MALKIN-BRUCE: Michelle Malkin has appealed to the public in an effort to find her missing cousin, Marizela Perez. She has posted on the family crisis since March 7. Marizela was first reported missing March 5. Anyone who loves his family knows something of this dreadful experience. However, the when Tammy Bruce (substituting for Laura Ingraham) tried to make it a national crisis, and a conservative cause, she weakened the urgency and insulted the cause altogether. Political conservatism has nothing to do with personal family crises of this nature. And personal family crises, however piquant, are not national crises. They may be national news, but Michelle Malkin is only a commentator, not a political office holder. Nothing of national policy or political import hinges on her daily columns. (Or are we mistaken on that? Just how important are conservative commentators?)
Tammy Bruce was essentially inappropriate in identifying a missing cousin as some national conservative cause, just because Michelle Malkin has to be conservative. This was very low-level rallying, and denigrating to Marizela. Marizela is precious because she is a human being, not because she is the cousin of a popular conservative talking head.
INGRAHAM: True to form, that is, the form that all conservative talking heads take, Laura Ingraham recently dissed American Indians. This is the usual take. This time, it was the opportunity afforded by the National Public Radio funding issue. It is an offense to conservatives, at least theoretically, according to Ingraham, that rural populations, including Indian reservations, should have voice provided by NPR. They have no other serious media voice, of course. And Indians are certainly, most positively, not going to get any voice in conservative media. (I’ll vouch for that one!) So, according to Ingraham, better that Indians have no voice at all. They have nothing to say anyway, and they have no problems–none that concern anyone else. So, just forget Indians.
Laura Ingraham, professional entertainer/conservative
But, Ingraham overreached in her dramatizations.
We have to trot out the Indians and the poor people in what most of the elites think is backwater USA. That’s what the elites think–it’s redneck country. And they think all the rednecks are listening to NPR.
Rednecks are “understood” to be the racists among the conservatives. Why would NPR want to give them a voice? Sounds like to me Ingraham sees Indians as “backwater USA” herself. Fine. Be it known.
IRAN: Major protests in Iran today. But, don’t worry. Don’t think it is a positive thing. Typically, the revolts, unrest, uprisings and protests in the Middle East have nothing to do with freedom, democracy, or good will. It’s Shiites against Sunnis; the poor against the irrationally rich dictators; the Muslims Brotherhood against all other Muslims. I have been told by insider Iranians that the mullahs in Tehran have about 1.5 million people for hire in the streets. They can stage any kind of pro-government protest whenever they desire. Today’s protest is about Muslim denominational disputes. Who cares?
NORTH AFRICA: Bloomberg reports a “Biblical Exodus” of Muslims from North Africa to Europe. Of course, the Negroid Arabs are not wanted in Europe, not because of their race, or even their religion (though either would be sufficient cause for rejecting them), but because of the economic burden they pose. Europe is already over-populated by foreigners from the wondrous Third World. These masses of people bring only the horrors of poverty and deprivation, expense and disease, and all else that derives from depraved morality.
Marine La Pen, Anti-Immigration
National Front, France.
Regarding the latest wave of North African trespassers, a French patriot (Marine La Pen) declared:
“They cannot be allowed on the shore,” Marine Le Pen, the 42-year-old leader of France’s anti-immigration National Front, said in a March 15 interview in Rome after a three-hour visit the previous day to Lampedusa. “Send boats out to feed them. But they must not set foot on land.”
Now there’s an interesting stance to take. But then, why take food out to them? That’s an expense, too. Why should anyone feed Muslims? Consider the wealth of their dictatorial oligarchies. It is foolishness to feed Muslims. They are no one’s responsibility but their own governments’. But the maniacal Muslims want their people spread out all over the world. It is their purpose. Civil war, voluntary immigration, whatever. The point is to colonize, and to bring satanic oppression on all. I say, let them starve, if their own will not care for them, being so well able to. Call it “suicide starvation,” after the order of suicide bombing. Every true Muslim will concede.
These are the necessities of nationalism, not personal morality or spirituality. Free nations, if to survive, must resist every lying Muslim ploy. Blessings on Marine La Pen. Nous réjouissons dans votre disposition.