David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
“Racism” is an end-all accusation. It is considered a universal evil. It is a fundamental crime against humanity. To be accused of it, in media, means the end of the one accused, regardless. But those who use the term as a political or career tool have never defined it. It is an emotional alarm, but nothing more. It excites deep moral imperatives, and natural passions, but, there is no meaning or map involved. Legal ‘sketches’ are pathetic and generally mistaken.
“If the Great Spirit had desired me to be a white man he would have made me so in the first place. He put in your heart certain wishes and plans, and in my heart he put other and different desires. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows.” Sitting Bull, Oglala Sioux.
BadEagle.com has defined “racism” as the desire to destory a race. Racism is the attempt to obliterate a culture, a language, a religion, and thus leave an ethnicity without any but the most naked identity in the flesh, which is then subject to interracial sex and mixed children–the ultimate, non-violent assault on race.
Liberal white Communists traitors (or, latent white male homosexuals with intent to defecate on the founding fathers of America) assert that “racism” is any possible aversion, natural or social, against any race or ethnicity besides your own. Indeed, liberal “racism” requires that you be averse to your own. The only semblance of race honoring liberals proffer is when the liberal uses a particular race, such as the American Negro, or the non-white illegal immigrant, as a victim of racism. The liberal whites want to eliminate all whiteness except for an elite white few–who wield all power on earth.
Liberals are the racists. Their constant cry of “racism” does not change their intent, the results of their efforts, nor disguise their malicious race-destroying drives. They are certainly “racist” against the white race, but also obviously against other races. For example, their passion to remove all Indian images from public view in America is profoundly racist. And their plot to group all non-white races together under the term “native” or “indigenous” is overtly racist against each individual non-white ethnicity within that group. and most of all denigrating to the American Indian. In that they usurp words that pertain first to the American Indian, such as “native,” it is clear that the American Indian is the center of all liberal hatred. The Indian alone is proud, and has sacrificed all to preserve himself. This is anathema to liberals–who hate all race, and all ethnic distinction. (And, though it’s true that there has been historically a great deal of intermarriage among Jewish people with non-Jews, when cornered, the Jewish people make profound sacrifices to preserve themselves.) Liberals cannot tolerate the self-esteem of the tribe. It robs them of their vision of tyranny for the human race.
Racism is committed chiefly by those who accuse others of racism. The white liberal racist makes first accusation. What I say here, that the liberals are the racists, is only a responsive observation. I do not accuse them of doing what I do. I don’t do what they do.
I love race. I love ethnicity. Not that every race, every tribe, clan, and family can be preserved forever; not that we idolize our differences. I say, however, that to love one’s race is appropriate. Love of race is the hope of the world. The racism of liberals means the dissolution of nationhood, and ultimately of individuality. This is what Barry “Obama” Soeotoro, the lying, alien black African Communist traitor and Negro mascot of the white liberals behind the anti-America movement, have in mind for the world. At every opportunity, they wish to destroy white people, and their religion, Christianity, anywhere in the world. That is the story of Kosovo, and the design to break Serbia. It is the story of the illegal Mexican immigration as well. The liberals want more and more masses of non-white people in America. They want confusion, chaos, and irrecoverable debt. They want to break America.
And so “racism” is the liberal’s thing. This is why they constantly accuse others of it. They think they cover their own evils in this way. They accuse someone else of being racist. How can they themselves be racist at the same time? No, “racism” is their prerogative. Racism belongs to the racists–the liberals. “Racism” is a terrifying alarm. It is a moral imperative. It silences all opposition. But the simple truth is, again, liberals are the racists.
To love one’s race, on the other hand, is the only way to enable one to respect another’s race. To hate one’s own race, as liberals do, requires hatred for all races, which liberals have.
The natural aversions, suspicions, and mistrusts of one tribe toward another are ubiquitous, obviously. Management of resources often reflects more than simply survival manoeuvers of one tribe over another. Nevertheless, natural aversions are natural defense mechanisms, and, as such, part and parcel of the human species. This psychology cannot be altered or transcended. It can be rather understood and managed. The liberal tyrannical dream of ‘no race’ results in the destruction of all. It is a lie, with malicious intent. It should be exposed and resisted at every opportunity.
25 responses so far ↓
1 Thrasymachus // Apr 25, 2010 at 12:40 pm
This article is so GOOD! It’s excellent!
Liberals deliberately use the word “racism,” invented by communists — probably Trotsky — to connote what ought to be called, plainly, race hatred.
But liberals want the more subtle term “racism,” for this also connotes a belief system. That is, the “racist” believes in the existence of some meaningful entity he calls “race” — he’s a believer in race as a biological reality.
As an intended result, the best way not to be “racist” is to declare and assert that “race does not exist — we are all one people.”
Is this not the source of the Rebellion that the Lord objected to in the Tower of Babel story? At that point in time, all the races and nations had become “one people.” This displeased God.
And yet today’s anti-racists regularly use the words “one people” to describe their pretended belief and their real goal — all-out miscegenation to end all distinct peoples and cultures on the planet and build a one-world economic and political system, so the future “owners” of the world — or its rulers — can plan for their own private advantages without opposition from any powerful group with an identity that might say “No” to any one of their masters whims.
If such a theory sounds too radical to be believed, just check the “Oxford Companion to Philosophy” under the title “Liberalism” to see if a one-world order is or is not desired by “Liberals.”
Of course, this dream is an impossible one and will never be fully realized. But in the meantime, what damage will it continue to bring into the lives of innocent people everywhere?
Islam too is a religion that seeks to conquer the world. World Rule is not a new idea.
The forces which lie behind the drive for a one-world government are the principalities and powers mentioned in the New Testament:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
— Ephesians 6:12
2 David Yeagley // Apr 25, 2010 at 3:32 pm
I once said if there really was such a thing as racism, it is rare.
Frankly, I don’t think what happened to the American Indian was racism, not really. I’ll write a piece on that next. What liberals mean by racism just doesn’t really pan out. It is all based on Marxist materialism, all measured by socio-economic standards.
They try to attach it to anyone or anything–as the reason the bro’s don’t all have Cadillacs, homes, and college education. Bro’s, skins, whatever. Non-whites.
3 zephyr // Apr 25, 2010 at 6:42 pm
“Hate speech”–another end-all liberal accusation.
Thras–great verse. A companion verse:
“Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Eph 5.11
4 David Yeagley // Apr 25, 2010 at 9:16 pm
Hate, race, sex, it’s all the same passion. Isn’t that just Freudian?!
Yes, don’t you dare hate. It’s morally wrong to hate. Only liberals don’t hate. Anyone who hates is a conservative, a right winger.
I think inconsistency is the worst part of the liberal character. They made a hollywood movie about assassinating Bush. No president in history was every so hated–by the LEFT!
They profess not to hate. Now, are they liars, or just pathologically inconsistent?
5 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 7:33 am
Back in my college years, I heard a liberal Professor’s assistant, in a Criminal Justice class (of all things!), declare of a Christian preacher: “I HATE him!”
If you love good, you must perforce HATE evil.
Liberal Whites are totally indifferent to the fate of other Whites, especially white children. Why children? Because it is their education (forced integration of the schools and anti-White propaganda) and their future (a minority in the midst of demanding aliens who have grievances against them) that the liberal Whites are selfishly throwing to the four winds.
In my opinion, liberals are sociopaths.
Liberalism is a mental disorder
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness
6 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 8:01 am
Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America, by Hilmar von Campe is another book worth considering.
Also of possible interest are:
The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised As Freedom, by David Kupelian
and
United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror by Jamie Glazov
7 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 11:17 am
Perhaps this article about liberalism and arrested development will be of interest. It deals with the sexual revolution and Hugh Hefner.
When I read a book on Psychology years ago, I was taught that “homosexuality” was a kind of “involuntary arrested development.” (This has seemed reasonable to me, though it certainly does not account for all cases.)
Is not liberalism a phenomenon of arrested development — especially along cultural lines? As Prof. Kevin MacDonald wrote recently on his blog, many will remain forever Democrats because they are wedded to the liberal counterculture.
8 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 11:17 am
Here’s the URL:
Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
9 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 11:22 am
Another interesting article. Mentions the cocaine epidemic in the black community. I must confess that I do not know what the CIA has to do with it.
The CIA, Homosexuality and Underdevelopment
10 David Yeagley // Apr 26, 2010 at 11:28 am
I don’t think there’s any question that race problems exist, and that some races have certainly tried to control other races, by one means or another. Some races just can’t live together. Too many differences of values. I still don’t know that this is properly called racism, though. To control (another race) to protect (one’s own race), or even to use another race (as labor, etc.), is not the same as trying to obliterate that race from the earth.
11 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53 am
Hatred is the desire to get rid of something — to bring about its nonexistence.
Thus “racism” is really a term that has come to mean “race hatred.”
Accordingly, few people are actually “racists.” Few people desire the wholesale elimination of another race.
This is why it is false to label segregationists or race separatists as “racists.” These people only desire to reduce miscegenation to the minimum. They do not want their children to be tempted to procreate with a race that is too far away, genetically, from their own.
It would be a dull world indeed if there were only one race and culture. The desire to preserve true diversity, by having separate places for separate peoples, has been falsely labeled “racism.” This it is not.
Just as Jesus said we are to love others as we love ourselves, so we must love our own heritage to enable us to love another’s heritage. The more we love and respect our own people, the easier and more natural it is to hold another people who are also self-respecting in high esteem.
I think that it’s really important to notice that Jesus says we are to love ourselves as well as others. Many people overlook that. The more I love myself in a sensible manner, the more I am able to love another!
12 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Shakespeare put it this way:
“Self-love, my liege, is not so vile a sin as self-neglecting.”
~ William Shakespeare, King Henry V. Act II, scene iv
Perhaps it is a vile sin to neglect one’s God-given heritage, and instead despise it?
So I am against race-hatred and “race-neglecting,” alike. I refuse to hate any race — including my own!
To love is to desire to preserve and to keep alive and healthy. Desire for racial integrity is hardly a sin!
13 Thrasymachus // Apr 26, 2010 at 12:15 pm
So perhaps the root of the liberals malady is the absence or lack of a healthy and natural self-love, which, properly understood, is not a sin at all. It is not to be confused with selfishness. Self-love is simply the desire to be healthy in mind and body.
14 David Yeagley // Apr 26, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Wow. Heavy thought there, Thras. Much appreciated.
15 EM // Apr 26, 2010 at 5:26 pm
“The liberal whites want to eliminate all whiteness except for an elite white few–who wield all power on earth. ”
==============================
I believe you are a bit misguide here. Have you ever understood the idea behind the tactic of divide and conquer? The whole liberal/ conservative fight is just a smoke screen for us to debate about and become very worked up about.
I found this site quite by accident…. I have only read this and another of your posts.
Quickly to my point.
A few white rich elites already wield all the power. they own everything already 98% of all US wealth… they are trying to preserve their power by using social programs, medical and immigration to hold on to their control, and trying to get you to pay for them.
How do most if not all revolutions start?
As we bicker about insurance and conservatism. They smile at a divided electorate.
A truly honest election process. The one we have now is corrupt as it gets, big money is paying out big bucks to get what they want..they have both parties bought.
Nothing will change until we have true election reform…. all TV adds should be free for one. a 100$ limit on contributions. Let the people and the ideas win.
Step out of the smoke.
16 colleague graduate // Apr 26, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Hi, colleague graduate here. I agree with David- real heavy thought on the part of Thras. Very philosophical. Thras must have a PhD or two or three like David has. I participate here as only a colleague grad who took only one course in philosophy entitled “Philosophy and History of Science” at Ga Tech around 1972. Our book we had to read and talk about was “Love and Will” by Rollo May. The prof was tall and had dark, kinda long hair and full beard. John Hines was his name. I passed the course with a “C”. I took this course in an old stone building devoted to Social Sciences. In a US history class I took there as Sophomore, one of the guys who was in that class with me was at that time the fastest runner in the world, a white guy named Ben Vaughn, on the Tech track team, with world records in the 100 yard dash and the 220 yard dash. This guy was a white, and he took over the world record in the 100 and 220 from black John Carlos and the second place black from the US they made during the 1968 Summer Olympics in Mexico City, when they raised their fists as a black power salute at the playing of the National Anthem when their gold and silver medals were given to them, when the American flag was raised. I saw Ben on tv back then in ’72 in race when he had a track shirt on saying “TECH” across it. I believe he was in the Army also, but he wore the “TECH” shirt then instead of one saying “ARMY”. Of course he won the tv race, a 220. He was about my height and more slightly built than me, about 30 pounds less. I earned a “B” in track myself. Getting back to the comments and the journal, just a few hours ago while walking on the beach, there was a couple laying on the beach composed of a pretty tall and large black guy and a white female. I passed by them, and the girl rolled over the top of the guy so that I then saw she was white. I did’nt really care about them. It was a public beach, and what was I to do, try to break it up somehow, or call the cops? I just kept beachcombing, minding my own business. But it demonstrates how here in the Chas, SC area, we are no longer in the old days when seeing an interracial couple here on the beach would never happen. As far as Thras’s name is concerned, I’m wondering if Thras’s real identity is the former Emory coed Barbara Mackey. I notice the “machus” of the name Thrasymachus, which is similar to Mackey. David would know who I’m referring to, but I don’t know if anyone else would know. She was kidnapped from Emory, and had a ransom on her. She was found buried in a cardboard box about one foot below the ground ALIVE. This happened a “Long” time ago, back in the 70′s or early 80′s. I was so relieved when they found her.
17 colleague graduate // Apr 26, 2010 at 5:41 pm
David, keep in mind the oil slick that is off the neighboring coast near OK. It doesn’t sound too good. I’ve been following it on national TV. It sounds like another Katrina.
18 colleague graduate // Apr 26, 2010 at 6:39 pm
“In a US history class I took there as a Sophomore”, not “as Sophomore”- sorry, proofreading is hard to accomplish when you’re drinking proof at the end of the day at 58 years old; Barbara Mackey was found somewhere in the Atlanta area in the woods, buried under dirt and leaves, but ALIVE, don’t know if her kidnappers were caught, don’t believe they were, just remember hearing about her being found, not also about her kidnappers being found
19 colleague graduate // Apr 26, 2010 at 6:51 pm
“drinking proof at the end of the day at 58 years old”…at the end of the day that began at 4:30 am
20 colleague graduate // Apr 26, 2010 at 6:59 pm
too bad Sitting Bull had no influence on Pawnee Larry Echohawk paying his property taxes to keep the land held by the Sioux instead of by the Feds; the Feds should give it back to the Sioux as hunting or Sioux Nation park grounds, and forget about the windmill power stations proposed for there; the Feds should buy the land for the energy grid from white farmers; Indians value land for what it is- land, more than white farmers; white farmers only want money for land, would sell if price was right, then move to Beverly Hills
21 Right-Wing Links (April 26, 2010) // Apr 26, 2010 at 10:09 pm
[...] Liberal “Racism” and Other Imaginary Evils To maintain the ascendancy of the Constitution over the lawmaking majority is the great and essential point on which the success of the [American] system must depend; unless that ascendancy can be preserved, the necessary consequence must be that the laws will supersede the Constitution; and, finally, the will of the Executive, by influence of its patronage, will supersede the laws … — John C. Calhoun (1782-1850) [...]
22 colleague graduate // Apr 27, 2010 at 5:21 am
and John C. is buried right here in downtown Charleston, right across the street from St. Philip’s church on Church St., in their little cemetery with wrought iron fence at the sidewalk; I’ve seen his tombstone several times, it’s in plain view from the sidewalk
23 colleague graduate // Apr 27, 2010 at 5:21 am
St. Philip’s is an Episcopal church
24 Liberal | nolibservice.com // Apr 27, 2010 at 5:37 pm
[...] Liberal “Racism” and Other Imaginary Evils [...]
25 jedati // Apr 27, 2010 at 11:33 pm
I’ve been astonished at the accusations of “racism” leveled against me by people I thought were my “friends” because I disagree with Obama’s policies! But those same people felt no remorse calling Sarah Palin’s kids ALL “special needs” kids because of their “genes”, even knowing I have sons who are legally blind. There is a sickness about it all.
I have come to view the left as my enemies and the media as the opposition media. They are risking my grandchildren’s futures on the policies that have already failed so many times in human history.
You must log in to post a comment.