David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
by David Yeagley"/>
MALKIN-BRUCE: Michelle Malkin has appealed to the public in an effort to find her missing cousin, Marizela Perez. She has posted on the family crisis since March 7. Marizela was first reported missing March 5. Anyone who loves his family knows something of this dreadful experience. However, the when Tammy Bruce (substituting for Laura Ingraham) tried to make it a national crisis, and a conservative cause, she weakened the urgency and insulted the cause altogether. Political conservatism has nothing to do with personal family crises of this nature. And personal family crises, however piquant, are not national crises. They may be national news, but Michelle Malkin is only a commentator, not a political office holder. Nothing of national policy or political import hinges on her daily columns. (Or are we mistaken on that? Just how important are conservative commentators?)
Tammy Bruce was essentially inappropriate in identifying a missing cousin as some national conservative cause, just because Michelle Malkin has to be conservative. This was very low-level rallying, and denigrating to Marizela. Marizela is precious because she is a human being, not because she is the cousin of a popular conservative talking head.
INGRAHAM: True to form, that is, the form that all conservative talking heads take, Laura Ingraham recently dissed American Indians. This is the usual take. This time, it was the opportunity afforded by the National Public Radio funding issue. It is an offense to conservatives, at least theoretically, according to Ingraham, that rural populations, including Indian reservations, should have voice provided by NPR. They have no other serious media voice, of course. And Indians are certainly, most positively, not going to get any voice in conservative media. (I’ll vouch for that one!) So, according to Ingraham, better that Indians have no voice at all. They have nothing to say anyway, and they have no problems–none that concern anyone else. So, just forget Indians.
Laura Ingraham, professional entertainer/conservative
But, Ingraham overreached in her dramatizations.
We have to trot out the Indians and the poor people in what most of the elites think is backwater USA. That’s what the elites think–it’s redneck country. And they think all the rednecks are listening to NPR.
Rednecks are “understood” to be the racists among the conservatives. Why would NPR want to give them a voice? Sounds like to me Ingraham sees Indians as “backwater USA” herself. Fine. Be it known.
IRAN: Major protests in Iran today. But, don’t worry. Don’t think it is a positive thing. Typically, the revolts, unrest, uprisings and protests in the Middle East have nothing to do with freedom, democracy, or good will. It’s Shiites against Sunnis; the poor against the irrationally rich dictators; the Muslims Brotherhood against all other Muslims. I have been told by insider Iranians that the mullahs in Tehran have about 1.5 million people for hire in the streets. They can stage any kind of pro-government protest whenever they desire. Today’s protest is about Muslim denominational disputes. Who cares?
NORTH AFRICA: Bloomberg reports a “Biblical Exodus” of Muslims from North Africa to Europe. Of course, the Negroid Arabs are not wanted in Europe, not because of their race, or even their religion (though either would be sufficient cause for rejecting them), but because of the economic burden they pose. Europe is already over-populated by foreigners from the wondrous Third World. These masses of people bring only the horrors of poverty and deprivation, expense and disease, and all else that derives from depraved morality.
Marine La Pen, Anti-Immigration
National Front, France.
Regarding the latest wave of North African trespassers, a French patriot (Marine La Pen) declared:
“They cannot be allowed on the shore,” Marine Le Pen, the 42-year-old leader of France’s anti-immigration National Front, said in a March 15 interview in Rome after a three-hour visit the previous day to Lampedusa. “Send boats out to feed them. But they must not set foot on land.”
Now there’s an interesting stance to take. But then, why take food out to them? That’s an expense, too. Why should anyone feed Muslims? Consider the wealth of their dictatorial oligarchies. It is foolishness to feed Muslims. They are no one’s responsibility but their own governments’. But the maniacal Muslims want their people spread out all over the world. It is their purpose. Civil war, voluntary immigration, whatever. The point is to colonize, and to bring satanic oppression on all. I say, let them starve, if their own will not care for them, being so well able to. Call it “suicide starvation,” after the order of suicide bombing. Every true Muslim will concede.
These are the necessities of nationalism, not personal morality or spirituality. Free nations, if to survive, must resist every lying Muslim ploy. Blessings on Marine La Pen. Nous réjouissons dans votre disposition.
13 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Mar 18, 2011 at 11:03 am
BadEagle.com has a complex FORUMS page, where innumerable topics and issues are addressed. However, the Bad Eagle Forums are currently on the often dysfunctional IKONBOARD software, which is passing out. We hope to change over to a new software soon. In the mean time, anyone wishing to participate must register there, and please, throught the CONTACT page of BadEagle.com, let us know the day you register, and under what user name and email. IKONBOARD does not block spam, and we have to fish out your registration from myriad drone and robot spam. Thank you.
Also, don’t forget to donate to BadEagle.com. If you cannot presently, you can click on the Google ads. These bring pennies to BadEagle.com, and the pennies ad up! Thanks.
2 Asaph // Mar 18, 2011 at 2:43 pm
Tough love – of country?
How many parents are afraid of their children nowadays? Should we be surprised entire nations have lost common sense when it comes to immigration?
La Pen’s position is tough, but without that determination France and the rest of Europe will become Islamic.
3 Michael N // Mar 18, 2011 at 3:02 pm
Brigitte Bardot says much the same thing, Asap. And she’s been fined for breaking “French law” in speaking her mind about the Islamic invasion.
4 David Yeagley // Mar 18, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Brigette Bardot Convicted of “Hate Crime.” June 3, 2008.
PARIS – Brigitte Bardot was convicted Tuesday of provoking discrimination and racial hatred for writing that Muslims are destroying France.
A Paris court also handed down a $23,325 fine against the former screen siren and animal rights campaigner. The court also ordered Bardot to pay $1,555 in damages to MRAP.
Before that, there was this story:
Brigitte Bardot on trial for Muslim slur
Fifth time she was accused. A actress/patriot. What a rarity!
5 Pamela K. // Mar 18, 2011 at 4:21 pm
Ms. Bardot was upset over the ritual slaughter of animals through Halal, which is a term used to designate food seen as permissible according to Sharia Law.
http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwide/europe/bardot-group-campaigns-against-halal-animal-slaughter
For her outspoken concern, Brigitte is being punished by her own country! It reminds me of what Italy did to Oriana Fallaci.
France’s legendary duplicity as a nation of traitorous cowards is running true to form. First it was secret collaboration with the Nazis after the 1940 invasion and the creation of the puppet government in Vichy in order to deport French Jews to concentration camps. Now the French government is catering to murderous Muslims. I just hope they do not expect America to liberate them again.
6 zephyr // Mar 18, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Did France EVER have freedom of speech?! Do any of their legislators realize how dangerous it is to make speech a crime? Where does it end?
7 Pamela K. // Mar 18, 2011 at 8:27 pm
“We have to trot out the Indians and the poor people in what most of the elites think is backwater USA. That’s what the elites think–it’s redneck country. And they think all the rednecks are listening to NPR.”
Guess again, Media Star Barbie. I sincerely doubt the elitist swine over at NPR use their little grey cells to mull over the possibility of rednecks listening to NPR. Rednecks generally do not listen to NPR or The Laura Ingraham Show as a rule.
Maury Povich and The Jerry Springer Show, now you’re talkin! I actually think those programs regularly scout for guests in America’s most trashy redneck trailer parks! And don’t forget, “My Big Redneck Wedding”! Now that’s considered classy entertainment in the backwater USA!
As for American Indians, while they might have access to NPR, it does not mean many Indians are regular listeners to the program. I am sure snotty elitist and possibly flaming homosexual Ron Schiller could care less about Indian listeners. He was too busy pandering to the Muslims. Now that he’s been canned he ought to head on over and get a job with al-Jazeera.
But besides this, both NPR, and the Laura Ingraham Show, primarily focus on issues effecting white society. The concerns of American Indians are usually not on the agenda. Furthermore, the media on both sides of the political spectrum are equally guilty of making offhand remarks which insult Native American culture. It is not right and just shows how ignorant they are!
8 BlackBart // Mar 19, 2011 at 4:51 am
I don’t think the conservative movement is dismissing you because you are an Indian.
I think they are dismissing you because they are idiots.
9 David Yeagley // Mar 19, 2011 at 7:46 pm
BB, It think it’s about race. They can’t handle race. Conservatives don’t know how to talk about race. They are “cowards,” according to racist-chauvinist Eric Holder.
But, as we all know, whites are not afraid of blacks. They’re afraid of attorneys–white oedipal liberal attorneys who will sue them if they say anything the attorneys consider offensive to the Negro.
I guess I just repeated what you said, huh?
10 Pamela K. // Mar 19, 2011 at 9:28 pm
“We have been given a choice between war and shame, we have chosen shame and we will get war.”-Sir Winston Churchill
“The persecution of Christians in the Islamic world and the western response.” Liberal or conservative media, there is no response!
Who in the West has been challenging the blasphemy laws found in many Islamic nations around the world? These “laws” are used to accuse, jail and often execute Christians living in Muslim countries whom allegedly have insulted the Prophet Mohammad and Islam. There does not have to be any proof of the blasphemy, just an accusation lodged by a disgruntled Muslim.
“What is an even bigger crime, says Keith Davies, of Whalid Shoebat.com, is the lesson of the Holocaust and all those films we have watched about Oscar Schindler, Raoul Wallenberg, Anne Frank and others has not given us the moral compass to act to stop such intolerance and persecution. Our Western democracies, our churches and our synagogues are about to repeat the same ignorance as we displayed in the 1930s and 40s. Where are the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti Defamation league on this issue? I have written to both but I did not get even a reply. If I were donating a million dollars in return for my name going on one of their buildings I am sure the response would have been instantaneous. As for the Christian organizations you do not get away with blame either as none of you will offer support to rescue victims in hiding from the blasphemy law, as doing something that might not fully conform within the law might infringe on your 501 c 3 charitable tax exempt status. So far we have failed to get anyone in the establishment to help. Let me remind you hypocrites who celebrate the bravery of Raoul Wallenberg and Oscar Schindler, and other righteous people; nearly everything they did to save Jews was illegal and life threatening in the countries they operated.”
How many Raoul Wallenberg and Oscar Schindlers can stand up and be counted today in the West? Not many it seems.
11 BlackBart // Mar 19, 2011 at 9:49 pm
I’m no social psychologist — don’t even play one on TV — but I observe.
My observation from within agenda-driven social groups, be they political or religious, is that there are personal agendas that operate within group that often trump the group agenda.
Example: Back before my deconversion I observed the the group agenda of evangelical churches (evangelism) often conflicted with personal agendas within the church as individuals jockied for positions of power, prestige or personal turf.
Personality conflicts are innate as individuals strive to advance their personal agendas. It’s interesting, for example, to watch a group of White church people board a bus for a group trip. They tend to unconsciously arrange themselves in a social pecking order with their personal agendas being the determining factor who sits with whom and who avoids whom.
Those who are avoided sense the exclusion. The inclination is to create an explanation; to answer the question, “Why am I excluded?”
Like water choosing the simplest path when running down hill, we answer that question with a “because I am . . . ” scenario. Granted, your Indian heritage may be a factor as White people arrange themselves in personal agenda-driven pecking orders, but they would also exclude you if you were not an Indian.
The short version of all this is: They don’t dislike you because you’re an Indian. They dislike you because they’re jerks.
12 Edwin M. Wright // Mar 25, 2011 at 11:30 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6sYB5d1Bu4
Media, now needs Billions in TAXES to compete with the World news outlet of other Nation.
Hmm?
What wrong with this pictue or right ?
13 nikeairmax // Mar 31, 2011 at 7:31 am
http://www.myairmaxstore.com/nike-air-max-skyline-c-20.html
You must log in to post a comment.