<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson or Neda Soltan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/</link>
	<description>For American Indian Patriots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:20:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18933</guid>
		<description>The coverage OF Anna Nicole, rather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coverage OF Anna Nicole, rather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18932</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve succumbed to nothing. I hardly watch television. I don&#039;t go to movies. Are you suggesting the same immoral agenda promoted by Hollywood (while making lots of money at business) can be stopped by Americans phoning Hollywood execs? How many movies with well defined liberal agendas as major components or themes have failed, while typical family productions have grossed lots of money from the public? And STILL, Hollywood is addicted to its own agenda, its own corruption and pumps out more and more movies that defy logic from a business stand point. 

I agree with those who have opined that Liberalism is a disease, a mental illness, a collapse of logic and common sense, and complete self-absorption. Even Fox News has succumbed to it, despite the supposed conservative angle they pitch. 

Anna Nicole showed the same determination to make news out of a story that should have died a week after it came out. Sure sensationalism sells. But yes, unequivocally I believe a small minority of corporate execs in media push their own personal agendas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve succumbed to nothing. I hardly watch television. I don&#8217;t go to movies. Are you suggesting the same immoral agenda promoted by Hollywood (while making lots of money at business) can be stopped by Americans phoning Hollywood execs? How many movies with well defined liberal agendas as major components or themes have failed, while typical family productions have grossed lots of money from the public? And STILL, Hollywood is addicted to its own agenda, its own corruption and pumps out more and more movies that defy logic from a business stand point. </p>
<p>I agree with those who have opined that Liberalism is a disease, a mental illness, a collapse of logic and common sense, and complete self-absorption. Even Fox News has succumbed to it, despite the supposed conservative angle they pitch. </p>
<p>Anna Nicole showed the same determination to make news out of a story that should have died a week after it came out. Sure sensationalism sells. But yes, unequivocally I believe a small minority of corporate execs in media push their own personal agendas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bops</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18920</link>
		<dc:creator>bops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18920</guid>
		<description>So, I just want to make sure I’ve understood all correctly.  What most of you are saying is there exists a small, elite group of people whose desire is to undermine our society.  And, this elite group wields enough power and authority to manipulate the media in order to redefine American values with total disregard of the business aspect of broadcasting.  Is that correct?  Please say no…

I hope that each of you have, at least once, written to you elected legislative representative and expressed an opinion.  I’d hope that Dr. Yeagley, the self-proclaimed advocate of the Native Americans, would have each of his legislators’ phone numbers, mailing addresses and email addresses, if not memorized, very close at hand and would have made hundreds of such expressions.  

I’d recommend you Dr. Yeagley, Whitetrash, Ray…all of you, make handy the phone numbers, mailing addresses and email addresses of each news outlet and major broadcaster in your area as well.  The next time you’re bombarded with a frenzy of round-the-clock corporate coverage of the freakish, try voicing your opinion to those who can make a difference.  Americans might not call television stations “asking where the coverage is” but concerned individual certainly can call in protest of such programming.

We the people have the power.  If you truly “feel no responsibility whatsoever for anything that is on TV or in the newspapers”, sorry my friend, you’ve succumbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I just want to make sure I’ve understood all correctly.  What most of you are saying is there exists a small, elite group of people whose desire is to undermine our society.  And, this elite group wields enough power and authority to manipulate the media in order to redefine American values with total disregard of the business aspect of broadcasting.  Is that correct?  Please say no…</p>
<p>I hope that each of you have, at least once, written to you elected legislative representative and expressed an opinion.  I’d hope that Dr. Yeagley, the self-proclaimed advocate of the Native Americans, would have each of his legislators’ phone numbers, mailing addresses and email addresses, if not memorized, very close at hand and would have made hundreds of such expressions.  </p>
<p>I’d recommend you Dr. Yeagley, Whitetrash, Ray…all of you, make handy the phone numbers, mailing addresses and email addresses of each news outlet and major broadcaster in your area as well.  The next time you’re bombarded with a frenzy of round-the-clock corporate coverage of the freakish, try voicing your opinion to those who can make a difference.  Americans might not call television stations “asking where the coverage is” but concerned individual certainly can call in protest of such programming.</p>
<p>We the people have the power.  If you truly “feel no responsibility whatsoever for anything that is on TV or in the newspapers”, sorry my friend, you’ve succumbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18919</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18919</guid>
		<description>NO ONE could ever convince me the American people at large requested homosexual television programming, just as NO ONE could convince me the majority of American parents want their children taught a homosexual agenda in grammar school, or any school, for that matter. 

Media is not only business. Media is business controlled by people with agendas. They test waters. They try things. And they seek to redefine American values. They are succeeding. 

Michael Jackson was a freak by any definition of that word. The round the clock coverage of Michael Jackson is testimony to corporate media&#039;s frenzy of the freakish. If they DID NOT provide round the clock coverage, Americans would not be protesting. They would not be calling television stations asking where the coverage is. 

Americans by nature are very tolerant people. Their tolerance of something shoved at them should not be categorized as their acceptance of it. 

As the minds of the young have been changed, on one school campus after another, the attitudes and morals of two generations have been changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO ONE could ever convince me the American people at large requested homosexual television programming, just as NO ONE could convince me the majority of American parents want their children taught a homosexual agenda in grammar school, or any school, for that matter. </p>
<p>Media is not only business. Media is business controlled by people with agendas. They test waters. They try things. And they seek to redefine American values. They are succeeding. </p>
<p>Michael Jackson was a freak by any definition of that word. The round the clock coverage of Michael Jackson is testimony to corporate media&#8217;s frenzy of the freakish. If they DID NOT provide round the clock coverage, Americans would not be protesting. They would not be calling television stations asking where the coverage is. </p>
<p>Americans by nature are very tolerant people. Their tolerance of something shoved at them should not be categorized as their acceptance of it. </p>
<p>As the minds of the young have been changed, on one school campus after another, the attitudes and morals of two generations have been changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bops</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18918</link>
		<dc:creator>bops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18918</guid>
		<description>Layla.  Why in the world would your 100%ers be offended by my observations?  My point remains; sexual orientation is not always a choice.  As I said, &quot;…some people are tall, some people are short, most are heterosexual and some aren’t&quot;.  I didn’t say all feminine acting males, nor all Tom-boys are homosexual…  Are the 100%ers truly that sensitive?

My experience has been as stated.  Those I know who’ve been non-heterosexual their entire lives find relations with the opposite sex just as uncomfortable as it would be for you (assuming you too are heterosexual) having relations with the same sex as you.

As I said, to say the media is responsible for homosexuality is ludicrous…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Layla.  Why in the world would your 100%ers be offended by my observations?  My point remains; sexual orientation is not always a choice.  As I said, &#8220;…some people are tall, some people are short, most are heterosexual and some aren’t&#8221;.  I didn’t say all feminine acting males, nor all Tom-boys are homosexual…  Are the 100%ers truly that sensitive?</p>
<p>My experience has been as stated.  Those I know who’ve been non-heterosexual their entire lives find relations with the opposite sex just as uncomfortable as it would be for you (assuming you too are heterosexual) having relations with the same sex as you.</p>
<p>As I said, to say the media is responsible for homosexuality is ludicrous…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layla</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18914</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18914</guid>
		<description>And bops, let me just say...I know more than a few effeminate men and even more tom-boy women that are 100% hetrosexual, each of them would be roundly offended by your observations...but I have no doubt you would say they were faking it, to avoid all the evil homophobes lurking around every corner waiting to for a homo to beat up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And bops, let me just say&#8230;I know more than a few effeminate men and even more tom-boy women that are 100% hetrosexual, each of them would be roundly offended by your observations&#8230;but I have no doubt you would say they were faking it, to avoid all the evil homophobes lurking around every corner waiting to for a homo to beat up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Yeagley</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18913</link>
		<dc:creator>David Yeagley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18913</guid>
		<description>No.  Just in denial.  I feel no responsibility whatsoever for anything that is on TV or in the newspapers.  

I find no pleasure in assuming guilt that is not mine.  I find no exaltation of my ego in attributing to myself that for which I have nothing to do.

And I do &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; mean to sound Libertarian!  I&#039;m simply innocent on this one.  I do not identify with &quot;the people&quot; whom the media feigns to give what they want.  That&#039;s some other people than they of whom I am part.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Just in denial.  I feel no responsibility whatsoever for anything that is on TV or in the newspapers.  </p>
<p>I find no pleasure in assuming guilt that is not mine.  I find no exaltation of my ego in attributing to myself that for which I have nothing to do.</p>
<p>And I do <em>not</em> mean to sound Libertarian!  I&#8217;m simply innocent on this one.  I do not identify with &#8220;the people&#8221; whom the media feigns to give what they want.  That&#8217;s some other people than they of whom I am part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bops</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18912</link>
		<dc:creator>bops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18912</guid>
		<description>...and a bit deluded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and a bit deluded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Yeagley</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>David Yeagley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roc</title>
		<link>http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/28/michael-jackson-or-neda-soltan/comment-page-1/#comment-18910</link>
		<dc:creator>roc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badeagle.com/?p=3894#comment-18910</guid>
		<description>bops has it straight.... the content media provides exists because there is a demand. Walt Kelly, through his creation Pogo, had it right : &quot;We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us&quot;

just as we have the government we want, &#039;cause we voted for those folks in office, we have the media we want, &#039;cause we consume the products they create.

the media you decry, we created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bops has it straight&#8230;. the content media provides exists because there is a demand. Walt Kelly, through his creation Pogo, had it right : &#8220;We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us&#8221;</p>
<p>just as we have the government we want, &#8217;cause we voted for those folks in office, we have the media we want, &#8217;cause we consume the products they create.</p>
<p>the media you decry, we created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
