David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Blacks love the Redskins. Why? They get to own the image, not their image, but the mighty image of the American Indian warrior. The American Negro is greedy. White America seems happy to let him do, have, or be anything he wants. A most spoiled, unruly child the Negro has become, learning well to play on white pity for his black skin.
In modern times the black man learned to play Indian, not by watching Indians, but by watching whites. He realized that the whites really value the Indian image, in some deep psychological capacity, and so he took up the white tradition.
The logo of the NFL’s Washington Redskins. Note the exceptionally dark “Indian” skin, almost black, like the Negro, not Indian. In this case, of the roster of 53 starting players, 41 are black. That’s, say, 80%. Why don’t they just call them the Washington Blackskins? Would that carry less “honor”?
These days, however, with casino money so readily available, many blacks actually claim to be Indian, by blood. Thus they hope to obtain federal status, get land, and great gain. BadEagle.com has monitored this movement for some time. It’s all perfectly infuriating–the vainity, overt greed, and denigration to American Indian people.
Whites, of course, seem humbly delighted to see the Negro claim to be Indian. In truth, some whites are happy to see the Indian denigrated. Some whites still hold profound fear and aversion to the American Indian. It isn’t just the liberal notion of race mixing, the sexual perversion, or the intentional obliteration of racial, ethnic distinction. It is actual fear of the Indian, and a special joy in destroying him. This is the kind of deep-seated contradiction found in the white liberal.
Let’s consider the white attitude toward blacks here in western civilization. The cultural “folk” custom is simple enough: one drop of Negro blood in a person makes him Negro. (Note, the white Wikipedia link naturally considers Negroes and Indians in the same article.) He is considered black. Innumberal mulattos abound, many of them more white than black, but all are still considered black by whites, and usually associate socially more with blacks. The “one drop” rule, as it is customarily called, works for white people when judging Negroes. But, white people are not so faithful when it comes Indians. If a Negro claims one drop of Indian blood, many whites are happy to consider him Indian. Thus the white can protect his whiteness, and who really cares about what a Negro is or isn’t? And it’s always been better to destroy Indians, one way or another. This is an unspoken, unconscious impetus in white race relations to the two major non-white races in America. The persistent, Collective Unconscious image of the Indian still reigns in white America. It is still an active force underneath. The Indians was the first encounter, the principle confrontation in the psychal history of America. In hopes to squelch the irritation, the whites are happy to consider blacks Indians, and Indians black. It’s all wonderful. A neat, tidy package of aassuagement.
Different white people deal with it differently, though. The liberals have of course programmed or harnessed talking points to manage the force. It is all obviously emasculating, racially denigrating, and generally miserable; but, conservative whites, at least the professional talkers in media, have no talking points at all. The pathetic image liberals have tried to market leaves the conservatives with nothing to say.
Again, George Soros himself is creating the new talking point–especially for conservatives. Indians are not like any other “minority group,” or certainly not like the kind he wants to use to stir up trouble. He can use the black Muslim Nubians of Kenya to help dissolve Kenyan nationhood; he can use the Mayan Indians to wreak political havoc for the government of Guatamala. But Soros cannot use the American Indian to disturb America. He certainly has been careful not to try.
Perhaps the historical treaties between the American Indians and the United States government declare that our wars are over. Our treaties testify to our nationhood. They are the evidence of the permanence of our nations. The one verifies the existence of the other. American Indians are not some minority group, historical or illegal, at aggressive odds with the U.S. government. Indians try only to make sure treaty promises are kept. That’s all. These others groups have not a whim of validity in their aggrandized complaints. They exist on the pure charity of the white man. Indians paid blood for our deal. We do not forget that, nor will we let liberal whites try to erase or even obfuscate that by trying to mix Indians with all the other races.
This is why I am infuriated when whites just casually go along with the idea that American Indians are somehow supposed to be associated with Negroes. The only thing the two races hold in common is that we are here, but even that is an incomplete image, which become false when not recognized as incomplete. Indians are on our homeland. The Negro is an import. The other thing emphasized by white liberals is the “common plight” theme. The Indiand and the Negro are understood to be mistreated by the great white race of America. This is a false comparison as well. The Indian fought like a wild cat for his home, his land, and his people. The Negro was a mere population extention of the white society. Moreover, the Negro occassionally fought with the whites against the Indian, or so it is said. The Negro did not fight with the Indian. The Negro was generally not a fighter. The Negro shares no part of the Indian experience or identity, then or now.
The idea that white liberals, or any one else, would fight for the Negro’s “right” to be Indian, even if he claims to have but “one drop” of Indian blood, is the most repugnant social ideological fragement of self-righteous sexal perversion ever evoled in liberal psychosis. The fact that white conservatives might be found going along with the notion merely shows how superficial some conservatives actually are. Their gut level reactions may protect their own white “tribes,” but they are not objective enough to grant others their right to protect theirs. (It does seem that the Indians is the only race present in America that is not ‘dying’ to be white. That surely puzzles the white man.)
Nevertheless, Soros cannot use Indians against America. All he can do is what he already tried–to “redistribute” Indian honor on all the other non-white people of the world, and thus to essentially demean or devalue American Indians. And that homosexual bit included in the Sundance redistribution effort is the covert use of homosexuality as a population-reducing method. The whole liberal advocacy of homosexuality by the United Nations, along with abortion, and child self-abuse, is all about reducing the number of people in the world.
So, once again, BadEagle.com must adovcate for the distinct identity of the American Indian. Without prejudice, without hate, without disdain for other races, I must advocate the preservation of what’s left of the American Indian. I love the Indian race. I only wish other people loved their race as well.
True love of race exposes racism. Without it, racism hides behind liberal tolerance and Sorosian Communism. And perhaps we need a new term: Sorosism. It is the most recent wave of Marxism. It’s a whole new rhetoric of compassion, to the uneducated ear. Soros is no average liberal. He is one of the wealthiest and smartest men in the world.
26 responses so far ↓
1 Thrasymachus // Dec 5, 2010 at 6:06 pm
I agree with your article. I certainly also want the American Indian to survive and even multiply. I want for him the very same things that I want for the European nations.
Whites these days simply do not love their race. In my entire family, I alone hold race as a value! Every last member of my family (whether “conservative” or “liberal”) holds to acceptance of miscegenation, and not one has taken a position in favor of racial integrity.
Some members of the family have adopted non-white children.
As far as I can tell, a majority of Whites simply are indifferent and apathetic to the fate of the race. I find this totally baffling! I feel that this is one sign of the “End Times,” as painted in Scripture.
I am greatly displeased that most Whites are indifferent or even hostile both to American Indians and to other races (including, of course, the White race itself) with respect to the survival of the physical and cultural entities involved — the survival of the nations.
For the multitude of Whites today, multiculturalism, not traditional Christianity, is their religion.
θρασυμαχος
2 David Yeagley // Dec 5, 2010 at 7:00 pm
That righteousness should become associated with interracial sex and mixed (lost) children is a strange development, and seems rather new in world history.
It is as if sexual curiosity and political sanction for it dominate theology! It is a moral imperative to dismiss the white race, or to dismiss all race. What is the principal tool? The darker races.
But the Japanese and Chinese (and perhaps other oriental races) still hold to their integrity–at least much more than this crazy “American” race.
Beware Freud, Jung, and deep, hidden drives. Man seems prone to separate what God hath joined together, and to join together what God has separated.
A likely story.
3 Thrasymachus // Dec 5, 2010 at 7:39 pm
If you visit Japan, you will find shops and other places with the sign “Japanese Only” allowed inside.
In my conversations with two or three Chinese and Japanese people via the Internet, I have been told that it is not uncommon for people in these nations to feel both loyalty to their own culture and nation and a healthy sense of belonging to something — the ethnic nation — greater than just one’s own ego. Being Japanese of Chinese gives the citizens a sense of meaning in their lives, and also a sense of their natural place in the world.
Television is the chief cause of the change in the West — at least as a medium for it. Just to watch American television one might get the impression that Blacks are 45% of the population? Condemnation and righteous indigntion is readily expressed against Whites who, like “Archie Bunker,” might dare to express the least dissatisfaction with miscegenation. Whites have been subjected to a steady and gradually intensifying propaganda campaign to make moral outcasts and pariahs of racial loyalists within the white population.
Johnny Carson once disowned his son for marrying a black woman and only re-established the bond of sonship when the son divorced this woman. Obviously, in Carson’s generation, miscegenation — especially black-white miscegenation — was generally socially frowned upon. Such a decision as Carson made — and which he probably felt was almost morally required of him — could never go unpunished today. This is a total reversal of values.
4 David Yeagley // Dec 5, 2010 at 7:48 pm
A very powerful force in our media-driven society is advertiseing This is a special venue for “normalizing,” even more that movies or regular TV shows.
Watch the race games going on in advertising. It is incredible. The whole industry is devoted to racial mixing, just for the excitement, for the looks and thoughts it provokes. This is sexual perversity, in my opinion. It denigrates sex and marriage, it seems to me, because it makes everything narcissistic, or self-oriented, and takes no higher consideration than the feelings of the two involved. Everyone else has to live with the results, like it or not.
5 ELIAKIM // Dec 5, 2010 at 9:51 pm
David, historically, have Native Americans been without homosexuality? If they were not without it, how was considered amongst the tribes?
6 David Yeagley // Dec 5, 2010 at 10:05 pm
It ‘occured.’ Comanches have an old word for it that’s particularly nasty. It’s only known by that word, and it pertains only to males. Other tribes are now claiming to have had it, and it was supposedly socially “accepted.” This is I think a suspect, revisionist kind of folk history, though. Certainly, among plains Indians, life was to short to waste much energy. Today, “liberalism” among certain tribal influences like to act accepting of anyone and everything. This, of course, is not the attitude that enabled us to survive the wars and the 20th century.
Then again, initially, Indians were quite accepting of the white strangers that washed up on shore.
If homosexuality was in any way part of the old Indian days, it was rather rare and unappreciated. This is the way it appears.
Now, ask a homosexual liberal thin blood who’s been to college, and he or she will brag about how great and normal homosexuality was among Indians. Sundance “Native American” documentary department has promoted several films about homosexuality of modern “tribes”–all non-white, on every continent. It’s an “initiative,” all right. Like Barry’s “stimulous.”
7 ELIAKIM // Dec 5, 2010 at 11:55 pm
Thank you David for your response. Yes, I feel it is about HONOR and HONOR of God’s creation of man and woman to co-create.
I feel sure the Samurai were the same.
HONOR = INTEGRITY
Integrity of being.
Nations gave up their honor every time they tried to take over other nations and build empires. When they gave up their honor they reduced their integrity, and love without integrity is like an ocean without fish. The library without books and shell without a pearl of wisdom.
However, biblically speaking, the Christ did say that some people are made like it and this is now being proven scientifically. Although the science has not gone far enough yet. As we know that the emotions of the mother in pregnancy can impact detrimently on the child.
He also said that people must accept them if they can.
I accept and embrace with love. However, I do not support their adoption of children and never could do so.
On mix breeds, there as always been intermarriage between the races/nations. Just look at how many women from different nations that Solomon married.
However, we seeing it in greater numbers now due to travel. Travel as reduced the size of the world and expanded the choices for relationships. All part of the process of nations coming to understand each other, all part of the plan to help stop the wars.
8 ELIAKIM // Dec 6, 2010 at 12:23 am
Intermarriage of black and white as also helped to overcome prejudice in my own nation.
However, I do appreciate the danger that the white race is walking into and the statistics are very concerning. One could say that what happened to the red race is now happening to the white race, Is that poetic justice?
Ultimately, no matter what color your skin, the blood that runs through our veins is the same color.
9 ELIAKIM // Dec 6, 2010 at 4:05 am
The prophecy of HOSEA 7 feels appropriate for this thread.
CHRISTIANITY (USA) AND ISRAEL
Hosea 7 is an interesting chapter so let us look at the criteria of the prophecy.
1. It speaks of the time when God will heal Israel. Reiki healing and other healing modalities started to arrive in Israel during the 80′s and it has had an incredible impact. So there is our timeline criteria.
2. Ephraim (Christianity) is exposed and Samaria is revealed. Samaria in Aramaic means ‘WATCH MOUNTAIN’ (Strongs 8115) and Samaria is in the NORTH = HEALING. Watch the Mountain in the North because all is going to be revealed.
3. Their hearts are like an oven, they approach with intrigue.
4. Their passion smoulders all night. No coincidence then that the film ‘PASSION OF CHRIST’ the covenant of death that as been annulled (Prophet Isaiah, 28), was a box office hit in this last decade. Another timeline criteria.
5. They devour their rulers, all their kings fall, but none of them call on me. That links in with Abba saying that they will fall like a pack of cards.
6. Ephraim (Christianity) mixes with the nations. Foreigners sap their strength. How do they mix with the nations in the last days of the end times? On internet forums.
7. Israel’s arrogance testifies against Ephraim but they still do not return to the LORD God or search for him.
8. Ephraim is like a dove, easily deceived and senseless. The Christians have strayed from him, destruction comes because they rebelled against him. That also links with the prophecy of Obadiah and Isaiah 28 in respect of the USA.
9. God cannot redeem them because they speak falsely against him.
10. They do not cry out to me with their hearts, instead they wail out on their beds.
11. They slash themselves eg. self-harm.
12. I trained them and strengthened their arms but they plot evil against God, most good Christians
would say that criteria fits Liberal America perfectly.
13. They do not turn to the Most High, they are a faulty bow.
14. Their (gang, political, religious and otherwise) leaders fall by the sword (of truth) because they have been insolent to God and the holy one he sent to help them. As I write this pink energy is being put on my left hand. I would like to say to you the organization of CODE PINK are an example of what this prophecy is all about.
May the good will of God be done for his glory.
Do it all for love and justice will be done.
10 David Yeagley // Dec 6, 2010 at 11:07 am
If anyone wonders whether I have overreached in the apparent gross generalization that blacks love being “Indian,” as manifested in the Redskins NFL team, I simply ask: Why have no blacks protested the use of the Indian name and logo as a sports mascot?
11 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 11:18 am
One could say that what happened to the red race is now happening to the white race, Is that poetic justice?”
——————————————————–
Rampant, snow-balling racial mixing — the kind and degree thereof that brings about race-suicide — is one of God’s punishments for sin.
I think it was the prophet Jeremiah who warned ancient Israel that if they sinned and abandoned their God, their daughters would be given to foreign men in marriage — miscegenation — and the Israelites would be powerless to stop it. This was to cause grief to the parents, just as it caused Rebbecca (Rebekah) untold grief when Esau married Canaanite women.
Liberalism has only one taboo left to crush, and I’m guessing that, unless there is a major disaster, it will occur within the next twenty-five to thirty years.
To humiliate the White Race, the finishing touch the Liberals will eventually get around to applying will be the promotion of the kind of relationships that Michael Jackson was accused of, namely, black men with young white boys. (BTW, I do not know whether Jackson was guilty or not of these accusations. Macaulay Culkin though Jackson was innocent.) And, of course, Muslim men will be marrying young white girls in spades.
14-year-old gay boy a national hero
I want to state very clearly that I am totally opposed to all bullying of gays — especially confused young people — and would never persecute them or mistreat them. But this does not mean that their lifestyle should be normalized and celebrated, or that they should force Christian churches to solemnize their relationships in marriage ceremonies.
That some young teen-agers may go through a period of sexual confusion has been known and written about for many decades. It is not all that uncommon. This simply is not the same thing as adult homosexuality. I do not want to see that situation exploited, the way young people are already exploited for racial mixing purposes. Also, there is a new theory that male homosexuality may be a result of the fetus not receiving the male hormone in that prenatal state. It is believed that all human brains are made female, initially, and that the male brain becomes male when the male hormone is provided to the developing child during pregnancy.
12 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 11:48 am
Here is the only online article I could find on American Indian population statistics:
American Indian Population Is Mostly in Midwest
It is important that any nation seeking its own survival have a birth-rate at, or preferably, above, replacement-level.
13 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 11:57 am
This American Indian has something to say that certainly is of real interest. His religious beliefs are the same, oddly, as those of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, who was a spiritualist in religion:
Native American Prophecy Elders Speak – Part 1
14 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 12:04 pm
This Hopi Indian (post #13) is how I generally see the American Indian. He is calm, rational, and intelligent, and he seems to be morally sound as well. I don’t see anything of the African hip-hop / rap culture and over-emotionalism thereof in him. I cannot possibly see the American Indian as inferior to the White Man.
The Black Man needs to develop self-esteem and a relationship with God. He must stop seeing himself as a victim and learn to grow up.
15 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 12:16 pm
I don’t mean to sound harsh. But I believe that Blacks need to develop self-respect — racial self-respect — and grow up, culturally and morally. Liberalism is a very racist theory that holds that the Black Man needs the White Man in order to improve himself. In short, Liberalism accuses Blacks of racial inferiority.
16 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 1:09 pm
More common sense wisdom from the American Indian
17 Thrasymachus // Dec 6, 2010 at 1:17 pm
I suspect that the reason today’s “Conservatives” — Neocons — don’t like the American Indian is because of what is said about corporations in post # 16. Modern “Conservatives” are only economic conservatives. They want to conserve the economic system. They are interested in big business, not in human values.
18 David Yeagley // Dec 6, 2010 at 2:31 pm
These are fine posts, Thras! Much appreciated.
And save some for the next post, too. I have a third Soros-Indian post to make, perhaps before the days out.
America is a very peculiar place, indeed.
19 jo282271 // Dec 6, 2010 at 4:10 pm
not only do blacks want to be indian, but they also want to be French…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyMMsVygxVc&feature=related
I love the comment below the video “Is that a France? Where is your proud, for what your fathers fight for? looks like African team. Almost only black a*ses. Wake up France while its not too late”
20 David Yeagley // Dec 6, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Yes, I noticed that, then, and wrote about it, several times. Here are a few pieces:
The New French Face
Zidane and Cultural Conflict in WC Soccer
Zidane Fails Test
Of course, all soccer teams do this, even at their local levels. This has been a long-established tradition, I’m afraid. Only now, gradually, are foreigners showing up on American football teams and baseball teams.
Baseball, the principle American sport, has always had Puerto Ricans, but, now, we’re talking Japanese, deep Central Americans, etc.
21 David Yeagley // Dec 6, 2010 at 6:01 pm
My older brother once said the reason there are so many blacks in football is because their chances of making that kind of money are very low in any other profession. White men can make money without sacrificing their bodies.
We have to take care not to misinterpret the data before us. I’ve been known to push things, sometimes, but, in this case, if blacks were sincere on the race bit, they would protest the “Redskin” moniker. I rest my case.
22 jo282271 // Dec 6, 2010 at 8:04 pm
your older brother is right. Blacks are about dominating other races and trying to be like them because they have no pride in their own. It’s funny how many of the blacks dominate almost all positions in football but their is an obsession with pushing blacks in the one position whites still dominate…quarterback (the only real thinking position).
23 Edwin M. Wright // Dec 6, 2010 at 11:20 pm
David Merry Christmas
Thank you even trying to cause critical thinking in these times.
Of course if there is “any” critical rather than 100% state religion the NKVD forces will complain IMO.
As for sports since 1945 the owers and recruiting was geared NOT seek the best all around members, there was and is an agenda.
The conduct in sports over the last 40 years has been deeply shameful and hateful. Media brain washing and a horrible public school system did a job on US.
http://www.castefootball.us
If you have never read this site, then your in for a surprise perhaps.
24 David Yeagley // Dec 7, 2010 at 11:26 am
Thank you, E. M. Wright! Yes, that was a jolt! I did not know such a site existed. I’ll have to spend some quality time looking it over carefully. I’m a bit stunned right now.
25 David Yeagley // Dec 7, 2010 at 12:53 pm
Well, not ever black prizes being a Redskin:
NFL’s highest-paid defensive player suspended for season
$100-million dollar Haynesworth is benched for the rest of the season. Horrible attitude. Unprofessional, and all about personality problems with coach Mike Shanahan.
Albert Haynesworth.
26 Edwin M. Wright // Dec 14, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Factual history is not known, when those in control have motivations that are kept secret.
An agenda with the end purpose of destruction was of formost importance to the Pro sports teams after the 1945 tragedy was over IMO.
You must log in to post a comment.