David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Former US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, has recently announced, repeatedly, that Israel has only a few days to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities, or it will be too late. Once the nuclear sites are fueled (by Russian resources), the fall-out from any such Israeli strike would spread dangerous radiation in the area. Strikes on Iran would involve serious consequences, indeed.
Former US envoy to the UN, John Bolton.
This is the story. Iran has for years defied the international “community,” the United Nations, and all attempts at disuasion. Sanctions are meaningless. Iranian mullahs are determined to have nuclear facilities and, obviously, neclear weapons. Barry “Obama” Soetoro, the joke of the Muslim world, has only increased Islamic aggression everywhere. So, it becomes a question of stopping a cancer with radical surgery, or letting it slowly develop, taking its own course, and suffering the consequences. A high risk surgery now, or sure death later.
In the past, BadEagle.com has noted the fact that other ‘rogue’ or unstable governments possess the nuclear bomb, such as North Korea, India, and Pakistan. China and Russia of course have the bomb. No one but the United States has ever used nuclear weapons against another country. Those atom bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WWII, in 1945. Since that time, different countries have tested nuclear bombs. North Korea continues to terrorize the world with childish and foolish tests. But, the likelihood of any country actually using a nuclear bomb on another country is negligent. Why? Self-preservation, or, the instinct life.
Until, of course, Islam wields nuclear power. Islam has demonstrated before the world, repeatedly, that it has no respect for life, and, with religious zeal would delight to evelop the world in a nuclear holocaust. Iran’s mullahs would most definitely use a nuclear bomb on another country. Any country. Especially Israel. Self-preservation is not a motivation in Islam. Death is the motivation. Islam is a death cult. Therefore, a nuclear weapon in the hands of Muslims, particularly ambitious Iranian muslims, is a sure catastrophy.
This appears to be the case, based on everything said and done to this point. Whether Israel will strike the nuclear facility at Beshehr or not remains to be seen.
Israel struck an Iraqi nuclear site in 1981: “Operation Mitzvah.”
What would be the consequences? WWIII? I say, WWIII with conventional weapons would be more tolerable than an Iranian-initiated nuclear holocaust. Iranian Islamicists don’t care about life. Israelis do. True Muslims desire to end the world in violence and blood. This, in their minds, brings forth the Mehdi, the Savior of the world, or, the new world. Something like that. Islam functions as a martyr’s role. Death is the object of the “religion.” Islam is truly hideous and repulsive to anyone who cherishes life. While many Muslims do not believe Islam is a death cult at all, but a better way of life, these Muslims do not shape the image of modern Islam. And even they themselves tend towards coercion, or the imposition of Sharia law on the West. This is what Islam is all about–coercion. Conquering. That was its nature from the day Mohammad began his politico-military career.
While it would be extremely risky and costly for Israel to strike Iran now, though the consequences on the world, particularly the United States, would be significant, the alternative is only to delay until a worse set of consequences develop.
I would have to say, to Israel, strike now. It is not a declaration of war. It is not war against Iran. It is a technical, surgical removal of a deadly threat, the kind of thing Israel has done twice in the past, a facility in Iraq (1981), and North Korean interests in Syria (2007). This would be simply another such action. Again, it is not a declaration of war against Iran, nor is it an attack on the people of Iran. This would be the anti-Zionist headline the world over, of course, but it would be a lie, as most anti-Zionist headlines are. Israel would not be attacking Iran. Israel would be disabling a nuclear weapons facility. That’s all. The world was strangely quiet in 1981, and in 2007. Most people don’t even know about the 2007 strike against the nuclear weapons program in Syria.
Israel bombed a nuclear facility in Syria, in 2007.
Of course, Syria is not Iran. Nevertheless, Iran is not the leader of the Islamic world–much as the Iranian mullahs would like to think they are. The Islamic world, which is Arabic in nature, would probably be grateful for the Israeli strike. Islam is an Arabic religion, in style, in content, and in spirit. (It is cruel, vain, and aggressive.) Iranians are Persian by heritage. They will never, ever be accepted as the leader of the Islamic world. This is a profound reality that must figure into the equation of what to do presently with the nuclear program in Beshehr.
14 responses so far ↓
1 Pamela K. // Aug 19, 2010 at 11:16 am
What you see happening at this present time with Iran has already been foretold by the Prophet Ezekiel.
“Son of Man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, of Meshech, and of Tubal and prophesy against him.” Ezekiel 38:2
“Gog is a symbolic name, representing the leader of the world powers antagonistic to God. (see also Rev. 20:8). Meshech and Tubal are understood to have been the same as the Moschi and Tibareni of the Greeks-tribes that inhabited the Caucasus. Rosh, which some identify with Russia, must have designated a land and people somewhere in the same area. Therefore, the Gog of Ezekiel must be viewed as in some sense the head of the high regions in the northwest of Asia” -Patrick Fairbairn, The Imperial Bible Dictionary
“Persia, (Iran) Cush, and Put, ( Libya) with them, all of them with shield and helmet…you shall go against the land that is restored from the ravages of the sword (persecution of the Jews) where people are gathered out of many nations upon the mountains of Israel, which has been a continual waste: but it’s people are brought forth out of nations and they shall dwell securely, all of them….And you shall come up against My people Israel like a cloud to cover the land. I will bring you against My land that the nations may know, understand and realize Me when My Holiness shall be vindicated through you and honored in your overwhelming destruction.”
Ezekiel 38: 5,8, 16
The outcome of this situation has already been decided. When the Lion of Judah finally roars, the enemies of Israel and the Jewish people will rue the day of their birth.
2 David Yeagley // Aug 19, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Well, I have to say, as I’ve said before, I really don’t have a Biblical understanding of the modern state of Israel, or her role in eschatological events. I know a lot of people do. I just can’t get my mind wrapped around it. All I can say is, there was never a gathering of Jewish people in Palestine that the Lord was not behind. The modern state of Israel would be the first time in history, if God isn’t involved.
Then one would have to re-examine the status of Israel altogether.
I am in no wise competent to comprehend or articulate this issue. I do not know the role of modern Israel in last-day events. That is my public confession!
Pam, thank you for your testimony!
3 Thrasymachus // Aug 19, 2010 at 2:11 pm
Israel will not reoccupy the land lawfully in God’s eyes until she recognizes Christ as her Messiah. This present occupation of Israel is not the final return prophesied in the Old Testament.
“Behold, your house is left to you desolate: and truly I say to you, You shall not see me, until the time come when you shall say, Blessed is he that comes in the name of the Lord.” — Jesus Christ, Luke 13:35
The Third Temple (Tisha Be’Av) – Will it be Rebuilt?
(every stone was overturned in 363 A.D.!).
4 David Yeagley // Aug 19, 2010 at 2:17 pm
I had assumed every stone was overturned in 70 AD, under Titus.
But, again, I am unsure of the application of these prophecies. A prophet can see things coming to pass in the era or age in which he writes, even though, historically, it turns out to be centuries later, or, in a different era. Prophecy is a fascinating thing. True prophecy is not a man-made art, like poetry and history writing.
Yet, the prophet sees things in terms of the day and age in which he lives.
But, I think we can all agree, we are in the end times. Serious things are transpiring before our eyes. We can also know that the Bible has something critical to say about it. The Lord does nothing without revealing it to his servants the prophets.
5 Thrasymachus // Aug 19, 2010 at 2:40 pm
Unless I am very much mistaken (and I often am!), we are living in very perilous times — we’re on the edge of a volcano that is about to erupt!
6 Pamela K. // Aug 19, 2010 at 3:34 pm
I have always said it’s time for the UN to get off US soil, forever!
‘UN Hides Evidence of Iran’s Nuke Program
7 David Yeagley // Aug 19, 2010 at 4:05 pm
And the WMDs of Iraq were moved to Syria before the US invaded, as I have read, anyway. Look at these news items on Yahoo. Here’s just one:
Iraq’s WMD Secreted in Syria, Sada Says
8 Thrasymachus // Aug 19, 2010 at 4:36 pm
“But, I think we can all agree, we are in the end times. Serious things are transpiring before our eyes. We can also know that the Bible has something critical to say about it. The Lord does nothing without revealing it to his servants the prophets.”
———————————————————
This video (the music is lame – might want to turn the volume down) presents a Biblical perspective of today’s multiculturalism and where it fits into prophesy:
Tower of Babel – Multiculturalism (NWO).
9 David Yeagley // Aug 19, 2010 at 5:36 pm
The psychological state of anticipating the end is something that the human race has been through before. For that reason, it is always difficult to take it seriously.
As I said, I wrote a research work on this, when I started a doctoral level program at Harvard. The End of the World in Poe, as I advertise on this site. It is a special state of mind. One is not to freak out, nor to give onself over to hysteria, foolishness, or radicalism. Nevertheless, when Jesus returns,
“Then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.” Matt. 24:30.
Sound like a very unpleasant suprise for most, certainly for everyone who is not right with God. Preparation, therefore, is about knowing the Lord first. But, even then, we can’t take ourselves for granted. Some say they do know Him, but He will say to them,
“I never knew you: depart from me, ye workers of iniquity.” Matt. 7:23. This He says–to the Christian world, to the leadership of the church.
Alto belle.
10 Thrasymachus // Aug 19, 2010 at 5:46 pm
This reminds me of what my childhood piano teacher once said. “These are the ‘last days’; but who can say how many ‘last days’ there will be?!”
Certainly, the world could go on for another five centuries.
It’s just that, when I read the Old Testament, I was struck by the “one people” statement from God Himself — how He was displeased with this unity. And today, the political movement uses those very words, “One People” in its propaganda. Ever hear of the “One People’s Project”?
I noticed this also when blacks interrupted Ross Perot’s speech because they were offended that he addressed them with the words “you people,” as in “Who benefits from this? You people do.” They shouted, “Don’t say ‘you people’! We are all ONE PEOPLE!”
11 Pamela K. // Aug 19, 2010 at 9:25 pm
Here is another interesting take on the current situation with Iran.
Iran boosts Qods shock troops in Venezuela
If it comes down to a preemptive strike against Iran, who should really do the dirty work? While Iran remains a definite threat to Israel and the Middle East, Iran is also America’s problem. So, should we allow Israel to do our work for us and suffer the consequences of worldwide condemnation and isolation, or will Obama be man enough to fulfill the obligation he made during his State of the Union address and handle this situation?
12 David Yeagley // Aug 20, 2010 at 9:42 am
It is very true, the government of Iran is an avowed enemy of the United States. Has been for years. Has been hooking up with Venezuela for years, too. No question about it.
However, I’m not sure we can conclude about whose responsibility it is to take care of the situation. i don’t think the US is capable right now. Israel is always on top of the situation. I wouldn’t trust anyone to do it but Israel.
Just my opinion. The US is in really bad shape, seems to me–mainly because of bureaucracy, incompetence, greed, selfish ambition on the part of leaders, etc. You know, the usual suspects in a demoracy. These things are obvious in tyrannical regimes. We think things are different in our republican form of democracy…
13 handle // Aug 21, 2010 at 6:55 am
From what I’ve read regarding the 2009 IAEA report, the iranians have correctly reported the amount of low-grade uranium produced, and it’s correctly and safely stored, so there’s not much chance of weaponization.
14 Edwin M. Wright // Dec 19, 2010 at 1:44 am
Bi-Polar Paranoid lunatic’s with power only care about what they want.
Thank you.
You must log in to post a comment.