71 responses so far ↓

• 1 Thrasymachus // Nov 2, 2010 at 5:02 pm   

  Okay, however relevant (I believe this IS culturally relevant) to this discussion:

  Here is what White American schools showed the children of the Great White Father in 1950 (before the successful liberal cultural revolutions of the 60s) –

  Appreciating Our Parents – Honoring Your Father And Mother

• 2 Thrasymachus // Nov 2, 2010 at 5:11 pm   

  There’s another factor of American History I need to recount here. From the very founding of the States, the impress of Calvinism was very strong and deep. Calvin taught that a sign that a Christian was truly a Christian — one of the elect — was material prosperity. This laid the foundation for the gospel of success that has led to the materialistic emphasis in American politics.

  True success is always essentially moral and ethical. Nothing in any person’s life is half as important as learning to cultivate right thought and good habits. Riches and Poverty are largely goverened by forces beyond the average person’s control. Personal integrity is not. Achieving integrity is authentic success.

• 3 Thrasymachus // Nov 2, 2010 at 5:26 pm   

  Yes, alas! Calvin taught that if the Christian were truly a child of God, God would make him rich. But this is not scriptural. The Bible simply promises that basic needs will not go unmet in those who follow the Lord.

• 4 David Yeagley // Nov 2, 2010 at 9:45 pm   

  I just don’t want to fall into the pit from which America looks like a giant ego production, or, the Great Satan, as it were. The glory of self-reliance, self-development, individual freedom, where any man can become a king. Ah, what a glorious vision.

  But, a nation founded on covetousness? Can’t be. It was founded on freedom religion–freedom from Rome and the Church of England. That’s what the Pilgrims were all about, and those are the people who formed the colonies which forged the principles of the later government of the United States. It is essentially a religious country, at the roots. All the covetousness developed later, in the name of freedom, independence, self-development, etc.

  I don’t know. Sometimes I lose the vision. It fades in and out, like a weak radio wave.

  The 2010 elections really spell discipline and common sense responsibility. This is wonderful. I hope we begin to see some critical results. I wonder. I hope. Washington is really an evil place for the soul. Who can bear it today?

• 5 calliegal235 // Nov 2, 2010 at 10:37 pm   

  First, Dr. Yeagley, Thank you for your views, and a place to respond.
  Second, I posted something not long ago which was incorrect, and only dawned on me as I was falling asleep later! I think I had said that Jesus said, before Moses was I AM; it should have been, before Abraham was, I AM.
  I am sure your closing comments are a good reminder to pray for those in Washington,
  It feels so good to say, “Pelosi, You’re Fired!” Ahhh, no more of those tax dollars paying for those weekend runs to CA!

• 6 calliegal235 // Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 pm   

  Oh, let’s not forgot President Wilson’s contributions and the creation of the Federal Reserve Board (soo NOT!).

• 7 Tweets that mention The Great White Father -- Topsy.com // Nov 2, 2010 at 10:42 pm   

  [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Holly Beatrice, Craig Baylor. Craig Baylor said: The Great White Father: Even people who wanted to quit smoking, written by Esteri Maina cialis tadalafil preis is … http://bit.ly/abTb6m [...]

• 8 Following Him // Nov 2, 2010 at 11:39 pm   

  Hi again Dr. Yeagley …

  I have compiled a few of your statements and phrases from past posts on your blog that caught my attention. I reread them quite often. The seventh paragraph from today’s posting is going to be placed at the top of the list.

  What a wonderfully stated, true heart felt description of how your forefathers acted in trying to save their land, compared to what little effort we are now putting forth to save our land.

  I truly appreciate your perspective on things.

  May the Lord continue to bless your efforts.

• 9 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:22 am   

  What can you say about California? Compare Jerry Brown’s speech to that of Marco Rubio. I grew up in southern California, but maybe it’s time to cut them loose. Sad.

• 10 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:33 am   

  Dr. Yeagley, I just realized, I guess I fit your description of those not fighting for the land. My problem with that, currently, is that these socialist vote in these horrible tax and spend policies (among others) and when they are bankrupt, thing the rest of us should bail them out. Well, I say, let’s just move to a state with more fiscal sense (maybe that’s cents!) and let’s see how they do without the tax money from those who did not vote for those policies. I think that’s fair competition among the states!

• 11 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:34 am   

  BTW, I have lived in Maryland for 20 years, so you can understand my view, right?

• 12 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 7:53 am   

  California, Nevada, Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut, these are failed states. These states should be banned from business with the rest of the country. These states should be boycotted. Isolated, extracted from the union. “Punished” in a sense. Left to themselves, receiving little or no federal funding. Let them reform, or die. Their governments should be dissolved. The people are unworthy.

• 13 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 8:42 am   

  Well, I guess the lunatics are still in charge of running the asylum. Nevertheless, Senators Barbara Boxer (D-California), Harry Reid (D-Nevada), Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland), and Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) all won re-election by the skin of their teeth! I’ll wager that if the states they represent had bothered to count the boxes of absentee ballots left to gather dust somewhere, none of them would have won re-election! It particularly makes my skin crawl to think that Barbara “Don’t call me ma’am” Boxer will be returning to Washington to continue to defend a woman’s right to have a partial-birth abortion, legislation initially drafted by her.
  Meanwhile, Christine O’Donnell lost primarily due to the negative media against her and because the Delaware GOP refused to back her candidacy.
  On a more positive note, I am sure glad Oklahoma voted to ban Sharia Law from being implemented there! Can’t say same here in the Garden State!

• 14 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 10:00 am   

  No, the Founder’s America was a great — though not perfect — nation. I’d say “ambitious” and “industrious,” but certainly not FOUNDED on covetousness or greed. Americans have generally been thought by visitors to be addicted to success rather than pleasure, in comparison with other world cultures. In any event, a number of Reformed Churches began to teach the gospel of success along with salvation. I don’t think one need mention those ministries here.

  Though Calvin personally believed in getting rich, it is by no means clear that this doctrine was commonly known or widely propagated in America.

  “Calvin did not invent capitalism, but he did teach that one of the rewards of hard work is wealth. His philosophy of work allowed capitalism to flourish where it was practiced.”

  [Concluding sentence in article here:]

  John Calvin
  

• 15 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 10:11 am   

  I happen to believe that one thing the Book of Job teaches is that riches or poverty — or being in between — depend on God. Material prosperity, lawfully gained, is a gift of God.

  A person’s financial status has nothing directly to do with their spiritual status. What Jesus promises is that God will faithfully supply our true needs if we first seek His Kingdom. Like the statement in Book of Proverbs , I ask of God that I be neither rich nor poor!

• 16 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 10:22 am   

  I just wouldn’t want America to be reduced to the thought of being a place where you can get rich, if you work hard enough. That happens only sometimes. To put it forth as a political doctrine has to be deeply wrong.

  There is no virtue in hard work alone, either; though I’ve worked very hard myself. Work does not exonerate or justify, in and of itself. Mexicans work very hard. Does this give them “rights” here? Work has little to do with money, and neither work nor money have anything to do with righteousness.

  I think human nature is happier working, and money might add a dimension of happiness. But, this is not religion, or doctrine, or even fact. The world is fallen. There is no guarantee of the material outcome in this life. I don’t see it.

• 17 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 10:41 am   

  Great post #16! I agree with every word of it.

  I’d even add that toil was a curse. According to Genesis, Man was not originally intended for miserably difficult labor: “in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.” — Genesis 3:19

• 18 whitetrash // Nov 3, 2010 at 11:54 am   

  In combat, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of your enemies is critical. Just as critical, maybe more so, is understanding your own strengths and weaknesses.

  Bottom line: Without the treason of George W. Bush and his global corporate masters, Barry “Obama” Soetoro, as you call him, would never have been elected. I have seen no sign that Conservatives have come to terms with the disaster they visited upon America in the form of George W. Bush and his role in corporate criminality and treason. You sold out the Reagan Revolution for “a thousand points of light” and a “new world order.” These are the Bush the First’s words, not mine. As for Obama, one only has to peruse his financial “reform” bill to see that he and the Dems serve the same Wall Street masters as Bush I, Bush II, and congressional Republicans. All of this nonsense about his socialist inclinations is infantile ranting from entertainers. It makes about as much sense as blaming the Jews.

  Romantic notions about warriors are all well and good, but what Americans have always done best and foremost is WORK. Show me, in the last 10 years, how cutting taxes on the wealthy has produced jobs for anyone but slave labor in China or illegal immigrants fleeing the economic disaster of NAFTA in Mexico. You can’t. Because not only did it not happen, but as the wealthy soaked up nearly triple their previous share of the wealth in this country, wages fell. Yet the lie that cutting taxes leads to job creation persists. And who would the liars be? Republicans.

  Americans need jobs. Not just for material issues, but for purpose. It’s in our DNA. This is where Conservatives have failed, willfully, since 1988. We have a surplus of yachts and private aircraft, and a failing infrastructure. Ronald Reagan would spin in his grave if he knew Conservatives were locked into these idiotic culture wars while our nation is sinking into economic oblivion in the face of an ascending Communist China. It’s madness.

  The truth is both parties, and their partisan followers, have nothing to offer America but more lies, more corruption, and more misery. You want to cut taxes? Fine. Then start cutting the military budget, and stop allowing our warriors to be used in corporate, nation building wars. Start there if you are really serious about smaller government. Don’t even talk about entitlement programs until you have done this. Because anything less is more corporate, Bush style treason. The only place America currently needs troops is on our Southern border.

  If Conservatives really want to be taken seriously, then put up or shut up. Don’t keep going to the well about the big, bad commies. Two many communist countries have benefited from the policies of your heroes, and you know it.

  Here is another chance Republicans. You now control the House again. So… whom is it that you really serve? We shall see. The proof is in the policies, not the rhetoric or lapel pins.

• 19 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:35 pm   

  “Beloved, I pray that you may prosper in all things and be in health just as your soul prospers.”
  -3 John:2

  The above statement is a beautiful reminder regarding the will of God in the life of a committed believer. The truth of God’s Word never fails the person who keeps on asking, who keeps on knocking. It is, as the psalmist wrote, “… is a lamp unto my feet and a light to my path.” Psalm 119:105.
  There is an important distinction between “rich and wealthy” and “prosperity and abundance”.
  Rich and wealthy is basically a worldly term and applies to someone with considerable financial and material assets, whereas, someone who is prosperous may not have a whole lot of money in the bank or live in a mansion, etc., and yet, they have an overflow of abundance meeting their needs with enough left over to share with others. Furthermore, they are content with their life because of the inner knowledge that no matter what happens, God is in control.

  “Delight yourself also in the Lord and He will give you the desires and secret petitions of your heart. Commit your way to the Lord, roll and repose each care of your load on Him; trust also in Him and He will bring it to pass.”
  Psalm 37:4-5

• 20 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:45 pm   

  “The Election Can’t Save Us From The Fed”
  By John Myers, Myers Energy & Gold Report

  “We can pay anybody by running a printing press.” — Thomas Gale Moore, a Ronald Reagan economic advisor, 1986.

  Don’t expect America’s fortunes to change in the wake of yesterday’s election. Even if some semblance of sanity comes to Congress we are still left with that other dysfunctional institution, the Federal Reserve, which is bent on inflating the United States economy, the dollar be damned.

  Part of the problem is Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve. He was reappointed by President Barack Obama last year and has shown himself to be a kindred spirit to the President. Both had zero business experience before moving to government. Bernanke spent most of his life learning economics as taught by Harvard and MIT, before becoming a professor at Stanford and Princeton.

  Bernanke has been hailed as the world’s leading expert on the Great Depression. If you are worried this doesn’t qualify him to help resurrect the U.S. economy you are probably right. It is doubtful that the Pentagon would have put famous historian A.J.P. Taylor in charge of combat operations in Vietnam because he knew so damn much about World War II.

  Bernanke is making sure that the Fed does what the central bank calls quantitative easing. That is a fancy term for saying they are “printing money” commented The Wall Street Journal last week, pointing out that such terminology makes it easier for the American public to swallow than if the Fed just came out and admitted what it is really doing.

  But even The Journal has it wrong. In today’s world Washington doesn’t run printing presses. The truth is that creating new money today doesn’t have anything to do with paper and ink (if it did the Greens would be screaming about the forests). Instead it is done at the push of a button.

  Rather than print money, the Federal Reserve buys assets — usually government bonds, mortgage-backed securities — from banks or on the open market. There is thus more dollars sloshing around in the economy.

  So where does the money to buy these assets come from in the first place? In fact says MoneyWeek, “The central bank just creates it out of nowhere.”

  The Fed is fighting the depression of the 1930s. It raged before the Internet, TV, and the hula hoop and ended 13 years before Bernanke was born.

  In the high-tech age, creating money to float the economy is very simple. The Treasury simply records on its computers the amount of securities the Fed purchased and this new money goes into the banking system to be loaned out at some multiple.

  How much money are we talking about? According to Goldman Sachs, the Federal Reserve may soon purchase $2 trillion of assets to stimulate the U.S. economy. Goldman estimates that as much as $4 trillion of additional large-scale asset purchases might be poured into the economy to meet the Fed’s targets. All this money is being created because the Fed has exhausted its usual mechanism of increasing the money supply: Lowering the interest rate at which banks may lend one another their reserves held at the Fed. Currently the Federal funds rate is now zero.

  I didn’t go to Harvard or Princeton, but even I understand Economics 101. Creating more dollars — in this case trillions more dollars — will devalue each and every dollar. That means that money you have tucked away in a retirement fund or bank account is going to be worth less, a lot less regardless of who is in Congress and how they are voting.

  Back when I was in college I was taught the purpose of the Federal Reserve was to protect the integrity of the dollar. And for most of the 20th Century the Fed did protect the integrity of the dollar. Even when I first started writing about the markets, the Fed under Paul Volcker made the country and the world swallow a bitter pill by jacking up the Fed Funds rate, which nearly doubled between 1979 and 1981; jacking up the interest rate that banks charge each other rose from 11.5 percent to 21.5 percent. That led to a bad recession, but the U.S. dug its way out because the dollar remained intact.

  Now we have the Fed as appointed by Obama. And as the chart below shows, under Bernanke, the Federal Funds Rate has been pushed to zero, lower than at any point in more than a half a century. Unlike Volcker, who worried about the stability of the nation’s currency — the world’s currency — The Wall Street Journal recently summed the central bank’s goal: “The Fed hopes to chase investors out of Treasuries into other, riskier securities. Like stocks.”

  Since when did it become the Fed’s job to get bullish on stocks? What’s next, moving the Merrill Lynch Bull statue outside the Eccles Building?

• 21 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:48 pm   

  WT,

  I think that both major parties are largely financed by the same wealthy corporations, who have all the bases covered. There is much in your post that I agree with. Ronald Reagan, however, should never have made MLKJr. Day a “national holiday.” This was a betrayal of Conservatism and has contributed to the unnatural state of affairs ascendant today.

• 22 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 12:55 pm   

  “The Election Can’t Save Us From The Fed”
  *Part II By John Myers
  Myers Energy & Gold Report
  (*For some reason, the chart would not copy)

  Effective Federal Funds Rates

  Now The Bad News
  Moreover, I am wondering if Bernanke and the Federal Reserve Bank presidents have really thought through their actions. What if money isn’t moved out of the Treasury market and into the stock market but is instead moved into euros, gold or anything besides U.S. dollars?

  China and Japan are sitting on $1.7 trillion of U.S. Treasury debt. China’s is holding one-fifth of its annual gross domestic product (GDP) in Uncle Sam IOUs. Their leaders might be Communists, but they are not idiots. With the Federal Reserve set to magically create four trillion new dollars you can bet that some of the guys wearing the Chairman Mao suits think it might be time to pull the plug on their Treasury investments.

  If this happens, and the Chinese do begin to liquidate Treasuries, it would create a level of financial havoc that would make the Great Depression seem like a bump in the road. I can’t see any way we are going to get out of this unscathed.

  I write this before the elections have happened, so I don’t know if the GOP won. But what should scare you is that it doesn’t matter. Congress could include Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy, and as long as we have a Federal Reserve acting as recklessly as the one now controlling our economic fate, we are in a lot of trouble.

  Action To Take
  Regardless of the election’s outcome and your expectations for 2012, please don’t get bullish on Big Board stocks or bonds. The core of your holdings should be in physical gold, along with some silver. If you want to get some leverage stick to resource stocks that are involved either in precious metals or hydrocarbon energy

• 23 whitetrash // Nov 3, 2010 at 2:20 pm   

  “Ronald Reagan, however, should never have made MLKJr. Day a “national holiday.” This was a betrayal of Conservatism and has contributed to the unnatural state of affairs ascendant today.”

  That’s an interesting statement. Do you really think that Reagan signing the bill for the MLK Holiday compares to shipping our strategic manufacturing capability to Communist China to enrich bankers as a betrayal of Conservative principles? If so… why?

• 24 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 2:29 pm   

  “If so… why?”

  MLKJ was a communist! Forced racial integration was a part of the communist program for America. The Roosevelts themselves turned much of Europe over to communist rule.

  A man of principle does not honor the ideology that is exactly the opposite of his own.

  Moreover, the MLK “holiday” has meant that this man’s ideas are “American” to the core. He now represents America, not, say, George Washington. With the erosion of historic American ideals, it is easy for U.S. politicians to sell out their own country now.

  Making MLK an official saint means that the Americans before him, who disagreed with his ideas, are now declared WRONG. This means that the foundation of the country was fundamentally in error. This opens the door wide to every form of betrayal from those who govern, including the shipping of manufacturing to communist China. Nothing’s sacred about traditional America now.

• 25 Thrasymachus // Nov 3, 2010 at 2:42 pm   

  What could be more un-conservative than forced racial integration? A people who cannot be bothered to conserve their own ethnic nation and its culture certainly can hardly be “conservative.” For me, a culture includes the ethnic nation who created it, and of whom it is an expression. A culture is not a mere commodity to be sold and purchased like an automobile.

• 26 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 3:58 pm   

  Exposing The Saint
  Martin Luther King Jr.
  Communist/Whore Master

  Why didn’t Coretta kick his butt to the curb?

  http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.htm

• 27 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:03 pm   

  The Beast as Saint:
  The Truth About “Martin Luther King, Jr.”

  WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people’s weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist “historians” rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official “saints.” Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations.

  Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?

  Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called “Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.” King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays — they share the generic-sounding “President’s Day.”) A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

  Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King.

  King’s Brazen Cheating

  We read in Michael Hoffman’s “Holiday for a Cheater”:

  The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.

  The first book that King wrote, “Stride Toward Freedom, – -was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

  And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of “The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- – (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: “Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.”

  King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of “The Finding of God.”

  Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

  King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”

  According to “The Martin Luther King Papers”, in King’s dissertation “only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!

  In “The Journal of American History”, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. (“King’s Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation,” The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)

  Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: “King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….” The editors of “The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers” state that “…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….”

  But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us “…actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King’s record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public.”

  Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the “New York Times” of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, “There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.” However, despite its finding, the committee said that “No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.”

  No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the “reverend” and the “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.

  Communist Beliefs and Connections

  Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

  On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

  From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the “Los Angeles Times” reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

  Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, “The Worker,- – openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

  Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis “Globe-Democrat – -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known.

  What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, “immediately hired him again- – as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the “Richmond News-Leader – -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

  During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled “Negroes With Guns.” The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

  According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.”, Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “…we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.”

  Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, “Stride Toward Freedom.” It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.”

  FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

  The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.

  Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

  According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.

  In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the “occupants – -of those rooms. That “according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold “would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.

  Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau hadáseen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.

  Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King’s supposedly “non-violent” marches, Sullivan’s probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King’s only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.”

  Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.

  J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King’s real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in “the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King’s writings as a new book in the Bible.

  Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

  Sources:

  1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- – (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change).

  2. “King’s Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation,” The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87) David J. Garrow

  3. New York Times” of October 11, 1991, page 15.

  4. “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.”, David J. Garrow, (1981).

  5. “And the walls came tumbling down,” Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)

• 28 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:19 pm   

  Whew!

  White Trash, I think the US government was afraid to let all the energy fields fall into the hands of our enemies–which we do have. That’s what was behind the Middle East “entry.” (I don’t call it an invasion at all. We were invited by the people of Iraq, as I understand it. In any case, we were not, nor have ever been, at war with the people of Iraq. They are at war with themselves. Muslim sects.)

  While I believe in the principle of isolationism, and self-reliance, and while I believe America has more than enough coal and oil to last an inconceivably long time, (let alone discovering more–contrary to the board T. Boon Pickens theories), why stand around and let your enemies strengthen themselves?

  Brittish and American oil created those flea-bitten Middle Eastern countries. It is one stroke of white nobleness too many to let them turn the blessing we gave them into a curse on us. But, that’s what seems to have happened.

  If we cut out, our enemies move in. THat would be Russia and Communist allies throughout the world, Muslims, etc. Everyone is happy to unite against America. It is called envy

• 29 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:23 pm   

  Hey, Communists created and controlled the American Indian Movement, too.

  Dennis Banks at Yale, BadEagle.com forum discussion, just started.

  The Yale Daily article, with a couple of comments.

  From the Marxist playbook, it’s called ‘racial agitation.’

  Barry boy fits right in. Lovin’ it!

• 30 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:35 pm   

  I do have to say, Barry is a cool person. I’ve always thought that. My repulsions aren’t based on his being “black.” It is precisely the “content of his character” that offends me, personally, politically, and socially. But, he is suave and cool. That makes his character the more deceptive, thus offensive. And I don’t think he planned that!

  The kid had no father. Bounced around, a political vagrant for a mother. Pathetic situation. He does strike me as a bi-sexual, whistling through his big teeth all the time. Creepy.

  But, he has a polished streak of gentlemanness in him. That he does.

• 31 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:39 pm   

  That information I posted was from the website:http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.htm. At the bottom of the page the reader can click on to a forum hosted by the group, Stormfront.
  Even Snopes.com. which is a liberal website, is hesitant to dismiss the claims made against Martin Luther King concerning his communist ties, etc.
  It is really sad and disgusting to learn the truth about this man whose status as a hero/champion of the Civil Rights Movement has been so positively ingrained into our culture by the liberal establishment and into the impressionable minds of thousands of school children.
  However, although I did not realize it at the time, I witnessed the true side of the King “legacy” several years ago at his wife’s funeral. It turned into less of a tribute to her memory and more of a bash against George Bush, the Republican Party, and Conservatism led by people like Bill and Hillary Clinton and some equally hostile and downright nasty members of the SCLC..

• 32 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 pm   

  Dr. Yeagley, thanks for post #12. So I’m not so crazy!
  My husband left Poland and went to Germany in 1985. After about six months of no work, for this former Polish National Railroad Train Engineer, a thoughtful old lady with Catholic Charities suggested he go to the U.S.A. He did so, even though he spoke not a word of English, having been required to study Russian. He not only learned English, he learned a new trade, and has bought and sold and paid off mortgages, all from hard work as a truck driver and then as a car hauler.
  Here’s a little story he told me, which I find interesting.
  In Poland, under the Communist system, there were some communal farms. People would plant potatos during the day, and then during the night they would dig them up and take them home. Of course, later, when there should have been a healthy potato crop, there wasn’t. The Soviet Union would be out a report, saying it had been a poor crop year.
  Yet I still hear some saying communism worked? Excuse me?
  My husband’s first father-in-law built his own, large home in Poland. All the materials for the home were stolen.
  A few years ago, when we stopped at a McDonald’s in Poland, we asked for ketchup for our French Fries, and were told we would need to pay for it; it was not included with the purchase of fries.
  My husband has explained, why in many restaurants in Poland, you will not see condiments on the tables; because people will steal it.
  Recently we were in Poland again for a wedding. I was using my nephew’s iron and ironing board to press a dress, and made the mistake of setting the hot side of the iron on the ironing board, just for a second. It burned a hole through the fabric and the thin layer of sponge (mine at home doesn’t do that; my ironing cover is not cheap polyester), also ruining the iron. My husband went walked to a nearby store and purchased a new iron, returning in less than 30 minutes. He said that under former communist soviet system, he would not have been able to do that, because he would not have been able to find an iron, nor many other things.
  Poland has come quite a ways, but they are still a very poor country, with many of the young people fleeing.
  We take material, physical, items for granted in the U.S.A. — still.

• 33 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 4:55 pm   

  Obama’s black skin does not offend me. It’s his politics. And although I might be wrong, he does not strike me as either a gay or bi-sexual man. In fact, unlike the semblance of marital affection expressed publicly by Bill and Hillary Clinton, I think Barack and Michelle Obama truly love each other. I just wish they were not President and First Lady.

• 34 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 5:02 pm   

  Michelle is truly a nothing if there ever was a nothing. Completely created by media. Utterly superficial. That is painful to watch, as a citizen. Both of them are “made.” They are puppets. We’ll never know what they are worth, as individual persons in the world. This presidential fantasy is just that, a fantasy. A nightmare, to be exact. All they know how to do is destroy, spend money, and act authoritative. Barry finds his “manhood” in how much he can spend. He thinks that’s macho. Michelle likes to order the country around like a child. This is a pathology in immaturity, seems to me.

  Their political presents represents the lowest moment in American history. It is incredible, really.

• 35 David Yeagley // Nov 3, 2010 at 5:05 pm   

  Dobje,Calliegal, barte dobje!

  I actually played on a Polish soccer team up in Connecticut, for half a season. When they figured out I wasn’t Polish, they let me go. (Actually, I wasn’t really good enough to play with them. I play better now, though.)

• 36 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 5:16 pm   

  Well, love is strange! And for all her fakeness, Michelle did grow a truly lovely vegetable garden at the White House. If she really cared about what our kids are eating and drinking she ought to host an organic gardening/cooking show on The Food Network, don’t you think?

• 37 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 5:55 pm   

  Dr. Yeagley, I’m not famliar with everything available at the badeagle webpage. If this post is not appropriate here, I take no offense at its removal.
  Here’s how conservative I am:
  I want congress to pass an amendment that will at least say that an unborn child has the right to live. If the president vetos such a law, congress should have the courage to pass it by getting the votes necessary to do so.

  I want congress to work within a budget and not borrow money!

  Of course, we need jobs in the United States again. (We sent our jobs to Mexico – and other countries – then have illegal aliens coming here taking jobs here? What did we achieve?)

  I want the Dept of Education gone.
  I want the states and local communities to be in charge of education, and at least some of them to offer school vouchers, as they choose, unless there’s a better idea. (We’ll see which states fare the best, this way.)
  I would have all schools, public and private, to have their students wear uniforms, but that should be decided by the local schools!
  I want history classes to include extensive biographical stories on our founding fathers, particularly George Washington. (Again, up to the local schools, but I highly recommend it!)

  Somewhere between education and advertising, we have failed to instill in Americans the knowledge and motivation to make healthy choices on their own – that needs to be fixed. I mean, people should have the freedom to choose to smoke and the knowledge and motivation to choose not to smoke! How many people drink from a bottle of arsenic every day? – Each person needs to be responsible for making healthy choices, not micro-managed by the government. What are they learning in school? Yes, this should be a job of a parent, but evidently, I failed at this, never thinking that in our smoke free home, a child of mine would choose to smoke!

  I am not aware of all the areas in our medical system where we need improvements, or reforms, but if we can make things better, not worse, then we should. (My parents tell me that their medical insurances, costs, etc. went up after signing up for medicare.)

  Do away with tax on businesses; totally.
  Dismantle the current tax system, and use a low percentage flat tax system.
  Dismantle the Federal Reserve Board.
  Return to a gold and silver backed monetary system, and stop using paper (most of us use credit cards or bank cards anyway, but remove the Federal Reserve Notes).

  Drill in Alaska! Drill anywhere in the country where it’s profitable, and the land is legally available (no, the government can’t just take it if held privately by someone else!)

  Does the federal government need to own so much land? Help them get rid of some federally owned land!

  Protect our borders from invaders, and uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution.

  If private companies wish to provide Spanish and English language options, I suppose they should be allowed to, but I don’t want to pay for it! Why should there be this preference for Spanish? My parents had some close frineds from France and Italy; I don’t remember seeing anything in print in those languages for them! Every language seems to be spoken in this country; pick English! This government should not print materials in any language other than ENGLISH.
  The link below will show how many languages are spoken in the Los Angeles school district.
  http://www.laalmanac.com/LA/la10b.htm

  I expect charitable organizations and churches to grow and continue to provide services people need at times. This covers a wide range of mental, emotional, and physical needs. From youth the general public should be more knowledgable about where to get such help. It’s heart breaking that our service men and women would return from a war zone and then commit suicide, or that adults who have survived sexual abuse as a children, commit suicide.

• 38 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 6:07 pm   

  Pamela, I think someone lied to you about why the Federal Reserve Board was created. What do you think of the website, the grandfather’s economic report?

• 39 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 6:08 pm   

  Dr. Yeagley! Get out of town! Polish soccer! Too funny! LOL

• 40 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 6:37 pm   

  calliegirl235 : Have you ever read the book, “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” By Gary Allen? No one lied to me about why the Federal Reserve Board was created. I believe what John Myers is saying about the Federal Reserve being out of control. Furthermore, our Founding Fathers never saw the need for the implementation of a Federal Reserve Board, so why does America need one today?

• 41 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 9:08 pm   

  Pamela, your comment #40 – I totally agree!
  Previously you wrote: Back when I was in college I was taught the purpose of the Federal Reserve was to protect the integrity of the dollar. And for most of the 20th Century the Fed did protect the integrity of the dollar.
  _____________________ But from what I see on the grandfather’s economic report, it does not appear to me that the dollar has been protected. In fact, it appears we had very little inflation at all (of course we were still on gold and silver standard) until after the creation of the Federal Reserve Board. I think the Federal Reserve Board, (not Federal, not a Reserve, and not a Board) protects the elitists in charge there. Am I right? — No, I have not read that book; sounds like a good book!

• 42 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 9:15 pm   

  The Federal Reserve, the IRS, & Communism

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqWQI3au7f4&feature=related

• 43 Pamela K. // Nov 3, 2010 at 9:28 pm   

  Calliegirl235: That post was a copy of a report written by John Myers, a financial expert.

• 44 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 9:48 pm   

  Oh, Thank you! That’s what I get for skimming!

• 45 calliegal235 // Nov 3, 2010 at 10:32 pm   

  Pamela – #42 I added it to my Obama New World Order Playlist. I forgot, in my list of things I’d like, how bad the IRS and the income tax is! I read most of The Creature from Jekyll Island. My dad sent it to me. He and my mother are the epitomy of fiscal conservatives as shown in their personal lives. Bt then, they were born during the depression. My father, the fourth boy in a family of 5 boys to a So. Baptist Minister and stay at home wife; my mother, the oldest of the 16 children my coal mining grandfather and his stay at home wife had. My father was not able to enter college; when his parents moved away from the place he’d lived most of his life, the college told him he would have to pay out of state tuition. My mom finished 8th grade, in a one room school house. (She was born in a log cabin.) Today, they live together in a home for which they paid cash (in Oceanside, CA) – my dad has had second thoughts about whether he should not have had a mortgage. They live, as they have for about 15 years, on their retirement earnings. In 1999, my dad told me he and my mother managed to save $40,000 out of their retirement income! A few weeks ago, he told me that now, they are living on $50,000 a year; he means that’s their annual income. My father helped build a small company, as its main design engineer. My mother used to dip ice cream, but through a friend got a job at Nabisco, in an office, where she never missed a day of work in 12 years. During that time all the money she earned, went into their savings. Today, my mother has a small pension from Nabisco, but my father does not. My mother is the coupon queen. She once left a grocery store with more money in her purse than when she went in, plus the few items she needed from the store! For about 10-15 years, they bought rented and sold a few properties; not a lot. Once when my dad was still working, in the 1980s, he told me he had paid $80,000 in taxes that year; I think that was just his income taxes. They have helped many people, seldom repaid for the money they put out, and helped build a church. When Obama took over GM…my dad’s $30k in stocks, went poof! So I get a bit emotional when I hear the leftist rhetoric about the poor and the rich! Is it my parents those on the left are referring to, when they talk about selfish, self-centered Americans? Is it my parents who aren’t paying their fair share? They don’t make $250,000 a year, but, because they are Americans who actually live on their retirement earnings — really theirs, not some union pension — they are part of the top 4-5% of retired Americans who do so. Hmm. Need to modify my wish list in post#37, for I am in favor of returning freedom to America, as it was delivered to us, with great sacrifices, by our founding fathers.
  Regarding the youtube message…I have been saying for some time, I’m not convinced that we won the cold war. Of course, America has been taken so far left, that the left seems to think defending and abiding by our constitution, being fiscally responsible, not spending our children’s money (basically the pagan practice of sacrificing your children for a better crop today) is…extremist. Thanks, Pamela!

• 46 Post election malaise « Old Atlantic Lighthouse // Nov 4, 2010 at 3:15 am   

  [...] http://www.badeagle.com/2010/11/02/the-great-white-father/#comments No amount of popular remorse, reaction, or even revolution will change the fact that the majority of the American people were amazingly naive, idealistic, and stupid to have elected such a fraud. [...]

• 47 ELIAKIM // Nov 4, 2010 at 4:28 am   

  Whether people like it or not there is a perfection in it all and Obama fulfilled the prophecies just like the destruction of the twin towers did. It is all the bible. It is well known in Judaism that when the mosquito bites you then it does so for a reason. What the USA is experiencing is karma on a grand scale and the bible states that people will be driven out.

  Its wake up time USA, for the land of ESAU and the men of EDOM.

  Children like to be independent David, they are born to be independent from their parents. Those parents that allow their children to be free Spirits are mighty indeed.

  However, society rules and its belief systems rule most people. Peer pressure is also a pressure of its own on the young ones.

  As a taxi driver said to me in 2008, the children in the USA would not know how to survive without fast food.

  So it comes back to choice again doesn’t it, what did parents choose for their children? What did they feed them on that helped them to become what they have become?

  Its easy to blame others all the time if and when people refuse to take responsibility for their co-creation.

  People have to seek within for the reasons why they become what they have. Only through healing do people seriously change their ways. Then they begin to live in harmony with the natural resources of the planet instead of create systems that destroy it.

  Obama is on his death bed metaphorically and when he dies you will see the demons rise like never before in American history.

  Time is short and the USA is running out of time to heal itself of its transgressions of the spiritual law.

• 48 ELIAKIM // Nov 4, 2010 at 4:40 am   

  Also important to add that the young ones in the Western world would not survive without supermarkets.

  It is time to engage people to grow their own food sooner rather than later.

• 49 ELIAKIM // Nov 4, 2010 at 5:01 am   

  calliegal235 the ‘I WANT’ consciousness got the USA into the mess that it is in. People have to move into the essentials of the heart of ‘WE GIVE’. The USA took 1/3rd of the worlds energy resources because of its ‘I WANTS’ and the rest of the world is not up for it anymore.

  Remember this the meek shall inherit the world.

  What is more important to God the woman or the baby?

  As the Christ said about abortion when people were disputing it.

  ‘SAVE THE LOST SOUL BEFORE YOU BIRTH A NEW ONE’.

  Profound words. Shame orthodox Christians don’t understand the bible and what a lost soul is all about. They can learn much from the Indian shamans about the true Christ teachings.

• 50 whitetrash // Nov 4, 2010 at 9:55 am   

  I’m familiar with the rap sheet on King. But you did not answer my question. How could it possibly be less treasonous to turn over our strategic manufacturing capability to a Communist Nation merely to enrich some bankers, than to sign off on a Holiday for some dead black dude with Communist affiliations? The Chinese now hold our debt as a result of the Bush, Clinton, Bush troika, not to mention advanced missile technology. I won’t even go into the whole “jobs Americans don’t want” schtick that “Conservatives” were singing along with right up until they saw Latinos in the streets demanding their “rights” in 2006.

  The question stands: Show me how signing off on the MLK holiday even approaches the treason of the Bush family. You need an answer, if for no other reason than for yourself, because the “Conservatives” are already teeing up Jeb Bush for 2012. And if you think these good “Christian” people care about “White America” you are whistling past the Grave Yard.

• 51 whitetrash // Nov 4, 2010 at 9:59 am   

  Sorry…. my last question was for Thrasymachus. Not trying to be confrontational, “T.” Just interested in why you see things this way.

• 52 whitetrash // Nov 4, 2010 at 12:30 pm   

  Doc,

  I had to ponder your response a bit.

  First it was WMD. Then is was fighting Al Quada over there instead of over here. Then is was nation building to “drain the swamp.” Now it’s a threat from Russia and Communist allies? The Muslims?

  The Muslims have been a concern since the end of WWII. The consensus, by the best military minds of the Greatest Generation, was that there is no way to occupy those oil fields militarily. They are too vulnerable for any conventional defense, hence we have to deal with the Muslims through their nation states. It’s a bargain to buy the oil compared to the cost of taking it. The Russians and the Chinese aren’t stupid. They have reached the same conclusion.

  The other key to the Middle East are the sea lanes. Last time I checked, Russia, China, nor any other nation can challenge us at sea. (Though, thanks to Mr. Magic Market and Global “Free Trade”, both fully supported and exported by the Bush “Conservatives”, the Chinese are building a Blue Water Navy.) It would require Iran AND Saudi to collude with the Russians or Chinese to place land based air craft at the Straits of Hormuz to create a viable threat to the U.S. Fleet. Even then, how would they ship the oil out of the Indian Ocean if the U.S.A contested the transport with fast attack submarines?

  It doesn’t add up. The Nation Building schemes of the Bush/Clinton cabal are corporate paydays. Nothing more… nothing less. We pay with the blood of our warrior sons and daughters, the 1 percenters triple their wealth.

• 53 Pamela K. // Nov 4, 2010 at 1:03 pm   

  “It is really sad and disgusting to learn the truth about this man whose status as a hero/champion of the Civil Rights Movement has been so positively ingrained into our culture by the liberal establishment and into the impressionable minds of thousands of school children.”

  I was only four years old when MLK was assassinated in 1968. I really do not remember much about him, although after his death it seemed a much more radical branch of the Civil Rights Movement emerged. I do remember the riots between the black and white students in the halls of our local high school in the early 1970′s.
  As far as the article (#27) I copied and posted on here yesterday, I am not sure what to believe about this man. Furthermore, it seems to me all the dirt on someone famous usually comes out after they are dead and are not able to defend themselves.
  Does anyone really know the truth about this man other than what they have been told or heard? I am not defending the liberal media’s advocacy of “The Saint” nor am I sure that his detractors, like the person wrote the article above, are not telling the truth about him. Since there is so much information and misinformation) today, how can we really discern what is the truth and what is either a half-truth, innuendo, or an outright lie? It seems like vindictive gossip is constantly grabbing the headlines ( look what the news media recently to Christine O’Donnell) while the truth receives a mere footnote or worse, a retraction far back in the Want Ads long after the damage has already been done.

• 54 calliegal235 // Nov 4, 2010 at 6:48 pm   

  Not on this topic, but have any of you seen or heard about the following regarding the stimulus package the connection to rationed healthcare?
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HnkxIh62dQ

• 55 ELIAKIM // Nov 6, 2010 at 8:16 am   

  “the covetousness”

  David, with the greatest respect the USA was founded by people who coveted the land of your ancestors. So is it any surprise that the deeds of the Fathers impacted on the following generations?

• 56 ELIAKIM // Nov 6, 2010 at 8:20 am   

  The orthodox in Europe had a choice, change their ways, chill out or get out. They chose to get out and take the Pope and the orthodox Church with them. Orthodoxy in the bible is the carnal mind that is the opposite to God.

  Why is that ?

  Change is the only constant in the cosmos

• 57 ELIAKIM // Nov 6, 2010 at 8:22 am   

  What happened to the orthodox Christians in Europe is now happening to the Muslims. Europe is not up for religious orthodoxy and their beliefs being imposed upon others.

• 58 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 9:14 am   

  “The question stands: Show me how signing off on the MLK holiday even approaches the treason of the Bush family. You need an answer, if for no other reason than for yourself, because the “Conservatives” are already teeing up Jeb Bush for 2012. And if you think these good “Christian” people care about “White America” you are whistling past the Grave Yard.”
  ———————————————————
  You take my conservative background for granted. Actually, two of the posters above stated that they are not offended by the fact that Obama is a Black. I AM! I could not disagree more with those two posts in accepting a Negro as President. I do not want Blacks to rule over Whites – period. I am opposed to having any one race rule over another and exercise power over that other.

  The Bush family’s act of treason was horrendous, to be sure. But Religion enters into the MLK “holiday.” According to my religious beliefs, this holiday is pure and open idolatry. It has brought about a punish-the- Whites mentality in practice among politicians. It has opened the door to Obama. It has fulfilled the dreams of the Left — or at least made some of them come true.

  If you define treason in solely economic or military terms, then, yes, you are absolutely right. The Bush family is guilty of the greater treason.

  If, like me, you define treason also so as to include disloyalty to and betrayal of the founding race and religion of the nation and the cultural supremacy of that race and religion, then the King holiday marks the end of the Founder’s America. It began dying when King was granted that cursed “holiday.” All the treasonous acts that followed — including those of the Bush dynasty — were simply the pillaging and plundering of the dead nation: professional Vultures swooping down on the dying society.

  I am no longer in the conservative camp. Republicans are so afraid of being labeled “racist,” that they’ll support the demise of their own Party before they defend the interests of Whites. I therefore now support the American Third Position Party. This party is openly pro-White.

• 59 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 9:46 am   

  I’m a little baffled by the “hands off” approach to the Jews.

  Does this mean that when a Jew, such as Bernie Madoff, is found guilty of a crime, that he’s not to be held responsible?

  To be sure, there ought never be any persecution or mistreatment of the Jews. In that sense, “hand off,” to be sure.

  But the doctrine that the modern Jews are the unblemished and unmixed descendants of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob — I just don’t see it. The Jews of today are obviously of mixed race — indeed, I’m guessing that they are the most mongrelized and confused mixture of a population group on the entire planet. Those Jews who are of mixed race are not God’s Chosen People, as God forbade the original Biblical Israelites ever to mix with other nations. Those who are the result of such mixtures are mamzer — not legitimate descendants of Abraham. Moreover, the Jews never were more than one or two tribes of the Israelite nation.

  I really do suspect that the Israelites of the Bible may have been of the White race, though probably not European. This remains a mystery. Who exactly were the Twelve tribes and who are their descendants in the world today? I cannot say.

  As to the modern Jews: let the world give them — all 15, 000, 000 of them, or so — a homeland. Let them all live there. 15 million (an estimate of how many Jews are now living in this world) is far short of the “too many to count” number promised Abraham by God in the book of Genesis — which lends further support to the theory that Jews are not the direct descendants of the Patriarchs — they are too few to fulfill the promise.

  Jews do put their perceived ethnic interests above those of all other peoples. To argue against this obvious fact is sheer prejudice in their favor. Organized Jewry is all too happy to interfere in the affairs of non-Jews: Jews introduce “profound change” in Europe and the U.S. — and this is beyond all doubt the fault of Organized Jewry!

  Jews play a “leading role” in promoting multiculturalism in Europe

  Jews are arrogant and guilty of chicanery. They reject Christ and really are without excuse. The parable of the Wheat and Tares in Christ’s teachings does indicate that Christians are to leave Jews alone. The Christians are the Wheat and the Jews are the Tares.

  In short, Jews will stay out of trouble when they govern themselves in their own ethnic state and leave Gentile nations in peace.

  θρασυμαχος

• 60 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 10:12 am   

  “Jews are arrogant and guilty of chicanery. They reject Christ and really are without excuse.”
  —————————–
  I am speaking here of Organized Jewry and its Jewish supporters. By no means does this refer to just any Jew who is. I cannot see how any Christian can support Zionism and the activities of Organized Jewry, when one look at the ADL website makes it very clear that they are in conflict with Christian teachings.

  Speaking of Jesus, we read in John 7:13 –

  “But no one had the courage to speak favorably about him in public, for they were afraid of getting in trouble with the Jewish leaders.” — New Living Translation

  Here’s the KJV:

  “Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.”

  The context makes it clear that it was the Jewish leaders, rather than ordinary Jewish people, whom those who believed in Jesus were afraid of.

  Leaders of organized Jewry today — most of them — have not changed their minds about Jesus Christ.

• 61 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 10:18 am   

  “Spake openly of him – The word translated “openly,” here, is commonly rendered “boldly.” This refers doubtless, to those who really believed on him. His enemies were not silent; but his friends had not confidence to speak of him openly or boldly that is, to speak what they really thought. Many supposed that he was the Messiah, yet even this they did not dare to profess. All that they could say in his favor was that he was a good man. There are always many such friends of Jesus in the world who are desirous of saying something good about him, but who, from fear or shame, refuse to make a full acknowledgment of him. Many will praise his morals, his precepts, and his holy life, while they are ashamed to speak of his divinity or his atonement, and still more to acknowledge that they are dependent on him for salvation.”

  Barnes Bible commentary on John 7:13.

  Yes, I am all for letting God deal with “the Jews” as He alone sees fit, and I oppose all persecution or unjust treatment of them. But followers of Jesus Christ must not allow Organized Jewry to interfere in their religious beliefs and practices. If the Jews are offended by these, they are always free to move to another country.

• 62 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 10:38 am   

  Final point: The Barnes Bible Notes clearly states that “multiculturalism” — that word was not in use in the 1800 — was the cause of the Fall of the Roman Empire:

  From Daniel 2:43, “they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men,” it would seem, however, that the reference is to some “foreign” admixture – like the intermingling of nations of other languages, laws, and customs, which were never truly amalgamated with the original materials, and which constantly tended to weaken and divide the kingdom. It is to be remarked, in the exposition of the passage, that in the previous three kingdoms there was comparative homogeneousness. In the fourth kingdom, there was to be something of a peculiar character in this respect by which it should be distinguished from the others. As a matter of fact, the other three kingdoms were comparatively homogeneous in their character. The predominant feature was “Oriental;” and though there were different nations and people intermingled in the Babylonian, the Medo-Persian, and the Macedonian kingdoms, yet there was the same general prevailing character in each; there was not such an intermingling of foreign nations as to produce disturbing elements, or to mar the symmetry and strength of the whole. It was not thus with Rome. In that empire there was the intermingling of all nations and tongues, and though the essential element of the empire remained always – “the Roman” – yet there was an intermingling of other influences under the same general government, which could be appropriately compared with clay united with iron, and which ultimately contributed to its fall (see the notes at Daniel 2:43).

  The United States is following exactly in the footsteps of Ancient Rome — and “conservatives” are cheering it on!

• 63 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 11:30 am   

  More research is needed to discover all Twelve Tribes of Israel — a people whom God said would be too numerous to count.

  I do not endorse any of the articles below. Each presents a unique theory. These theories cannot be reconciled, as they differ substantially. Nor do I do dismiss them out of hand. I cannot possibly determine, at this point, just what became of all the Biblical Israelites. One thing I do know: Jews may be among them, but they cannot possibly be the sum total. Also, a majority of modern Jews are racially very mixed, so thier status as the Children of Abraham is questionable (Deuteronomy.

  Research Proves Jews are not Israelites
  

  Israel’s History Written in Advance
  

  WHO ARE THE MODERN JEWS?
  

  “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”
  (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

  Ashkenazis are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites
  

  What Relationship Do The Modern Jews Have With Ancient Israelites?
  

  Here we have the Jewish claim. It may be true — or not. How can I say with certainty?

  Brief History of Israel and the Jewish People
  

  Are Modern “Jews” Really Descended from the Sons of Jacob?

• 64 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 11:34 am   

  I forgot the verse from Deuteronomy in the above post. Here it is:

  “No one born of a forbidden marriage nor any of his descendants may enter the assembly of the LORD, even down to the tenth generation.”
  – Deuteronomy 23:2

  This means that modern Jews, if they are very racially mixed, are not reckoned among the Chosen People for that very reason.

• 65 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 11:47 am   

  More here:

  Jew – Definition

  Are the Jews really Israelites?

  “If today’s Jews aren’t descended from Abraham, but are instead a mixed race of people whose only common connection is religion, then they are not a ‘nation’ in any identifiable sense. They are instead religious zealots who usurped a Biblical promise in order to steal land from the Arabs based on a fraudulent claim.”

  Special Report: Are Today’s Jews Really Ancient Israel?

  
  History of ancient Israel and Judah – Definition

  I try here to accomodate various points of view.

  Who is a Jew?

• 66 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 11:59 am   

  Here we are provided with the official Jewish view of Jesus:

  Who Was Jesus?
  The Jewish View of Jesus
  

  For this reason alone, it is not advisable for a Christian nation to have a Jewish government!

• 67 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 12:47 pm   

  At least one link above did not successfully copy and paste (too many links not to allow for a few mistakes):

  Ashkenazis are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites
  

  A MOSAIC OF PEOPLE: THE JEWISH STORY AND A REASSESSMENT OF THE DNA EVIDENCE

• 68 Thrasymachus // Nov 6, 2010 at 2:10 pm   

  Here is why I disagree with those who said that the color of Obama’s skin — his racial background — is of no importance.

  “It is very dangerous for any ethnic group to give up political power and control. Voluntarily giving up power to ethnic groups that hold historical grudges is insane.” — Kevin MacDonald, psychologist

  Blacks have shown, time and time again, that they’ll turn from Conservative Republican to Liberal Democrat in a heartbeat. Colon Powell is the first Negro Republican who comes to mind.

  To suggest that Blacks can safely be trusted to rule over Whites — or over Comanches, for that matter — is a huge miscalculation. There’s simply no historical example to provide for the endorsement of this hypothesis, wereas there are numerous and plentiful examples to prove the contrary — that Blacks simply cannot rule successfully and wisely over other races.

  Surely, it was never in God’s Plan for Negroes to rule other races.

  As a White, I want neither power nor dominion over other races. I don’t want to rule over Comanches, nor do I really want to rule over Negroes. But until such time as an effective separation can be achieved (if God so wills), Whites are entitled by default to rule in the nations they have created and brought into being.

  θρασυμαχος

• 69 Thrasymachus // Nov 7, 2010 at 8:48 am   

  Once again, the rule that Christians should not be ruled over by unbelievers ( and I’d add that one religion should not rule over any other when the nations is of that religion):

  Joel 2:17 (King James Version)

  17Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God?

• 70 No, I don’t see America becoming a giant reservation for defeated white people… | EUROPID * MUSINGS // Feb 27, 2011 at 10:01 pm   

  [...] “No, I don’t see America becoming a giant reservation for defeated white people; I don’t see any comparison to what happened to Indians and what is happening to white America. If I have used such metaphors in the past, I recant. There is no similarity. Indians fought like hell for our land and our people! White people are writhing in self-righteous ideology and suicidal superiority, giving away what their fathers fought for. Indians would never, ever do such a thing–not knowingly or intentionally, not as a people.”   ~David Yeagley This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← The Stranger by Rudyard Kipling LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

• 71 American Indians in Children's Literature (AICL): Hanging Off … | Literature Blog // Jul 5, 2012 at 1:17 am   

  [...] Turning a Dream Into Reality – The Story Behind the Creation of Mount RushmoreHistory of Native American Indians, Documentary – Pt. 1/4A New Picture Book ChallengeMembers of the Oglala Lakota Tribe and their allies, including DGR Blockade White ClayThe Great White Father [...]

You must log in to post a comment.