David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Hear ye, all men of the world. Listen, all warriors! If you value your culture, your race, and your religion, do as the Israeli men do. Protect your women. Forget “tolerance.” Away with “compassion.” Down with inter-faith marriage, miscengenation, and multiculturalism. This is Communist inspired, perverted freedom, and the destruction of culture. “Racism!” the liberals cry. Thus they attempt to condemn those who want to protect and preserve themselves. Forget liberals.
Look at this recent report from Israel.
If you value your culture, your race, and your religion. The key word is “if.” Many people don’t value these things. Many people think culture is passé. The Jewish news report is obviously liberal, created by liberal Jews, about conservative Jews. Of course, there is one flaw in the “Jewish conservatism” as presented in the report, however. A true conservative person, who involves morality in his life, does not practice promiscuity, or sexuality outside marriage. A true conservative person does not practice adultery or fornication. In the Jewish news report, the Jewish woman involved consented to extra-marital sexual relations. Yes she was extremely offended, having been deceived by an Arab man. But, had she practiced true morality, she would never have been thus offended.
Conservatism, without fundamental morality, is perhaps an awkward position to take, at least politically, since it inevitably identifies itself with the larger scope of conservatism, yet, also brings a certain moral liberty with it.
We recently witnessed the incomparable Ann Coulter create a whirlwind of controversy when she spoke to a homosexual group in New York in September. It is true that she stood for traditional marriage (between a man and a woman) as she spoke. She did not flatter homosexuals for their condition, and her speech was essentially a rebuke, in the very final analysis. But, the fact that she would lend her reputation to even the concept that homosexuality did not prevent a homosexual from being conservative and Republican was more than many conservatives could accept, conservatives like Peter LeBarbera and Joseph Farah.
Conservatism is inevitably associated with the Biblical, Judeo-Christian religion. With conservatism comes the fundamental concern for the preservation of race, religion, and culture–at least of the white, Judeo-Christian, western culture (i.e., the American, European culture.) The war against the white race, against the Judeo-Christian religion, and against western culture, is waged by people without morality, certainly without Biblical morality. Is there another kind? A better kind? A more healthy kind, producing better people, with happier lives? I think not. There’s no evidence to support that notion. The existence of America–the envy of the world, is the strongest argument against any other kind of so-called “morality.” The blessings of America would never have evolved had the enemies of the Bible (i.e., liberals) had their way. This is abundantly clear.
The Israeli report is timely. Consensual sex is called “rape” because a man deceived a woman as to his racial (cultural and religious) identity. That’s how important race, cultural and religion are, and, the clarion implication is, that’s how important sex is. Of course, morality is not going to be the focus of the story, but rather race, religion, and culture. There are many words, terms, and much political jargon being thrown around in the story, but, Biblical morality is not one of them. Yet, that’s what the issue is really based on. The Jew is obligated to protect and preserve his people. The Jewish warrior is coming alive there in Jaffe, Israel. Amen.
May that same warrior come alive in all other races and cultures–particularly the American white race, and the American Indian race. It is time to simply understand that race and culture does not preserve itself. The natural aggressions of men and women work against preservation of anything. Special, conscious effort must be made to preserve and protect whatever is valued. I taught this to my classes at Oklahoma State University (Oklahoma City) when I was allowed to teach. “Whatever you have that is valuable, if you are not willing to fight for it, it will be taken from you”–whether its your race, your culture, your religion, your money, or your land. This is the law of the wild. This is mankind. Be advised.
I like what I hear in this Israeli report, about Jewish men taking the initiative to protect what they have. There is always the tempation of a woman to wander into “forbidden” sex with a “foreign” man. And men always want to explore women exotic to them. This is the story of humanity, really. But that same story contains a lot of war, and the fact is, people in the end prefer their own race, their own religion, their own language, and their own kind. It’s called “home.”
No political theory, no feigned liberal “morality” (which is essentially immorality), no global trend, or no media campaign will ever remove man’s desire for his own. May the Creator of all grant us understanding of these things, and remind us of our most basic intuitions of being.
22 responses so far ↓
1 Thrasymachus // Nov 8, 2010 at 11:34 am
A beautiful article. You have obviously given much careful thought to this subject over the years. I know this because I have done likewise.
The fact that nearly all human beings naturally want to feel ‘at home’ in their dwellings and where they live out their lives is the bottom line here. This need is instinctive.
War arises only when another population and culture would steal our home. In the absence of this theft, there is no actual race hatred. Greed is the root of war, not “racism.”
A race is an extended family of genetically related and culturally homogeneous people. God decided the bounds of the habitations of the nations. This logically means that people are not free, under God’s law, simply to disregard national boundaries. Yet the permanent erasure of all such boundaries is the ultimate goal of the Liberal.
2 calliegal235 // Nov 8, 2010 at 1:46 pm
Excellent again, Dr. Yeagley!
I also added this to my youtube.com playlist,
David Yeagley: Native American patriot speaks out about patriotism and white guilt
3 Pamela K. // Nov 8, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Arabs Declare “Jews Out!” (A Story you won’t see on CNN!)
Arab Villagers Declare ‘Jews Out!’
4 Georgia // Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 pm
The Bible is not clear on the subject of interracial marriage and whether it’s right or wrong.
Deuteronomy 7:1-6 tells the Israelite’s to destroy all the inhabitants of the Canaan land and not to intermarry with them–because they would “turn your sons away from following Me, that they may serve other gods.” The same concern of 2 Corinthians 6:14 is again expressed here.
On the other hand, Aaron and Miriam were punished for criticizing Moses’s wife who was another race (Numbers 12:1-15)
I’m not sure if policing the streets to avert interracial attraction is the way to go about
encouraging families to stay strong in their beliefs and culture. It’s rather late at that point isn’t it?
The video clip is more about the sin of deception than about interracial conflicts.
Some of the people I know in interracial relationships do have low self esteem issues.
5 ELIAKIM // Nov 8, 2010 at 4:28 pm
“May the Creator of all grant us understanding of these things, and remind us of our most basic intuitions of being.”
1. Many of the famous ancient hebrews and their heros of their religion married outside of their religion.
a. JOSEPH
b. Queen Ester who saved her people.
c. King Solomon who married to ensure peace would reign.
That is just three that come to remembrance.
Intermarriage as been a complex issue in Judaism that has caused a tremendous amount of heartbreak and rejection of children.
In my own life I met an Israeli in my 20′s. He did not like Jewish women, he did not like Israeli’s.
After an eight year relationship with an English woman he was forced by the family to break it off.
They sent him off around the world for a year. the first thing he did on his return was call her
How religion can divide even love when people put family and religion before love. People are not a commodity without love they become so.
When we met he shared his heartbreak,so we agreed to spend a year together.
He only liked English women.
We finished our romance with a holiday. There
a bigger story that I will not go into.
Had I known then what I know now then things might have been different.
As far as I am aware he never married.
However, both my great grandmothers married outside of family doctrine.
My Jewish great grandmother married outside of her family tradition. There is a fresco of her in the Vatican. As far as I am aware, her eldest
son did as well. He was JOSEPH.
She was rejected from her Jewish family.
My other great grandmother did the same. She was born into an extremely wealthy Scottish family, and she fell in love with the footman.
Oh dear love is not allowed if it is perceived to be beneath you and your power and status.
She was also rejected from the family and its wealth.
Let me ask your heart David, is it fair and right that money is used to control children and who they love?
Isn’t it wonderful that some people have had the courage to say, LOVE IS EVERYTHING, it is beyond religion and money.
Are they not the people of integrity?
However, where ISLAM is concerned that is an entirely different issue, because orthodox Islam have what is known as SOCIAL JIHAD that in is part of their global strategy.
SOCIAL JIHAD includes using love and relationships to convert the world to Islam, and I cannot tell you how the creator feels about that. However, I am sure that you can imagine how he feels about it.
So people that are on internet dating sites etc are very vulnerable, both male and female to the Islamic agenda.
However, ISRAELI women, the majority of them have been in the army, so they know the score.
Should orthodox Jews police discos?
Certainly not.
Everyone has the right to choose the love of their life, all we can do is make people aware of what is at stake.
Now the video mentions ARABS, it does not differentiate between Muslim Arabs, Christian or Druze.
6 David Yeagley // Nov 8, 2010 at 4:37 pm
There are rules, and there are exceptions. You don’t built the nation, or your personal life, on exceptions.
Georgia and Eliakim, your analogies are mistaken, I believe, although I understand your sentiments. I’m only saying that the logical thing to do, if you value your culture and your race, is to take steps, make efforts, to preserve it. This can never be a crime.
I don’t condemn mixed breeds. I’m one myself. I say, however, we don’t have to repeat, aggrandize, and glorify our fathers’ steps. I say we should make the effort to do better than our fathers have done.
I say consider the nation first, then yourself. Most people put it the other way around. Self first, the community second. God last. Yes, I do believe these tensions are at play in this matter.
If the street is where it happens, then the street must be the point of concern.
The wife of Moses in question was apparently a second wife, and not so blessed, as second wives rarely are. Yes, some times the ancient God-fearers made exceptions, but, there was only trouble that followed as a result. Every time. Zipporah was a Midianite, not an Ethiopian. Zipporah was the true wife, not an add-on.
7 ELIAKIM // Nov 8, 2010 at 5:55 pm
David, my view is this. That every child born on a specific land as a right to exist. It is the land that they are born on that is their homeland.
When I was in Israel I met Israel’s that felt they did not belong, they felt they were missing their roots and heritage from other lands their parents had brought them. My advice to them was seek out your roots, go find them. Take the adventure and see where it leads you.
I also met a girl from Northern Europe that felt she completely belonged in Israel and that she felt compelled to convert. My response was the same, follow your heart.
I met a wonderful couple in Safed, he was an American Jew she was Iranian.
I stayed with another couple. He was Yemenite Jew by birth and she was an American.
Israel is such a multi-cultural society, the most complex of any country in the world, with 15 different religions with a base there. it is a pressure pot and I admire them so much for what they have achieved and the sheer power and effort that individuals have put into the peace process.
Israel is truly international and secular.
The Western world is only fed what the mediI a feeds them. I met Jewish people that have dinner parties with their Arab neighbours.
I was blessed to meet artists, musicians, health and healing professionals that have worked tirelessly for decades to co-create peace amongst the peoples.
However, as we know some of the orthodox Jews and orthodox Muslims are a stumbling block.
Many people in the West have believed all that they are fed and that Israel was co-created by orthodox religionists but that is not the case.
The black hats may have been the inspiration for it but they certainly did not build the nation that it has become.
I can only speak as I find and I always do my utmost to listen to the people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_shGkHZ-1G8
God bless Israel and all that live there. May they all be allowed to live in peace. May they all be given the right to exist by man.
8 ELIAKIM // Nov 8, 2010 at 6:15 pm
So are you saying David, that you believe that stopping people marrying each other can stop the destruction of a culture?
My truth is that when people honor each other’s nations and cultures with love, truth and integrity, there is no destruction.
Its about people becoming united in the heart to defend cultures and nations. No matter what your beliefs or who you are married too.
I know a loyal Christian (central American) that is married to a Buddhist (north American) and she says that it has been the most amazing healing journey.
This is the time for healing now David, IMHV. With healing people teach their souls to fly beyond division and that which has destroyed cultures in the past.
9 Georgia // Nov 8, 2010 at 6:31 pm
Thank you David Yeagley,
I do value my culture and race, especially for the future of my children and grandchildren.
30 years ago, ours was a small, rural, Christian, agricultural community; now we have a police Gang Task Force.
Where do we go from here?
Whites leave the cities and move to the suburbs…15 years later they are leaving the suburbs for the same reason they left the city.
High crime rates and a fast decline in the quality of life in the community.
Our way of life is changing.
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it.
I tend to lurk and not post much because all I see are the problems and I’m not sure if I can offer any Christian fixes.
Quote: “I say we should make the effort to do better than our fathers have done.” /quote
Yes!
10 jo282271 // Nov 8, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Great article Dr. Yeagley. Your second to last paragraph especially stood out to me as I have seen many white women go with non-white men, and after a period of time they start to miss their “home” (their race). But many of them, knowing they can’t go back “home” will become depressed and miserable. They will not say this to you openly but look at any white woman who marries a non-white man, after a while they will start be overly nice to any white man they meet as a subliminal way of saying I’m sorry for leaving you (my race). very sad in many cases that these women will live the rest of their lives alone. we got to stop all inter-racial marriages and dating, it’s destroying our country. I know most people don’t like to hear it but the races that are proud of who they are (the american indians, western europeans etc..) will disown their women when they go with a man outside of their race.
In my apartment complex we have several black men with white women. One couple consist of a white woman, her two white son’s from her frist marriage and a mixed baby with here black husband who she is currently married to. I feel sorry for the two white boys. I pray for them, since they have to grow up in a screwed up houshold like that. The chidren of the marriages in the end will be the one’s who will suffer most, which why we have to stand up and fight back against the negro obsession with marrying outside their own race.
11 hulagirl // Nov 9, 2010 at 1:56 am
Wonder what my race, culture, “identity” is. My race is a European mish mash, my culture is, what, American? Who am I?
12 David Yeagley // Nov 9, 2010 at 8:22 am
White, Western, American. Sounds like start!
Seriously, I’m well aware of the established inroads of multiculturalism. It’s been going on a long time.
As an Indian, I’m simply piquantly aware of the possibility of passing out of existence. I believe this is a real possibility unless conscious steps are begun.
I’m not really “condemning” anyone for anything. There is no intent of morality here, but possibily only in the broadest, deepest sense. I believe the nations are ordained. The ethnicities. The races. A gesture of respect therefore cannot be ill-founded, or any too problematic, can it?
13 Stella // Nov 9, 2010 at 8:26 am
Despite monumental organized PR efforts to portray Israel as a “liberal” country sharing common values with its only lifeline (the US Congress), the true nature of zionism (as an anachronist expression of ethnic nationalism) bubbles to the surface. At some point, all the slick lobbyists in the world won’t be able to obfuscate the fundamental contraduction between a “Jewish State” and a “democracy.”
This phenomenon is a symptom of the desparation sweeping Israeli society as the illusion of a “two state solution” dissipates. Israel’s future looks increasingly bleak, not because of any external threat, but because of the internal contradictions of Zionism in the modern world.
14 Thrasymachus // Nov 9, 2010 at 9:22 am
It is true that Organized Jewry needs to embrace peaceful nationalism as a universal principle. Note, I said “peaceful.” I am not talking about Hitlerism, something I detest.
The Almighty would not bring about the existence of distinct races and take pains to separate them if He wanted them to blend into a raceless world society. Nationhood is indeed ordained of the Lord and is an expression of His Will.
Indeed, the desire for a borderless world state is of the Enemy of God, as he too seeks to reign. But his power has been broken and defeated by Jesus’ supreme accomplishment on the cross.
15 Pamela K. // Nov 9, 2010 at 9:26 am
In only one day-May 15, 1948- God restored the nation of Israel as foretold by the Prophet Isaiah:
“Before Zion travailed, she gave birth; before her pain came upon her she was delivered of a male child. Who has heard of such a thing? Who has seen such things? Shall a land be born in one day? Or shall a nation be brought forth in a moment? For as soon as Zion was in labor, she brought forth her children.” Isaiah 66:7-8
Israel emerged as a complete nation, with a parliament, military, civilian police force, medical and educational system firmly in place. There is no other nation on the face of the earth that ever experienced a similar rebirth.
The word, Zionism, comes from Zion of course, and over the years the Jewish people adopted this special name for their inheritance.
“Great is the Lord and highly to be praised in the city of our God! His holy mountain. Fair and beautiful in elevation, is the joy of all the earth, Mount Zion (the city of David) and the temple, the whole city (Jerusalem) of the Great King.”
Psalm 48;1-2
16 David Yeagley // Nov 9, 2010 at 9:38 am
Well, it was pretty phenomenal! And the US didn’t lift a finger, and was no part of it. The Jews of Europe did it. And I do believe that Providence had the upper hand.
In the history of the world, in Heilsgeschichte, anyway, the Jews have never, ever gathered and become established in Cana’an (Palestine) unless the Lord had made it so. They’ve been dispersed, gathered, dispersed, and gathered again, even in the prophetic narrative itself. They are never gathere except the Lord gathers them. That is the precedent.
Many people wonder about Israel’s identity to day. I don’t know. I can only offer the precedent. I don’t have any evangelical prophetic note to offer about what is happening today.
17 Pamela K. // Nov 9, 2010 at 10:42 am
The restoration of the nation of Israel in1948 was the single greatest fulfillment of biblical prophecy since the coming of The Messiah.
The single most continual fulfillment of prophecy concerning the Jewish people and Israel is the consistent hostility against them from the Arabs and most of the world, which unfortunately includes the present government of the United States.
Israel’s foremost modern day prophet is Professor Benzion Netanyahu, the father of the current prime minister. At 100 years old this year, Professor Netanyahu still has a mind like a steel trap and makes it very clear that he is a Zionist Historian, not a “Historian of Zionism”.
He also does not mince words in his opinion concerning Israel’s hostile Arab neighbors:
: “The Bible finds no worse image than this of the man from the desert. And why? Because he has no respect for any law. Because in the desert he can do as he pleases. The tendency towards conflict is in the essence of the Arab. He is an enemy by essence. His personality won’t allow him any compromise or agreement. It doesn’t matter what kind of resistance he will meet, what price he will pay. His existence is one of perpetual war.”
I suppose the ringing clarity of this wise man’s words is the reason why his son, the prime minister, always tries to censor his father’s interviews with the press!
18 Stella // Nov 9, 2010 at 11:40 am
“Because he has no respect for any law. Because in the desert he can do as he pleases. The tendency towards conflict is in the essence of the Arab. He is an enemy by essence. His personality won’t allow him any compromise or agreement. It doesn’t matter what kind of resistance he will meet, what price he will pay. His existence is one of perpetual war.”
This (“no respect for any law”) is ironic, to say the very least, coming from a spokesman for the outlaw state. The peace treaties signed by Egypt and Jordan in themselves refute Netanyahu’s moronic racist nonsense.
19 David Yeagley // Nov 9, 2010 at 11:41 am
And Ann Coulter says her mother is not allowed to do interviews for the same kind of reason. I met her noble and lovely mother a few years ago. I said, with an unavoidable smile, “You must be very, very proud! She said, “Ann is like the voice of an angel…” Then her daughter said, “THIS is why mother is not allowed to do interview!”
Well, parents to get prophetic, indeed. Maybe it’s just age, maybe experience. I don’t know. I’m not of a disposition to repeat things my mother said about me…
20 Pamela K. // Nov 9, 2010 at 2:50 pm
I believe Professor Netanyahu was referring to the Bible’s description of the Arabs, who are the descendants of Ishmael, the son of Abraham and his Egyptian handmaid, Hagar.
Thus said the Angel of the Lord: “And he (Ishmael) will be as a wild ass among men; his hand will be against every man and every man’s hand against him, and he will live to the east and on the borders of all his kinsmen.” Genesis 18:12
The great British Arabist T.E. Lawrence, a.k.a. “Lawrence of Arabia” who helped unite the Arab armies against the Ottoman Turks even chastised the sons of the Arabian desert for being “barbarous and cruel. As long as they fight among themselves they will remain a little people.” In other words, their innate nature, keeping their “hand raised against every man” would keep their culture insignificant to real growth and prosperity. And despite their glut of oil wealth, I am afraid this remains true today. I am not speaking about individual Arab people, however. I am speaking about the collective Arab conscious that they have been a continually wronged people, overlooked and forsaken from the beginning although God promised Ishmael he would “multiply his descendants exceedingly”. Twelve princes came from Ishmael. (Read Genesis 25). However, Isaac was the promised (spiritual heir) to the land as are his descendants.
When Israel was officially declared a nation in 1948, the very next day, the Arabs attacked it and lost, just like they have lost every single battle when they have come against her. God will not allow them to win. They are the outlaws and they are in rebellion to God through their embrace of Islam.
These Arab governments do not want peace. They want the ancestral home of the Jewish people, ancient Judea and Samaria, which they already have virtually surrounded, thanks to the meddling of the United States and other countries and their constant push for Israel to give up more and more land to her enemies. I am hesitant to say, Palestinians, because there was never a country called Palestine. It was a region of the Near East. Most of the Arabs who claim to be Palestinian, are actually descendants of families from either Jordan or Syria.
As a Christian, I am no longer allowed to visit the site of the Nativity in Bethlehem, yet, the Arab Muslims can freely go there and defecate on this holy shrine, as they can freely desecrate Joseph’s Tomb, which has long been a focus of Jewish pilgrimage and prayer.
The world turns a blind eye and a deaf ear to these abominations, and yet, when Israel retaliates against Hamas for launching missiles into their towns and cities,or kills Arab guerillas for car jacking and murdering a pregnant Jewish woman and her children, or attacks a ship bringing more terrorists into Gaza, they are immediately condemned by the world, not to mention the rogue states running the UN for conducting “Crimes against humanity”.
Contrary to revisionist historians, both secular and religious, God has never broken His covenant with the Jewish people. Furthermore, God has made it very clear what will happen to the enemies of Israel:
“I will gather all nations and will bring them down into the Valley of Jehoshaphat and there will I deal with and execute judgment upon them for their treatment of My People and My heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations and because they have divided My land.” Joel 3:2
21 calliegal235 // Nov 9, 2010 at 3:44 pm
P.K. – above, well spoken.
In other related matters, I have decided we should be more careful about accepting gifts from foreigners; particularly the French. In fact, I’ve even considered we might return them.
22 David Yeagley // Nov 9, 2010 at 4:04 pm
The Arabs say they are decendents of Ishmael. No one questions them, but some one-fanged Indian in Oklahoma…
Are the Arabs Arab?
The Descendents of Ishmael?
You must log in to post a comment.