David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Kyrgyzstan has a right to determine who its citizens are. So does Serbia, and American Indian nations. The current crisis in Kyrgyzstan is another example of what happens when too many ethnic aliens in a nation threaten control of the territory and oppose the government where they are dwelling.
It looks likely that the Uzbeks want control over the southern province of Kyrgyzstan. The UN and the US and the UN share an air base in northern Kyrgyzstan. One might think they would side with Kyrgyzstan, the secular government. But, with IslamaBarry in the White House, we cannot be sure. After all, Washington is an Islamic government already.
Uzbeks, a far more aggressive Muslim people than the Kyrgyz, belong in Uzbekistan. Let them go there, and live there, if they must be opposed to the Kyrgyzstan government. The UN is claiming 400,000 Uzbeks living in Kyrgyrzstan have been displaced, and have become “refugees” in their on country of Uzbekistan! Does Uzbekistan plan to make “Palestinians” out of the displaced Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan? As noted before, the struggle is over who should control the the territory of Kyrgyzstan. Is there a question that it should be the Kyrgyz?
Look what happend to Serbia. Hundreds of thousands of Albanian Muslims moved into the historically significant Serbian province of Kosovo. The Albanians and the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army (which included Turk and Arab Muslims) finally convinced the world that Kosovo deserved to be an independent “nation.” The United States, no less, Clinton–followed by Bush–supported the Albanians!
Is the world going to demand that Kyrgyrzstan give over their territory that happens to be occupied by Uzbeks–whose presence in Kyrgyrzstan we really do not presently know the history of? Perhaps Uzbeks are planning a mass “immigration” to Kyrgyrzstan in order to claim control of the territory–and the Afghan heroin traffic.
Israel claim its homeland, but the squatters (the Jordanian, the Syrians, and the newer Arab terrorist groups) refused to leave. Indeed, their respective “Arab” countries would not allowe them repatriation. King Hussein, of Jordon, said in 1960 Associate Press interview (quoted in Michael Curtis,The Palestinians, People, History, and Politics, 1975):
Since 1948 Arab leaders have approached the Palestine problem in an irresponsible manner… They have used the Palestine people for selfish political purposes. This is reidiculous and, I could say, even criminal.”
The so-called “Palestinians” don’t want their own state so much as Israel to have no state. To this end, Barry Soetoro, the alien, lying, black African Communist Muslim traitor just authorized $400 million dollars of American tax payers money to be sent to Hamas, or, the government of “Gaza strip,” as if the politically fabricated “Palestinian” identity is some ancient, indigenous entity.
Interestingly, there are some unthinking conservatives who see the American Indian reservations as somehow similar to “Palestinians,” or, also, the “balkanization” of American unity. They see the emphasis on the various ethnicities in southestern European Balkans as the cause of endless and hopeless dispute, as if these people have no right to be who they are, and to preserve who they are. Why, American Indian reservations need to be dissolved, and the Indians just blend in with the rest of the great melting pot.
This analogy is so mistaken that it is hard to believe conservatives cherish the notion. While Communist Democrats and other liberals love to use the Indian separateness as a ploy for racial agitation and disruption of American society in any way possible, conservatives often have no concept or respect for the historical significance of the Indian treaties, and the Indian reservations.
Indians did not invade someone else’s land. Indians did not try to take over someone else’s government by migrating into their territory. Indians were corralled onto reservations, often nowhere near their own homelands. Nevertheless, Indians are essentially on our own homelands, and we cannot be compared to Uzbeks living in Kyrgyzstan, or to Albanian Muslims who migrated to Kosovo, or least of all “Palestinians.”
But, America should surely compare itself to Kyrgyrzstan and Serbia. Look at our Mexican problem on the southern borders. Look at our Arab Muslim problem in various large communities like Dearborn, Michigan. When mass numbers of aliens migrate, and live in a foreign country, they eventually claim the territory on which they live. Possession is nine tenth’s of the law, as they say. Just by being there, they claim all for themselves.
Conservatives who think Indian reservations should be dissovlved need to think again. Do they want to see America dissolve? Does America now feel as out-numbered and out gunned as the Indians were? Does America feel obligated to give up all her hard-earned land to foriegners–just because the foreigners stepped across the borders? Is that all it takes?
“Remember the Alamo!” the patriotic Americans used to say. Remember Kosovo! I say, today. Remember what it means to be a nation. Whatever you are, whatever you have, if you are not willing to fight for it, it will be taken from you. And even if you are willing to fight, you may be outnumbered, and it will still be taken from you.
You may in fact end up like an Indian. You have yourself. Your beliefs. But there may be another world built on top of you. And yet, America let Indians be Indian, as much as possible, for ever. No other people, no other modern government, has ever let something like happen. Modern tyrants eliminate unwanted people. America never did that. America stopped short, intentionally. They just wanted Indians out of the way. They couldn’t send us to another country, or back to our own country. We were in our own country! And Americans didn’t even mind to much if the Indians joined them in the new nation, but the Indians never wanted to. So, that’s that.
In the end, the strong rule over the weak, the rich over the poor, and the many over the few. Historically, America has tried to give place to the few, to honor the few. In a way, the American Indian stands as the greatest example of this in history. We’re still here. We still have some land. Now if we can just stop the interracial reproduction, we may still be able to stand our ground.
88 responses so far ↓
1 Pamela K. // Jun 20, 2010 at 7:59 pm
…”Fierce, Stalwart, Free Stood the American Warrior…” reads the caption beneath an artist’s rendition of 91 year old Chief One Bull, nephew and adopted son of Sitting Bull. His proud features “envoke the Indian’s indomitable spirit.”
This is what sets the Indians apart from other ethnic groups. At least that’s my opinion, and apparently the opinions of the authors of National Geographic’s “Indians Of The Americas.” Of course, this book was published in 1955, long before the advent of political correctness in America and in organizations like today’s National Geographic Society. I’m glad I found this book.
This books covers almost all the tribes of North America, as well as the Maya Of Yucatan, The Aztecs Of Mexico, The Incas, The Indian tribes in South and Central America, and Canada’s different tribes. It is clear, however, that the Indian tribes of North America, in the area that is now the United States, were a very diverse people with different customs and traditions, clearly set apart from each other, and clearly Indians, period! Not African or white or Hispanic wannabees! Now I understand what you were talking about in regards to the Cherokee Nation cutting off benefits for those who claim to be descendants of the tribe’s slaves. I read that after the Civil War, Cherokees who had fought for the Confederacy lost everything they owned, including their lands. Those who owned slaves were forced to free them,( although I’m not sure that Lincoln’s 1863 emancipation initially applied to Indian Territory). Even if they allowed these former slaves to continue to live on lands owned by their former masters, or in Indian Territory,, they were not Indians and neither are they’re descendants. It’s like you always say, it’s all about money these days. However, all the money in the world can never buy back someone self-respect.
2 David Yeagley // Jun 20, 2010 at 11:17 pm
And you can’t give anyone dignity, really. One has to come to understand these things for oneself. If your self-concept is dependent on how other people treat you, or how other people think of you, you’re in a difficult place. Much like slavery.
And, actually, the whole modern concept of “self-esteem” is, I think, not healthy. A good, loving mother and father, to start you out, is a wondrous thing. But, things happen after that. Life sets in!
A nation can try to be independent, too, but, in this day and age, most can’t pay the price alone. All nations have to ally with other nations. In a very real sense, Indians are dependent on the good word of the US government. The government could change the Indian legal status with th stroke of a pen–as Barry the wonder boy wants to do. He wants to declare the Indian lands “national parks,” by the millions of acres. This way, the federal government has direct control.
He thinks it’s an easy kill. Indians are like dumb dogs, stupid animals, from his lofty point of view.
3 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 5:12 am
“And you can’t give anyone dignity, really.”
———————————————————
Great article! Much food for thought.
Liberals officially teach that dignity is a commodity on the market! That is, they call it a “social good.” They view it as something conferred on the citizen by society!
For proof, see the work of the influential liberal philosopher, John Rawls.
This is complete rubbish! Self-esteem is a CHOICE — it comes from the SELF — it starts at home. Parents can help build a child’s self-esteem. From adulthood on, one must accept dignity as the gift of the Creator. Recognizing that the human being is made in the Creator’s image, with free will, and the power to control his own thoughts and actions — this is the basis of genuine self-esteem. Even if everybody else thinks you’re crazy, you may still have self-esteem, if you lead a morally sound life. It’s a matter of choosing humility before God and eschewing sin. Love God and obey His commandments, and self-esteem will be granted you: Genesis 4: “6 Then the LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it.” ”
God tells Man that if he chooses good behavior, he will be accepted. To be accepted by God is to have dignity – a dignity that the world cannot give – a dignity that the world cannot take away.
4 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 5:24 am
If the treaties made with the American Indian are disregarded and dissolved, then White America is disregarded and dissolved — and vice versa.
The real goal of the “liberals” is to erase Whiteness from the entire world. The core of modern liberalism is anti-white race-hatred. This is a fact that must become common knowledge.
To prove this, here are a few quotes from the Liberal Establishment (according to dictionaries, the adjective Black is to be capitalized when referring to race, so White activists demand the same for the corresponding use of White, though the establishment prefers to use lower-case for it!):
“It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white [sic].” — Newsweek, Sept. 14, 2009
“The goal of abolishing the white [sic] race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white [sic] supremacists.” — Noel Ignatiev, history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art, Harvard Magazine, Sep-Oct 2002
“I don’t think white [sic] people should love their whiteness. Better for everyone, I think, that we take a shot first at hating it”.” — Robert Jensen, journalism professor at the University of Texas, Heart of Whiteness: Confronting Race, Racism and White Privilege
“It’s always illegitimate for white men to organize as white men.” — William Raspberry, a black columnist for the Washington Post
5 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 5:37 am
The Liberal’s Dream-Girl:
New Face
America’s New Face
6 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 5:51 am
The Modern Liberal insists that “race does not exist — only cultures exist.” And, of course, cultures belong to “whosoever will” — they are commodities for sale on the free market.
Their first goal is to take away the European-American peoples’ culture, along with that of the American Indian, so as to begin the dismantling, dispossession, and ultimate destruction of Western Christian Civilization. Jesse Jackson, no less, called ALOUD for exactly this.
I believe these are the times spoken of in the Old Testament book of Daniel, the second chapter.
7 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 5:52 am
Obama has no shame. No dignity. Only arrogance, and for all his Ivy League education, vast stupidity and ignorance!
His rise is prophetic, however, but not in the Biblical sense. I think it was either in the late 1980′s or early 1990′s when Newsweek Magazine came out with the photograph of a young brown-skinned woman on it’s front cover. She was being presented as “America’s future face”. Not white. Not black. Not Hispanic or American Indian. She was a blending of races. This is the majority in 2010. The white race is no longer dominant. The majority of people are now mixed bloods, our culture is no longer American, and according to the Muslim occupying the Oval Office, we are no longer a Christian nation, but a blender mix of racial and religious cultures. It’s certainly not the America I know and love, the America that inspired Norman Rockwell, whose art captured the essence of small town America, as well as the pride and patriotism of her citizens. Your not the only one who chokes up during the National Anthem, or while saying the Pledge of Allegiance! America’s true heart can also be found in the artistic renderings of George Caitlin, whose portraits of proud Indian chiefs embodied the indomitable spirit of the great warrior-this is America to me!
8 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 6:14 am
It all comes down to the love of money. The ultra-wealthy plutocrats want to destroy the identity — and the sense of personal dignity that this may give — in all people and reduce the masses to serfdom. They want to eliminate the middle class and have only two groups: the very rich elites and the cheap-labor commoners. Even the Queen of England knows and (we assume) understands this — and approves. She has condemned all British nationalism. She is a traitor to her own British people.
9 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 6:23 am
The Queen (who is the “head” of the Church of England?) has given Muslims a place of worship inside Buckingham Palace, and Prince Charles has called upon his people to “follow the Islamic way.” What more evidence do we need that England and America are united in common liberal political trends?
10 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 7:52 am
Thras, I fixed your link, again, and then some (just because I’m neurotic, and can’t stand URL addresses!) There’s a forumla for pictures, too, which I’ll show you later.
I don’t understand the general agreement that Islam is acceptable and to be followed. This is for soul-less people. This is for cowards, quitters, and tyrannists.
My soul doth rise up against it. Forever!
11 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 9:07 am
So, it was Time Magazine! I knew it was either Time or Newsweek, I could not remember, but I do remember that cover!
Islam is rooted in pagan rituals and witchcraft. It has it’s basis in the moon god worship of Ur, the land where Abram came from, in the Chaldees. Abram was called out of that land: “..the Lord said to Abram, go for yourself and your own advantage away from your country, away from your relatives, and your father’s house, to the land I will show you.” Genesis 12:1
Abram took his wife and family and went forth into the land of Canaan, to Shechem where the Lord appeared to him and told him, “I will give this land to your posterity”.Genesis 12:7.
Abram, later became Abraham. God made his covenant with him for ownership of the land and that through him and his descendants the nations of the world will be blessed. This covenant remains unchanged between God and His Jewish people.
There is no people on earth like the Jewish people. Although they might be small in number compared to other peoples, wherever they live, they prosper. Israel has one of the most highest standards of living on the face of the earth.
Meanwhile, those who have bowed their knee to the antichrist spirit of Islam live in some of the worst squalor, while their leaders bask in the luxury of ill-gotten gains-money and power through lies and manipulation- and the worst part is the governments and the news media of the West seem totally oblivious to what is going on, or, like Obama, are protecting these people who want to come here and destroy us. I hate to say this, but before this ongoing situation gets any worse, we are going to see armed insurrection in our streets. This ‘green army’ Obama is training to harrass and intimidate people in their own homes is a perfect example. A lot of innocent people are going to be caught up in it, but that’s what happens when push comes to shove between people and their government. You either have to kill or be killed in order to secure freedom for the next generation. You have to become like William Wallace in “Braveheart.”
12 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 9:28 am
“My soul doth rise up against it. Forever!”
————————————————————
Mine also!
Islam is a fatalistic and militaristic creed. Liberals actually love the military lifestyle. Race-relations, according to liberals, are always at their best in military life. Some “liberals” have claimed that this should be the model for all society.
If someone could prove to me that Christianity were a false belief, then I would at least consider the non-Theistic philosophy of Taoism.
That “Chinese” belief is not a religion, as there is no Divine Person necessarily involved, but merely a philosophy — and one similar to Plato’s ideas to boot — but, I might add, apparently more developed. [A similar belief in the Absolute has existed in the West, but not embracing monism.]
The West has traditionally ever struggled with dualism (in which one side must defeat the other), whereas the East has always held to monism. In Eastern thought, negative and positive, and indeed all apparent opposites, are ultimately ONE. All Reality is ultimately ONE, and hence everything comes full circle in developing into its opposite, through cyclic motions: In other words, everything works like the pedals of a bicycle. The pedals, seemingly opposite, are actually one pair and form a single unit. (It is not possible to separate the negative and positive poles of a magnet but cutting the magnet in half.)
My real point, however, is that Islam (the religion of “Submission” to a system) is unacceptable to any traditional Western society and is contrary to any freedom-loving people. Living a free and peaceful life — a life of basic simplicity, in harmony with nature and in intelligent mutual co-operation with one’s fellow man — has long seemed best to me.
Yes, God will eventually end the satanic rebellion against His Kingdom, but with great (and even astonishing!) patience, at the very last moment. If Man did not have freedom, our Lord would have set up His earthly reign in the First Century — or so it seemeth to me!
13 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 9:49 am
The reason I call the plan for the elimination of all races and nations the “satanic rebellion” lies in the premise on which it rests, viz.: God made a huge mistake in creating distinct peoples, or races and nations, and it is for Man to correct this through liberal social engineering. For the modern liberal, this is not a question of an occasional, rather eccentric, mixed marriage, but rather the deliberate plan to rid the world of the “sin” of “racism” by ridding the world of all races and nations. The liberal dreams of a raceless and nationless world. A single “world-man.” I cannot find anywhere in Scripture where this is a stated (or even implied) goal of the Creator.
I find the world a more interesting place because of the peoples, cultures, and nations that God has made. I do not seek to eliminate any one of them, but rather to respect them all and preserve them.
We can never have perfect peace until the Prince of Peace reigns on this Earth. But if we can respect the bounds of the habitations of the nations, instead of forcibly mixing everything up as much as possible, we can reduce the competition between peoples that generates the lies and slanders that lead to aggression and acts of violence.
Respecting the principle of nationalism and always looking for and encouraging the BEST in others is the way to improve international relations. In this condition, the goal is to expose the lies about others and replace these with truths. Truth about peoples is the only thing that can lead to understanding and some measure of temporary peace. We know that in every war, the first causality is the Truth.
14 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 10:00 am
Correction: We know that in every war, the first CASUALTY is the Truth.
15 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 10:52 am
The core tenet in the practice of witchcraft is imposing your will on the will of other people. While I am not sure if killing suspected witches was practiced by the Comanches, I read that some American Indian tribes regularly killed those they thought might be practicing sorcery among their people.
Islam and Liberalism both usurp the wills of the people they indoctrinate and once their victims have succumbed, they become spiritual blinded, and often openly hostile to the Truth, which of course, is the Gospel, or Good News of Y’Shua, the Messiah, or Christ.
“So if the Son liberates you, then you are really and unquestionably free.” John 8:36
This is the basis of our own freedom here in America. Yet, the prideful and self-righteous liberal establishment have thrown God’s promises into the wind of hope and change, along with the iron clad guarantee of His Divine Protection and Providence, in favor of giving succor and recognition to our enemies.
However, unlike the enemies’ god of violence, destruction, and death, Jehovah God is a loving Father, rich with mercy and compassion for His children. He sent his Son here to die in order to set us free from the captivity of sin and second death. Furthermore, there are still many good, God-fearing people here in America and I still believe there is light at the end of this long, dark tunnel. While I still do not want to see our nation erupt into another civil war, sometimes there must be a conflict in order to have genuine peace and to secure freedom for furture generations. This “war” on America is more spiritual than physical, and it will be best waged lying on our face before God, crying out for mercy… and that despite what we are witnessing on a daily basis, His Will Be Done for our people and our nation.
16 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 11:03 am
There is a news line on Islam, indeed, which declares Islam a great advocate of the occult, the formal, organized, traditional occult I shall puts some links up on that. I would like to look into that.
17 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 11:18 am
The Muslims believe that their god preceeded Jehovah God in the Bible. That is the basis for their claim that they descend from Abram, or Abraham and so have a “right’ to the land of Israel. It’s a lie, of course. The only thing they have in common with Abraham is that he was once Abram, a pagan, and possibly a worshipper of the moon god religion himself before God called him out of Ur, which was the center of moon god worship.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/moongod.htm
18 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 11:20 am
Here’s one article on this (note: the Nazis also have been accused of involvement in the Occult):
The Occult Origins of Islam
19 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 11:28 am
Interesting Christian article says that Islam has many forms, and these need to be taken into account:
The History of Islam
20 Thrasymachus // Jun 21, 2010 at 11:45 am
“Muslims in most Islamic lands still communicate with spirits through dreams, visions, and divinations. They still appeal to occult forces using an assortment of amulets, charms, magic, astrology, sorcery, and witchcraft.”
Quoted from:
Four Faces of Islam: Folk Islam
21 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 1:08 pm
Whoa! This is more formal than I thought. I was just going by what I heard, when I was in Iran (Messhad). This is truly a very dark dimension. Thank you all very much!
22 zephyr // Jun 21, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Hamas Covenant, Article 2, states that one of the goals of Hamas is to promote the “science of the occult”.
23 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 1:26 pm
Did you visit Iran prior to the 1979 revolution or afterwards? Contrary to all the negative reports you hear about Persia, which is the name I prefer over Iran, it is a very beautiful country with many beautiful flowers!
24 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 2:42 pm
Zephyr, we’re going to have to expose this, big time.
PK, I went in 1999, exactly twenty years after the Revolution. It’s still a beaufitul place, but, a bit run down, with many infrastructure problems. Way over-built. Also, more than half of the fabulous freshwater lakes have turned to salt.
Muslim mulah mismanagement, I was told by an engineer. They just don’t know how to run anything. They just want to control people. You know, like the MuslimBarry administration.
25 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 2:58 pm
Again, the influence of the Islamic religion! Squalor among the ruins of a once great civilization!
“There was a door to which I found no key: There was the veil through which I might not see.”
Omar Khayyam
26 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 3:33 pm
The Qur’an seems to condemn magic (at least the peddlers thereof) in Sura 2:102. But, angels Harut and Marut were given magic at Babylon. They never practiced (or dealt it) without warning about it first.
Description, not real identity…
27 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 4:04 pm
“Description, not real identity…”
Saint Paul’s take on occult, or ‘hidden practices.’
“Take no part in and have no fellowship with the fruitless deeds and enterprises of darkness, but instead let your lives be in so in contrast as to EXPOSE and reprove and convict them. For it is a shame even to speak of or mention the things such people practice in secret. But when anything is EXPOSED and reproved by the light, it is made visible and clear; and where everything is visible and clear, there is light.” Ephesians 5:11-13
“For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood, contending only with physical opponents, but against the despotisms, against the master spirits who are the world rulers of this present darkness.” Ephesians 6:12
28 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Whalid Shoebat Explains Who Allah Really Is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpWgq7DFmsQ
29 colleague graduate // Jun 21, 2010 at 8:05 pm
And right now, Remember the Arizona peyote!, that some arsonist is trying to completely eliminate for AZs who have a legal right to grow it. Is the fire in AZ caused by AZs upset bc the feds are goind to sue, or caused by the feds bc they are upset AZ will not accept their new border protection id checks law? Who is right? AZ says they called for NG troops from the Fed for border protection, and they never appeared. That’s why they used States Rights for this new law. The feds say it’s racial profiling. It is. Hispanic is a race. They are usually brown skinned coming from Mex. If there are 100,000 illegals in AZ, chances are 98% of them are brown skinned Hispanics. In a police lineup of crooks who were identified as Mex, they would be brown skinned and not low profiled nosed brownskins like some “blacks” are- jigs if you will. So the racial profiling is accurate applied to the lineup. Hispanics don’t have low profiled brown noses Catch them for proof of US ids, and if they are unable to produce, AZ sends then back. The feds have a big issue with such efficiency. They wish to confuse the nosey race element. Not if low profile noses distinguish spics from blacks. And this AZ fire…I see it as destroying peyote, and I am opposed to it entirely. The NAC uses peyote as the desert sacrament, and I am 100% oppposed to any attempt to prevent by forest fire them or whites, including Jan Brewer and John McCain, who are legally allowed to grow this cactus at home, from the benefit peyote provides. Even though my state of SC does not allow peyote cultivation, I still support AZ and Indians who use it. This fire is Satan’s fire to prevent use of peyote in the NAC when looking at this from a religious point of view, bc peyote is found in AZ. It does grow there. For the whites, it is devastation of their plant that provides them with however they use it.
30 colleague graduate // Jun 21, 2010 at 8:19 pm
if my comments keep appearing as typos such as in line 4 of 29 where it says “goind”, as opposed to how I typed it and proofread it as “going”, I might eventually get so bummed out with this site I’ll drop out
31 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 8:22 pm
David, I think you should consider interviewing Whalid Shoebat for BadEagle.com. The man definitely knows what he is talking about!
32 PearlGirl // Jun 21, 2010 at 8:32 pm
Greetings!
The USA wil break apart, I think this will happens sooner, rather than later – then the sooner the better. The debt alone is unsustainable.
Prof Yeagley – The John Doe named “Barry Sotoero does not merely want to irradicate Indian Identity, by seizing Indian lands – he wants to irradicate all American Identity (and most Americans, that do not ‘look like him”, as well ) Have you seen the viral YouTube vidoe, of Sen Kyle, explaining why the Freaks the Sotoero Admin refuses to enforce the American borders, and plans to brinbg a lawsuit against AZ?
It won’t work.
Be of good cheer, people. We are not defenseless Kulak peasants. We have options, and we are armed to the teeth. We have the means for modern communications. I am a White Nationalist. I do not hate people of other eaces – I just want my people to continue to exist. I am certainly not, in anyway, adverse to working qwith other groups. The hard core Commie deviate vermin, behind Sotoero, and sloppy, They are vicious, and remorseless – but sloppy and childish. Have you heard about the All Boys No Girls Allowed Squirt Gun Party, held at Joe Biden’s house a few weeks ago? This is what we are dealing with…These cretins are controlling the military, right now – but the rank and file must hold. I don’t think they are gonna hold, in the end.
Many *in* the O Admin are already jumping ship. Our Dear Rahmbo Emmenual (the pics, on the Net, of Rahmbo at the Squirt Party are…priceless) is supposedly gonna, quit, and most likely bail back to Israel (he just got back).
Many incumbents are decling to run again. Let the rats flee. We are better of without ‘em.
The debt, in the USA is utterly unsustainable. This mess cannot hold. The Secessionist Movement is gaining ground. Don’t fear secession – all it would really come down to is the Original Intent, of the Great White Founders of this Nation – States Rights. We wouldn’t be dissolvng America – we’d be shedding the infestation of Pussilanemous [sic]Putrid Punks, on the Potomac – and whatever dreck washes out, in their wake…you guys would get ot keep your lands – and so would other Americans.
A few things – you prefer the name “American Indian” to “Native American” – n’est ce pas? I’ve been arguing with members of various “Patriot “groups, in this point. I mean – I am a Native American – as are you. I was born on Americna soil, and I am a legal and legitimate Citizen. I am an American. I am of Englsih descent but I am an AMERICAN. That makes me a Native. Sloppy language betokens sloppy thinking.
Finally – are you on FaceBook?
33 David Yeagley // Jun 21, 2010 at 8:58 pm
PG, I don’t really know how to work facebook very well, but yes. I have a page. Mostly for finding old friends. I post some of my articles there.
American Indian. There’s only one, one kind. People from the Indus River are properly called HINDU. I always refer to them as such. It is their native name. You indeed are a native American.
I wish it were all as simple as “sloppy.” I’m afraid it is all exactly intentional.
Appreciate your courage!
34 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 9:01 pm
The American Indian tribes were the first inhabitants of America. I might have been ‘native born’ -meaning I was born on American soil- but in my opinion were all just trespassers.
35 Pamela K. // Jun 21, 2010 at 9:34 pm
The same for the Aborigines of Australia and the Maori people of New Zealand. I learned about the history of the indigenous people from Down Under during a trip to Australia in 1987. Australia was a British penal colony but the native Aborigines predated the first white people by thousands of years. Same for the Maori, who inhabited New Zealand for thousands of years, only to be wiped out by the British, first with disease like the American Indian tribes here. But unlike here, the remaining Maoris were not placed on reservations. The tribes were literally marched into the sea to drown in order for the British to gain control of their ancestral homeland.
36 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 4:57 am
A Professor who is pro-White has recommended that “White Advocates” should be used in place of “White Nationalists.” I think it’s a good idea and have therefore adopted the new term. He has further stated that it is essential that sincere Whites totally divorce pro-White activism from all associations with national socialism and Holocaust revisionism.
The new and developing movement is for the defense of White civil rights but is equally committed not to repeat the crimes of the past. The new White Patriot wants to conduct himself in a fully righteous manner.
37 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 5:52 am
I have a deep hatred of tyranny, cruelty, and oppression. My goal is to defeat these scourges. Those who delight in killing will come to an evil end.
It is God’s Kingdom on this Earth that is the ultimate salvation of this planet.
It is mind-boggling to me that anyone in their right mind could place Hitler on a pedestal. Here was a man who wet his finger and held it to the winds of power to see which way they were blowing. He was an ego-maniac if ever there was one.
Had Hitler been in the right he would certainly have won. He had every chance to win back then. Now, when such a political philosophy has zero chance to win, there are still a few idiots who wish to revive and emulate the Nazi failure.
I am convinced that neo-nazis of every stripe will play no leadership part in any movement to protect the White nations. Only a movement that intends to protect ALL nations can have any hope for success. Compassion is the virtue that will prevail in this struggle. Neither the far Left (Communists) nor the far Right (Nazis) are possessed this necessary virtue.
38 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 6:07 am
I would like to clarify: It is the combination of compassion and intelligent thinking that will prevail. Wisdom in all its aspects is always necessary for a true victory.
39 colleague graduate // Jun 22, 2010 at 7:14 am
PearlGirl is full of bologna. As a white nationalist she wants to appease David. Recently I watched a tv program on the History Channel about white nationalists. This program had a part about a couple of young white nationalists going to a state fair and seeing a young, dark-skinned guy with long black hair. They felt he was not of their supreme white race, and they proceeded to beat him up. The young, dark-skinned person turned out to be an American Indian like David is. I recommend becoming wary of white nationalists and supremists on this site.
40 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 7:17 am
Does anyone ever think about why, after liberating Europe from the Nazis, the United States and other allied nations allowed Stalin to come in and suppress half of Europe under Communism? That later, in Korea, when our troops were gaining ground against the Chinese communists and could have taken back North Korea and reunified that nation, they were stopped from doing so? Why the “crazy witch hunter” Joseph McCarthy fought so hard to expose the Communist propagandists in Hollywood? The answer is fairly simple. There is more communism coming out of the hallowed halls of Washington DC via Manhattan and Hollywood than there ever was in Moscow or Pyongyang. The election of Barack Obama is the long awaited fufillment of the hopes and dreams of this obscure element within this nation’s highest circles of power.However, if they think that they can buy off the Muslims, they are sorely mistaken. The Muslims could care less about Communism or Capitalism. They have one mission and that is to destroy and to conquer the entire world in the name of Allah!
41 colleague graduate // Jun 22, 2010 at 7:21 am
To avoid future spelling errors, I downloaded a program from iespell.com that checks the spelling of whatever is typed on ie.
42 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 7:52 am
For the Left, the Muslims are simply a tool in the old “divide and conquer” war strategy.
Hitler was obsessed of the idea that all life was engaged in a vicious and endless death-struggle for life.
In my backyard there is a giant apple tree that I planted as a sapling years ago. This tree has very deep roots and draws nourishment from the ground. It enjoys a peaceful and non-violent existence.
Mankind needs to learn the wisdom of this tree. Religion itself teaches such a view of human life: “But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.” Matthew 6:33
The things necessary to life will be added unto those who obey this teaching.
——————————————-
Pamela,
Yes, the U.S. simply was on the side of one brand of socialism and against another. Communism is a socialist system, and so was Nazism. I am personally in favor of a Jeffersonian republican democracy. One essential is a reform in education. Leaders and voters alike must be educated in such a manner that virtue and sound reasoning and adherence to basic principles of freedom will be maintained.
The Chinese book on government and life, the Tao Teh Ching was known to Thomas Jefferson in a Latin translation made by Catholic missionaries to China. This book is second only to the Bible in the number of its translations.
Along with Plato’s Republic, one should read what philosophers have written. It is important to note that God wanted Ancient Israel to have HIM as King, not a man. Taoism is a political philosophy that comes very close to this, with its idea of the invisible emperor. Of course, that book has to be interpreted in the light of Chinese history. In the West, we need to search for the principles that will secure true freedom to the nations and the citizens.
43 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:09 am
I cite the Lao Tzu (Tao Teh Ching) because a major principle of this book is LIMITED GOVERNMENT. The less government interference in peoples’ lives, the better. The book seems to me to be saying that the major function of government is to root out evil-doers (i.e., maintain law and order) and maintain a simple life style so that the people can enjoy the maximum of personal freedom. The book promotes a simplicity that is Amish-like — with the exception that self-defense of the nation is part of the program.
44 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:20 am
As I read it, here are some of the more important principles of the rule of the sage, according to Lao Tzu:
Limited government
Local autonomy
Non-violence in rule
Reduction/elimination of selfish desires
Non-involvement in the affairs of foreign nations
An attitude of community segregation
Simple, honest public (and private) discourse
Legitimate self-defense
Low taxation
Elimination of egotism in public affairs
Impartiality in matters of justice
45 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:30 am
The latest from Time Magazine:
46 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:32 am
“The demographic crisis which imperils Europe’s future also threatens the United States of America, a fact illustrated by this week’s news that European Americans will become a minority among newborn children in that nation next year.”
47 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:36 am
Whites will be swallowed up in a sea of color unless present trends are reversed:
“Among the Hispanic population, there were roughly nine births for every one death, compared with a roughly one-to-one ratio for whites.”
“According to the census count, as of July 2009, whites constituted 65 percent of the American population. The rate of the white decline is astonishing: in 1960, they made up 85 percent of the population.
This figure is most certainly an underestimate as the US Census bureau counts all Middle Easterners (including people from North Africa and most of the Arab world) as “white.” “
48 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:41 am
“As shocking as these figures are, they do not even include the impact of illegal immigration. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, an independent, non-partisan, non-profit research body widely regarded as an authority on the issue, in August 2007, the illegal population total stood at around 12.5 million. This means, in real terms, that there are probably more illegal aliens in America than there are blacks.”
Full article here:
U.S. Immigration Crisis
49 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 8:59 am
Prior to Obamanation, the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt was probably the greatest example of Socialism-Communism In Action.
General George Patton knew the wheeling and dealing going on between FDR and Stalin. If you remember the movie, “Patton” this truly American general refused to give the Russian tyrant time of day let alone an audience. Stalin was a monster. Rumor has it that the man regularly got drunk on human blood, figuratively speaking that is, sort of like Idi Amin enjoying listening to the anguished cries of his opponents being tortured while he ate his meals.
50 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:10 am
If America continues to do nothing to resist and eventually to cast off non-White socialist rule, and if Europe begins seriously to resist alien invasion, I will, with God’s help, return to Europe, the land of my ancestors!
51 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:22 am
Europe is a nightmare of socialism gone haywire. Islam is making great progress there, especially in Great Britain, the former bastion of Christianity. ( A Muslim now controls the ALL the content of the religious programming at the BBC!) The mighty Lion roars no more. Queen Victoria and Winston Churchill must be rolling in their graves.
52 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:42 am
An important MSNBC poll result:
53 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:45 am
54 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:50 am
In my opinion, the U.S. actually has a just cause to declare war on Mexico. Not that I’m expecting that, of course. The Mexican government seems seriously to be at war with the U.S. I think that the situation is serious.
96% of Americans in the poll support Arizona’s decision to begin to defend the border.
55 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 9:53 am
I tried using these instructions to post pictures, but for some reason it hasn’t worked!
Use the img tag to post the image by replacing the ‘URL’ in this tag: with the actual URL of the image.
Note: The quotations marks around the URL / address are important.
For example, if the image name is
“img.jpg”
and the URL for you page is
“www.host.com/mypage”
then the tag would be
56 REG // Jun 22, 2010 at 10:11 am
I have to disagree with CG’s comments about ‘PearlGirl’. The television is full of “Politically and Cultural Correct” education, I enjoy watching the History channel, they have a very viewable format; But, I take everything I see with a grain of salt. I seriously doubt that two whites beat up on a dark person because they were ‘white nationalists.’ Almost a year ago a white football player came upon a Hispanic rapist getting off the thirteen year old girl he had just raped. They fought and the white won, now the Hispanic “rights groups” want the white to go to prison for fighting (winning) and preforming a citizen’s arrest while also demanding that the Hispanic rapist go free. You can’t trust the news. I do like the label ‘advocate’ better than ‘nationalist’ though.
57 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 10:26 am
PK,
Here is what gives me a glimmer of hope about Europe:
Alliance of European Nationalist Movements
Grahnlaw Euroblog
58 David Yeagley // Jun 22, 2010 at 10:31 am
I supposed anyone can be a nationalist. If the founders or “indigenous” folk of a particular nation happen to be white, then I suppose the term “white nationalist” is not inaccurate.
I’m an Indian (Red) nationalist when it comes to the Comanche nation (or any Indian nation). I think a nation should try to be what it is, and not evolve into something it wasn’t.
Nigeria would never elect or allow a French Jew to become president of Nigeria.
I mean, where’s common sense here?
59 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:02 am
If you are a follower and a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, you know that you find your true identity in Him. God does not look at the color of our skin, our ethnicity, what tribe we come from, what our politics or nation origin is, God examines the heart.
“Keep and guard your heart with all vigilance and above all that you guard, for out of it flow the springs of life.
Put away from you false and dishonest speech, and willful and contrary talk put far from you.” Proverbs:5:23, 24
60 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:02 am
It is quite obvious that point VI in the Wikipedia article is misquoted and the EXACT OPPOSITE is what is in the declaration!
“VI
A degrading and inhumane settlement of immigration problems through, among other measures, international cooperation aiming at development and self sufficiency of third world countries.”
Yikes!
AENM article (Wikipedia)
61 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:09 am
“If you are a follower and a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, you know that you find your true identity in Him. God does not look at the color of our skin, our ethnicity, what tribe we come from, what our politics or nation origin is, God examines the heart.”
———————————————————-
I am sorry, but I don’t think it’s quite as simple as all that. What you state IS true in the matter of personal salvation. We’re all sinners and we all may come to Christ.
At the same time, as a fundamentalist Baptist preacher said in a debate I heard online, “God is the first segregationist.” It was He who divided the nations and separated them. He also separated the ONE original continent into the continents we know today. All this is part of the Divine Plan as it relates to earthly affairs.
This Baptist theologian was by no means a racist or a prejudiced man.
62 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:16 am
That Baptist minister was wrong. Jesus said, “Not all religious people are Godly people.” While God separated the nations, He sent his Only Begotten Son into the world so that all may be saved through Him.
And the Angel said, “Fear not. For behold, I bring news of great joy which shall be for ALL people. For born unto you this day in the city of David is a Savior who is Christ the Lord.”
Just remember one more thing. The worst possible words that a so-called, self-professed Christian could ever here are, “Depart from Me. I never knew you.”
63 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:27 am
I agree that the good news of Jesus Christ is for ALL people! And so would that Baptist theologian!
But when God looks at this world, He sees both individuals AND nations. God does have a Plan for the nations. This Plan is political and has nothing to do with personal salvation.
Here is the preacher (sorry I don’t know his name) that I heard online in a debate with “Christian Israel” believers. I am only slightly familiar with all this
:
Audio of the Great Identity Debate (part IV)
64 David Yeagley // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:28 am
Certainly, one is never saved by virtue of one’s nationality or one’s chosen national identity. However, “when we all get to heaven,” we are still in the form of nations, ethnicities, languages, etc.
65 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49 am
“Certainly, one is never saved by virtue of one’s nationality or one’s chosen national identity. However, “when we all get to heaven,” we are still in the form of nations, ethnicities, languages, etc.”
———————————
Yes.
The popular “Christian” view nowadays (but not from the beginning of the Faith) is that God has dissolved the nations and no longer recognizes them. I believe this is false.
“When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.” — Deuteronomy 32:8
Reaffirmed in the New Testament:
“. . .and he [God] made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitation. . .” — Acts 17:26
God says in Genesis that He does not desire a One-World political Order:
“And the LORD said, “Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.”
So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city.”
Genesis 11:6-8
66 David Yeagley // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:07 pm
But now, there’s some difference of opinion as to what language will be spoken there. All my Mexican friends say it will be Spanish. My Italians friends insist that the angels all speak Italian. The “tongues” (languages) will all be there. This is truly amazing.
67 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:09 pm
In Daniel, the second chapter, it is said that iron and clay will not hold together.
This speaks of the multicultural New World Order that we are now living in.
It specifically states that the ethnicities will be deliberately mixed and that God will put an end to this situation and set up His Kingdom on this Earth.
68 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:12 pm
“43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.” Daniel Chapter 2:43-44
“Mingle themselves with the seed of men” means mix the ethnicities in marriage — i.e., try to dissolve the nations (originally 70 in number) that God established on the Earth.
69 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Two other translations of Daniel chapter 2, verse 43 that confirm that miscegenation is the subject here:
“43 And just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay.”
“43 As you saw the iron mixed with soft clay, so they will mix with one another in marriage,[c] but they will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with clay.”
70 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:21 pm
“This is truly amazing.”
———————————
Indeed! Well, at least it will not be boring or monotonous.
You know, I enjoy experiencing different cultures on YouTube. Each language has its own personality, as do, it would seem, the peoples who speak them!
71 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:34 pm
To lighten up, here’s a taste of those languages!
Song Mama (Young boys singing to their mothers)
Original Italian Version
A Famous Dutch Version
72 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:36 pm
Jesus spoke Aramaic, which preceeded Hebrew. It is still spoken in remote villages in the mountains of western Syria. I never understood the modern church phenomenon of “speaking in tongues”. I briefly attended a church where there was a big emphasis on this, but really, it scared me to watch people ‘manifest’ and spew unintelligible drivel, or collapse on the floor, laughing hysterically, or after being ‘slain in the spirit.’ i felt like I had been transported into a scene from the old Olivia de Havilland movie, “The Snake Pit”.
I’m told Satan has a mighty foothold inside the Christian church. I believe I was once an eye witness to his presence.
73 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Yes, there’s a great deal of foolishness in some churches. One case involved a woman dying after handling a poisonous snake. The members of the congregation were passing this living snake from one to another in a ritual, so as to prove their faith. They held that God would miraculously preserve them from snake-bites.
74 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm
One example — a reason why the White race should be preserved too! It has given the world this song and this singer!
Ave Maria (Schubert) sung by Robertino Loretti
75 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 1:28 pm
Mark 16:18: “They will pick up serpents and even if they drink anything deadly it will not hurt them.”
According to the Biblico-Theological Lexicon, some of the earler manuscripts do not contain the verses 9 through 20 of Mark Chapter 16.
It makes you wonder why anyone would want to dance around “in the joy” of the Holy Spirit while handling a big old rattlesnake!
A test of faith?
Why would God want anyone to risk being bitten by a rattlesnake in order to prove their faith?
In my very brief attendance at this particular church I mentioned earlier, I knew almost instinctively that I would not speak in tongues. In fact, after observing some of the regular attendees, I noticed that there seemed to be a chain reaction-like power of suggestion going on between them and other visitors who were eager to participate in these spiritually engaging activities. I think God was actually giving me insight into the whole situation and today I am glad my association with this church was on a short term basis only!
76 Pamela K. // Jun 22, 2010 at 1:33 pm
Thrasymachus, I love the Ava Maria. I especially love the version sung by the great Italian tenor, Beniamino Gigli.
77 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Great! I’ll check it out. Thanks!
In the meantime, here’s another interesting version (modern instrumentation):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxyt2RMLeXU
Ave Maria Italian & (Church) Latin version (Jantje Smit)
78 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Great! I’ll check it out. Thanks!
In the meantime, here’s another interesting version (modern instrumentation):
Ave Maria Italian & (Church) Latin version (Jantje Smit)
79 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 2:16 pm
The 1936 recording sung by Beniamino Gigli is indeed fantastic.
The Bach-Gounod version is interesting, as Gounod placed his melody over the first prelude of Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier, making the Bach music the accompaniment!
To share this with everyone:
Bach-Gounod – Ave Maria (Beniamino Gigli – 1936)
80 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Another performance worth the listening:
Ave Maria – Romeo)k
81 Thrasymachus // Jun 22, 2010 at 3:05 pm
A movie for classical music fans:
Vitus
By the way, there was another classical pianist by the name of Carmen Vitos, who may be largely forgotten. I hope some day to upload one of his performances on YouTube.
82 David Yeagley // Jun 22, 2010 at 4:07 pm
In Western culture, Italians have been singing longer, in an uninterupted, continuum of development. Therefore, the angels obviously sing in Italian. Alto belle.
83 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:32 pm
na·tion (nshn)
n.
1.
a. A relatively large group of people organized under a single, usually independent government; a country.
b. The territory occupied by such a group of people: All across the nation, people are voting their representatives out.
2. The government of a sovereign state.
3. A people who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language; a nationality: “Historically the Ukrainians are an ancient nation which has persisted and survived through terrible calamity” (Robert Conquest).
4.
a. A federation or tribe, especially one composed of Native Americans.
b. The territory occupied by such a federation or tribe.
——————————————————————————–
[Middle English nacioun, from Old French nation, from Latin nti, ntin-, from ntus, past participle of nsc, to be born; see gen- in Indo-European roots.]
The word “nation is derived from Latin, and the original meaning is “to be born”. Birth. Flesh. Race. Nation.
Race is simply extended family, and the desire to protect and preserve one’s won kind is the most natural, health,y and normal thing in the world. (Until it Humanity was conned by the Devils for mthe Frankurt School Nation)
Dr, Yeagley – I am glad you are caling yourself a Red Nationalist/ That rocks! As a White Nationalist – I fully support you. There is nothing wrong with this term, as calling oneself a Nationalist is accurate, and biologically, spiritually, and morally correct.
If Kevin MacDonald wants to play around with words- fine. He’s brilliant. However – calling oneself a “White Advocate” smacks of masking. Hiding. Trickery. I won’t allow any-one to set my language parameters for me. Giving up control of language is one of the war fronts that Whites ceded ages ago – and it’s worked out really well, right?
84 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:38 pm
colleague graduate – you are full of what bologna becomes, after it’s travelled through the alimentary tract.
White Nationalists niether want, nor need, to “appease ” Dr. Yeagley. What does that evne mean?
A bunch of us read him cause he’s written really interesting, insightful things on the number of topics (although he had one big glaring blind spot)
FYI, DR Yeagley – you wrote a column, 300 million years ago, lamenting the absence of a modern-day Vlad Tepes. I quote that article all the time. In WN circles – good old Vlad is quite the cult figure.
85 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:38 pm
We consider Vlad to be a good Catholic boy.
86 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:42 pm
Pamela K – please get up to speed on archeology. Your “Indians are Natives” cliche is way past it’s due date. No one is really pushing that nonsense anymore. Please tell me that you have never heard of Kennewick Man.
No one knows who was “here first”. All kinds of things are being discovered, now that Indian Race Hustlers are geting pushback from the scientific community.
Jeez Lou-weez. No one is gonna take away the casinos…
87 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Thrasymachus – errr….don’t invoke the name o Hitler until you actually read something besides the kosher slander. Mmmm’key?
Hitler and the Nazis DID want other Nations (other people) to pursue their own individual destinies. All kinds of people wore Nazi uniforms. Wanna see pics of Black Africans, in same?
The truth will out. It always does. Even Jews are starting to admit the scope of the Hoax. Look up the name “Jeff Prager”. And “Ariel Toaff”, while you are at it.
Man – hope you have enough soap to get that egg off your face…
88 PearlGirl // Jun 22, 2010 at 11:55 pm
PK – you are cherry picking Scripture- but why did God create different Races, in the first place? Any thoughts on the raison d’etre for blasting apart the Tower of Babel, hmmm?
Why are you disputing God’s Creation? Why are you so afraid of real diversity?
You must log in to post a comment.