David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
George Soros, the globalist billionaire who condemns the concept of nationhood, who actively seeks to dissolve nations of the world, has a crooked, crippling hand in Serbia. Soros is intimately involved in the international betrayal of Serbia, and the theft of the Serbian province of Kosovo.
Anti-nationalist, George Soros.
Soros has “foundations” in Kosovo, and in Serbia. In 2008, Nathanel Kapner published an article about Soros as a Rothchild agent in the Balkans.
SOROS has been operating his Kosovo Foundation For Open Society for over 10 years in an effort to usurp Serbian Christian culture in Kosovo & support the drug-running Muslim KLA. Because of his “Quantum Fund” that does business in Kosovo along with his weapons-dealing Carlyle Group, Soros wants to be free of any constraints by the Putin-sponsored Serbs.
An independent Muslim Kosovo is also in the interest of the Rothschilds because it is the “Serbian Kuwait” with its enormous reserves of lead, zinc, gold, and coal. Soros has invested millions of dollars through his International Crisis Group in an effort to possess Trepca for the Rothschilds a rich mining area in Kosovo. Oil interests also figure into an independent Kosovo for Soros and the Rothschilds.
Like most globalist visionaries, Soros professes a messianic calling to save the world, when all he’s really doing is taking financial advantage. With more intelligence than most world players, the roguish financier merely manoeuvers for personal gain.
Soros, a Hungarian Jew who pretended to be Christian to avoid Nazi persecution, and who persecuted other Jews to their deaths, despises the idea of nationhood, and especially Christian nationhood. He believes that ethnicity is equivalent to tribalism, and in the name of French Jewish philosopher Henri Bergson, Soros condemns human separatism as the cause of all social problems, and advocates the dissolution of all nations–in the name of a global government, in which he and those like him expect to have exalted positions of incomprehensible power.
The modus operandi, of course, are the NGOs (non-government organizations)–which exist entirely, exclusively, and precisely to overthrow existing governments and to replace them with globalist regimes under the control of the world elites. Soros is names as one of several who push their anti-nationhood, anti-sovereignty agendas through this means. Says the Underground Serbian Café:
In fact, if one would want to single out the most widely despised, distrusted and disliked segment of society in Serbia, the Western-funded NGOs would be the undisputed champions. Nataa Kandiæ of Soros Open Society, Sonja Biserko of the Helsinki Committee, Borka Paviæeviæ running a Centre for Cultural Decontamination, Biljana Kovaèeviæ Vuèo of YUCOM and Sonja Liht running Belgrade Foundation for Political Excellence are personally responsible for triggering more barf throbs among the Serbs than the slimiest glob of creatures wriggling in a pond of puss could produce.
(Remember that other Finnish connection, Martti Ahtisaari, the UN envoy who made very suspicious deals with Albanian “mafia” and supported the independence of Kosovo?)
Sonja Biserko, NGO rep determined to dissolve Serbia, talking with Zoran Radojicic, who happens to be the chairman of the Arbitration Tribunal of the Summer Olympic International Federations. He is a Montenegran. Biserko is Croatian.
Indeed, the anti-Serbian NGO’s all work together. Here is their profession: Serbian Human Rights Defenders at Risk They are essentially the ACORN of the Balkans. In the name of “freedom” and “democracy,” their aim is to destroy the nation. In the name of “human rights,” they propose the deadliest tyranny of all. It’s the old Communist ploy, actually. In the name of “equality,” they assert their own control.
BadEagle.com has long recognized the cause of Serbia, the last of the Mohicans in Eastern Europe. The last barrier against the invasion and triumph of Islam. The only reason the western Christian nations do not support Serbia is because of the indefatigable courage and determination of the Serbian people. The West casually writes of Serbia as the cause of trouble in the Balkans, when the West is obviously interested in profits to be made.
Serbia then is attacked from two sides, both of which are apparently coming from one source: globalist profiteers. In the name of western democracy and freedom, western nations condemn Serbia, but they do so only in conjunction with globalist, anti-nationalist forces. I am most bewildered and sad to say, the United States is part of this anti-Serbian campaign. To this day, I consider this the most unfounded betrayal in the modern history of America. Globalists, whether Democrat (Clinton) or Republican (Bush) have all contributed to the onslaught of Serbian sovereignty. In their blind lust for power, the “Christian” globalist leaders are willing to let Islam smash a Christian nation, in order to profit thereby. Though the media scarcely mentions it, the Kosovo Independence phenomenon is simply about allowing Islamic Albania to get an upper hand over Christian Serbia.
To these globalist power players, nationhood and religion are just toys, manoeuvers, or techniques. There is nothing sacred about nationality, or ethnicity, or religion. As Soros preaches, that’s all tribalism, something to be overcome. Nationhood is something to advance beyond. Religion is something to rise above. It is time, globalists say, for the nations to surrender to the mild sway of the messianic elitists.
39 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Dec 2, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Soros, I understand, used to fund Radio B92 and OpenNet, a group which the Serbian government cracked down on. Thus, Serbia is again made to appear the bad guy. Here’s Radio B92′s one-sided account, justifying themselves, in the name of freedom and democracy.
And here’s an interesting commentary on a article published in the LA Times back in 2000:
Veran Matic – Soros’ Thug
This is more like it!
2 Awen // Dec 2, 2009 at 7:40 pm
That freeserbia.net is heavy duty! I’ve kept it for Mother. That whole story makes me too sick to comment much. I was baptized in the Serbian Cathedral in St Louis and was close to my Serbian godfather’s family all my life. I’ve been hanging my head in shame over America’s actions for ten years now. That IS the oldest front line isn’t it, together with Greece. Remember what Kissinger said about the Greeks?
“The Greek people are anarchic and difficult to tame. For this reason we must strike deep into their cultural roots: Perhaps then we can force them to conform. I mean, of course, to strike at their language, their religion, their cultural and historical reserves, so that we can neutralize their ability to develop, to distinguish themselves, or to prevail; thereby removing them as an obstacle to our strategically vital plans in the Balkans, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East.”
Sarkozy of France, another Hungarian Jew, made a public speech exhorting the French people to intermarry with the Muslims as a patriotic act. It wasn’t even about assimilating the non-white Muslims but rather too obviously about making the French people disappear. Apparently he and Soros don’t think anybody should have a ‘Tribe’ but them. Imagine the fuss if we suggested all the Hungarian Jews should intermarry with something different.
3 David Yeagley // Dec 2, 2009 at 9:56 pm
The president of the current Albanian Muslim community of “Kosovo” is Ramush Haradinaj. He is a well-trained terrorist and guilty of terrible war crimes. But, the West honors him.
German general Claus Reinhardt (KFOR commander Oct 1999-Apr 2000) and Ramush Haradinaj shaking hands in Prishtina. According to Dnevnik they have close cooperation.
“Ramush Haradinaj is the organizer of ethnic cleansing of Serbs and other non-Albanians from the areas of Pec, Decani and Djakovica. The main perpetrators of these activities were members of the Black Eagles under the commander of Toger. For example, in order to intimidate the Serbs and destroy signs of Serb life and history on the territory of Metohija, the Black Eagles torched the Serbian Orthodox church in the village of Donji Ratis.”
4 David Yeagley // Dec 2, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Here is a fine interview with the president of the Serbian Coordinating Center for Kosovo and Metohija, Sanda Raskovic-Ivic.
She says Serbia will never accept independence of Kosovo.
5 Awen // Dec 2, 2009 at 10:06 pm
“Over 150 churches and monasteries in Kosovo, Serbia have been destroyed or seriously damaged over the last 6 years. Now authorities project to turn the hull of one sanctuary into a nightclub. The Church of Christ the Savior in Pristina has been turned into public toilet.”
Albania : Muslims Torch Churches , Hate Christ
“A little more than two years ago, between March 17 and March 19, 2004, Muslim Albanian mobs, estimated to number as high as 50,000, went on a lethal rampage, killing 19 Christian Serbs, injuring hundreds, and permanently expelling thousands from their ancestral homes in Serbia’s UN-run province of Kosovo and Metohia.
In addition, more than 20 Orthodox churches were torched and several Christian cemeteries desecrated.”
Kosovo campaign against Christians
6 Awen // Dec 2, 2009 at 10:14 pm
@ Yeagley
Have you heard anything more about whether the UN is actually going to do anything about the corrupt Martti Ahtisaari? Are they even pretending to do? That link you brought in is a mind-blower; we’re all just sitting here and allowing these outrages to continue. I’ll tell you something I don’t like to say, though: I’m more nervous about going after that creepy Soros, online or anywhere else than to say what I want about our own government. That one has his fingers in too many pies. You know about the new Brazil oil exploration deal with America, now and who knows what else he’s bought his way into.
7 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 8:27 am
Inasmuch as the UN is pro-Muslim Kosovo independence from Serbia, I don’t expect any reprisals for Ahtisaari. Here’s a quipper commentary from the Balkan Forum, on Ahtisaari. (It’s a bit multi-lingual, but, the English comments are on Ahtisaari are in the first entry.)
Soros is profound, actually. At his level, he has to have purpose. Messianic vision, he has presented. Richard Poe’s Newsmax article “George Soros’ Coup” (May 2004) exposed all this. It was the first and most frightful exposé.
I started a blog on Soros: The Soros Sundance. I was angered when he took over Redford’s Sundance Institute documentary division. Soros advances all his racial eradication by putting Polynesians, Asians, Africans, and homosexuals all under the title, “Native America.”
8 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 9:49 am
The Balkan Forum is a good one. Multilingual is fine – so am I, anyhow.
What really annoys me about him – nobody ever said he wasn’t smart – is he’s attaching himself to issues that really need to be dealt with, for the right reasons, and just using them to get his claws into the country deeper.
For instance, the term ‘native.’ Well, it means where you are born and there is no particular group of people who have a patent on that one so long as they are born in the country. Obviously Soros isn’t interested in giving credit to those who actually built the country by failing to distinguish them from the late-comers so he, again, manages to confuse terms until they no longer have a meaning in the public consciousness; that’s what he’s good at.
Then, decriminalization of pot, really needs to happen! What kind of people are letting the sick live in pain just because they want to control a weed in the fields made by God? We are setting murderers free after a few years of their sentences and keeping people in prison for a bag of weed? That’s nuts! Big Pharma has a stake in keeping natural plants illegal because they are the true drug pushers. A lot of our wealthiest and most corrupt political families made their money during Prohibition, as you know. Trying to legislate personal behaviour has never worked and it never will. It’s nobody else’s business and has every time just been used as an excuse to chip away at all our Constitutional rights. Do you remember National Review doing a whole issue on why we need to repeal all the drug laws? That was the late 90′s.
So what is Soros doing with this? It’s because every time the Dems campaign, one of their promises is to put an end to this injustice so my guess is he’s just trying to make himself look ‘progressive’ and he is really the farthest thing from that. He’s an old school fascist if I ever saw one. Three times in AZ when we had a referendum on pot, we voted to legalize medicinal use and then the Clinton Administration nixed it, interfering where they have no Constitutional right to do. All such matters are supposed to be at the discretion of each state. How sneaky snakes like Soros get their influence in the first place is by occasionally appearing to support the right causes – he couldn’t very well have got this far by always being at odds with the will of the people.
9 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 10:06 am
As it happens, I think I know ‘what kind of people’ would make others live and die in agony because our drug laws won’t allow doctors to ease their pain: that Puritan toxic mold in the American mindset. Mother said not long ago, if we had sunk that Mayflower the whole country would have been better off. It was full of people like that who had finally been driven out of Europe, the worst of riff-raff. They think suffering is good for the character and insist everybody else has to be as miserable as they are. (needless to say, our own were the cavaliers who got here a bit earlier)
We have to be very careful, at a time in our history when we are ready to evolve beyond our beginnings that opportunists with very nasty agendas don’t take advantage of us and push us to throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. Being a conservative is about keeping the qualities that made us a great country, a unique one; it doesn’t mean we have to stay mired in outdated and destructive world-views. The trick is to come up with our own American ways to improve our society, not the UN’s and their clique of globalists.
10 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 10:32 am
AWEN, you are truly unidentifiable. This concerns me. I don’t advocate confusion and contradicion, though some of this is inevitable in any search for truth.
I perceive something seriously wrong here. I don’t know that it is appropriate to discuss publicly. I don’t think the problem is in ideas.
11 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 10:43 am
The country was created by the pilgrims. One cannot consign them to a sentiment, else there is no principle upon which to build.
So, you must essentially be liberal, in the philosophical sense. A “progressive” conservative, eh?
No such thing. Perhaps I read you wrong, but, I don’t think so. There is a larger picture of you than your words themselves.
12 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 11:11 am
@ Yeagley,
Isn’t there a much larger picture of both of us than what we can say here? I would venture to say there is no ‘end’ to either of us, which of course makes us unusual. It’s one of the most disappointing things about most people, to get to a place where their interests in things stops, their willingness to discuss, explore and learn new things. My mother is an ‘endless’ sort of person also; I can talk to her forever and we never run out of things. You will never find my ‘end,’ Yeagley; there isn’t one.
13 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 11:17 am
Yes, there is such a thing as progressive conservatives: they’re called libertarians.
14 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 11:34 am
There is the matter of quirks. There are conservatives with liberal quirks, and liberals with conservative quirks. Few are utterly consistent. But, that’s not what I mean.
You showed your cards when you out-dated the Pilgrims. You are like Barry Soetoro, in my mind. Convince me otherwise.
15 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 11:40 am
@ Yeagley,
Nobody can convince you of anything. You’ll make up your own mind what you’re comfortable believing, as usual. Are you perhaps lumping all the pilgrims together? Some were alright and some were not. Then there are the pioneers, another very nation-building group. Define your terms a little more clearly for me so I can answer your question properly. And what do I have in common with a Kenyan Muslim? That is an impertinent remark.
16 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 12:14 pm
@ Yeagley,
BTW, unless we’re all still living in the 1600′s and nobody sent me the memo, the ‘pilgrims’ ARE outdated, regardless of which were or were not such nice people. We do not live in the same world at all, nor are we supposed to. The framers of our Constitution were social geniuses without peer for they managed to produce a document that allows for our natural evolution through time, safeguarding our unique status as a free nation.
17 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Barry Soetoro thinks the Constitution is out-dated. You think the Pilgrims are out-dated.
The Mayflower is sacrosanct, to me anyway. The people had biblical faith. No such faith at Roanoke. The pilgrims moreover were successful.
If there were no Pilgrims, there would never have been “framers of our Constitution.” If you don’t see this, I don’t know what to say else.
Now, this discussion is not about Soros, or Serbia. It belongs elsewhere, on one of the many forums on the BadEagle.com forum page. You disdain discussion there? because you’d rather be on the front page? This is not a good thing, and it will end, I must say.
I’m losing commenters no doubt on this account. You’ve managed to usurp every thread you write on. Very bad manners.
18 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 12:31 pm
@ Yeagley,
No, I do not disdain discussion anywhere; I simply thought some of them a bit rough on other forums. As to topic, I always only follow your own lead – and you know it. There wasn’t anybody else here for Serbia, so I came, that’s all. If you want to argue, you know my e-mail.
19 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 12:47 pm
AWEN: As it happens, I think I know ‘what kind of people’ would make others live and die in agony because our drug laws won’t allow doctors to ease their pain: that Puritan toxic mold in the American mindset. Mother said not long ago, if we had sunk that Mayflower the whole country would have been better off. It was full of people like that who had finally been driven out of Europe, the worst of riff-raff. They think suffering is good for the character and insist everybody else has to be as miserable as they are. (needless to say, our own were the cavaliers who got here a bit earlier)
I demonstrate your usurpation here. You equate the Pilgrims with Soros. Then you take off from there.
Perhaps that is legitimate discussion.
All I know is, no one else seems to want to post when you’re posting. Why is that?
20 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 1:24 pm
@ Yeagley,
Because you always go off the rails when I show up. It’s obvious to everyone but you. If you ever figure out why that is, you know where I can be found, at least in cyberspace. Meanwhile, I have other fish to fry and so do you.
21 whitetrash // Dec 3, 2009 at 2:05 pm
I can only speak for myself, buy I have found the sparring between you two guys pretty interesting.
22 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 2:30 pm
@ Yeagley
You forgot to say goodbye! Your own manners could use some improving! Hurry up and turn me loose so I can go out and get it on with a string of liberal Democrats, and keep doing that until when somebody mentions your name, I’m going to say, “Who??”
23 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 3:31 pm
White Trash, AWEN is a woman, at least I think so. At least in cyber space. Ha!
But, something’s wrong there with her Pilgrim thing. Biblical faith, they had. That’s what got them through. They had no support, like Roanoke had. Roanoke was a big waste, and it was the Pilgrim’s sons who shaped the country.
Of course, according to Ann Coulter, it is the Pilgrims great-great….grandsons who have betrayed the country. She thinks the rednecks down souf be de las of the patriots!
I must write about this. Again.
24 whitetrash // Dec 3, 2009 at 3:58 pm
Awen makes some interesting points as a foil to your arguments. It does not have to be antagonistic, though when two intellectuals collide, the “smartest guy in the room” syndrome has a way of creeping in.
I wonder though, if you guys are not confusing the Pilgrims with the Puritins. My understanding is that the Pilgrims were a more gentle people than Hawthorne’s Grandfathers.
25 keyboard jockey // Dec 3, 2009 at 5:06 pm
I think if Soros takes on Putin he loses, couldn’t happen to a better villain.
26 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 8:08 pm
Soros was very ticked off at Bill Clinton because Clinton didn’t give him the position he wanted in Russian-American relations. Soros had made a fortune as Russian business became privatized, but wanted a genuine political position. He stepped up the NGO tactic and really influenced elections that way. He vowed to spend every nickle he had to defeat George W. Bush in the 2004 campaign, but failed. He hated Bush worse than the Clintons.
The sordid tale of Soros in America (and before in Europe) is in The Shadlow Party (2006), by David Horowitz and Richard Poe.
Soros started spending serious money in American politics (far Left, Democrat politics) in the mid-’90′s, but came on strong in 2000. Been at it ever since, more and more so.
27 David Yeagley // Dec 3, 2009 at 9:10 pm
White Trash, the Pilgrims were Puritans, by faith, by religion. They were separatists from the Church of England, and their ‘radical’ branch was called Puritan. Of course, making their journey to freedom was a heroic “pilgrimage.” Thus, they were called Pilgrims.
Maybe they can be considered heirs of Wycliffe, and they could be called sons of the Lollards.
28 Awen // Dec 3, 2009 at 9:56 pm
@ Yeagley
Those ‘heroes’ of yours hanged and burnt alive innocent women and children for so-called witchcraft. Of course, you probably much adored Cotton Mather too. That’s why I’d rather have an endless string of disgusting liberals than one hour with YOU. Please say goodbye so I can tell my husband’s spirit that you said NO and I can get out of here. One word. Type it.
What is your worst nightmare? I’ll tell you. That is finding out I exist in a lot more places than cyberspace. What do you want less in the world than to meet me in the flesh? Prevent that, be free forever by just typing that word.
29 John Sandusky // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:37 am
Actually, Awen, not one person convicted of witchcraft was ever burnt at the stake in North America.
The following are common errors about witchcraft. Purposeful errors used by those that attack Christianity.
Ten Common Errors and Myths about the Witch Hunts,
Doctor, my blog has come to life . . . no more flat-lining since I got a plug from yours.
Thank you!
30 hulagirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:58 am
Awen needs to go alleviate her pain and smoke lots of pot. I gather she’s smoked a fair amount from her ill informed comments. I don’t take her for some heavy duty “intellectual”, far far from it.
31 duvexy // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:11 am
Hello this is my first post
I am trying to understand what it in that why an article about Soros and Serbia ends up in the dust bin about Columbus, Puritan Pilgrams? Is this smoke and mirrors or division by psycoanyalisis
32 Gary DeLoriea // Dec 4, 2009 at 5:00 am
Just a Few Points. First Mr. Sandusky is correct in that no one executed for witchcraft was actually a witch. They were executed for a variety of reasons. They ran afoul of a prominant citizen(Usually the clergy) or some one in power wanted their lands and the easiest way to get it was to accuse the person of witch craft. Since the accused had to pay the judge his attorney . prosecutor, and discustingly enough his torturer even if he was found innocent he would have to sell his property to pay his debts Which the person coveting the property gets to buy it at a discount no less. The Puritans came here because they simply had no where else to go. At one point they ruled England after Oliver Cromwell drove out the English king and proceeded to rule the land with an iron fist. He also sent his black and tans(called so because of the color of their uniforms) to slaughter the Irish. Entire villages were wiped out under Puritan rule so i can’t say i’m sorry to see them wind up on the scrap heap of history, As for the point of the post. I can’t feel sorry for Serbians they started running over their neighbors and made the term ethnic cleansing part of our vocabulary. Milosovic and company were no different than the Nazis. As far as the individual pictured. If i take it as true what you say about him it would not be the first time we teamed up with a monster to get rid of a common enemy. Surely you remember us allying with Stalin in WW2. A man who was responsible for the deaths of an estimated 60 million of his country men(Kind of makes Hitler look like an amatuer doesn’t he?). Lastly i couldn’t care less that the Serbians are losing their churches and cathederals.
You xtians were more than happy to tear down heathan a nd pagan temple to build your churches. That’s why there’s a church at Hammerfall sweeden instead of a proper Thorshof (Which stood for millenia before the xtians tore it down). So now it’s being done to you. Not so much fun being on the receiving end is it?
before you go on the we’re better than Muslims rant let me say this. I have read history books which included atrocities that various xtians sect commited and bragged about at the time. I have read news articles detailing hoe xtians act around the world and this country were they have near absolute power. Your no better than the muslims. If given the chance you would slaughter those who do not conform to your belief system. My wish in this matter is that you both destroy each other so the rest of us can get on with the business of improving ourselves and the state of the world in general.
Gary DeLoriea
Normannii Riech
33 David Yeagley // Dec 4, 2009 at 9:42 am
Duvexy, sometimes commenters have trouble focusing on the topic. Sometimes I as the host have trouble administering discipline…
I try to be as open as possible. Sometimes commenters focus on me, personally, rather than the topic.
Sometimes it gets really interesting…!
And welcome to BadEagle.com
34 David Yeagley // Dec 4, 2009 at 9:51 am
Gary, you make a point, indeed.
But let me add a detail (or two). Puritans, breaking away from an establishment, were not just another form and English tyranny, or stone-willed power playing. There is a deeper pattern involved. When Israel (slaves) were let out of Egypt, they were led into the wilderness, and their God superimposed one of the more mysterious, detailed, and serious social norm system mankind had ever seen.
There is a learning period, when a people migrate and establish a new order. Those are times when discipline is seemingly over-intense. But it calms down as the people’s social order becomes more complex.
If you think pagan cultures offer anything better, or even different, I think you are greatly mistaken. In this, nevertheless, I concede your point. Christianity, as a social order, behaves as a conquering force.
Someone is going to rule. America eventually achieved the novelty of at least the illusion that ideas/laws rule.
And to be fair, you should remember that Jesus never commanded any Christian government. “My kingdom is not of this world,” is what he said. John 18:36. Your next challenge then is to figure out why Christians continually seek to make His kingdom of this world.
35 Awen // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:33 pm
@ Gary,
Merry meet and blessed be! Thrilled to meet another Pagan anywhere. Is there anything more boring than listening to fundies make excuses for all the war crimes of their past? z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
@ HulaGirl,
Will you stop talking like an airhead here? I don’t think you really are an airhead but who knows anybody online? You’re wrong about who needs the pot, too. Yeagley needs a lot of pot and quickly; then he might be less of a stuffed-shirt and overblown egoist.
You’d be in pain too if you’d let your honourable deceased husband pick your next marriage for you in his last days and the guy he picked turned out to be absolutely the most horrible person you’d ever met. We were traditional believers and our word to each other was law. I would have promised my husband anything he asked of me, even if it was crazy. All Yeagley has to do is send me off like I told him and then I can forget about the whole matter but he hates me so much he’s determined not to do the least thing I ask him to do. So he must not like himself either or he wouldn’t put up with all the annoyances his stubbornness is costing him.
I am handicapped here because I cannot even bring myself to be as cruel to him as I have seen people on his own forum be. He definitely deserves cruelty. He’s made a beeline for me with personal attacks since the very day I showed up and dared to express an opinion; all of you have seen him in action. So determined is he to pester me, he can’t even stick to his own topics – and then blames everyone else for it.
All I want is a goodbye, ‘get lost,’ ‘piss off,’ ‘go away,’ whatever and I will gladly oblige and nobody will ever see another word of mine here and everybody will be happier! That will complete the ritual. All I have left is my memories and my husband still in my heart and to be able to tell him, ‘OK honey, I tried like you said and the guy hates me and sent me off.’ Then, freedom for all concerned.
There, now you know all. I don’t care what you think of me HulaGirl, and it’s nothing personal. I never did care what people thought of me or what I was doing; I’ve been that way all my life.
Back to Soros, everybody. Just so you know another source of his funding for his dirty deeds in Serbia and everywhere else: the American tax-payers. Check this out from atlasshrugs:
Anatomy of Obama’s Government-Abetted Fraud: Why Soros Always Forecloses
Spectre writes of the latest grotesque fleecing of the folks by Obama mentor and money man George Soros. It’s all so dirty, the stench is overwhelming. And Obama preaches to us so.
One West Bank, the bank formed out of the IndyMac failure, has been getting ripped in the press and by the courts lately. Just last week, a judge in the NY Supreme Court went above and beyond and way out of his way to rip One West several new orafices (link here). In finding for the poor defendant homeowner and wiping out her dedt to OneWest, the Judge opined:
“Plaintiff’s conduct is wholly unsupportable at law or in equity, greatly egregious and so completely devoid of good faith that equity cannot be permitted to intervene on its behalf. Indeed, Plaintiff’s actions toward Defendant in this matter have been harsh, repugnant, shocking and repulsive to the extent that it must be appropriately sanctioned so as to deter it from imposing further mortifying abuse against Defendant.”
Yikes! In judicial terms, the judge took a flamethrower to them.
Then today, I find a little article in a relatively obscure blog that hits the nail on the head. It is factually accurate and correctly connects all of the dots.
So who owns OneWest? None other than the Collaborator himself. Yes, O’s biggest supporter cuts an unconscionable deal with the FDIC (I have never seen one like it). The deal provides incentive for Soros to toss people out in the street through foreclosure and to ignore the lip service the Obama administration is and has given to protecting people in need. George makes no money if he allows people to midify their loans, but makes a tin of it is he forecloses on them and tosses them out into the street. My, my.
And at this time of year, when we are all watching Jimmy Stewart in It’s A Wonderful Life for the umpteenth time, one cannot not help to ingore the similarities between George Soros and Old Man Potter……”
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/12/anatomy-of-obamas-governmentabetted-fraud-why-soros-always-forecloses.html
Read it all and weep.
36 Tweets that mention Soros in Serbia: The Plot to Plunder -- Topsy.com // Dec 4, 2009 at 9:47 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Deserve Liberty and Dominion Pundit, X. X said: RT @Pepper_10: "Soros in Serbia: The Plot to Plunder" ( http://bit.ly/84NDOE ) [...]
37 George Soros: China Will Lead New World Order - Page 4 - Stormfront // Sep 21, 2010 at 9:54 am
[...] Re: George Soros: China Will Lead New World Order Soros in Serbia: The Plot to Plunder [...]
38 Anonymous // Sep 21, 2010 at 10:43 am
[...] [...]
39 Political Mavens » Bad Eagle Nails Mad Scientist George Soros, Hungarian-Jewish Nazi // May 10, 2011 at 6:51 pm
[...] Soros in Serbia: The Plot to Plunder George Soros, the globalist billionaire who condemns the concept of nationhood, who actively seeks to dissolve nations of the world, has a crooked, crippling hand in Serbia. Soros is intimately involved in the international betrayal of Serbia, and the theft of the Serbian province of Kosovo. [...]
You must log in to post a comment.