BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Hitler DNA: Jewish and Negro

by David Yeagley · August 25, 2010 · 17 Comments ·

Perhaps it is the joke of the day, but it is a classic example of the circus quality entertainment provided by the pseudo science of DNA: Hitler was a Jewish Negro.


Adolf Hitler, the Negro Jew.

That’s the latest position–held not by scientists, but journalists! That makes the joke even funnier. Belgian journalist Jean-Paul Mulders and historian Marc Vermeeren claim they hunted down 39 living relatives of Adolph Hitler, had saliva samples taken, and tests run. According to the unimpeachable ThirdAge.com:

Based on reports by NewYorkDailyNews.com, the Haplopgroup E1b1b (Y-DNA) chromosome found in the samples is rarely found in Western Europeans.

Instead, “it is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, in Algeria, Libya and Tunisia as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews,” Vermeeren said in Knack, the Belgium magazine in which the findings were published.

Of course, USAToday had several years ago noted that the actual remains of the man Hitler were in ‘grave’ doubt, so to speak. But, no problem. When you don’t have any evidence of the man, you go for his relatives. Okay. Which ones? Ah, that little sliver of information is not readily available, at least not in the public new reports.

The news is, Hitler was a Negro Jew. Isn’t that just wonderful? Doesn’t that just thrill our souls? To make the man as completely odious as conceivable, he is now, through the miraculous revelatory power of DNA, declared to be part of the two most despised, persecuted, unwanted races in the entire world. That’s the Hitler we all know and love, right?

Well, maybe this is all English propaganda. The news sources quoted often in the stories are the Daily Mail and the Telegraph. And Brits have always had a penchant for “yellow” news.

There was a Hitler cousin named. According to Bloomberg, it was an Austrian cousin, “Norbert H.” No last name given. (There’s real scientific scholarship for you, indicated the exactitude and thoroughness of the news reports, and no doubt, the “science” involved as well.)

But let’s be fair. The magazine in which this was all published is the Belgian Knack, and the best actual account of it all is in a Huffington Post piece on it. The reporting is a bit confusing, since everyone is quoting everyone else but the Belgian magazine (which happens to be in German). So, if there’s any prejudice at all, it’s from the Teutons, not the Angles. Of course, they’re related, are they not? And never mind the New York Daily news version of the story. Old hat by now.

So, I think the important observation to make is about the clownish employment of DNA “science.” We all know DNA won its sterling rep in court. That is to say, when it became part of forensic evidence, it earned the reputation of the last word, the undeniable testimony. Everyone has always been “Islamic” in submission to the claims of DNA. It is a slavish subjugation. Scientists have, as never before, ascended to the kind of social control and power that they have dreamed of ever since they rebelled against the superstitions of the Dark Ages.

Fine. But, must we all bow to the superstitions of science now? The issue is all about social authority. That’s was the legal profession is all about. That’s what politics is all about. Authority. Power of men over other men. It is the human thing. Our worst thing, perhaps.

This story is about using “scientific” authority for entertainment, but of such kind as relates directly to race and politics. As we noted earlier, the word “nigger” has been made into a cultural fetish–the vortext of evil. As such it wields great power. But there are other names, too, which work wonders in the way of psychological authority–which is the basis of political and legal authority: Nazi, Hitler, Racism, and Jew, for instance. Even words (names) like God, Jesus, and now that utterly fabricated fetish, “Mohammad.” Power words, they are. Of course, they are certainly not interchangeable terms, but, there is a certain similarity in their impact. The name of “God” is sacred. The word “nigger” is simply evil. People swear in the name of God all the time, with apparent impunity; but, if you say “nigger” you are evil. You will be destroyed. Nothing but power plays, these word issues.

So, let Hitler be whatever he was. Associating the words “Jew” and “Negro” with him, in the name of DNA, really puts it all in clear light. The game is obvious. All players are exposed.

Posted by David Yeagley · August 25, 2010 · 4:49 pm CT · ·

Tags: Bad Eagle Journal · Islam · Jews · Negro Race · Politics · Race · Religion · White Race




Read More Journal Posts »

17 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Pamela K. // Aug 25, 2010 at 6:02 pm   

    I’m sure Hitler is freaking out in the pits of Hell over this latest ‘scientific revelation’. He’s still smarting over being humbled by Jesse Owens. It’s funny how a poor black sharecropper’s son from Alabama blew de fuhrer’s “Master Race” theory clean out of the water!
    What’s the point of presenting a study like this, anyway? Hitler’s dead. It would be far more disturbing if someone had preserved Hitler’s DNA and was mass producing clones of him like in the movie, “The Boys from Brazil.” However, after watching that movie a dozen times, I’ve always thought that even if someone like Hitler could be cloned, does this mean his clone would turn out to be just like him?

  • 2 David Yeagley // Aug 25, 2010 at 8:50 pm   

    Well, I don’t really see the connection between an athletic test and cultural strength, but…

    I’m struck by the way this little “study” goes in the wrong direction. Living descendents of Hitler, rather than genealogy of his ancestors. That’s where the revelations would be, if anywhere. Marriages of cousins, neices, nephews, grand nephews, etc., I would think would make it quite futile to expect to fine a definitive line on Adolf. 1945, and now 2010?

    But, can you recreate genetic identity of those for which you have no physiological evidence–by looking at descendent DNA?

    My impression is, this journalist scheme is completely backwards, anti-scientific. DNA scientists should immediately come out and denounce this as fraud.

    But, then, I really don’t know. It just seems quite illogical.

  • 3 Pamela K. // Aug 25, 2010 at 9:53 pm   

    It was alleged ‘descendant’ DNA from members of the British royal family that was used to disprove the claim that Anna Anderson was the lost Russian Grand Duchess Anastasia. Personally, I believe this woman knew far too many intimate details of the lives of the immediate family members of Czar Nicholas II not to have been Anastasia. Meanwhile, the Russian forensic scientists involved in the case claimed that the missing girl was the Grand Duchess Marie, not Anastasia. I guess we will never really know the truth. But in this case, I believe DNA was used to bring the controversy to an abrupt conclusion, which was to disprove Anderson’s claim and thus expunge the guilt (posthumously) of King George V who allowed himself to be talked into not permitting his cousin, the Czar, and his family to emigrate to England at the request of certain high-ranking members of Parliament who wanted to cultivate relations with the new Communist government in Russia. I’ve read that until the day he died, George V never forgave himself for his decision that ultimately sealed the fate of the Czar and his family. I suppose this was his descendants’ way of letting him off the hook.

  • 4 Thrasymachus // Aug 25, 2010 at 10:04 pm   

    Really, there’s nothing new in all this.

    I’ve heard all my life that Hitler had a Jewish ancestor somewhere — probably a great-grandmother. Even if true, that would be nothing especially unusual. Nor would it be important. Hitler certainly does not qualify as Jewish: there’s just not enough Jewish in him (if, indeed, there’s any at all).

    Hitler has been accused of every sort of evil. Because of his reputation, it is possible to make any claim of perversion in the man and go practically unchallenged. If someone were to claim him to have been a child molester and a cannibal, few people would even bother to question it.

    For this reason, I don’t readily accept anything I hear about Hitler; so many of the claims are urban legends.

    For those of you who hate David Duke (I think he’s misunderstood to some extent): Mr. Duke does in fact have a Jewish grand-parent (or great-grandparent). He admits it. Yet no one considers him Jewish.

  • 5 Thrasymachus // Aug 25, 2010 at 10:26 pm   

    “People swear in the name of God all the time, with apparent impunity; but, if you say “nigger” you are evil.”
    ————————————–
    When I was in high school, it was a White school. I rarely heard the word “nigger.” In fact, I have no specific memory of hearing it used by students.

    Now that the school is 35% – 40% Black, any White student who uses that word will be expelled! No doubt, cursing using the Lord’s name will not result in expulsion.

    Wonderful freedom the integrationists have brought us!

    The American people are idiots to imagine themselves to be more free than they were fifty years ago.

  • 6 Pamela K. // Aug 25, 2010 at 10:33 pm   

    As a footnote to my last comment, I think the only good thing about DNA testing is that medical science can now determine if a person is likely to carry the gene which causes a disorder. The Czarvitch Alexei was a hemophiliac, which he inherited through his mother, the Czarina Alexandria, the grand-daughter of Queen Victoria. Hemophilia was prominent in both the English and Spanish royal families, unfortunately brought to Spain by a granddaughter of Queen Victoria.
    DNA testing can also determine if a Jewish person carries the gene which causes Tay-Sachs Disease, which only effects Jews from Eastern Europe..

  • 7 Thrasymachus // Aug 26, 2010 at 12:15 am   

    Yes, Blacks can run faster and longer than Whites or Asians. But this is hardly a sign of superiority in intellectual achievement.

    Let’s hear from a Black preacher on this matter:

    Her Name is “Ms. Ann.”

  • 8 Gary DeLoriea // Aug 26, 2010 at 12:29 am   

    First off the Fact hitler was had a Jewish grandmother was not really in doubt. As a matter of fact Hitler knew it. This is why he used his Fathers home town as target practice for his atrillery. He wanted no evidence left behind of his Jewish ancestry. As far as he not being Jewish enough for it to matter. You forget the Blood and Iron laws the Nazis instituted. Even a great grand parent was enough to get you considered jewish. In order to join the Waffen SS you had to prove German ancestry on both sides to1750. Also just because he may have had “African” DNa doesn’t mean he was necessarily black the countries names are more arabic than anything else.
    Gary DeLoriea
    Arfstoll Church of Theodish Belief

  • 9 Monsieur Calguès // Aug 26, 2010 at 1:32 am   

    Dr. Yeagley,

    The article stated the particular Haplogroup was found in a quarter of Greeks and Sicilians and %80 of NORTH Africans. Greeks mixed with other people of the Mediterranean and Sicilians were under Muslim rule a few centuries ago, hence some genetic flow from Arab countries. Of course Maghrebis are a mix of Arab and Berber, both of which are classed as Caucasoid, notwithstanding the small traces of Negroid which found their way into the Maghreb population (most of it probably from slaves taken by Arab slave traders).

    Gary,

    The Nazis could be quite selective in whom they considered to be Jews. The SS may have been more exclusive, but aside from Hitler (rumored), there were many others: Goering (Jewish godfather, I think), von Manstein who had Jewish ancestry 2-3 generations back, I believe there were rumors Heydrich was part Jewish as well. Many mischlings served, one was even the poster boy for one of the Wehrmacht publicity campaigns. Hitler allowed his Jewish childhood doctor to leave the country. One of the top guys, I think it was Goering, said something to the effect of, “I decide who is a Jew…”

  • 10 dailykenn.com // Aug 26, 2010 at 5:59 am   

    Hitler’s atrocities can now be blamed on black people?

  • 11 Pamela K. // Aug 26, 2010 at 8:33 am   

    No! Hitler’s atrocities can only be blamed on one person. Himself. He chose to be evil.
    Was Hitler born evil? I don’t know. Are people born to be inherently good or evil? I do believe people can be effected by a generational curse on their family. Spirits of witchcraft and divination, sexual perversion, the tendencies to abuse drugs and alcohol are all passed down from generation to generation. So are spirits of murder and suicide. And as we can plainly see, there were spirits of murder and suicide which influenced Hitler’s life.

  • 12 David Yeagley // Aug 26, 2010 at 9:00 am   

    dailykenn.com, I trust you got my sarcastic humor on this. I think the article is incredibly racist, so that it is humorous. I don’t know what else to do but to poke fun at it.

    Yes! Let’s blame the Negro race for the Holocaust! I mean, isn’t that the wildest thing?

    Well, “African” has a dubious meaning. Africa is not a race, not a language, not a country, a culture, but simply the name of a continent. North Africa was “white” anciently. All south Africa was white, for, what, 400 years or so? at least in terms of majority and control.

    I know everyone associates the word Africa with the Negro race. That may be appropriate, too. Certainly, that’s what the Beligan journalists (liberals, no doubt) assumed people would do–associate the word Africa with Negroes.

    The effect of the article is to say that Hitler hated himself (his own blood); Hitler had no respect for life–especially Jewish and black life; any person interested in race is a racist, a fake, a self-hating, dangerous person.

    Okay. I call THIS position racist! One who truly loves and respect race simply loves and respects race. Hitler’s “race” problems, be they what they were, represent someone who did not love any race. His pro-white position was a power-grab, and not about race at all. I think he was profoundly fake on that score.

  • 13 Hitler Dna latest | Celebrity Buzz // Aug 26, 2010 at 9:31 am   

    [...] Hitler DNA: Jewish and Negro Perhaps it is the joke of the day, but it is a classic example of the circus quality entertainment provided by the pseudo science of DNA: Hitler was a Jewish Negro. Adolf Hitler, the Negro Jew. That’s the latest position–held not by … [...]

  • 14 Thrasymachus // Aug 26, 2010 at 11:45 am   

    “His pro-white position was a power-grab, and not about race at all. I think he was profoundly fake on that score.”
    ———————————
    My cousin is a history teacher and he said the same thing. Hitler wet his finger and held it to the winds to see what might bring him power.

    Hitler was the absolute worst thing to ever happen to the White race, as well as other races. He causes people to associate the desire for racial or ethnic preservation — nationalism — with cruelty and insane hatred for other races — an association that is entirely unjustified. Hitler’s power mania may actually bring about the suicide of the White race, unless the stigma and false guilt can be overcome by the truth — that truth being that healthy and sincere respect for race necessarily means respect for every race and nation.

  • 15 akwiley1 // Aug 31, 2010 at 7:06 pm   

    laughable….. since jew is not a race but a religion.
    sure someone in hitlers ancestry may have been guilty of practicing judaism, such as a Rothschild or a ashkenazi Khazar jew convert who are by race Asiatics. so in reality according to the DNA results he would be part Asian.and i have yet to come up with a response to their claims of african dna, laughable….

  • 16 akwiley1 // Aug 31, 2010 at 7:10 pm   

    I do not see Hitler as being any more or less evil than Joe Stalin, the little jew commie who murdered millions more Jews homo’s gypsy’s and white Christians than Hitler could have dreamed of.yes he is not portrayed as evil by the Jewish media.mainly because he is one of their own.

  • 17 akwiley1 // Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 pm   

    the biblical pharasee who are now known as jews were all Arabs at one time.related to Abraham.
    all their descendants would have their DNA.
    Arab… the ashkenazi khazar jews intermarried with these same Arabs in the past which gives them the DNA of the Arab/jew…. geesh, even sammy davis junior was a jew… by conversion. yet he had no DNA they could prove him a arab? or a jew. see my point?

You must log in to post a comment.