BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

Barry Wants White Women Nude

by David Yeagley · January 8, 2010 · 29 Comments ·

Barry’s dream comes true.


Barry “Obama” Soetoro finally strips white American women naked.

The upshot of the new “Obama” homeland security plan is to strip women naked. That would be white, American women. Islam, then, has succeeded in humiliating the white American to the final degree: Islam has stripped America naked, in public, to be dragged through the streets of the internet.

From Alex Jones InfoWars, we find this piece by Paul Joseph Watson today: Inverted Body Scanner Image Shows Naked Body In Full Living Color [Friday, January 8, 2010]


The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display your naked body in full living color.

This is what it’s come to. Islam has been gradually ‘invading’ our privacy (as well as our country) for years. It started with our luggage, then our shoes, our jackets, and now our clothes. This is Islam. Make no mistake. Islam is what has caused this. Islam, together with the sexual perversion liberalism has brought into American society.

This is textbook Freudian Oedipal urges wreaked upon American society by latent white male homosexuals in power. It is the cruelty of unleashed libido. Yes, it is Communism’s denigration of people also; it is a demonic delight in cruel power over others. But, in this particular case, not about taxes, money, or even life styles. It is about rape. It is the perfect “Obama” touch. It is a homosexual perversion, but expressed through a black male. Again, the object is nudity, particularly that of the white female. (Who cares about anyone else’s nudity?)

How much will Americans take? How much can the lying, black African Communist pervert get by with? And why? Above all, Why?

The enemies of all good, freedom, and dignity, rule. At this time, they have the ascendancy. Islam is their more-than-willing perverted servant. Really, we can’t blame Islam. The demon is allowed. The demon is loosed. The damned religion is allowed to run rampant–by latent male white liberal homosexuals in power, in this country, at this time. They’re called academic elites. They’re called liberals, international good deed doers, globalists, and usually Democrats.

Nothing could be more obviously denigrating, anti-American, and stupid, than this full-body screening at American airports. Nothing. Barry and his boys are not interesting in making America safe, nor in pursuing Al qaeda, or any other such necessity. They are interested in punishing Americans, in humiliating, denigrating, and shaming Americans. The administration is Islamic. They are mild-mannered jihadists. One form of sexual perversion meets another. Islam reaches over to grasp the hand of latent white male homosexuals in America.

Anyone who cannot see this is either blind, or spiritually dead–doped up on some selfish, slavish indulgence which has left him a craving dependent, either blaming or bleeding the government in abject psychological chattels. No Christian in his right mind will tolerate this for a moment! This government “safety” plan is using fear as a cause for immorality. Nothing is made safer. The body scan does not detect chemicals. It is a useless exercise, designed only to strip people naked. This is Obama. This is Bary Soetoro. This is the American government now, the government white latent male homosexuals put in office.

Posted by David Yeagley · January 8, 2010 · 4:42 pm CT · ·

Tags: American Patriotism · Bad Eagle Journal · Christianity · Communism · Conservatism · Islam · Liberalism · Politics · Race · Religion · White Race · Women




Read More Journal Posts »

29 responses so far ↓

  • 1 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2010 at 4:46 pm   

    I’ve never been so angry. I’ve never see a country’s leadership become so perverted.

    Barry boy took “responsibility” for increased fears (which his agencies promote–no doubt to justify their existence) only to justify taking more power–power to denigrate and punish Americans.

    This is Islam. But this is also the white males who put him in power. Unbelievable!

  • 2 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2010 at 4:55 pm   

    More articles from PrisonPlanet:

    Now Mobile Devices Will Scan Your Naked Body On The Streets

    Children At Most Risk From Pedophiles In Government

    Mind Reading Machines: The Next Step If We Accept Naked Body Scanners

    Israeli Proposes Absurd Mind Reading Technology at Airports

    In my opinion, the Israeli proposes makes much more sense that the sexually perverted body scan scam.

  • 3 zephyr // Jan 8, 2010 at 5:20 pm   

    This is disgusting. If they want naked pics of people, let people of Middle Eastern descent get the full body scans.

    Btw, your last blog was one of the best.

  • 4 zephyr // Jan 8, 2010 at 5:53 pm   

    Hmmm…wonder if Muslim women will have to go through this? Probably not–would be against their principles. Well, it’s against mine as well so I’ll be opting out.

    Then of course, one wonders, what will happen to these images? Where will they be stored? For how long? Who will have access to them? and who will be the first government employee to sell the nude pics to porn sites where any traveler’s body can be posted for all to see?

    Total invasion of privacy.

  • 5 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2010 at 6:06 pm   

    Either the Muslim women will not submit, or they will sue, or both. Everything American government does is for Muslims, not against them. The American government is essentially in cahoots with Islam.

  • 6 David Yeagley // Jan 8, 2010 at 6:39 pm   

    I realize that the expression of such intense aversion tends to put me in the category of the radical, the extremist.

    But, no. The enemies of America are the extremist. Extreme liars, and evil workers.

    I can’t stand to see something I love–this country–dragged through the dirt like this! I can’t stand it!

    I am angry because I am powerless.

  • 7 zephyr // Jan 8, 2010 at 6:40 pm   

    It’s vomitable. Ironically, you can hide an entire arsenal under long flowing robes. Muslim dress codes for women are a great way to smuggle!

  • 8 Thrasymachus // Jan 8, 2010 at 8:40 pm   

    Unbelievable. Yet I have already seen liberals (claiming to be ofNorwegian and of Dutch descent) defending and arguing for these unnecessary and immoral measures.

    I think that the American people live in total fear of their government. I hope I’m wrong; but it seems that most Americans will go along with anything.

    This has all happened so FAST! I would have put these developments 20 years down the road into the future.

  • 9 Thrasymachus // Jan 8, 2010 at 8:44 pm   

    Liberals are arguing that “getting along” with Muslims requires citizens to make these “necessary” sacrifices — and that, since the world is overpopulated, Whites must sacrifice the liberties of the Constitution so as to be fair to all.

    They are really arguing that Whites should not exist, as the race is an intolerable burden to the planet and to “humanity.”

  • 10 Thrasymachus // Jan 8, 2010 at 8:47 pm   

    I too feel powerless and therefore angry.

    After all, as a people, what kind of life does the White Race have — psychologically and spiritually speaking? And, of course, this lack of a healthy Western civilization harms the other races and nations as well.

    Really, where is the joy in all this? The ‘glory’ of decent manhood and normal living?

    I seem to recall an American patriot who said that life without Liberty was a fate worse than death. Could he but have forseen these times!

  • 11 John Sandusky // Jan 8, 2010 at 11:42 pm   

    Who in there right mind would trust airport security guards, that are not even required to hold a high school diploma, with equipment that produces images such as these.

    Ann Coulter stated, “look for Bill Clinton to become an airport security guard.”

    The insanity of Democrats with regard to national security issues will destroy them for years to come . . . the race to fill Ted Kennedy’s senate seat is now within various polls’ margin of error.

    A problem can never be solved unless the problem is clearly defined. Team Obama can’t even say the words, “radical Islamic terrorists” and doesn’t even know that the Army of Islam captives belong in the military courts and should disappear.

    Even the “progressives” God FDR executed German spies using the military courts caught plotting death and mayhem on American soil.

  • 12 wyoman // Jan 9, 2010 at 12:05 am   

    Security at airports will be hit and miss as long as we have dull norms manning the stations. I recently flew from Salt Lake City to Tulsa. I passed security with no questions. On the return flight the security people found a large pair of pliers I has apparently left in the bag a few months earlier. I was amazed that it had made it through the outbound check but the Tulsa people said it was not unusual. It did not cause me any problems and the security people were nice about it. Of course I lost the pliers but that is to be expected. The thing is it seems x ray checks apparently miss things as big as 8″ long steel pliers in carry on luggage. The 911 outlaws did not have anything that big. I must say though, I would not care to see most of my fellow passengers in the nude. Air travel is upsetting enough as it is.

  • 13 Thrasymachus // Jan 9, 2010 at 8:07 am   

    X-ray technology is not only invasive of ultimate privacy, but it is severely damaging to the human body. It can even lead to impotence — the inability to reproduce.

    Cancer patients used to be given X-ray treatment in the 1930s to kill cancerous cells.

    This crime must not be tolerated.

    Sadly, there is no organized and powerful movement in the States to overthrow the tyrannical system. Not great men to lead the people back to freedom.

    This calls for brilliant and successful infiltration and take-over from the inside, as a rising up of the people can do little against the highly effective weaponry modern warfare.

    Actually, the only thing that could possibly work today is passive resistance. Every American should refuse to pay taxes, send their children to government schools, or otherwise support the system. Refusal to play the game is the only option left. But this requires an organized protest movement and careful planning. It requires visible leadership of powerful men! It requires heroism of the highest kind. It requires mighty warriors who will refuse to participate in the evil of modern government.

  • 14 beakerkin // Jan 9, 2010 at 7:58 pm   

    I must be missing something. What does this have to do with white women. All will be scanned and this policy has nothing to do with gays.

  • 15 David Yeagley // Jan 9, 2010 at 8:33 pm   

    Perhaps you’re not familiar with Freudian sexual theory.

  • 16 zephyr // Jan 9, 2010 at 9:02 pm   

    Th: “liberals (claiming to be ofNorwegian and of Dutch descent) defending and arguing for these unnecessary and immoral measures.”

    We certainly can’t look to Europe for help. They are weak, sold on socialism (they should know better!), and besides, so many nude beaches and even towns that being nude at the airport means nothing to them ;)

    Wy: “Security at airports will be hit and miss as long as we have dull norms manning the stations.”

    A relative of mine had been shooting at a range and the next day, realized there were some extra bullets on the floor of her car. She picked them up and stashed them in her purse, intending to remove them when she returned home.

    But there was a hole in the lining of her purse and she completely forgot about them until a month later, when she was cleaning out her purse. During the interim, she’d flown from Orlando to a city out West. TSA never caught the bullets–and they weren’t small. Scary.

  • 17 David Yeagley // Jan 9, 2010 at 9:23 pm   

    Beak, my application of Freudian sexual theory to political manifestations of this grand scale is indeed less than professional, however obvious the fit. I am not a professional psychologist. I know a little about it, and see this as a rather obvious case of pathology. The social scale is not to deter application of the personal, certainly not in the case of a pathological narcissist like Barry.

  • 18 John Sandusky // Jan 9, 2010 at 10:38 pm   

    I would not have a problem using Inverted Body Scanners as a secondary security step. But as long as blond women are singled out at the same rate as Mideast looking men between 15 and 35 to satisfy the lefts destructive MO of cultural Marxism (PC] . . . the scanners are out of the question.

  • 19 David Yeagley // Jan 9, 2010 at 10:57 pm   

    The only people that need to be stopped, stripped, scanned, checked, interrogated, or in any way convenienced, are Muslim men.

    I heard on the radio tonight some people (Oklahoma newsmen) suggesting that the Muslims countries keep the suspected terrorist from getting on planes in their own countries.

    This is at least in the direction of the traval ban I have been long suggesting. At any rate, any country which fosters, trains, supports terrorists should itself be banned by the UN. The UN. Haha! What a joke. But, that would be the ideal consequence. The countries of the terrorists be made to pay for their ‘product.’ Fine that country. Boycott that country.

    There simply has to be concret CONSEQUENCE for the terrorists. American government want only to punish AMERICAN’s, and foster the terrorists. The American government today is essentially Islamic.

  • 20 johnnymac // Jan 10, 2010 at 4:04 pm   

    Don’t forget young children suffering this humiliation too Doctor. Obamas ”safe school czar”"( a misnomer if ever there was one) Kevin Jennings , the pedophile is going to love this too. Nothing is outside the pale for “Barry” when it comes to denigrating America. For me it’s his absolute fecklessness and infantile arrogance that infuriates me. The way he behaves like some two-bit Mussolini. I wouldn’t worry as being seen as ”radical” or ”extremist” Doctor. I believe it was Orwell who said, “In a time of universal deceit speaking the truth is a revolutionary act”.

  • 21 beakerkin // Jan 10, 2010 at 5:04 pm   

    J Mac

    Great to see you. I wish Yeagley understood the Professionalism of my peers. We have rigorous rules and procedures that guarantee privacy.

  • 22 johnnymac // Jan 10, 2010 at 5:13 pm   

    Hello beaker Happy New Year. Count me as uniformed as the Doctor. I quess the temptation to see it as he does is understandable given Barry Obama. And in that vein, the work you do, what in the world went wrong on Christmas Day?

  • 23 Thrasymachus // Jan 10, 2010 at 5:31 pm   

    In these unreal times, simple “common sense” is ‘radical’ and ‘extremist.’ The changes I’ve seen in my lifetime can only be compared to some weird sci-fi novel or the “Twilight Zone.”

    Note also that Barry has lifted the ban on HIV-carriers, allowing people known to be infected freely to enter the country.

    Not a few blacks view this presidency as revenge on this country in which they once were kept as slaves.

  • 24 beakerkin // Jan 10, 2010 at 6:43 pm   

    J Mac

    It was an error of PC. If the government kicked him off the plane you would see lawsuits the other way.

    Nigeria is not a country with secure ID’s. This individual has traveled in Europe and has likely had biometrics taken.

    The security system is more of an art than anything else. This may sound odd but it really
    depends on the operator and the staff behind them.

    Many people work in fear of a lawsuit.

    Tras

    In the old system all people had to do was show
    medical coverage and they were admitted. The
    new policy is no real change from the previous one.

  • 25 David Yeagley // Jan 10, 2010 at 9:32 pm   

    So, Beak, the “composers” of the art need to be more orthodox in their forms. Israel knows how to do this thing. No one listens to Israel. Our leaders deserve these failures.

    The American people don’t deserve such leaders.

  • 26 beakerkin // Jan 10, 2010 at 10:01 pm   

    Doc

    Israel is a small nation with few ports of entry. Its citizens with rare exception all serve in the military.

    Americans will not accept being asked quick questions before boarding. If I were to go I could expect questions about my background and about my job. Are you going to accept that
    every time you go to Akron.

    We also have lawsuit culture. Do your job and you can get sued.

  • 27 zephyr // Jan 10, 2010 at 10:21 pm   

    Just saw Dateline’s “Passenger in Seat 19A” that aired tonight re: the Underwear Bomber. Brian Williams went through one of the new scanners. The rep he was interviewing from Rapiscan Systems insisted the airport images would be “filtered”, admitting that the scanner does produce very detailed images of the body. So detailed that Williams covered his genitals so they would not appear on the scan. And NBC was careful not to show any close-ups of the scans. But I’m sure air travelers will not get that respect.

    Williams had a “hidden” syringe and baggy of sugar (to imitate the bomber); the TSA agent who viewed Williams’ scans missed the syringe entirely and the sugar was not at all visible in the image, though the Rapiscan rep insisted it would be. When the sugar didn’t show, the rep said, “well, it would have been visible if it had been real explosives”. And we’re supposed to believe that?

    These scanners would not have helped AT ALL in detecting the Underwear Bomber’s hidden explosives. So how are they a help? Airports can already check for metal weapons w/o these full body scans, and that is all that appears on these images. The needle in Williams’ syringe did show up, but it was so thin the TSA rep missed it.

    And, while the Rapiscan rep insisted airport images will be “filtered”, he later also said the airport scanners would have “enhanced detecting capabilities”. I don’t think BOTH of these statements can be correct.

  • 28 beakerkin // Jan 11, 2010 at 4:21 am   

    What makes you certain passengers won’t get respect? Operators are professional and 99% of the public is not something one would want to see
    anyway.

  • 29 PM // Jan 17, 2010 at 1:36 pm   

    I read your blog, and various responses, and am shocked at how you, and others, can see the world so differently from myself. For example, you say

    “The upshot of the new “Obama” homeland security plan is to strip women naked. That would be white, American women. Islam, then, has succeeded in humiliating the white American to the final degree: Islam has stripped America naked, in public, to be dragged through the streets of the internet.”

    First, identifying the new security plan as Obama’s is rather iffy. Of course it is Obama’s administration so in the end he is responsible. But how much did he have to do with designing it — probably nothing at all. There is a body of people, with attendant bureaucracy, tasked with making the homeland secure. Perhaps they came up with a dumb plan and perhaps the President should have shot it out of the water, but to ascribe evilness to Obama on this matter is bizarre.

    Second, why concentrate on “white American women”. From anything I have read the scanning is to be applied to all including white American men, black American women, Mexican men, women in long robes from the Middle East, and so on (as the notion of equality, central to American culture, would requrie). Perhaps Islam has won, but any Muslims in America are going to be stripped naked and dragged through the streets as well.

    PM

You must log in to post a comment.