Blacks love the Redskins. Why? They get to own the image, not their image, but the mighty image of the American Indian warrior. The American Negro is greedy. White America seems happy to let him do, have, or be anything he wants. A most spoiled, unruly child the Negro has become, learning well to play on white pity for his black skin.
In modern times the black man learned to play Indian, not by watching Indians, but by watching whites. He realized that the whites really value the Indian image, in some deep psychological capacity, and so he took up the white tradition.
The logo of the NFL’s Washington Redskins. Note the exceptionally dark “Indian” skin, almost black, like the Negro, not Indian. In this case, of the roster of 53 starting players, 41 are black. That’s, say, 80%. Why don’t they just call them the Washington Blackskins? Would that carry less “honor”?
These days, however, with casino money so readily available, many blacks actually claim to be Indian, by blood. Thus they hope to obtain federal status, get land, and great gain. BadEagle.com has monitored this movement for some time. It’s all perfectly infuriating–the vainity, overt greed, and denigration to American Indian people.
Whites, of course, seem humbly delighted to see the Negro claim to be Indian. In truth, some whites are happy to see the Indian denigrated. Some whites still hold profound fear and aversion to the American Indian. It isn’t just the liberal notion of race mixing, the sexual perversion, or the intentional obliteration of racial, ethnic distinction. It is actual fear of the Indian, and a special joy in destroying him. This is the kind of deep-seated contradiction found in the white liberal.
Let’s consider the white attitude toward blacks here in western civilization. The cultural “folk” custom is simple enough: one drop of Negro blood in a person makes him Negro. (Note, the white Wikipedia link naturally considers Negroes and Indians in the same article.) He is considered black. Innumberal mulattos abound, many of them more white than black, but all are still considered black by whites, and usually associate socially more with blacks. The “one drop” rule, as it is customarily called, works for white people when judging Negroes. But, white people are not so faithful when it comes Indians. If a Negro claims one drop of Indian blood, many whites are happy to consider him Indian. Thus the white can protect his whiteness, and who really cares about what a Negro is or isn’t? And it’s always been better to destroy Indians, one way or another. This is an unspoken, unconscious impetus in white race relations to the two major non-white races in America. The persistent, Collective Unconscious image of the Indian still reigns in white America. It is still an active force underneath. The Indians was the first encounter, the principle confrontation in the psychal history of America. In hopes to squelch the irritation, the whites are happy to consider blacks Indians, and Indians black. It’s all wonderful. A neat, tidy package of aassuagement.
Different white people deal with it differently, though. The liberals have of course programmed or harnessed talking points to manage the force. It is all obviously emasculating, racially denigrating, and generally miserable; but, conservative whites, at least the professional talkers in media, have no talking points at all. The pathetic image liberals have tried to market leaves the conservatives with nothing to say.
Again, George Soros himself is creating the new talking point–especially for conservatives. Indians are not like any other “minority group,” or certainly not like the kind he wants to use to stir up trouble. He can use the black Muslim Nubians of Kenya to help dissolve Kenyan nationhood; he can use the Mayan Indians to wreak political havoc for the government of Guatamala. But Soros cannot use the American Indian to disturb America. He certainly has been careful not to try.
Perhaps the historical treaties between the American Indians and the United States government declare that our wars are over. Our treaties testify to our nationhood. They are the evidence of the permanence of our nations. The one verifies the existence of the other. American Indians are not some minority group, historical or illegal, at aggressive odds with the U.S. government. Indians try only to make sure treaty promises are kept. That’s all. These others groups have not a whim of validity in their aggrandized complaints. They exist on the pure charity of the white man. Indians paid blood for our deal. We do not forget that, nor will we let liberal whites try to erase or even obfuscate that by trying to mix Indians with all the other races.
This is why I am infuriated when whites just casually go along with the idea that American Indians are somehow supposed to be associated with Negroes. The only thing the two races hold in common is that we are here, but even that is an incomplete image, which become false when not recognized as incomplete. Indians are on our homeland. The Negro is an import. The other thing emphasized by white liberals is the “common plight” theme. The Indiand and the Negro are understood to be mistreated by the great white race of America. This is a false comparison as well. The Indian fought like a wild cat for his home, his land, and his people. The Negro was a mere population extention of the white society. Moreover, the Negro occassionally fought with the whites against the Indian, or so it is said. The Negro did not fight with the Indian. The Negro was generally not a fighter. The Negro shares no part of the Indian experience or identity, then or now.
The idea that white liberals, or any one else, would fight for the Negro’s “right” to be Indian, even if he claims to have but “one drop” of Indian blood, is the most repugnant social ideological fragement of self-righteous sexal perversion ever evoled in liberal psychosis. The fact that white conservatives might be found going along with the notion merely shows how superficial some conservatives actually are. Their gut level reactions may protect their own white “tribes,” but they are not objective enough to grant others their right to protect theirs. (It does seem that the Indians is the only race present in America that is not ‘dying’ to be white. That surely puzzles the white man.)
Nevertheless, Soros cannot use Indians against America. All he can do is what he already tried–to “redistribute” Indian honor on all the other non-white people of the world, and thus to essentially demean or devalue American Indians. And that homosexual bit included in the Sundance redistribution effort is the covert use of homosexuality as a population-reducing method. The whole liberal advocacy of homosexuality by the United Nations, along with abortion, and child self-abuse, is all about reducing the number of people in the world.
So, once again, BadEagle.com must adovcate for the distinct identity of the American Indian. Without prejudice, without hate, without disdain for other races, I must advocate the preservation of what’s left of the American Indian. I love the Indian race. I only wish other people loved their race as well.
True love of race exposes racism. Without it, racism hides behind liberal tolerance and Sorosian Communism. And perhaps we need a new term: Sorosism. It is the most recent wave of Marxism. It’s a whole new rhetoric of compassion, to the uneducated ear. Soros is no average liberal. He is one of the wealthiest and smartest men in the world.