Barry Soetoro, (a.k.a. “Barak Hussein Obama”) has brought personal identity crisis into the White House. This is truly the big “first” that history will remember him for. Everything about his personal identity is purposefully obfuscated. He has sustained chaos in his image, and in his influence. Identity confusion is his principle legacy. All the ills ensuing are attributable to this initial proffer.
And now Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, is also found to be of dubious identity. It is a distinct possibility that he is from a Jewish family which converted to Islam when he was a child. This is astounding, if true.

Ahmadinejad showing papers
during election. It shows that
his family’s previous name was
Jewish. London Telegraph
It is fascinating to the public when the identity of a leader is found to be mysterious, quixotic, or suspicious. Of course, those who love chaos and amalgamation are not offended at all. Indeed, much of the American population is delighted to have a president whose racial, cultural, and even biological origins are unknown and now forbidden. Many people like intrigue, pretense, secret lives, and general duplicity. It seems to render the person more powerful or more attractive. There is nothing more attractive than a secret.
How far will this go? What will the public accept in a person of note? How much cloak and dagger doings, how much surreptitious manoeuvering, how much hypocrisy and lying is tolerable?
Remember Herod Agrippa, who died in 44 AD? According to Acts 12:20-24, he was struck dead by “the angel of the Lord” because he accepted the worship of the people as though he were a god. (Barry take note.) There is something about a man and power that is archetypal, in the Jungian sense. There is only the man before us, but he might be connected to so many unseen powers, human, global, or even divine. This is where identity chaos, or identity “fusion” becomes deceptively powerful.
Men have been trying to become gods since time immemorial. Indeed, in the Hebrew tradition, the idea was introduced by the adversary of God and man, the Serpent. “Ye shall be as gods,” he said. (Genesis 3:5.) It is a power play, nothing more, or other. Men love to play it, and apparently people love to be played by such men. It is as if leadership is all about vicarious glory-riding. Some jerk down here among us must be a god. We must idolize ourselves, in one way or another.
To bring this down to earth, I must say, I have faced identity crisis myself, thanks to my devoted opponents. It happened on this wise.
Every real Indian knows, there is nothing more important to an Indian than being Indian. There is nothing he values more. He will sacrifice everything for that, if necessary. This is why Indians are in the social stratum we are in. We prefer Indianness to ’success.’ For us, being Indian, remaining Indian, this is success.
And so I happen to be Comanche Indian, and I happen to be a conservative Republican (of sorts, anyway). This is simply intolerable to Marxists, Communists, Socialists, Leftists, Liberals, Progressives, and all other anti-Americans. So, the place to attack me is my Indianness. Never mind my ideas. The way to oppose those deadly arrows is to detract to my “personal narrative.” (You see, personal narrative doesn’t work positively for conservatives. Only for liberals.) My opponents early on created the absolute libel that I am not Indian. Thus, they say I am a fraud, a liar, much like their beloved but fallen Ward Churchill. (The difference between he and I, however, was racial, as well as ideological. I am Indian, and I love America. He only claimed to be Indian, and definitely hated America. The other difference is he was paid 100K a year for his false claim and true hatred.)
So, identity chaos or crisis is a tool to destroy someone, as well as tool to achieve power.
Soon, however, I will be taking action against all who have created and participated in the libel against me. They have succeeded in getting the libel in print, in university publications, in newspapers, and elsewhere. For this, they will soon suffer significant inconvenience. I only point out the identity issue they falsely created as an example of the trend of identity crisis, and the love for chaos and lies.
The difference between a real Indian, and someone like Barry Soetoro and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, however, is that I am willing to demonstrate who I am. I deeply cherish who I am, as an Indian. I am fiercely defensive of Indian identity. I deeply cherish Comanche people. This is my mother’s people. I have inevitably followed the path of Bad Eagle in life, and I am behooved to honor my Comanche family. The genetic code coerces it.
Barry Soetoro, however, is pleased to hide every detail of his identity possible, and to create confusion and uncertainty about every aspect of his identity that happens to be known. (His wife likes sealed records, too.) He isn’t proud of who he is. That is obvious. He doesn’t want anyone to know who and what he really is. It remains to be seen how and if Ahmadinejad responds to the Jewish element suggested on his passport.
A poor Indian in Oklahoma will stand up and invoke the law to defend and enforce who he is, but Barry uses the law to hide who he is. There is the difference.
I hope my example will encourage Americans to stand up and invoke the law to preserve America. I hope Americans will be willing to make personal sacrifice to preserve the American identity. Those who love uncertainty, dubiousness, shadows, camouflage, and who make lies their refuge (Isaiah 28:15)–all in the quest for power and significance, or just for the excitement of hide-and-seek games, or worst of all, for the intent of hiding crimes and sins, these people are in for a rude awakening.
When I think of the sacrifice I am making to honor who I am, who my family is, who my people are, (and what my country is), and I look at the behavior of Barry Soetoro (a.k.a. “Barak Hussein Obama”), he becomes a dog in my eyes. He is worthless. He is nothing. He doesn’t care who he is, who is family is, nor does he care that anyone else know.
This is not an honest man. This is a snake. He doesn’t even try to be honest. He seems to make every effort to be dishonest, and yet to sell the deception to the people as something good. He wants adulation from the mouths of babes? Sounds like he wants to be a god. This is hideous in our eyes. This is Herod.
May the Lord have mercy on our country.





David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 

5 responses so far ↓
1 John Sandusky // Oct 8, 2009 at 7:34 pm
Doctor Yeagley, I applaud your efforts to inconvenience your enemies, but keep in mind that, opinionated subjects such as one’s physical state of being, are rarely, if ever considered libelous in an American court.
A court in England or Germany is another matter. You may want to keep your powder dry and wait for the inevitable hard left turn with regard to American libel laws.
2 David Yeagley // Oct 8, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Well, I believe in freedom of speech. My opponents are free to “interpret” my ideas however they please. But, they cannot say I’m not who I am, that I’m not born to my mother, and that our family isn’t who and what it is. This is all legally demonstrable. Therefore, my opponents are legally liable.
There are applicable laws. There is precedent as well.
I’m not sure what you mean by “physical state of being,” but, as I said, they can interpret my ideas however they want. That just can’t publish I’m not who I say I am–without any evidence or research.
3 John Sandusky // Oct 8, 2009 at 8:57 pm
I probably should have been more specific.
It would be difficult, “in my opinion” to get an American court to even consider the following statement to be libel: “Doctor Yeagley is not an Indian.”
Obviously, there is more to your argument than the above statement.
4 David Yeagley // Oct 9, 2009 at 8:40 am
They have said I am not the son of my mother. They have said I am a liar, my mother is a liar, (my father is a liar) and the Comanche Nation honors liars, thus, a lying nation, that anyone who engages me honors liars.
Don’t you think this is a bit negative? Libel is a very simple concept. Slander in print. Designed to denigrate, negate, destroy, etc. To publish something that is demonstrably not true, with malice, is fundamental libel.
Well, it will all be clarified soon enough. I could be mistaken, certainly.
5 David Yeagley // Oct 9, 2009 at 10:41 am
And now, with the Nobel Peace Prize, the unidentified Barry Soetoro (a.k.a. “Barak Hussein Obama”) needs no affirmative identity! This is a remarkable moment in the history of civilization. A person who has no demonstrable idenity, having paid attorneys one and a quarter million dollars to hid his identity, is accepted by the anti-American world.
You must log in to post a comment.