Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

Honoring the Dead: 2010 Memorial Day

by David Yeagley · May 30, 2010 · 32 Comments ·

If Barry “Obama” Soetoro’s disdain for America wasn’t clear enough when he ignored the Gulf oil spill for over a month, his refusal to honor America’s fallen braves at the national cemetery on Memorial Day should make it dramatically evident that this man despises, yea, mocks America.

Love for the fallen soldier. Love for family. Love for America. These things are apparently alien to the current “acting” president. From the Brandon Joseph Van Parys site, USMC.

Of course, there are those of us who have known from the earliest days that he was an alien traitor, but, the American public is so liberalized that it can no longer perceive. His chosen, fake Muslim name, “Barak Hussein Obama,” itself principal evidence of his perferences and intents, was regarded as a wondrous expression of hope for world unity (i.e., a one world government of elitists). This idiotic, neurotic psycho-social sexual indulgence was America’s ultimate expression of emasculated impotence, and the desire to be raped. Even Barry’s election to the U.S. senate was enough to convince any sincere patriot that America was a sick, abused woman.

Barry is a man without honor. He has no sense of what it means. His adolescent narcissism is the guiding force in his personality. It also reflects the pathetic state of American social ambience.

The Mad Jewess (on her X-rated site) expresses these sentiments more viscerally, in her Memorial Day Tribute to Fallen Soldiers & Vets:

We dont even deserve the Military. We deserve zero. We have s— all over our military, from the far left, to the liberals, to the moderates, to the FAKE A– GOP, to the Sicko jerk Neo-Nazis that call our troops traitors & “Israel-firsters”. We deserve all the bad we’ve got coming.

Then she suggests not only that the soldiers all come home to protect us from our “evil” government, but that we the people to rise up and oust this worthless, traitorous government. Finally, she apologizes deeply to the dead and the living soldiers, for the unworthy country for which they risk and give their lives. It is a powerful testimony The Mad Jewess gives, felt by many, no doubt.

So we can honor our soldiers by declaring our government treasonous, and vowing to shape it up by shipping it out.

Ah, but we always have trouble assessing our own blood, let alone someone elses. Christianity itself generally fails to feel the “power in the blood.” We remain the blind, fumbling searchers we always are, even with the banner of Christ above us. How shall we be true patriots?

But, at least the Mad Jewess puts two and two together. We need to consciously articulate what it is we value and believe–and die for. We should lay down for ourselves standards or actions which consciously express the meaning of the blood, or, the lives our soldiers have given. We should have in mind specific kinds of actions that directly express our value of their sacrifice. There has to be literal, visceral, legal, tacit, and dramatic action. There must be immediate understanding–in practical terms–of what our soldiers’ lives and deaths mean. We need to find a common language of literal actions which shout clearly the meaning of their sacrifice. And it means a lot more than saluting the flag, attending parades, and visiting graves. It means guarding American values with our own lives, here, on the homeland, in our own country, now.

Perhaps it really means taking risks–beyond Tea Parties, beyond the political process. Obviously, the patriots have not been able to find worthy candidates, or to establish a message that is convincing. Conservative talk radio and media did not prevent the lying, alien black African Communist traitor from winning the election, nor has it prevented any of his anti-American legislation. These ghastly offenses are supported by Congress, moreover. Patriotism may mean jail time. It may mean condemnation by our corrupt, traitorious, Communist Democrat government.

It seems we can no longer fully trust the political system. It is failing. It seems some kind of second revolution is coming. A new kind of civil war. This time its all about recovering American values.

The Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, the Federalist Papers, have all become as a dead letter. To honor them is a weak, queer sort of romanticism of an earlier age–something which was appropriate at the time, but from which we must now clearly move on (.org). Our founding fathers and their documents are regarded as museum pieces of American history, nothing that should actually influence our lives today. Our national leaders (Democrat Communists and traitorous Republicans) regard the Constitution as atheist academics regard the sacred Scriptures. Right for past times, but inadequate for the present.

So, in this malaise of manipulative ‘government,’ we really don’t know why our soldiers fight and die. They are not allowed to win, even if and when allowed to shoot. The country never declares war. Our soldiers are missionaries–glorious missionaires–but not out to defeat, only to develop a social reform purpose in a foreign land. Their victories are personal, their honor universal. It is a new breed, indeed.

But The Mad Jewess is right. We don’t even deserve them. And if mission is what they’re all about, then the real mission is here, in America. The most dangerous enemy is here–our own government.

Posted by David Yeagley · May 30, 2010 · 9:48 am CT · ·

Tags: American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Christianity · Conservatism · Politics · Religion

Read More Journal Posts »

32 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 10:53 am   

    Life is in the blood. The Messiah Y’Shua shed his precious, pure blood so that all of mankind would be saved from sin and death.
    “Whom the Son sets free is free indeed.”
    The American soldier fighting a war on foreign soil is shedding his blood, his life force, so his people can be free. While the politics behind the war may not be popular, the soldier, like Christ, bears our wounds, suffers our transgressions. I always stop soldiers or veterans when I see them and thank them for my freedom, yet to me, personally, it seems inadequate. We owe them so much more than just one Memorial Day.
    In regards to Obama and the elitist liberal establishment running our country into the ground,the late Bible teacher, Derek Prince once did a great lesson on the love of money. Y’shua said, “The love of money is the root of all evil.” The word, money, translated from the Hebrew, is “Mammon” which is not actually currency or money, but an evil spirit that infects the souls of men (and women too) causing an insatiable lust for power and for gold. The lust for power and gold are gods unto themselves. If you read your Bible, you will see what happened to Israel time and again when they rejected God’s love and mercy and followed after other gods. He allowed their enemies to come into the land and take them over. America has turned her back on God. Liberals hate the fact that we were founded on the Judeo-Christian principles found in the Bible. The ACLU threatens Christian children who gather around the flag pole to pray but turn a blind eye to schools who accomodate Muslims with a separate prayer room and Jell-O free lunch menus. In keeping with the topic of this blog, I recently wrote to my local newspaper about the story of the Mojave cross. The Supreme Court recently overruled a lower court’s decision to have the cross removed from the Mojave Desert Preserve. The cross was placed on an outcropping of rock there by veterans in 1934 in memory of their fallen comrades in WWI. The ACLU wanted to remove the cross because of a lawsuit filed by a former park ranger who said the sight of the cross “offended him”. This man, who worked at the park in 1994 when President Clinton made the sight into a national memorial waited until he retired and collected his federal pension and moved to Oregon-over a thousand miles away from California- before filing his lawsuit! Now that the Supreme Court has weighed in, some idiots stole the cross! It makes me sick that people would want to destroy a harmless cross to honor our heroes. But it is like I always say, the real enemies of America and our freedom are a lot closer to home.

  • 2 zephyr // May 30, 2010 at 11:34 am   

    Great blog, David.

    I for one am glad BO did not go to Arlington–his visit would have been a disgrace to those who fought and died.

  • 3 David Yeagley // May 30, 2010 at 1:42 pm   

    There is that view, yes. I heard a veteran say it on the radio.

  • 4 MariaAnastasia // May 30, 2010 at 2:02 pm   

    Not only is Barry Soetoro a foreign usurper, but each and every voter who cast a vote for him is a traitor to America.

    I hope him and all of them rot in the lowest parts of hell, and I pray Psalm 109 against all of them every day.

  • 5 David Yeagley // May 30, 2010 at 2:02 pm   

    PK, I understood “mammon” to be of Chaldean origin, actually. I didn’t know about the Jewish tradition you speak of. I know that, from the NT, μαμμωνας (mammonas) means something like “avarice,” or a kind of personification of gold and lust, combined. That all certainly suggests a demon, doesn’t it? Paul is the one who made the statement you quote: 1 Tim. 6:10, but, he doesn’t use the word mammon, but φιλαργυρια (philarguria), which does in fact mean avarice, or love of money (silver).

    I always been curious. Is it the actual medium of exchange, green paper, or the gold coins or bars, that is loved? or the pschological state knowing what you can do with it brings? I mean, how can someone love a gold coin?

    In any case, I agree with about America’s forgetfulness of God. Materialism tends to stupify spiritual values. Almost every time.

  • 6 David Yeagley // May 30, 2010 at 2:05 pm   

    MA, every nation has a chance. That ancient Hebrew God says He created them all, and they’re all on probation, to demonstrate what they are.

    America somehow has suffered a lot of rot in the last half-century. I don’t think it’s what we are, but, we’ll suffer the consequences for letting it happen.

    A number of folks are trying to wake up! We must rally what we have left. Great wars are sometimes one when only a few rally, and make a turning point.

  • 7 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 2:51 pm   

    “No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other or he will stand by and be devoted to the one and despise and be against the other. You cannot serve God and mammon (deceitful riches, money, possessions, or whatever is trusted in)
    Matthew 6:24 The Amplified Bible
    Most of the people who voted for Obama were desperate for change, only the “hope and change’ he has delivered is not what they bargained for. Furthermore, Obama was raised in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country in Southeast Asia. His mother was an agnostic so the spiritual door was open for Islam to come in and take him over. Obama does not think like an American. He has been brain-washed to believe that America was a colonial power and that is why he runs around the world apologizing for our perceived aggression, belligerence, etc. He is wrong and I despies his politics, but I also feel sorry for him and I pray for him because he is in rebellion against God.

  • 8 geronl // May 30, 2010 at 3:06 pm   

    Not only does BO not visit Arlington on Memorial Day but he couldn’t be bothered to have a flag on the stage or anywhere near it at his last press conference. (The first in over 300 days)

  • 9 David Yeagley // May 30, 2010 at 3:51 pm   

    First in history–without a flag.

    Just a gold, Arab vanity curtain.

  • 10 Chris Gussa // May 30, 2010 at 5:24 pm   

    David, you really nailed it this time! Thank you!

    I don’t know if anyone has seen this video from “Jews Against Obama” on Obama’s Family Ties to Radical Islam but here is a link to it at Fed Up With

    “Obama” (I did not know that was a fake name!) has shown consistent and blatant pandering to America’s sworn enemies in the Muslim world which is tantamount to treason, the definition of which, according to the U.S. Constitution, is the aiding and abetting of America’s enemies. Still we have done nothing! He has have ripped the very fabric of our great country by supporting the radical Muslim faith of his cousin Odinga whose belief is that of Sharia law. These Sharia law supporters, as you know, are the same people that burned Christians to death inside their churches. Still we have done nothing.

    David, please tell me, When is it time to do something? And what are we to do?

  • 11 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 5:58 pm   

    Where did you hear that Barack Obama’s name is not Barack Obama? Wasn’t his father named Barack Obama?

  • 12 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 6:11 pm   

    This is the latest message from Whalid Shoebat, a former PLO operative turned Christian Zionist, about those advocating for Sharia Law in America.

    911 Mosque Founder wants to Establish Shariah in USA


    by Walid Shoebat

    Is Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf – founder of the hugely controversial Ground Zero Mosque – lying to the American public?

    We have uncovered extraordinary contradictions between what he says in English and what he says in Arabic that raise serious questions about his true intentions in the construction of the mosque.

    On May 25, 2010 Abdul Rauf wrote in an article for the New York Daily News: “My colleagues and I are the anti-terrorists. We are the people who want to embolden the vast majority of Muslims who hate terrorism to stand up to the radical rhetoric. Our purpose is to interweave America’s Muslim population into the mainstream society.”

    Oh really?

    Only two months before, on March 24, 2010, Abdul Rauf is quoted in an article in Arabic for Rights4All entitled (from one of his responses) “I Do Not Believe in Religious Dialogue”.

    Yes, you read that correctly and, yes, that is an accurate translation. And Right4All is not an obscure blog, but the website of the media department of Cairo University, the leading educational institution of the Arabic-speaking world.

    In the article, the Imam said the following of the “religious dialogue” and “interweaving into the mainstream society” that he so solemnly seems to advocate in the Daily News and elsewhere: “This phrase is inaccurate. Religious dialogue as customarily understood is a set of events with discussions in large hotels that result in nothing. Religions do not dialogue and dialogue is not present in the attitudes of the followers, regardless of being Muslim or Christian. The image of Muslims in the West is complex which needs to be remedied.”

    But that’s only the beginning of what we learn from the Rights4All piece. When asked his view regarding an Islamic state, Abdul Rauf responded that “Throughout my discussions with contemporary Muslim theologians, it is clear an Islamic state can be established in more then just a single form or mold. It can be established through a kingdom or a democracy. The important issue is to establish the general fundamentals of Shariah that are required to govern. It is known that there are sets of standards that are accepted by [Muslim] scholars to organize the relationships between government and the governed.”

    When questioned about this, Abdul Rauf continued “Current governments are unjust and do not follow Islamic laws.” He added “New laws were permitted after the death of Muhammad, so long of course that these laws do not contradict the Quran or the Deeds of Muhammad…so they create institutions that assure no conflicts with Shariah.” [emphasis in translation]

    In yet plainer English, Abdul Rauf’s goal is the imposition of Shariah law – in every country, including the U. S.

    He made that even clearer in an interview with Sa’da Abdul Maksoud that appeared on the popular Islamic website Hadiyul-Islam on May 26, 2010 – one day after his article for the New York Daily News.

    In the Hadiyul-Islam article, Abdul Rauf reiterates that an Islamic state under Shariah law with no separation of church and state can be established even when the government is a kingdom or a democracy.

    But these attitudes are nothing new for the (alas, few) people who have been paying attention. Way back on September 30, 2001, Faisal Abdul Rauf was interviewed on 60 Minutes by host Ed Bradley. Their verbatim dialogue from this CBS News transcript concluded:

    BRADLEY: Are–are–are you in any way suggesting that we in the United States deserved what happened?

    Imam ABDUL RAUF: I wouldn’t say that the United States deserved what happened, but the United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened.

    BRADLEY: OK. You say that we’re an accessory?

    Imam ABDUL RAUF: Yes.

    BRADLEY: How?

    Imam ABDUL RAUF: Because we have been an accessory to a lot of–of innocent lives dying in the world. In fact, it–in the most direct sense, Osama bin Laden is made in the USA.

    This is the “anti-terrorist” of the Daily News article?

    The Faisal Abdul Rauf who spoke to 60 Minutes in 2001 is the same Abdul Rauf who, in the last couple of months, espoused the spread of Shariah law on Arabic websites and said the opposite in the pages of the Daily News. He is the man New York City authorities are about to allow to build a mosque on Ground Zero.

    Caveat emptor.

  • 13 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 7:51 pm   

    It’s all happened so FAST!

    I’ve known the U.S was changing, but expected the extensiveness of these developments a few decades down the road.

    I really can hardly believe that Americans voted for such a man! Any time we see some man or ruler worshiped by the masses, we know that the nation has forsaken God. Nations who do this will be terminated. Psalm 9:17.

  • 14 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 8:02 pm   

    Two factors are involved in this shocking election: (1) MLK idolatry and indoctrination (which liberalized a new generation of voters), and (2) the culmination of Ted Kennedy’s power.
    Here’s a controversial piece I wrote some time back.

    What a hideous coward Ted Kennedy was.

    He was clearly guilty of involuntary manslaughter. So what doe he do? He runs away from the law and develops an unnecessary guilty conscience which was to shape and color his actions for the rest of his life.

    We know that he had a guilty conscience because, after his death, he “released” a public statement saying so.

    To be sure, he did not intend to kill the young lady; it was an accident. But did he have the courage to call for help? To make a report? To explain what really happened? No! That would have revealed his mistake! Yet, a real man would have confessed his mistake and owned up to the consequences. People would have forgiven him if he had shown the courage to do the right thing. After all, he did not plan this misfortune.

    Again, I’m not bad-mouthing him about his hating the Founding Fathers.

    In a speech right before his death, he said that he chose Barack Obama because Obama could not have been much more than a slave in 1776.

    Obama is everything anti-WASP. He’s not white, nor is he, obviously Anglo-Saxon (he’s a citizen of a foreign country, not the U.S.), and he’s a Muslim — about as far from Protestant as you can get. Why all this? Because many Irish still hate the English, for various reasons, from the Irish Potato Famine to the occupation and annexation of Northern Ireland. This hatred of WASPs is perhaps a major factor in why Kennedy kept getting re-elected, as many of his own people strenuously opposed his racial views. I’ve seen them — Kennedy supporters — trying to reason with him on this, with Kennedy telling his own voters to shut up and listen to him! I’m not making this up: I have seen Ted Kennedy, on television, telling people back in the 1970s to shut up — that he did not want to hear what they — the Massachusetts voters! — had to say about racial integration. These voters accosted Ted on the streets, in person, and protested his schools integration program — and Ted told them to shut up.

  • 15 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 8:27 pm   

    Barry Soetero has always refused to honor the American flag — even during his campaign. This is only natural, since he’s obviously not a U.S. Citizen, neither in fact nor in heart. When an alien rules over a people, it is often a “judgment of God.

    “The alien who lives among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower.” — Deuteronomy 28:43

    A very touching tribute to van Parys. That photo shows that there is some true humanity left in our souls. May this spread and restore the nation!

    “When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance,
    When He separated the sons of man,
    He set the boundaries of the peoples According to the number of the sons of Israel”. — Deuteronomy

  • 16 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 8:31 pm   

    I heard that Mary Jo Kopechne was pregnant with Ted Kennedy’s child. That is why he let her drown in the river that night. Whether or not it was true that Mary Jo was pregnant the Chappadiquick incident sealed Ted Kennedy’s fate in terms of being the next brother in line for the presidency. Instead they made him a senator for life.

  • 17 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 8:45 pm   

    Here is the verse of verses against the Obama presidency. God told the Ancient Israelites, His chosen people (and I believe the principle holds good for ANY people):

    “Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee; thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.” — Deuteronomy 17:15

  • 18 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 8:57 pm   

    “When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance,
    When he separated the children of men,
    He set the bounds of the peoples
    According to the number of the children of Israel.”
    — Deuteronomy 32:8

    Another translation puts it this way:

    “When the Most High assigned lands to the nations, when he divided up the human race, he established the boundaries of the peoples according to the number in his heavenly court.”
    — Deuteronomy 32:8

    Multiculturalism is a violation of God’s principle of nationhood and the inheritance each nation was to enjoy.

    If anyone can prove to me that God does not care in any fashion about race and nation, I’ll give up and throw my lot in with the liberals. I don’t understand how anyone can believe in the Bible and also believe that the God of the Bible is a multiculturalist. A Jewish rabbi — or Bible scholar — agreed with me in a private conversation that multiculturalism is “Man going ‘back to Babel.'”

  • 19 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 9:04 pm   

    What puzzles me is that the liberal establishment claims Barack Obama is our first black president. How can this be true when his mother was a white woman? I was once told that if a man has a black father and a white mother he is considered black, but if he has a white father and a black mother he is considered bi-racial. This makes no sense to me, however, liberals never make sense anyway!

  • 20 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 9:17 pm   

    Black preacher David L. Manning said to his congregation, “It has to be a Black womb if you’re going to have a Black child.” Even in the Bible the emphasis seems to be on the female’s race, as in deciding the racial identity of the child. Manning says that Obama is NOT Black. “I won’t call him White, if you won’t call him Black! Got a deal?”

    Like you, Pamela, liberals make no real sense to me! For one thing, the liberal academics believe that self-esteem is something society confers on the individual, rather than a personal achievement. This has much to do with their philosophy: According to liberal thinking, self-esteem is a “social good” — i.e., a commodity that is found in the market-place.

  • 21 David Yeagley // May 30, 2010 at 9:31 pm   

    A professor is supposed to be an expert on a given subject. He is looked to as an authority. Media quotes him. Senators seek him out. It is a strange kind of social significance that has developed around the “teacher.” Professor, univeristy, Dr., these all have great authority.

    Yet, can we say their influence has been positive? Has their contribution to society been worthy?

  • 22 Thrasymachus // May 30, 2010 at 9:46 pm   

    “Yet, can we say their influence has been positive? Has their contribution to society been worthy?”

    My personal opinion is NO!

    True Wisdom is not book-learning.

    There is much truth in the oft-heard statement that academia speaks from “an ivory tower.”

    There is a serious disconnect with everyday reality in the academic world and its ideas.

    For many, higher education leads to learned stupidity, rather than Wisdom.

  • 23 Pamela K. // May 30, 2010 at 10:19 pm   

    In Deuteronomy 32 Moses is speaking about how God separated the nations of men from his portion or His people, Israel. “Jacob (Israel) is the lot of His inheritance.” Deut 32:9 He goes on to remind the people of the spiritual adultery committed by Israel in the past and how they provoked God to jealousy following after strange gods and indulging in abominations, therefore this must mean that they intermarried with pagan cultures.
    The word, ” Deuteronomy” is derived from the Greek word, Deuteronomion, meaning “second lawgiving.” the book is a summary of Moses on Israel’s covenant relationship with God. According to Bible teacher Derek Prince: “Essentially a covenant expresses a relationship that God Himself sovereignly initiates out of His own choice and decision.”

  • 24 Gary DeLoriea // May 30, 2010 at 10:22 pm   

    While i think it is impolite for Obama to attend memorial day events in his own state rather than Arlington I, however, think there are more important matters at hand. Matters such as are our veterans receiving the care they need? Are they still waiting months if not years for their disability checks to start? Is the suicide prevention hot line they need actually doing a good job helping them? Or are they still being treated like disposable heros like they were during the Bush administration?
    As far as the mosque at ground zero goes as far as i’m concerned they should rebuild the wtc as is was before 9/11 just to show those bastards that no matter how many times they knock them down we will always rebuild them and their impact on the nyc skyline is nill. but that’s just my opinion. But then again i think the freedom tower is pretty damn ugly.

  • 25 David Yeagley // May 31, 2010 at 7:35 am   

    Gary, it’s been nearly 10 years. And there’s still a big whole in the ground. Tell my why NYC or the government, or whomever, can’t get their act together? The Cordoba House thinks it can open by Sept. 11, 2011.

    The Muslims should be made to rebuild the towers. That might smack of real sincerety.
    Forget the mosques.

  • 26 Illana // May 31, 2010 at 10:58 am   

    Your idea of the towers been rebuilt by Muslims is interesting . But if this idea is proposed the community will assume that they are not responsible for what terrorists have done ..

    What will you answer them ?

  • 27 Pamela K. // May 31, 2010 at 11:33 am   

    The community will never assume responsibility for what happened on 9/11 because the American people are not responsible for the actions of a bunch of murderous cowards who killed our people. The community-especially the fire fighters- are up in arms over this proposed mosque-cultural center, which is nothing more than a ruse to cover up what is really going on, soft jihad, or building on ground that they (the Muslims) believe they have conquered. The terrorists struck the symbol of our finance, the World Trade Center, and the Pentagon, the symbol of our military strength, and killed thousands of innocent people who just got up to go to work that day. They were striking out at the American government, but these losers who killed our people have yet to be confronted with the American people. No one came to help us on that horrible day, however, the true spirit of the American people was revealed to the world, how we came together to help each other. Bush said we are fierce when stirred to anger and he is right! If anything should be built at Ground Zero by the Muslims it should be a gallows built by the conspirators of 9/11-their own gallows- and they should be hung there without a trial, just like they would do to our people! Flash that picture around the world and see how fast they try and attack us again!

  • 28 REG // May 31, 2010 at 11:56 am   

    Go Pam Go. I agree that retribution should be swift; however, if we look at the score card. It’s Muslims- One square block, thirty-five citizens. US Two countries and how many hundred thousand citizens and still counting. We’re moving into Pakistan now. Hopefully we will stay out of Iran; but I doubt it. If Ben Labin or however you spell his name hasn’t figured it out yet; he’s as stupid as his camel (granted it’s possible) Not that I wouldn’t laugh to see his scrawny neck stretched over the hole either. He started something with us that just won’t stop. I do want us to bring the troops home, let the big ‘M’s’ simmer in their own mess; but I don’t see it happening.

  • 29 REG // May 31, 2010 at 11:58 am   

    Correction to my last, thirty-five hundred citizens. Sorry, missed it on the proofread.

  • 30 David Yeagley // May 31, 2010 at 12:17 pm   

    Illana, I thought you meant that the Muslim community will not assume responsitility for what happened, and therefore will not want to rebuild the towers.

    I would say, “You provide camouflage for the redicals all the time. So, cover for them at Ground Zero!”

  • 31 Illana // May 31, 2010 at 12:26 pm   

    I may have been misunderstood : I was thinking of the Muslim community and not the American nation.

  • 32 Illana // May 31, 2010 at 1:21 pm   

    David, apologies if my English is so poor..

    If they see a Jewish woman coming towards them, they would kill me. ..I never cover them, I just assume they will never accept to rebuild the towers…

You must log in to post a comment.