3, 2011 at 7:03 pm   

    The Lord certainly does have a hand in earthly affairs. Judgment of the nations of the world will be metered out according to their treatment of God’s people and His heritage Israel.

    “Ho! Escape to Zion, you who dwell with the daughter of Babylon! For thus said the Lord of hosts, he who touches you (Israel) touches the apple of My eye.” Zechariah 2:7-8

    Who dwells with the ‘daughter of Babylon’? The Arabs. Their religion, Islam, is a rehash of the worship of Sin, the moon god of ancient Babylon. The Arab Muslim nations are all daughters of Babylon. At the present time, Israel is surrounded by hostile Arab Muslims-Hamas on the southern border, Hezbollah on the north, Fatah and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. Who is supporting the Arab cause against Israel? Barack Obama.
    When the UN reconvenes in September, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is going to use the newly passed UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People to lay claim to the Old City of Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian State. This is the very reason why Obama signed the declaration in the first place.
    His decision has brought America under the wrath and judgment of God. Our arrogant and ignorant leader has not only touched the apple of God’s eye, but in supporting a Palestinian state has aligned himself with the enemies of God Himself
    Furthermore, if Obama thinks the recent violent weather outbreaks in Alabama, Missouri, and now Massachusetts were bad, he ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

  • 16 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 7:11 pm   

    “The Lord certainly does have a hand in earthly affairs. Judgment of the nations of the world will be metered out according to their treatment of God’s people and His heritage Israel.” — Pamela K

    Well, then the Netherlands will be most blessed! No where on Earth have the Jews been better treated than in the Netherlands. The Jews were cast out of every nation of Europe — except the Netherlands, that is.

  • 17 Thrasymachus // Jun 3, 2011 at 8:28 pm   

    In my opinion, Man’s physical nature has some meaning in the sight of God. After all, God found it needful to manifest Himself in human flesh. The work of Jesus Christ was accomplished in this manner:

    “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” — John 1:14

    “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.” — 1 Timothy 3:16

    My point is that if God cared nothing for the physical — the fleshly portion — of His human creation, He certainly took surprising steps involving it in the Person of our Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus did not simply accomplish his Great and Holy Purpose while remaining in the spirit world.

    To suggest that all concern for the human body is “carnal,” in a pejorative sense, does not make sense in light of the Creation of Man and the later manifestation of God in human flesh.

    I do not think that the human body is evil or that God will fail to restore it to future glory and perfection.

    Thus the concern for the physical as manifest in race is not necessarily sinful or even “carnal.”

  • 18 Pamela K. // Jun 3, 2011 at 10:20 pm   

    “Thus the concern for the physical as manifest in race is not necessarily sinful or even “carnal”-
    Thrasymachus
    God created man in His own likeness and image. The human body is one of God’s most unique and beautiful creations. I definitely believe our bodies have an importance to God and as our bodies house God’s own spirit, it is important to take care of ourselves. But appreciation of the human body is not what I am talking about here.
    White supremacists and Liberal Jews define themselves by their labels. They are carnal, not spiritual, in their outlook on life. They thrive on being merely human. They cannot see beyond the things of this life: personal success, pleasure, wealth, and promoting their extreme viewpoints. Most white supremacist do not have any sense of “appreciating the artistic creative work of God in the diversity of human beauty.” To them, “White is Right”. They are no better than the Black Panthers whose primary goal is “to get Whitey”. And while it is a rare liberal Jew who would side with an Aryan/White Supremacy group, many have taken up the cause of the Panthers and the Black Liberation Movement while denouncing the white supremacists as hate-filled racists. That’s like the pot calling the kettle black, is it not?

  • 19 Edwin M. Wright // Jun 4, 2011 at 3:52 am   

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mInOzKRZE5g&feature=related

  • 20 WHEELER // Jun 4, 2011 at 11:46 am   

    Dr. Yeagley writes:


    And, remember, Jews are white. Jews are part of the white race.”

    That is not right. Language has got to be precise. “White” is not a race, nor is it an ethnicity. The term “White” is a slang term, non-scientific. I do not use the term “white” nor should any Christian because God did not create that way. God created by Language the ethnicities, the races. The taxonomy of race follows language. It was popular opinion that started to use color as a way of defining race.

    That should be rejected! I use the term Europeans, or Indo-European. Europeans are of the House of Japeth. Jews are of the House of Shem! Jews are an Eastern Race, Oriental, not Western, nor European. If “white” means European, then Jews are NOT European. That is a grand mistake! The thinking patterns of Jews/Asians is far different from European/Western thought patterns.

    It is harmful to think that Jews are a part of Europe. They are Visitors, Wanderers. Not European.

    A lot of people forget that the first thought of the Jews is “Is it good for the Jews?” That is opposite of European thought. And what Jews want is at cross purposes to Christianity and to the survival of Europeans.

    Jews are NOT and Cannot and should NOT be considered part of the “White Race” and the term “white race” and “white supremacy” need to be dropped! Every person needs to revert to his Old nationality. We are to preserve the Order of God.

  • 21 Thrasymachus // Jun 4, 2011 at 11:48 am   

    Well, the good thing, Pamela, is that you and I have at long last reached a clearer understanding of each other’s position.

    I strongly view Life in terms of art and the aesthetic view (I’m a FourFOUR on the Enneagram personality scale) .

    I view the human races as works of art and God as the Supreme Artist. It is essentially for aesthetic purposes that I wish to preserve all races. Also I think that it’s wrong for one race to rule over and have dominion over another.

    So my second objection to Dr. King’s philosophy is that in bringing people together without Christ’s reign puts them into bondage, not freedom. (My first objection is that forced integration is a denial of race — a kind of racial nihilism — that leads to the destruction of unique races that God took the trouble of creating as He saw fit.)

  • 22 David Yeagley // Jun 4, 2011 at 10:03 pm   

    Wheeler, maybe you missed post #6. I clarified the language by using the word “Caucasian.” That’s what I myself was talking about, anyway. Japeth is associated with the East, the Oriental (the Mogoloid). Even someone like J. Philippe Rushton still uses the three classifications, though he uses “white,” “black,” and “Asian.”

    You are speaking of geographical locale when you say Jews are not white. Racially, they are.
    However, if your point is that they are not European in origin, I would certainly agree with that.

    But, there were Jewish communities in Cologne by 300 AD. How long does it take to be considered a “native.”?

    I admit, most Indians consider the White Man here in America to be an alien, still.

  • 23 WHEELER // Jun 5, 2011 at 11:45 am   

    The Etruscans are only one part that makes up Ancient Rome. Ancient Rome was settled by three different tribes inhabiting the separate hills on the crook of the Tiber river. Latins, Sabines and Etruscans. Even though the Etruscans inhabited the area and influenced Rome, they are not European!

    Basques are another non-European people yet inhabit Northern Spain.

    Just because Jews moved into parts of Europe, does not make them Europeans. They are Semites.

    The “White Man” which was created by both Indians and Europeans to differentiate themselves, is European. Europeans took over the Northern part of this continent.

    I even heard the other day some one using the term “American” as a nationality. How absurd.

You must log in to post a comment.