David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Immediately after Jared Loughner was identified as the murderer in the Tuscon shooting, American Renaissance was also identified as an influence on Loughner. I, Dr. David A. Yeagley, was then identified (with borrowed libel) as one associated with American Renaissance, and the same Jewish sources quickly made a story, a scape goat, out of American Renaissance. For the record, BadEagle.com addresses these matters forthwith.
Jared Loughner has no known association with any specific political group of any kind, other the an unrefined identity as having a Jewish mother. The main Jewish reports have not mentioned this. MotherJones and others have. (In fact, JTA finally noted it.) Though Loughner ethnicity has nothing to do with the tragedy, nor does the fact that Gabrielle Gifford is Jewish, the very fact that Jewish reports immediately identified Loughner as someone associated with American Renaissance demonstrates a extreme bias. The Tuscon tragedy was used to condemn American Renaissance.
The name “American Renaissance” appeared in a couple of places on some internet posting of Loughner’s, but no reports have identified it, linked to it, or named the place. It was simply reported that he had mentioned the name, without any reference to verify the report. See: FoxNews (Jennifer Griffin); JTL, Christian Science Monitor, Huffington Post. Compare dates and sources. The “DHS memo” on which the initial FoxNews line is based is not available to the public. The Huffington Post references the removed “MySpace” Loughner page, without quoting the page, or stating it was removed. However, Huffington Post does may an “update” confession, currently reading:
Update: A leaked Department of Homeland Security memo that discussed possible ties between Jared Lee Loughner, the alleged shooter of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, and hate group American Renaissance, contained errors and overstated the connection, an Arizona law enforcement official told Politico. The new information refutes earlier reports by Fox News on a potential link between the Tucson shooter and the group, based on a law enforcement memo that reportedly included information from DHS. A DHS official told The Washington Post on Monday the agency has not officially provided information on Loughner to any law enforcement officials, but may have done so unofficially.
The commander of the agency that originated the memo said the document “was never intended for public dissemination” and contained incorrect statements. “I do have no reason to believe in anything that we did that (Loughner) had any direct connection or was being directed by American Renaissance,” David Denlinger, commander of the Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center, told Politico.
(The DHS website does not even list the name “Jared Loughner” or “American Renaissance.”)
American Renaissance is labeled a hate group by such esteemed fear-mongering groups as the Southern Poverty Law Center, which, according to TheSocialContract.com, is one of the most fraudulent fear fest groups in the business.
As many people know, American Renaissance was targeted by Communist/Marxist groups out of New York, and by international unions, and its 2010 conference was cancelled due to threats and death threats to four different hotels in which AmRen had attempted to assemble. The 2011 Conference is schedule for next month (February), and I, Dr. David A. Yeagley, am scheduled as a guest speaker. For this reason, I am concerned about this recent hate crime against American Renaissance committed by JTA, Huffington Post, and the Christian Science Monitor.
BadEagle.com has long advocated love, honor, respect, and encouragement for Jewish people, Judaism, and Biblical history. My personal preferences for Jewish things, my artistic works involving Jewish topics, like the Holocaust, are well known. In spite of this, however, my opponents delight in accusing me of being anti-Semitic, and/or racism, and even white supremacism. These accusations are as shameful as the immediate bias shown by both the JTL, Huffington Post, and the CSM. I might add, again, my opponents are being sued at this present time, for libel, among other torts to come.
I believe in race, in the preservation of race, and in the honor, dignity, and divine purpose in race. I believe the nations are ordained, and must be respected and fostered therefore. As an American Indian, I honor my own race. I condemn the mindless intermarriage or interracial sexual relations which dilute genetic identity. I believe we must all make the effort to preserve the races and ethnicities in the world. What makes me apparently different is the fact that I freely assign and ascribe the same privilege to all other races, not just American Indians. I believe each race has the right to love, honor, and preserve itself.
I have stated that, in the natural hierarchies of mind, one is inclined to a disposition of preference. Objectively, one might even ask, Is there a preferred race? Is there a race more important, more significant than another, one more vital to the world than another? I have repeatedly professed the guiding influence in my thinking on this matter, and that would be the Bible. There is no question as to the historically implied answer to the objective question of race, therefore, in my mind.
As I once taught my students at Oklahoma State University (OKC), patriotism is the elixir of national ills. Love of country is the prerequisite, the foundation, and the life of any country. I happen to believe that the basic constituents of a nation are boundaries, ethnicity, language, religion, and resultant culture. In this, I may differ from my opponents, even many “American” opponents. I am not a multiculturalist, nor a multinationalist.
This being said, I once again testify to the fact that Jared Loughner’s Jewish ethnicity, and Gabrielle Gifford’s Jewish ethnicity, have nothing to do with what happened in Tucson, and nothing to do with the story. Hasty reports, anxious to condemn white people, and all conservatives, have made the Jewish factor an element in the story. That’s all. I do not consider JTL a liberal body, but, in this case, they did jump the gun, as it were. Jewish people have every right to protect themselves, but not to accuse too quickly.
21 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Jan 11, 2011 at 9:09 pm
TheSocialContract.com has made available online the contents of a new publication: Profiteers of Hate. It is all about the Southern Poverty Law Center. Be prepared to be appalled. A must read. Various articles separable.
2 David Yeagley // Jan 11, 2011 at 9:17 pm
The site which recently associated me with American Renaissance (and borrowed libel) is called ConWebWatch. There is a blog, by Terry Krepel, a writer for MediaMatters. In fact, this same article which mentions me is crossed-posted ad MediaMatters. I have of course personally requested that Mr. Krepel remove the parenthetical libel. Has has not responded. I informed him of the present suit, and suggested that he free himself from that association. I shall have to inform MediaMatters as well. There must be some virtue in wasting my time, no?
3 BrockTownsend // Jan 11, 2011 at 9:31 pm
Well said.
=========
The Despicable $outhern Poverty Law Center
4 David Yeagley // Jan 11, 2011 at 9:55 pm
It is quite deplorable, isn’t it? How did such a fraud develop such a power? It is remarkable, the willingness of people to believe any and all accusations of “hate.”
5 Pamela K. // Jan 11, 2011 at 10:55 pm
Unlike your cowardly detractors, you have the guts to stand up and tell the truth about how the issue of race has been used in this nation as a weapon to intimidate and silence people, especially white people. White people are the most discriminated against people in America today. If we choose to complain about it, we are called racists and quickly linked in with hardcore hate groups like the KKK and the Aryan Nations.
The Left deals in half-truths, innuendo, and outright lies. They has no conscience, no moral guiding force.. They remind me of a bunch of greedy, overfed rats scurrying around at the town dump, vermin, feasting on garbage.
6 Following Him // Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18 am
Pamela … excellent comment, very well said. You didn’t study under Dr. Yeagley at O.K.C. did you.
“They remind me of a bunch of greedy, overfed rats scurrying around at the town dump, vermin, feasting on garbage.” With you and the doc … America is in very good hands.
I love it.
7 Pamela K. // Jan 12, 2011 at 8:46 am
Thank you, Following Him. No, I have never studied under Dr. Yeagley though it probably would have been interesting!
Speaking of Dr. Yeagley, he was absolutely right about the Democrats using this shooting of Congresswoman Giffords to try and enforce more gun control on law-abiding American gun owners.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/congresswoman-to-introduce-bill-to-ban-high-capacity-ammunition-clips-011111
Although the weapon used in this tragedy was a gun, the issue of gun control, like political rhetoric, has nothing to do with it.
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people.The demented motives behind Jared Loughner’s rampage last Saturday still remain unclear. Furthermore, tighter government restrictions or outright bans on hand guns is not going to prevent the criminal element in this country from getting their hands on them. Unlike law-abiding and responsible gun owners, criminals will always know of a black market enterprise to obtain stolen or illegals weapons, just like they always know where or who they can go to in order to buy dope!
8 David Yeagley // Jan 12, 2011 at 10:30 am
Palin calls the liberal acccusations “blood libel.” False blame of murder intentionally placed on conservativers, etc. Incredible. The woman hits the target, all right.
Palin charges critics with ‘blood libel’
Sarah Palin: “America’s Enduring Strength” from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.
9 Pamela K. // Jan 12, 2011 at 11:22 am
Sarah Palin not only believes in personal accountability and being a responsible member of society, both in her private life as well as in public, but she chooses to live righteously before God. And that makes all the difference!
Furthermore, talk about having someone in your sights! Ever since she first walked out on the stage at the Republican National Convention-unannounced, no less-and pulled the rug out from under the liberal establishment, Sarah Palin has been the target/victim of a vicious, continuous character assassination by the lamestream American news media, the exceptions being FOX News and CBN (Christian Broadcasting Network). Now, heaven forbid, if some lunatic tries to harm her or one of her family members,will the rabid Palin bashers at MSNBC or CNN be held responsible? Will this passel of losers be charged with “inciting a hate crime with vitriol?”
10 David Yeagley // Jan 12, 2011 at 11:33 am
It is a growing fear in all people, especially public figures, as the moral restraints of society continue to erode.
We know liberals lie, profoundly, to the point that they do believe a lie. It is called “delusion.” They could pass a lie-detector test, easily.
Strong delusion, indeed. But, such conditions always come to an end, in cold concrete.
11 Pamela K. // Jan 12, 2011 at 12:12 pm
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Propaganda under Adolf Hitler
Sounds like the left-wing news media are taking their cues from him.
12 Thrasymachus // Jan 12, 2011 at 4:28 pm
“I believe in race, in the preservation of race, and in the honor, dignity, and divine purpose in race. I believe the nations are ordained, and must be respected and fostered therefore. As an American Indian, I honor my own race. I condemn the mindless intermarriage or interracial sexual relations which dilute genetic identity. I believe we must all make the effort to preserve the races and ethnicities in the world. What makes me apparently different is the fact that I freely assign and ascribe the same privilege to all other races, not just American Indians. I believe each race has the right to love, honor, and preserve itself.”
———————————————————–
Yes. It’s a basic human right. There’s absolutely no hatred involved whatever. It’s the same thing as a family that wishes not to see its name wiped out. A race is just a very large family. A race has meaning because other races exist, just as a family has meaning because other families exist. It’s a mutual dependence relation. No hatred could possible thrive in the proper understanding of the thing involved. Without respect for and preservation of other races, one’s own race would cease to exist, owing to a lack of the absolutely necessary “other factor” in the equation. The more I recognize, respect, and honor an other people and nation, the greater I can do the same for my own.
13 Thrasymachus // Jan 12, 2011 at 4:38 pm
FOR THE RECORD!
I totally denounce and renounce Hitlerism, tyranny, war-mongering, race hatred, and the worship of a man in the place of God. Hitler is the opposite of what I believe in. So is Stalin, Mussolini, etc. Chauvinism is not a part of the recepe I am sold on.
Respect for all human dignity and human life as precious. No desire to crush or humiliate or rule over another people. Just a simple desire for freedom and survival for all peoples and nations.
14 Thrasymachus // Jan 12, 2011 at 4:48 pm
The Amish say that our world is “a vale of tears” and live a simple life accordingly. There is much I admire about them.
Hitler did not love people. People’s lives meant nothing to him, whether Jewish people or Germans. He was insanely interested in having unlimited power for himself and in magnifying himself.
My interest in racial matters is the very opposite. I view human life as very fragile and very precious, and I want to see it preserved in all its forms.
Each family within the human race needs its own real estate and its own culture and way of life. I am only opposed to the forced mixing and the forced destruction of distinct societies and nations. That also is cruel. We do not need a world plantation population with a few ultra rich elites lording it over the rest of us. This is the true goal of the cosmopolitans and universalists. They preach “love and tolerance,” but they have an ulterior motive and hidden agenda — to make poor and desperate the great masses of human beings on this planet. They are not about true love and tolerance at all.
15 Craig // Jan 12, 2011 at 9:08 pm
Nausea continues to swell within me from hearing and reading the absolute baseless distortions the MSM have created in the aftermath of the Tuscon murders. Unbelievable the non existance of any attempt to try and actually get facts as to the reasons and motives leading up to this tragedy.
Automatically, the left starts the very ‘vitriolic rhetoric’ of which they accuse many god loving, god fearing citizens of and those who espouse the ideas of mutual conservatism.
Even more sickening is the knee-jerk reactions from Washington. Gun laws as they exist don’t do a damn. Enacting newer, more stringent gun laws will not deter or dissuade other incidents to the like.
But even more frightening is the possibility that members of Congress want to ‘Shut down’ free speech. We’ve (Big Sis Janet, et al) got to put a stop to those vitriolic, rhetorically speaking rabblerousers before they casue anymore harm, which they didn’t.
Good luck Dr. Yeagley. You just might have big sis Janet Napolotano keeping her ugly eye on you.
16 Thrasymachus // Jan 13, 2011 at 10:28 am
I can tell you from sad experience that many White people today accept all government decisions as inevitable. Government is omnipotent in the eyes of many “conservative-minded” White Americans. Any decision any branch of government makes is looked upon as ineluctable and non-negotiable. Government orders are to be obeyed blindly, no matter how questionable these may be morally, no matter how disadvantageous these may be to the honest citizen. Many Whites are simply politically paralyzed and totally unable even to imagine that they can lawfully enact any meaningful change in politics, no matter how righteous the cause. Whites today feel powerless to resist any mandate of government on any level — but especially on the state and federal level. Very many Whites are convinced that they have absolutely no real say in how their lives are ruled by government or in the decision government makes.
17 Pamela K. // Jan 13, 2011 at 11:13 am
Many white people fear “rocking the boat” especially older generations of white Americans when it comes to the subject of race. They have been conditioned to think that because we are white we owe the rest of the races unswerving loyalty to prevent what happened in the past from ever happening again. Discrimination. Jim Crow Laws. Slavery. The only problem with this is that it is happening again- to us!
You are not allowed to stand up and defend yourself if you are white. You can not publicly say that you want to preserve your race. You are automatically deemed a racist.
The only problem with that is that we are all a little bit racist. With the exception of a few, most of us prefer our own skin, our own ethnic heritage or race, as opposed to being a person of another race with another ethnic heritage and a different skin color.
Being a bigot is something else. A bigoted person deliberately targets people of another race who have a different skin color and labels them as “different” or “inferior to my race”.
Sort of like what Barack “my grandmother was a typical white woman” Obama expresses far too often yet he gets away with what he says because he is a liberal and black liberal to boot.
If a black conservative politician had expressed the same words, the liberal establishment and news media would have exploded with self-righteous indignation.. They are the only ones allowed to play the race card. It’s the same with Sarah Palin’s mention of “blood libel”. Only liberal Jews who are Jewish only when it is politically convenient for them can be the victims of, or have ancestors that were the victims of blood libel. And they have the nerve to call her ignorant.
18 Thrasymachus // Jan 13, 2011 at 12:25 pm
Pamela:
Agreed!
Another example: “Conservative” Whites know that gay couples can readily adopt a White baby with few questions asked, whereas a childless heterosexual White couple will be denied the White baby. Yet where are the Whites who are standing up to put an end to this unjust and outrageous discrimination?!
19 Pamela K. // Jan 13, 2011 at 12:58 pm
Again, we see (collectively speaking) the “conditioning of our society and erroneously believe that we are not to question why things are the way they are today. If you question the rights given to homosexuals, that they are now, under federal law, deemed a protected class, you are called homophobic.I am not homophobic. However, I believe sin is sin. Both homosexuality and adultery are condemned in the Bible. Yet, we exalt homosexuals in our society and hold adulterers with contempt, especially if the culprit is a public figure. Go figure. Ditto for the Muslims who are pushing their way in and enforcing their whims upon us. If you question why the schools in Minnesota no longer serve Jell-O on their cafeteria menus, or why preschoolers in a Head Start program there were denied Santa Claus bringing them presents this year, or why Muslim high school students who threatened to kill the companion dog to a fellow student who was epileptic were not reprimanded or punished, you will be told that “we must be sensitive to the religious cultures of other people who live among us.” In her books, “The Rage and The Pride” and “The Force of Reason” the late Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci exposed very similar incidents happening in her beloved Italy and across Europe. Islam and the rights of Muslims is fast replacing the black male as the Democratic Party’s poster child.
On the flip side, We, the American people, did not choose “those who live among us” to come here in the first place. They chose us. So, if they cannot and will not abide by our laws, are offended by our Christianity and our society’s customs, then they should kindly exercise another right given to all Americans-the right to leave! Let them return to wherever it was they came from in the first place.
20 Thrasymachus // Jan 13, 2011 at 1:12 pm
Another shocking injustice:
A Muslim, or Hindu from India, can come here and be educated, almost always at taxpayer expense, to become a M.D. and earn a large salary, while a White American child with a high I.Q. and good grade will find it extremely difficult to compete for a degree in medical practice. Our government literally favors foreign-born individuals over American-born Whites. It’s rank anti-American discrimination Where is the anger among our people?
21 Julian Lee // Jul 18, 2012 at 1:43 am
I am a racialist. I have the same opinion as David that the peoples are valuable, representing eons of time and unique development, should respect themselves, and not self-destruct or let others destroy them.
I have never understood how the ideas of “supreme” or “supremacy” need to be mixed up with this. I’m not English, but if I put in a word on some thread like “long live the English” or “England for the English — a thousand nitwits start calling me ‘supremsis, supremisis.” It’s inane.
I see every race and ethnicity as having its particular strengths or shining areas, and it’s particular faults. I am White, and I could list the faults of my race probably better than anybody. But I also see our virtues. And I don’t list them, because we are so under siege at this time that to do so would be traitorship.
You must log in to post a comment.