Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

Lessons in Persecution: Why Hate Jews

by David Yeagley · October 13, 2010 · 27 Comments ·

It is an ancient art, persecution. Not that anyone in particular needs lessons in how to persecute, but, historically speaking, we find the very finest motivations for persecution in the way other people have treated the Jews. It’s a matter of cause, not technique.

Michael Grant’s The Jews in the Roman World (Dorset, 1973), though a classic work of confusion wherein opinion is ensconced with history, and interpretation entwined with documented history, does make one thing clear–the Jews have remarkable influence in the societies in which they dwell. It is generally unwanted, or regarded as inimical by those in power. The Gentile authorities consider the Jews a perpetual competitor, not an ally.

Lucius Annaeus Seneca (ca. 3 BCE-65 AD), the great Roman stoic philosopher, teacher, writer, and politician, made his opinion of the Jews known to his intellectual apprentice, Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, better known as Nero Claudius Caesar (AD 37-68) , which Grant notes in detail, from the Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium, 95, 4-7:

The smoking lamps on the Sabbath, and the wastefulness of this institution in losing one seventh of man’s labour, caused Seneca great annoyance, and he complained that “the customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands: the conquered have given laws to the conquerors.”

Sound like a familiar circumstance?

And so it was, Nero was surrounded with visceral anti-Semites. Interestingly, his second wife Poppaea (whom he married in 62), is said by Josephus to have been God-fearing (Antiquitatus Judaicae, XX, 195). Furthermore, she more than once influenced him favorably toward the Jews.

Enter: Hollywood.

There was a Jewish actor, one Aliturus, evidently played a “rôle” in curbing at least some of the mania against the Jews. Aliturus had introduced Josephus to Poppaea, in fact. That was the connection. So, clearly, actors have had a long tradition of political opinion and active involvement in society. Aliturus is some prototype of the Hollwood activist, no? He was in on the Roman act, as it were. Right at a time of intense uncertainty of Jewish status. Grant says that Poppaea was the sponsor of the young Josephus when he came to Rome.

Nero, from the Roman National Museum.

Alas, Nero, as most other Romans, considered the Jews a foreign pest, always demanding rights, privileges, special considerations, etc. (Even Edgar Allan Poe wrote a short story aggrandizing the stereotype of the demanding Jew, “A Tale of Jerusalem,” published the year after his death, 1850). Separatists they were, preoccupied with preserving their religion, language, culture, and race. Apparently their persecutors never anticipated the effects of scattering the Jews from Palestine. Ol’ Sargon II, the Assyrian, started a dreadful trend in the world, a way back in 722 BC, or was that Tiglath-Pileser in 733? See, J. Maxwell Miller, Israelite and Judean History (Fortress, 1977), pp. 432, 433. All they did was to cause little ‘satellite’ Jerusalems to be set up all over the world–wherever the Jews would find a place to settle.

So, real persecution has to be based on an indelible separatism and cultural preservation–especially when the subject is based on a die-hard insistence on pristine balkanism. Obviously, a society like that in America is the target of all such separatism. The impossible task of honoring multiculturalism and yet preserving anything American is a perfect storm for social frustration. An alien, African Negro Communist president over a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant society we can blame entirely on the Jews, and the whole principle of not surrendering your identity, no matter where you are or what position you are in socially.

So, don’t hate Obama. Hate the Jews. That’s the sensible thing to do. Those pestilential Jewish morals and social values are simply the ruination of every country in which the Jews introduce them.

Admittedly, such sarcasm as presented in this article cannot be sustained without great risk of being misunderstood. I would say that the point is to distinguish between the believer in God, and the non-believer, I say, the believer in the Bible, and the non-believer. The Bible says God has a profound purpose in the presence of the Jews in the world, then and now, in Israel and outside Israel. That is something to simply leave alone, to stand back from, with hands off. The mysteries of God cannot be penatrated. Yet, for this very reason, the Jews have always been persecuted. They have been persecuted because they are separated. They have developed survival techniques in the secular world, in the land of the goyim. These techniques may not have had such a spectacular effect on other countries, historically, as they have had on the United States. The principle of human rights, as applied racially, and religiously, has obscured the meaning of nationhood in American society, indeed. The idea of cherishing the minority–to the expense and demise of the majority, has been a most poisonous prospect as manifested in American law and politics.

But the principles of Jewish presence in the world are not weakened or abeyant. Barbare Lerner Spectre, Founding Director of Paideia, The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, has made some recent statements about the Jewish tactic of multiculturalism.

For this cause, she has received some rather seedy, rank opprobrium, and one such source of disapproval even includes me as a collateral target (see lengthy”comments” beginning here). I find this interesting. This less than rational site, “What Do You Believe?, hosted by the less that forthright “Brian Akira” (pseudonym) finds the Jews to be the source of all evil in the world. This is, of course, the inevitable conclusions of the weak, frustrated masses who just can’t seem to do away with the Jews, despite the disproportionately small number of Jews in the world.

With the exception of Adolf Ahmadinejad, most anti-Semitic sites stop short of calling for the extermination of the Jews, and instead writhe in endless lamentation, condemnation, execration, and a kind of psychological defecation. They achieve some satisfaction in cursing the Jews, but, they seem impotent when it comes to expression their idea of a solution. I have called for them to state their solution, publicly, more than once. They immediately retire to an oblivious silence.

I don’t think the white race is a genocidal race. They don’t don’t do that. Not really. They have a soul. I am amazed at how true this really is. They did not eliminate American Indians. They will not even call for the elimination of Jewish people. They are content, as it were, to condemn what they feel is wrong with the Jews. But, they don’t work to even exclude Jews anymore. They are willing to hate the Jewish influence, and maybe even hate some Jews. But, they don’t even persecute them effectually. Maybe the whites race did learn some lessons from history about persecution.

Nero was willing to persecute Christians, but, that’s because most of them were Jewish in the first century AD. Jews had been kicked out of Rome before, by Claudius, around 49 AD, but later all their rights were restored. Nero, always willing to excel in outrage, actually put many Jews (Christians) to death in 64 AD, for public entertainment (according to the young Tacitus).

So, blame it all on the ancient Assyrians, to the north of Israel. They were the ones who first expelled the Jews from their homeland. Now the world can’t get rid fo them, or their profound influence on government, law, and society. How’s that for unintended consequences?

To the Jews, I say, beware of that “minority rights” bit. I think it may backfire on you. That’s an unintended consequence, too.

Posted by David Yeagley · October 13, 2010 · 5:03 pm CT · ·

Tags: Bad Eagle Journal · Israel · Jews · Politics · Race · Religion · White Race

Read More Journal Posts »

27 responses so far ↓

  • 1 BrockTownsend // Oct 13, 2010 at 5:40 pm   

    Excellent piece. Thanks.

  • 2 Pamela K. // Oct 13, 2010 at 7:33 pm   

    “So, don’t hate Obama. Hate the Jews. That’s the sensible thing to do.”

    Jewish American billionaire and atheist George Soros is an anathema among his own people.
    In 2003, at a gathering of his fellow Jews, Soros claimed that the Jewish people and Israel are partially to blame for the current rise of anti-Semitism. He has since formed his own Jewish public affairs committee ( Z Street, which was recently exposed for it’s anti-Semitic propaganda) to influence the United States policy(especially within the Democratic Party) away from supporting Israel and lending support to the Palestinians. In fact, according to one Republican Party official, “George Soros has purchased the Democratic Party.” He is the primary reason why arrogant fraud-elect African-born Socialist-Muslim Barack Hussein Obama, is currently occupying the White House.
    Soros is the worst kind of Jew. Like the Jewish bankers in Europe who financed Hitler’s Third Reich, Soros uses his vast wealth to buy whatever he wants, even if that means destroying his own people to get his way.
    As the father of the extremely influential group, Soros, in 2006, helped to rob fellow Jew Joseph Lieberman of the Democratic nomination for the US Senate because Lieberman backed the war in Iraq.
    According to Caroline Glick, managing editor of the Jerusalem Post: Propaganda posted on the Web site was laced with blatant anti-Semitic attacks…referring to Lieberman as “the Jew Lieberman” and “ZioNazi Lieberman.” These attacks were by no means unusual. Indeed, anti-Semitic attacks against Israel and Jewish Americans and belittlement of the Holocaust appear regularly on Web forums.”
    Glick further names groups like American Friends For Peace Now, Israel Policy Forum, and Brit Tzedek v’Shalom as hurting Israel. Another group, Not In My Name, acts as the Jewish American branch of the International Solidarity Movement, and seeks to undermine the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) operations. This group has also aligned itself with the enemies of the Jewish people and Israel.

  • 3 Pamela K. // Oct 13, 2010 at 8:38 pm   

    Correction: The name of Soros’ lobbyist group is J Street, not Z Street.

  • 4 agrneydgrl // Oct 13, 2010 at 9:02 pm   

    Very interesting and educational article. Thanks

  • 5 David Yeagley // Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 pm   

    Sarcasm can be stimulating. I don’t try it too often, so, I haven’t perfected my skills. Sarcasm is delicate. The agony of the irony I feel in the Jewish story is so heavy that I can’t really sustain sarcasm long.

    The story of Jewish history is just too remarkable for any mode of thought except the truth, if we’re capable of it.

  • 6 Thrasymachus // Oct 14, 2010 at 10:47 am   

    “I have called for them to state their solution, publicly, more than once. They immediately retire to an oblivious silence.”
    I have done the same on these sites. I was told that this was a “strawman argument.” (Actually, I believe that in actual conversational argument, it is in bad taste, to say the least, to use technical labels against your opponent. Defeat the argument using your own logic; don’t name his error. I find using textbook labels in a non-academic situation offensive.)

    The truth is obvious: if “the Jews” really WERE the cause of all evil in the world, then their annihilation would certainly be justified. But Jews are NOT the cause of evil per se. The capacity for good and for evil exists in every human being, exactly as explained here:

    What is the Nature of Evil?

    The truth is, it is not the purpose of this world to ELIMINATE evil from it. This world is a moral gymnasium in which the human being is expected to train himself in moral strength and righteous Will Power.

  • 7 Thrasymachus // Oct 14, 2010 at 10:52 am   


    I had meant to say in the above post that I had done the very same thing WITH THE VERYSAME RESULTS. I was attacked for my “weakness” and for using “a strawman argument.” But no real answer was given to my question.

  • 8 David Yeagley // Oct 14, 2010 at 10:55 am   

    What do you think about my proposition that white people are actually deeply good, and that they don’t go in for genocide? I think that’s historically true, generally.

    But they certainly love to do verbal genocides! Some of these try to bury the Jews with accusations. But they’d never lift a finger in reality.


  • 9 Thrasymachus // Oct 14, 2010 at 11:06 am   

    Actually, the cultural root-cause of anti-Semitism is of the same moralistic nature as other religious persecutions. Muslims claim that they (Muslims) are the Chosen. Calvinists claim that they (Calvinists) are the Chosen. When religion enters this domain, there is bound to be anger and hostility among those who take such claims seriously. If I say to you, “God has chosen me; He has NOT chosen you” — this implies that you are a spiritual reject. I cannot entirely condemn Gentiles who take offense at the “chosen status” of Jews, in cases where this is perceived as unjust racial discrimination against Gentiles.

    But the matter runs deeper than this superficial analysis. The majority of cases of anti-Semitism are political, not religious. It arises from the fact that Jews politick — and with tremendous zeal.

  • 10 Pamela K. // Oct 14, 2010 at 11:06 am   

    Human nature, whether it is harbored beneath white or black or red or yellow skin is essentially fallen. Carnal. You cannot measure someone’s innate goodness by skin color.
    As for genocidal tendencies, look no farther than the ethnic- cleansing wars in the Balkans. One of the worse offenders of this was a group known as the Ustasi, or fair-haired, fair-skinned Croatian insurgents who, during WWII, delighted in gouging out the eyeballs of their many victims, mainly Slovenians and Serbs, while they were still alive and then carrying them around as souvenirs to take back home to their wives and sweethearts.
    Neither children or babies or pregnant women were spared this horrible fate.

  • 11 David Yeagley // Oct 14, 2010 at 11:14 am   

    True, true. (But, were the Croatians not “Muslim?”)

    The invasion of Serbian Kosovo was done by white Muslims Albanians.

    Islam is an evil spell. It can dupe whites as easily as darks.

    I guess I’m saying that, generally, white are not into genocide. War, yes.

    Of course, we’d have to consider Africa today, and the clear attempts of lessening the population there–all conducted by white liberals. AIDS, abortion, disease–all designed to reduce the population. But, that isn’t really genocide, is it?

  • 12 Pamela K. // Oct 14, 2010 at 11:34 am   

    Anti-Semitism is spiritual. It’s roots go back to Genesis, when the Lord called Abram out of the heathen culture of Ur, in the Chaldees, into the land of Canaan. Because of his obedience to God, Abram, who later became Abraham, was made into a mighty nation, Israel. God said, “I will bless those who bless you and curse those whom curse you or use insolent language against you.” Genesis 12:3
    The evidence of God’s curse can clearly be seen in the big Arab nations surrounding prosperous little Israel. Since she took her place among the nations in 1948, Israel has lead the world in science and medical technology and education. Since that time, she has won every single war against the Arab armies that came against her. Meanwhile, what have these Arab nations contributed to the world besides oil? Nothing, except agitating and manipulating the situation in the Middle East through their support of terrorism. Even in the oil-rich Persian Gulf nations the young people have to leave and either go to Europe or America for higher education. Furthermore, unlike Israel, where Arab citizens can go to school and vote in elections, worship unhindered, and are guaranteed equal employment under the law, the Arab countries are ruled by autocratic leaders, either sovereigns or dictators, where the common people have little or no rights, especially where Sharia Law is implemented, and where a Jewish people would be condemned to death, along with Christians, if they were caught practicing their religion.

  • 13 Pamela K. // Oct 14, 2010 at 11:51 am   

    When it was founded in 1929, the Ustaše was a nationalist organization which practiced Roman Catholic Fundamentalism. This group sought to create an independent Croatian state. When the Ustaše came to power in the Independent State of Croatia, a state established by Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany during World War II, its military wing became the Ustaše Army (Ustaška Vojnica). The movement collaborated with the German occupation forces in Yugoslavia to decimate the Serb and Roma populations, while fighting an increasingly unsuccessful campaign against the Tito-led Partisan Army. It was the Partisans who eventually drove them out of Yugoslavia and into exile.

  • 14 Thrasymachus // Oct 14, 2010 at 12:12 pm   

    “But they certainly love to do verbal genocides! Some of these try to bury the Jews with accusations. But they’d never lift a finger in reality.


    [This is a very difficult topic to analyze satisfactorily, and I am sure that some will accuse me of being “anti-Semitic.” I’m not. So I’ll state my conclusion before attempting to explain it: Jews want to play the game of politics and culture with Gentiles, but they want also to set the rules. This is the source of anti-Semitism.]

    There are several factors, in my opinion. But the heart or core of the matter is the claim of moral superiority that Judaism APPEARS to make. I’ll attempt to explain below.

    (Keep in mind that Judaism is not a universalist religion — at least the conservative branch is not. Being a Jew is not an option open to every human being without exception — from the Orthodox Jewish point of view.)

    For one thing, very few Whites actually and sincerely believe that Jews are intrinsically evil — i.e., the incarnation of evil (those Whites who are thus convinced would advocate genocide). These Whites know that they are themselves sinners, or wrong-doers, and, being less than perfect, they do not want to do evil to the Jews: it simply cannot be justified..

    Another reason is that the more intelligent Whites understand that evil cannot be overcome by evil. That, as Plato stated, the just man never does an injury to any human being. Plato argues that to injure another creature is to make that creature worse, not better (an intrinsically unjust act); ergo, the just man will never make any excuse for injuring another human being deliberately. This solves nothing.

    The reason why Whites verbalize annihilation of Jewish INFLUENCE is simply an expression of their frustration.

    Let me try to illustrate.

    Say you find yourself an innocent man (or woman) confined in a jail cell with a very mean, foul-tongued inmate. Your desire is to be free from this situation entirely. You definitely feel unjustly put upon. You do not deserve this fate.

    Now, let us suppose that if you attack this particular inmate, he will only become all the more aggressive; the more you try to silence him, the more he will make your existence miserable; and if you kill him, you will be hanged. Now, also, let us suppose, on the other hand, that no matter how hard you try to be angelically nice, kind, and compassionate toward him, he still has only one ambition — i.e., to make your situation as miserable as possible. Everything you do or say arouses his displeasure, and he vocalizes it bitterly. It seems that you cannot appease him, no matter what you do. All you really can hope for (and all you honestly desire) is for him to leave you alone, but this he refuses to do. He insists on engaging you at all costs. What can you do, other than complain to the jailer and ask him to do something to help you (which, of course, he won’t)?

    My point is not so much that Jews are exactly like that obnoxious inmate painted in the above portrait. This scenario is given for illustration purposes, to shed some light on a more complicated situation, viz., the question of who controls culture and customs in Gentile lands?

    Jews, on average, are certainly intelligent. They make excellent scientists and entertainers. However, I do not see where they are culturally superior to Gentiles in a creative sense. They are brilliant at analyzing and interpreting, but because of their need for a separate identity, they can scarcely contribute authentically to a particular Gentile culture. (For example, how can a non-Christian Jew write an inspiring religiously intense Christmas song?) My point here is not that Jews are not creative in Jewish culture — they are — but it is very difficult for them to contribute to non-Jewish culture, from the hear, as their sources of inspiration are not the same. Thus Mendelssohn, a Christian Jew, was able to contribute to Western Christian culture, but Schoenberg, ultimately a non-Christian Jew, was not a wide cultural influence.

    To make a long story short (not really possible here), this is a summary of the situation, as I see it:

    1. Conservative Whites want cultural dominion in their own nations.

    2. Jews want to be accepted in Gentile nations, and yet remain separate (i.e., not fully embrace the Gentile culture they are living in).

    3. To achieve this twin goal of acceptance and cultural and racial separateness, Jews need great political and cultural POWER. (Gentiles will otherwise insist, join us or leave us. Be one of us or “get lost.” But the Jew wants to do neither of these.)

    So, my conclusion is that it is the struggle for POWER and social INFLUENCE that arouses anti-semitic sentiments.

    After all, the very act of seeking POWER automatically creates resentment and anger. (Would any of us talk about Obama if he were an ordinary Black without the power he now holds?)


    Now, am I anti-semitic?

    I would insist that Jews use their power both for good and for ill. It depends on the personality involved.

    Lao-Tzu said that the wise Emperor must be invisible. He must rule but create the impression among the people that they themselves bring all things about.

    Jews want to be a “Light Unto the Nations.” This implies superiority — specifically, MORAL superiority. That is always a cause of resentment and hostility.

    Do people ordinarily hate those who are superior to them in non-moral ways? NO!

    All people desire moral justification. Not everyone desires to be a great mathematician, scientist, singer, business executive, or even politician. But it is built into the human psyche to desire MORAL justification.

  • 15 Pamela K. // Oct 14, 2010 at 5:07 pm   

    In order to understand the nature of the Jewish people, we have to go to the most credible historical source about them, which is the Holy Bible.
    The Jews are not morally or spiritually superior to the Gentiles. God chose the Jews to bring salvation to the world through the person of His Son, Jesus Christ. The Lord Himself stated, “Salvation comes from the Jews.” John 4:22
    In his letter to the Romans, Saint Paul declared, “But he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and true circumcision is of the heart, a spiritual and not a literal matter. His praise is not from men, but from God.”
    Jesus came not only to bring redemption from sin and death, but to bridge the gap between the Jews and the Christians. Again, St. Paul confirmed this in Galatians 3:28-29:
    “There is now no distinction neither Jew nor Greek (Gentile), there is neither slave or free, there is not male or female for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.
    And if you belong to Christ, are in Him Who is Abraham’s Seed, then you are Abraham’s offspring and spiritual heirs according to the promise.”
    Unfortunately, this did not stop the terrible persecution of the Jewish people by those who professed to be Christians.
    Renowned preacher John Chrysostom, whom today is regarded as a saint, described the Jewish people in his sermons as “lustful, rapacious, greedy, perfidious bandits…”
    Meanwhile, the scurrilous nature of Church Father and Protestant Reformer Martin Luther’s
    attacks on the Jews is equally shocking.
    “The Jews deserve the most severe penalties,” he said. Their synagogues should be leveled, their homes destroyed, they should be exiled into tents like the gypsies. Their religious writings should be taken from them. The rabbis should be forbidden to continue teaching the Law.
    All professions should be closed to them. Only the hardest, coarsest work should be permitted them…the Christian princes should have the duty of driving the Jews from their lands as they would rabid dogs.”
    Centuries later, when the Nazis came to power in Germany, Hitler, an atheist, used the statements used by Martin Luther to justify the implementation of his anti-Semitic policies.
    Poland too, has a long, deeply rooted history of Jew hatred, and the main responsibility for this situation was the anti-Semitism fostered by the Roman Catholic Church.
    Of course, in modern times there have been leaders in both the Catholic and the Protestant churches who have come forward and humbly acknowledged the guilt of the Church towards the Jews, especially during the years of the Holocaust, and have sought to make amends.
    One of the most moving prayers of confession and repentance was written by Pope John XXIII:

    “We are conscious today that many, many centuries of blindness have cloaked our eyes so that we can no longer see the beauty of Thy Chosen People, nor recognize in their faces the features of our privileged brethren.
    We realize that the mark of Cain stands upon our foreheads. Across the centuries our brother, Abel, has lain in the blood which we drew, or shed tears which we caused by forgetting Thy love.
    Forgive us for the curse we falsely attached to their name as Jew. Forgive us for crucifying Thee a second time in their flesh. For, O Lord,
    we know not what we did.”

  • 16 David Yeagley // Oct 14, 2010 at 10:20 pm   

    Pam, I’m sorry. I knew the Ustashis were Catholic Croations. I’ve shattered my brains with fatigue lately. It is the Bosnians who are Muslim. The Serbs, of course, are orthodox. I even have books on the Ustashis. Mea culpa (Just tired, that’s all.)

    And it was white against white. I’ve even written about Vilna, Neretva, etc. My sincere apologies for suffering from fried brains! (Had a good soccer workout tonight, however.)

    Hitler, whom I do not consider a representative of the white race, had no respect for Germany, or for the white race. He was simply using handy tools for his power structure. But, objectively, it might be said that, in that instance, white people did consider genocide. But, other white people kept them from it.

  • 17 David Yeagley // Oct 14, 2010 at 10:29 pm   

    Thras, the true Jews would consider what you call cultural creativity to be idolatry. The whole Catholic religion they consider idolatry. Thus, they consider Christianity a form of idolatry. (They make no distinction between icon and idol.)

    Hitler blames the Jews for “modern art.” You know, the abstract, anti-creative sort of gestures. I don’t know that this is true, but, modernity is certainly something Jews have always had a strong knack for. Cutting edge. New. Different. (A Jew invented the internal combustion engine, and a Jew put it on wheels. It wasn’t Ford, at all. It was German Jews.) A Jews have certainly been into theatre, drama, and then movies. But, these would not be orthodox Jews, but the secular type. Anciently, drama was forbidden. Anciently, drama grew out of re-enactments of the stories of the gods. Usually, it involved sex and violence. The usual suspects.

    Anyway, the anti-creative bit, on Jews, has been around a while. I’m just not sure if it is entirely true. It may be in some fields of art, but, not in all.

  • 18 Pamela K. // Oct 15, 2010 at 8:45 am   

    Ante Pavelic was the Poglavnik, or Head of the Ustaces. Although his organization aligned itself with Roman Catholicism, the Vatican did not recognize this group. However, it did not stop Pope Pius XII from granting Pavelic an audience, for which he was later highly criticized, nor did the Church condemn what was Pavelic’s personal campaign of genocide against Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and Communist Croatians. It is estimated that some 700,000 Yugoslavians were horribly tortured and killed by the Ustace, whom, as I mentioned earlier, took delight in gouging out the eyeballs of their victims, usually while the person was still alive. It did not matter if the victim was an elderly person, a child, or even a pregnant woman. Once during the war, Pavelic granted an interview to an Italian journalist, during which he offered the man “a bowl of oyster stew”. Before the Italian journalist could respond, Pavelic removed the lid off of a glass jar which was full of human eyeballs soaking in some kind of preservative. Needless to say, the Italian journalist not only lost his desire for lunch that day, but quickly ended his interview with this monster. After the war, Pavelic escaped justice and fled to Austria, where, according to reports gathered by US Intelligence, he was given protection by members of the Roman Catholic Church! He later went into exile in South America, where in 1957, he was wounded in an assassination attempt. He later found exile in Spain where, in 1959, he died from complications from the bullet lodged in his spine. He was buried in San Isidro, part of the Catholic cemeteries listed under “Sacred Brotherhood” in Madrid. I am not sure what that means, but I did find out it is one of the better known finally resting places of many famous politicians, religious clergy, artists, etc, in southern Europe. As for this “Sacred Brotherhood” could it be or could it have been a Catholic version of the Free Masons, perhaps?

  • 19 Thrasymachus // Oct 15, 2010 at 10:25 am   

    Interestingly, my poetry and drama teacher in high school was a Jewish lady. She suggested that the book of Job in the Bible was actually an ancient work for theater — a play.

    Again, though, this fact that they consider Christianity and the huge Renaissance of the Arts that it inspired “idolatry” is an inevitible source of conflict. Even I disagree with them to some extent. [BTW, it may be interesting to not that Calvinists also consider New Testament-inspired are to be “idolatry”; yet they find Old Testament Art, such as the movie “The Ten Commandments” to be morally pure. The Amish, by way of contrast, may also consider much of Catholic art “idolatry”; however, they remain separate from society and do not complain.

    Every human mind needs to justify itself on moral grounds. Even organized crime bosses must do this rationalizing.

    I’ll have to get back to you on this subject. But, for now, I’d like to say that I don’t quite see in the Bible that the dispersion of the Jews is a “blessing” for them; rather, I seem to recall it as a punishment. They are to be a “Light Unto the Nations” in the Holy Land, at a future time, when all the world will come to them there. This is how I have traditioally understood the Scriptures.

  • 20 Thrasymachus // Oct 15, 2010 at 10:33 am   

    My spelling!!


    Again, though, this fact that Jews consider Christianity and the huge Renaissance of the Arts that it inspired “idolatry” is an inevitable source of conflict. Even I disagree with them to some extent (though I see some merit in their point of view). [BTW, it may be interesting to note that Calvinists also consider New Testament-inspired Art to be “idolatry”; yet they find Old Testament Art, such as the movie “The Ten Commandments” to be morally pure.] The Amish, by way of contrast, may also consider much of Catholic art “idolatry”; however, they remain separate from society and do not complain; rather, they ignore it by not engaging the “English” — the world outside of the Amish community — at all.

    We define a criminally insane person as one who cannot distinguish right from wrong. This is because it is built into the human mind, universally, to seek moral justification for actions and behaviors and culture. Since Jews disagree intractably with White Christians as to the definition of “culture,” this would go far in explaining what is actually the root-cause of this conflict. That is to say, there seems to be no way to reconcile these two points of view, given that the Jews have been dispersed among the nations.

  • 21 Thrasymachus // Oct 15, 2010 at 11:18 am   

    “The Amish, by way of contrast, may also consider much of Catholic art “idolatry”; however, they remain separate from society and do not complain.”
    On second thought, the Amish probably consider ALL of Catholic visual art “idolatry.” The Amish are forbidden even to use cameras to snap pictures, as pictorial representations, even of family members, are “idolatry” to them.

    The difference between the Amish and the Jews in this is that the Amish are not intermeddling, whereas Jews challenge Gentile mores wherever they settle.

    Now, anytime anybody says, “I have the Truth, it has been entrusted to me; you do NOT have it, except as you receive it from me” there is bound to be conflict. You may say, “I’m better at math than you,” and, if this is obvious, the other person will probably agree. But if you say, “I’m superior in morals and religious truth to you, because I have privileged status over you,” the human mind is so designed that conflict and rebellion are almost always inevitable. Very few people, if any, will take this perceived accusation lying down.

    In my opinion, the moral accusations against the Jews are rooted in the soil of the Chosen People status, and, specifically, its perceived assertion that the rules of true righteousness were given exclusively to this race or nation. Such implication, whether justified or not, that one race has been granted moral truth that no other race has ever known cannot help but cause human nature, as we know it, to attack the very claim to good morals coming from the privileged race. Thus, coming from the subconscious needs of other races — Black as well as White — will be accusations to prove the Jews’ moral claims false, and the Jews will automatically be accused of immorality.

  • 22 Thrasymachus // Oct 15, 2010 at 11:28 am   

    “A Jew invented the internal combustion engine, and a Jew put it on wheels. It wasn’t Ford, at all. It was German Jews.”
    Thank you for this interesting information. Actually, I had thought that it was an Italian who invented this and that Ford merely found the means to mass producton of the automobile.

  • 23 Illana // Oct 15, 2010 at 11:53 am   

    I don’t have the same representation of you : other ethnies and other persons that Europeans and Christians can be antisemitic which proves that History is not the only responsible for antisemitism : some black Muslims can have hateful, many Native americans becomes antisemitic under the influence of media propaganda…

    The questions would be more ” has antisemitism psychological reasons or sociological ?”may be both..

    I am waiting for a next article from you like “Can Israeli and Palestinians make peace ?”.

  • 24 David Yeagley // Oct 15, 2010 at 3:07 pm   

    I don’t think it takes much to make a group of people into anti-semites. I think Deut. 2:25 and 11:25, and Exodus 15:16 and 23:27 make it quite clear that the Lord put a natural aversion between His people and all others. It is profound separatism.

    I suppose that’s why Jews have such a talent of absorbing other people’s cultures and excelling in them!

    History is all about irony.

  • 25 Quex // Nov 25, 2012 at 6:28 pm   

    Aww, kike-indian promoting white guilt. Oy vey, everybody percecutes poor tiny jews. They just can’t get enough from hate. I bet they’re all jelous and have tiny dicks too, right?

    Jews seem to be too good for this world. German jews inventtors combustion engine? haha, I’ve never heard such ludicrous crap!

    Your nose is too hooked to be indian, mate, lolol

  • 26 owainglyndwr1416 // Mar 2, 2013 at 3:11 pm   

    Jews who fail or refuse to assimilate still want to be involved in Politics at the highest level and i have a major problem with that.. If a Jew claims on a Census form that their Nationality is Jewish then he or she should be excluded from serving in office of any description as their loyalties serve only their best interests and their tribe.. The Jews should stop lying about every dam thing too.. If they aren’t lying about the holocaust they are lying about the influence they have in media and politics..

  • 27 owainglyndwr1416 // Mar 2, 2013 at 3:17 pm   

    For the record this is my Comrades blog..

    Now you know which side of the fence i am on but i REFUSE to be an apologist for international Jewry and all their evil deeds..

You must log in to post a comment.