David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Why are American white women so anxious to adopt a “dusky little heathen” child from the Third World?
It’s the latest fad of the White Woman Saviour, and it carries high status. A white American women must adopt a Third World child (preferably a non-white) to really keep up with the savior image. It’s a grand American tradition, dating back to the early 19th century Christian missions. Only today, you don’t have to be Christian at all. You just have to be white, female, (and preferably single). Look at Laura Ingraham, famous “conservative” radio talk show host. One child (Maria, a Guatamalan girl) wasn’t enough. She had to adopt a Russian boy, Dmitri.
Laura Ingraham, and her adopted
Russian boy, Dmitri.
So what are the real issues involved is this social phenomenon?
White women are obviously still operating on the grand old Christian missionary template. But what about the “single mom” bit? Is that an extra, thrown in to aggrandize the nobility of motherhood? Is that about self or about the child? What happened to the father figure? Is that not important any more? Ingraham is quite forthright about her Christianity (Catholic). Is the father figure not in that picture?
And why the craze for foreign babies? America has plenty of “home grown” infants and children available. Shouldn’t an American patriot mother’s first concern be for American babies? Why the rush to bring alien children here? Are Third World (or even European) countries anxiously adopting American children? Of course not. Let’s be honest: America is the dream country. America is where everyone wants to come. America is the place they want their children to come.
Angelina Jolie really dramatized the role of the American white woman savior grabbing up the darkest, blackest babies, from deepest, darkest, most miserable Africa (as well as Cambodian, Vietnamese, and possibly Syrian). She and Madonna. That’s the extreme, of course. That is the zenith of the white woman savior image. Shall we not ask, however, why she didn’t adopt an American Negro child, if race was the issue? Or why not simply adopt an American white child? Is there something wrong with that? Or, is it not dramatic enough to suit the heroic vision of self-importanc? Do these white women have any knowledge, or even concern, about the foreign child’s present and future feelings, or the adopted child’s psychological development?
Angelina Jolie, white woman savior of non-white babies.
It is difficult to avoid the immediate conclusion that these American white woman saviors are acting out their own sense of superiority and advantage. (Some might say, guilt, but, that’s not too likely.) They are romatically reaching out to the farthest corners of the globe to save a desperately lost and innocent child. What could be more noble, more heroic, more American? (Key focus here is on “noble”, and “heroic,” that is to say, on the woman’s feelings.)
Alas, it doesn’t always work out so well. One white woman savior family in Shelbyville, Tennessee figured they got a bad deal, and sent their little alien angel back to Siberia. Russia threatens to suspend all American adoptions? Please! A great blessing it would be. What do we need 61,600 Russian kids over here for? What about the American kids that need adoption? May all foreign countries quickly follow Russia’s suit. No more non-American babies adopted by Americans!
This whole international adoption routine is all a social status scheme. It insults all countries, who love to hate America anyway– while obviously trying to take every possible advantage of America. Americans disgrace America when they fall into this flesh fad of adopting foreigners. Sure, there are some wonderful stories. Fairy tale stories. It truly is a splendorous dream, and it has worked out beautifully in some cases, or certainly as well as anyone could ever expect when a child is taken from its home and put in another, foreign home, and of a dramatically different race.
But that’s not really the point. This is about nationalism, or, we should say, patriotism versus individualism. The individual fantasy can, unfortunately, often override the good of the community, or the country. It is as if a white woman savior sees America as the best nest of the world, and she wants to bring up the worst of the worst here. This makes her feel, in fact, patriotic. What more noble thing could an American white woman do? Yet, objectively, in terms of the America, this “customary” call for the world’s most unfortunate needs to be reevaluated–especially when there are American-born children in dire straights. Is it less patriotic for an American woman to reach out to Americans?
I think we can dispense with the foreign vision at this point. Our Kenyan President has certainly reduced the American image to one disdained, having offended just about every important country in the world, and having done little or nothing for those in greatest need. Barry “Obama” Soetoro, as the great Black Father has done everything he can to denigrate America (and glorify himself), so that foreign countries see America only as a free ticket to a home, a Cadillac, and a college education–while these things must be denied white Americans.
Madonna, and her African boy.
America has had enough of foreigners. Take it from an Indian. It is time to close the doors. Nationhood demands it. No one would ever expect a Kenyan to become tribal chairman of the Arapaho, or a Nigerian to become chief of the Cheyenne. No one would expect a Saudi Arabian to become Prime Minister of Israel. Yes, an alien, lying black African became president of the United States–but that’s only because of the white liberal Communist traitors manipulating their way into power. It isn’t because it was the right, moral thing to do. It was an Oedipal thing to do. It was, collectively, a Freudian thing to do, perverted, self-destructive, and uneducated.
I say American white woman should adopt American white children. This business of bringing in the “dusky little heathen” is racism. It is an incredibly careless, selfish move, actually. It is bad for the child, and for the country. Yes, it is a noble instinct in the American white woman. It truly is. But, it is gone awry at this point, and needs advice and guidance.
Perhaps the white race needs some humility at this point. The white woman should honor her own white race. Does she feel above race? Does she really feel so suprior to other races as to save them? I say her white “racial” capital has used up. She needs to love her own race. If she doesn’t, she is a curse to the country. Beware.
37 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Apr 14, 2010 at 2:34 pm
I didn’t want to include this in the main blog, but, I think there is a psycho-sexual theme underneath this white woman/dark (foreign) child phenomenon. I’ve written about the whole sexual issue as pertinent to race relations in other articles, like What’s Up With Dark Men, and Tall, Dark, and Scary.
Then I suggested that liberalism was basically an psycho-social Oedipal Complex, a latent white male homosexuality: Liberalism: Ancient Phallicism..
In the case of the white woman savior and the “dusky little heathen,” I think it is just another sexually-based impulse on the part of the female–both the dark race fantasy, and the feminism that seeks master over the male.
This is Freudianism, and I realize it is only theory–in fact offensive theory to many.
2 Sioux // Apr 14, 2010 at 3:35 pm
Well, what a meaty and timely topic! I have been thinking the same thing lately. If Laura and Madonna and Angelina really wanted to do these children a favor, they would help subsidize the families to keep the children in their home country. These children are not orphans for the most part – remember how Madonna got the Daddy’s permission in Malawi to take his daughter to Great Britain/America for a “better life.” It is not just the single moms doing this, but also couples, who also fit the template of great White saviors. Russia typically doesn’t allow foreign-born adoptions except for those children who are “hard to place” due to bad medical and/or psychological problems (Not always disclosed) to prospective parents). Some of these children are truly the devil incarnate for a host of reasons. I have seen this up close & personal in a pre-K class where the normal kids all had to put up with a psychotic four year old from Rumania. I finally had to kick her out – the parents never could place her, and I think she was ulimately institutionalized.
I did a little research about Laura – she doesn’t seem to have much luck in love. She was engaged to Dinesh D’Souza and then broke that off. Went out with Keith Olberman for awhile (need we say more about her taste in men).
So, we have a huge number of single women who will never find a man, but they still want to have children. What to do? I am with you, Dr. Y, about adopting American children first and only. As far as race goes, it appears that it’s the White people who are doing the bulk of adoption. Maybe it’s economics, I don’t know. Blindside, the movie, portrayed that rather poignantly.
3 David Yeagley // Apr 14, 2010 at 4:03 pm
Sioux, thank you for your response. What a relief! I did expect the worst of it–from all well-meaning women in the world. Laura is such a favorite. It was a terrible thing to put her in this example, but, truth is truth. She did adopt two very foreign children. It is a missionary instinct, I’m sure. But, these days, without Christianity, so much of the time. Philanthropy. And, in fact, liberalism. That’s what’s so hard to grasp, how conservative women can act so liberal.
I think every major conservative white woman has been engaged to Dinesh D’Souza, the ‘beloved’ Hindu. Same kind of story, actually.
I listen to Laura almost everyone morning here in OKC, while I’m having breakfast. I used to listen to Glenn Beck, but, I’m afraid he’s anti-Republican. This is not good. This is another form of careerism, I think. Lots of great information, lately, though. He’s digging. (I’m already familiar with most of it, through Charlie Meadows’ OCPAC club here in Oklahoma City.
Luck in love is a serious consideration. I truly don’t mean to offend anyone on this matter. (The Lord knows my luck on that score! Only, I don’t think it’s luck. I think it’s wrong thinking, or right thinking, more than circumstance. At least, I hope so. I’d rather be guilty than a victim!)
4 Sioux // Apr 14, 2010 at 4:12 pm
No fear with me on Laura or most of the so-called female conservatives. I like Ann Coulter, but how can she hang out with Bill Maher, BFF???? Laura sounds like a RINO quite often, so I can’t listen to her.
I don’t know why women do what they do, and I say that for myself, too. I married the tall, dark handsome mysterious Jew back in 1969. It didn’t work out despite my best efforts for more than 20 years. I thought he was something he wasn’t, and it took me a long time to admit that I would have been so much better off with my “own boring kind.” ;o)
If intentions were truly noble and savior-like, then why didn’t Laura et.al., adopt little dark children from America? I think they want to avoid ever having to give the child back, which is always a threat in America thanks to the Leftie lawyers.
5 Sioux // Apr 14, 2010 at 4:18 pm
BTW – Beck really has jumped the shark – I hate to think that he is a “plant” to discredit all conservatives and other Patriots. When he came out so negatively on Geert Wilders (along with other pundits on Fox), I realized that we have to be very careful where we get our opinion-based info from. So far, there are very few reliable consistent conservative voices — Brit Hume, Ann C, Mark Steyn, Praeger, come to mind as worthy of trust…..so far…..what’s up with Coburn??? What a disappointment he’s turned into – maybe you need to unseat him?
6 Billy Reynolds // Apr 14, 2010 at 4:51 pm
This is how they prove to each other how they are not racist.
It’s like getting a Prius.
7 David Yeagley // Apr 14, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Well, Annie defended Michael Steele the other night on Geraldo. No one respects Ann more than I. But, I think she’s wrong on this one.
Have to forgive her on this one. And look passed the clown Sharpton, the stereotype Negro, with Negro dialect, etc.
Here’s what Ben Stein says about Steele:
Ben Stein: Steele Must Go
And a CBS commentary: Ben Stein: Time for Michael Steele to Go
Who ya gonna believe?
8 jo282271 // Apr 14, 2010 at 5:21 pm
thank you for finally bringing this up. I noticed it a long time ago. Most famous conservative white women seem to go unmarried and when they get lonely they make up for it by sticking it to all the white men who have rejected them by adopting a foreign born child. It’s creepy and sad. By the way, there’s a difference between a single man and single woman. For a man to be single is normal as men were created to lead while being a single woman is not natural because women were created by God to be followers. Just look at the apostle Paul, he was single. so when it comes to love don’t put yourself in the same category as laura and ann, dr. yeagley. hey if you want maybe you get a date with laura. you and her could raise a couple of darkies, it would be a “multi-cultural” family that the liberals could look up to.
Just Kidding.
9 David Yeagley // Apr 14, 2010 at 5:44 pm
Good one, jo. But, hey, I don’t like being classified with all the other darkies. I’m American Indian, and their ain’t nothin’ in the world like it.
It is the tendency of the white American to put all darkies in the same category. That category would ultimately be the Negro category.
Nothin’ doin!
Truth is, race and culture are fascinating. Everyone knows it. Except liberals, who want to destory it all. One must be fascinated at a proper distance. That’s all. Proper distance.
10 Sioux // Apr 14, 2010 at 6:04 pm
I did catch some of the speeches at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference – the only ones I enjoyed were Herman Cain and JC Watts. Steele was a total bore – good grief!
Also caught Bill Moyer’s interview with Louise Erdrich – what do you think of her, Dr. Y?
11 jo282271 // Apr 14, 2010 at 6:05 pm
I typically don’t group Indians in with all the other darkies becuase they are the only ones who don’t have self hatred issues. Indians don’t want wnat to be white which is why I’ve always respected them. They’re also the only other group that has ever put up a real fight against the white man. I was just reading the other day that during the white expansion to the west a comanche warrior could wipe out 50 soldiers in one ambush. maybe the some of the Indian tribes (more speciafically the Great plains indians) could start teaching some of their martial arts if they still remember any moves. I would gladly pay for lessons. only problem is if I join the UFC I might kill a man in the ring with those types of moves.
12 Thrasymachus // Apr 14, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Young Chinese females are in short supply in China, owing to the one-child rule for a couple. More often than not, if the baby to be born is a girl, it will be aborted.
Yet American women are bringing baby Chinese girls into their homes to save them.
In my city, the government sends adoption scouts — white women, by the way — to the Third World to import babies for placement in white homes in our community.
In fact, liberal government policy in adoption matters is hardly neutral, racially speaking. One must wait a lifetime, in many cases, to get a white baby, whereas the non-white baby is already quite ready for its new home in a white family.
And this is not to mention the government’s desire to give White children into Negro families for adoption.
For the white liberal, the ultimate glory is to proclaim to all the world that one does not prefer one’s own race — does not prefer white people. Is there any more potent way to demonstrate this moral superiority than to adopt a non-white baby — often after having first slaughtered a white one in the womb?
13 David Yeagley // Apr 14, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Jo, Indians are content with being Indian. True. I don’t think Indians dislike the white man for being white. But, the Indian never envied the white man. That’s the deal.
Still, that was a good one about Laura and me.
Funny. Her currently professional personality, fasicinating and charming as it is, apparently has absolutely no room for another human being. Have you noticed?
“Power to the People!” she shouts.
14 colleague graduate // Apr 15, 2010 at 8:13 am
Nobody has mentioned all the whites Americans going to Haiti and adopting. They had plenty of blacks here in the US, why not leave the blacks there with all the other blacks who will remain?Perhaps they were afraid of the black parents or relatives from the US showing up and taking the adopted black child back. So often you read in your local newspaper about a black child being taken from one parent by the other that was divorced from the first. Then the cops have to go and try and find the abducted. So white Americans interested in black babies and children travel abroad to ensure the parent will not be likely to find them in the US because they lack visas or passports, and don’t speak the English language. Or perhaps these white Americans have intentions of making life for black adoptees a life of glorified slavery. They adopt them to have black servants when they grow older, like in “Gone With the Wind”. Wasn’t there a houseservant named “Bessie” at Tara? Yeah, I think there was. This idea of social regression to plantation days I believe has been spawned by Ted Turner and his coming from a plantation here in SC. When his father committed suicide here, that’s when Turner left the plantation and began his empire with donations from people who felt sorry for him. Stars perhaps want to identify with him and become rich like him. At my alma mater, Georgia Tech, there in Atlanta, this practice of students to beome rich Dem plantation owners like Dems Turner and Jane Fonda is in full swing. All the sports players are blacks like slaves were, all the students are white, and the students sit up in the stands watching the slaves sweat. The students there take only one physical training course now, a “wellness course”, during their sophomore year. Any fat couch potato high schooler who has good grades and scores high on the SAT can now enroll at Tech. They need not be apprehensive about any required rigorous physical training courses in the online catalog. When I was going to Tech we had to take 6 courses in Physical Training- Freshman courses in Track for times in the 100, 220, 440, mile and I believe two mile, Drownproofing, Gymnastics for tricks=grades, then in the Sophomore year ball sports such as Football, Basketball and Tennis. Tech not too long ago even tore down the building the drownproofing pool was in, probably to not remind students of too much atleticism they don’t have but blacks do in an attempt to motivate them to become unhealthy bookworms. So students get educated to become perhaps adoptees of foreign blacks, just like their plantation ancestors and Ted Turner. They learn how to make big bucks to run plantations and have slaves. Stars are doing the same thing. This theory is what I’ve noticed about this issue of fad adopting and black athlete worshipping.
15 colleague graduate // Apr 15, 2010 at 9:07 am
Another thing I should say about my colleague years was that there weren’t many black athtetes to watch play NCAA sports, they were mostly white. It was still mostly segregated from ’69 to ’73. Now it’s high school integrated because of Fed integration. I’m going down hill now at 58 toward the bottom of the hill. I’ve already climbed to the top, and actually really have walked to the top of the mountain known as Stone Mountain in Atl. David probably walked up when he was at Emory. I’ll bet blacks have planned to eliminate the carving of Robert E. Lee on horseback from Stone Mountain, just like they want the confederate flag eliminated everywhere. Then next they probably want a place in Atlanta’s Grant Park called “The Cyclorama”, the largest oil painting in the world that depicts the Battle of Atlanta during the Civil War, to be eliminated.
16 zephyr // Apr 15, 2010 at 9:18 am
There are some pragmatic issues to consider here. I have three friends who, due to physical issues, could not have more children (both were married–the intentional single-mother bit is a whole other issue!). They opted for foreign adoption when they discovered the waiting list for American babies was a wait of 4-10 years.
Most couples want adopted kids to be close in age to their biological children. Very few parents, when they are ready to adopt, want to wait that long. International adoptions often don’t take nearly the same amount of time.
It is possible, of course, to adopt American kids more quickly, but they will not be infants. Most parents, understandably, want to raise up a child in the way they should grow–not deal with intense emotional/behavioral issues brought on, sadly, by years of abuse. Many of those problems will only surface later on.
Infants that are readily available for adoption in America tend to have serious health issues–crack babies, HIV, fetal alcohol syndrome, etc. Tragic. And yet, again understandable why most parents would opt for a normal, healthy, int’l kid over an infant that is already facing serious and/or life-threatening physical issues and developmental problems.
17 David Yeagley // Apr 15, 2010 at 10:35 am
Very good points, Zephyr. Lots of details in the mix. And, as pointed out by CG, in America, they don’t want the parent coming after you! The likelihood of a foreign parent or relative coming after the adopted child is virtually nil.
But, I must say, undoubtedly, as in the case of the recent Russian send back, foreign children have health and psychological issues as well. I don’t think you can distinguish foreign children from American children in the matter of health and psychological issues.
A child from a broken family, from a dysfunctional family, inherits hell on earth. There is no real healing. This is part of what’s wrong with wrong: the permanent consequences.
I’ll never forget the sermon Rabbi Benjamin Skolnic gave on Yom Kippur Sabbath, back in the 80′s, at Beth Shalom, in Hamden, CT. He was “preaching” from the heart, with passion.
“There are sins that are NOT forgiven!”
I think this kind of thing is what he was talking about. Permanent effects.
18 wyattearp // Apr 15, 2010 at 10:42 am
dear jo 282271
Sorry, but the 27june1874 battle of ADOBE WALLS in the Texas panhandle, where 28 buffallo hunters held off over 500 braves (COMANCHE, APACHE, S CHEYENNE, KIOWA). This 6 hr engagement(3 white dead) does not support the legend of COMANCHE invinsibilty in battle. As a student of history these frontier engagements could go either way against great odds. I cant deny gods hands in all human conflict.
WYATT
19 wyattearp // Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59 am
I actually graduated high school with DINESH D’SOUSA. He was a ROTARY Sponsored exchange student who suffered culture shock, at the hand of a bunch of barely socialized, red neck and mexican kids, in a rural SE ARIZONA high school. “BAD, BAD LEROY BROWN” was his nickname(everyone 1 or several). Glad to see he is doing well after graduating DARTMOUTH.
WYATT
20 David Yeagley // Apr 15, 2010 at 11:30 am
Yes, the Hindu has done well. Engaged at one time or another to nearly every white conservative female of note…
You see, white conservatives think foreign brownies, like Hindu D’Souza, Filipino Michelle Malkin, etc., triumphantly validate the ideology of conservatism. Why, it’s open for everyone. Anyone.
All this does is encourage more immigration. Setting them up as exemplary only invites more cultural conflict, despite the “conservative” ploy. This kind of thinking led to Michael Steele as chairman of the Republican Committee.
You can’t play with race. It’s not a toy to manipulate. I think this is wrong. That is to say, I’m uncomfortable with it myself. Even if I may have played into it, somewhat, here and there–I’M NOT A FOREIGNER. That’s the difference. I’m not an immigrant darkie.
21 colleague graduate // Apr 15, 2010 at 1:46 pm
I can offer a real story that is an unusual cowboy and indian one other than Adobe Walls. On my dad’s side of my ancestors were some brothers who did not believe in the Confederacy in Arkansas and decided to move to Kansas because of their disenchantment. There they were hired by the Union Army as “civilian teamsters” to ride as civilian guards for a Union supply wagon train of 225 wagons that was to deliver supplies from Ft. Scott to Ft. Gibson down in Eastern Oklahoma below Tulsa. All the wagons and horses belonged to the teamsters. These guys were the only connection I have to the Union during the Civil War. When the wagon train was at Big Cabin, OK, they decided to stay overnight there in a valley. They were surrounded by a huge confederate force of 2,500 that outnumbered their 600 Union troops and teamsters. The Confederate force was commanded by two generals, one of which was an Indian leader by the name of Stand Watie. Now have you ever heard of an Indian as a leader for the Confederacy? Anyway, my ancestors and the other teamsters unhitched their horses and took off north from that valley of doom, leaving the 600 Union guards to shoot it out and be annihilated, with the Confederate soldiers obtaining the supplies.
22 wyattearp // Apr 15, 2010 at 2:21 pm
dear CG
I know of STAND WATIE and the engagement you discribe,is mentioned in ALVIN JOSEPHY’s book “The CIVIL WAR in the AMERICAN WEST”.
In fact STAND WATIE was the last CONFEDERATE GENERAL to surrender, on 23jun1865,
WYATT
23 themadjewess // Apr 15, 2010 at 5:29 pm
Stupid American women.
They, most of them make me wanna puke. I blog with Madonna the hag, she is a heathen slime bucket.
Good post David. Men are sick and tired of this junk in USA, they really ought to wake the hell up.
24 MariaAnastasia // Apr 15, 2010 at 7:30 pm
At one time I researched the idea of adopting a child from Eastern Europe (we already had several biological children, but we wanted more…alas that would not be possible naturally since I lost my childbearing abilities after our 2nd child was born).
We later opted out of the idea due to some other issues that arose, but at no time did I ever consider a non-white child. I just know I could never bond with a child that did not look like my husband and I, at least in skin color. And you know what? I think that is NORMAL.
What to me is not normal are these white women who seem to want black children. I just don’t see how they can genuinely bond with children that are so foreign-looking and eventually will be foreign-acting. IT TRULY IS NOT NORMAL.
25 David Yeagley // Apr 15, 2010 at 9:08 pm
You know, there has to be a way of communicate these natural sentiments without hurting anyone’s feelings. These people have gone way out on a limb. They expect everyone to accept what they’re doing, I’m sure.
They don’t see the bigger picture.
Of course, my whole approach is based on the idea that nationhood is ordained. It is of divine origin, for better or worse.
And for all the blistering and traditional contrasts of thought within the Jewish “community,” all we have to do is look at Israel to straighten all that out. You simply can’t have a nation without a basic, ancient forumla: language, borders, ethnicity, religion, etc. Just some basic concepts there. If they become obliterated and absent, you have—Communist America. An alien, lying black African Communist, made the mascot of liberal whites. Ichabad!
26 zephyr // Apr 15, 2010 at 9:48 pm
There is a difference in terms of numbers of infants available for adoption in foreign countries. In the U.S., many single welfare mothers rely on their children for income. They can survive on government benefits.
In third world countries, that isn’t the case. Infants are more routinely turned over to orphanages for adoption if parents cannot afford to care for them. They don’t have the luxury of government subsidies to rely on.
While it’s entirely possible for children from any country to be emotionally and/or physically damaged by their parents’ behavior, there are more healthy infants available in third world countries.
27 David Yeagley // Apr 15, 2010 at 10:00 pm
Well, that may appear to be the case. I know the big Romanian “holocaust” left have the children in the coutry orphans. Parents were DEAD, not just poor. This was in our life time.
So, what you’re saying is that American welfare surpases all the Communist welfare. Now, isn’t that an irony. Why, American Communism has always been a better Communism. Let’s go for broke (literally), and make it the best Communism in the world! That cursed ideology has never worked before, anywhere, successfully–if pursuit of happiness and freedom are to be valued at all. But, by cracky, it’s gonna work in America! The white liberals and their Negro mascot will make it so!
But back to the babies, “healthy” Third World children have no special “right” to be in America. This is an illusion. The Communist dream. We OWE them. That’s the ideology. That’s your “Christless” Christianity. It destroys all concept of nationhood, responsibility and order. It just ain’t right.
Compassion gone awry.
Maybe I’m wrong.
28 handle // Apr 16, 2010 at 3:12 am
My 3rd cousin was adopted from bangladesh or something because his mother had already had 2 miscarriages, and the doctor said there was no way she would be able to carry a baby to term.
They chose to adopt from a 3rd world country after adopting a norwegian baby proved to be next to impossible.
29 David Yeagley // Apr 16, 2010 at 6:12 am
Hey, caring for kids in the world is a wonderful thing, obviously. I’m just trying to bring in the bigger picture here, or an important part of the picture that’s being left out, I think.
30 zephyr // Apr 16, 2010 at 6:54 am
American communism and its government subsidies are the supreme “enablers” of irresponsible behavior.
Behavior modification is tough and has to be done by the individual. Unfortunately, our fed and state governments have found it easier to band-aid the cancer than to treat or prevent it.
31 colleague graduate // Apr 16, 2010 at 7:04 am
wyattearp- I guess I was wrong in assuming nobody had ever heard of Stand Watie; during that wagon train raid my ancestors encountered, my dad told me all of the brothers who were related to me escaped on their unhitched horses; they eventually ended up living in Missouri; some of my family moved to Indian Territory in Oklahoma, my grandmother on my dad’s side, and survived, not by fighting, but probably by avoiding contact, staying within race; that’s why I feel as a white I will be able to survive here on David’s site, participating in bandy smoke signalling, David’s sent through his tipi’s top, mine sent through knowledge of conics such as the equation for determining the area of a cone
32 eggfarm // Apr 16, 2010 at 9:09 am
I cannot speak for what moves someone to adopt a child from a 3rd world country. Our family provides monthly support to an Indonesian child through Compassion (see compassion.com). That happened to be the child we were given through the ministry. If you are born in a rich or poor country you still need someone to care about you and provide for your needs. I will look into adopting a child from this country 1st as a result of reading your column.
33 Thrasymachus // Apr 20, 2010 at 5:37 am
“What to me is not normal are these white women who seem to want black children. I just don’t see how they can genuinely bond with children that are so foreign-looking and eventually will be foreign-acting. IT TRULY IS NOT NORMAL.”
I cannot understand it either. I just can’t.
I CAN understand compassion, but really race-suicide makes no sense to me. There’s a right and a wrong way to go about things. We’re living in an age when common sense has been thrown out the window.
What greater responsibility can there be than the proper raising of a child? Not to prefer one’s own simply is NOT NORMAL!
34 American Women Adopting International Children – Courtney Captions // Jun 15, 2010 at 9:59 am
[...] For Giggles this is a good article to read (The bad Eagle Journal!!); http://www.badeagle.com/2010/04/14/american-white-women-adopting-dark-foreign-children/ [...]
35 crammasters // Jun 22, 2010 at 4:29 pm
I was in agreement with some of the white female’s motivations for adopting “dark” children. However, after reading further, it was surprising to see so much white identification from those who claim to be “proud Indians”
What was also surprising was the appalling lack of knowledge regarding YOUR history, and that the original “Indians” were Moorish (black) people who were dark. It was only AFTER white colonization that the “Indians” were divided into two groups “Blacks” and “Indians” depending on skin color.
Most blacks have some “Indian” in their background and most who identify themselves as “Indians” have blacks (Africans) in their backgrounds.
If I didn’t know better, I would have thought I was on the Aryan Nation website. Sad to read so many racist (and ignorant) comments that border on delusional, as some point arrogant fingers at other non-whites and conveniently ignore their OWN history of almost total defeat at the hands of white invaders.
However, this delusional mentality is typical of a people who have been colonized (defeated) by Europeans such as African slaves and Indians.
Otherwise, how does one NOT make the comparison between “reservations” and “black ghettos?”
36 crammasters // Jun 22, 2010 at 4:39 pm
@ jo282271 who said, “I typically don’t group Indians in with all the other darkies becuase they are the only ones who don’t have self hatred issues.”
ME: you must be kidding….any non-white who seeks to identify with the POV of their WHITE OPPRESSORS is literally overflowing with self-hatred…
@ jo282271 who said, “They’re also the only other group that has ever put up a real fight against the white man.”
ME: again, the appalling lack of knowledge of history. There were HUNDREDS of slave rebellions, and on the slave ships, slaves sometimes managed to kill the enslavers and take over the ships, regaining their freedom. During the Civil Rights era, BLACKS fought and died for the right of ALL NON-WHITES to have more freedom.
If i remember correctly, INDIANS were treated just as badly as blacks, couldn’t work, live or play where you wanted, couldn’t sit at the front of the bus, eat in restaurants, walk in through the front door, go to the same schools as whites
the comments on this site are conclusive proof that some Indians are just as brainwashed as some of the descendants of slaves….
the white man doesn’t need to lift a finger to oppress non-whites; some are too busy trying to occupy the top rung of the n**gger ladder in a white supremacy society
FYI — anyone who is NOT white in a white supremacy society, is a “n*gger.”
37 American White Women Adopting Dark, Foreign Children by David Yeagley « National-Anarchist Women // Jul 7, 2010 at 10:39 pm
[...] Perhaps the white race needs some humility at this point. The white woman should honor her own white race. Does she feel above race? Does she really feel so suprior to other races as to save them? I say her white “racial” capital has used up. She needs to love her own race. If she doesn’t, she is a curse to the country. Beware. http://www.badeagle.com/2010/04/14/american-white-women-adopting-dark-foreign-children/ [...]
You must log in to post a comment.