David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Carrie Prejean, Miss California contestant in a national beauty pageant (Miss USA 2009), is the most recent victim of media malpractice. In perhaps the most hateful way yet, the media falsely denigrated her, and continues to humilate her. Because she publicly stated, under incredible pressure, her belief that marriage was between a man and a woman, the media despises her. “Miss USA Gets Awkward,” and “Miss California fumbles over a controversial question,” were just a few of the headlilnes.
MIss California, 2009, Carrie Prejean,
first runner-up, Miss USA.
It was all the design of a male homosexual Perez Hilton, one of the incredibly inapporpriate and inappropriately appointed judges. And the media’s support and honor of an immature, psychologically damaged person only shows that the media is willing to encourage distortion, falsehood, and intentional perversion. (How can a homosexual male judge the personhood and beauty of a female? His opinion doesn’t count! By his own profession. By his own act.)
Of all the issues present in this story, the Hilton’s claim that Miss California was “booed” was perhaps the most obvious falsehood at all. Listen to the tape. There was only cheering and support.
But the left-wing media, which encourages immorality whenever possible, and which is keen to condemn religion at any point, carefully placed a photo of Carrie in the required “underwear” bikini next to the headline, “God was testing my faith.” Underwear and God. A hard sell for Christianity, indeed. (This arrangement was on FoxNews, in fact. Either conservatives don’t see a problem with underwear and God, or Fox News conservatism is illusory.)
The “exposure” of juvenile and self-contradicting homosexual Perez Hilton is typical of media as well. He is technically guilty of a sexist hate crime in his personal video response, but, because of the media’s preference for homosexuality, he is exempted. After all, the point of his style of homosexuality is for the man to be a women, or to out-act a woman in femininity. To throw a “hussie” is the woman’s right and distinction, so, the male homosexual must out-do her, to prove his womanness. Therefore, it would insult his homosexual act to condemn him for his rant of hate. And after all, we must protect homosexual rights.
And the discussion hasn’t ended yet. MSNBC’s Today Show featured both Carrie and the hussified homosexual Hilton. Hilton said he did not want to see politics become part of the pageant! Laughable self-contradiction, since he’s the one who brought in politics, but, then again, inconsistency is a woman’s right, and he is determined to be a woman.
Miss USA runner-up, Carrie Prejean
It is a grand lesson in politics, morality, and confusion. It seems the liberals consider hypocrisy the highest crime. Since inconsistency is part of being human, the liberals always have a good shot at conservatives. This isn’t serious. But, an essentially nude female, nude in the name of God, this, I dare say, is a problem. Conservatives don’t seem to be offended at that. And certainly, the liberals make no issue of it. But that a hussified homosexual male should lash out at the woman’s beauty in the dissembled form of a political rant denying the preeminence of feminine power–this is quixotic. Hilton’s ‘vicarious’ and loathsome envy of Carrie was obvious to objective observers, but truly confusing to those shy of moral commitment. I’m quite sure Carrie is a very fine Christian girl. However, she is in a ringer with the ungodly. And she placed herself in it, willingly.
I want to know who placed Perez Hilton among the judges.
13 responses so far ↓
1 David Yeagley // Apr 22, 2009 at 11:07 am
I mean, it can’t be that a woman’s body validates here words, can it?
2 kschwantz // Apr 22, 2009 at 12:19 pm
If she looks good, I could care less what she says, or thinks; of course if she doesn’t look good, I’ll just look around for a good looking one to stare at while I ignore what the hag is going on about!!!
What do you think about that?
3 Layla // Apr 22, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Yes siree!…Eve didn’t have to validate one single thing…
4 Layla // Apr 22, 2009 at 1:34 pm
seriously though…this seems to be a perfectly nice Christian girl…that indeed missed a few Sunday school lessons on “modesty”….but she did evidently, show up for the Sodom and Gomorah lessons…praise God….her righteous answer did cost her the Miss America crown…for that, she will be greatly rewarded, that tiara would have never gotten her the glory, that she will receive for throwing holy water on one of Satan’s filthy smutmongers…
5 David Yeagley // Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 pm
KS, come now. Aren’t you just broken-hearted when a beautiful women says, “I’m gay!”? I know you care what they say!
6 David Yeagley // Apr 22, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Layla, this is a curious situation. She did have moral capital, so to speak. In our confused society, probably her naked body did give great power to her “marriage” thesis.
In the end, though, the deformity of the male homosexual judge left the largest impression. And his presence reflects on the whole competition. All all other American institutions, Miss America is utterly degraded now. Means nothing. Just like the White House.
7 whitetrash // Apr 22, 2009 at 3:34 pm
The whole “Gay Rights” thing is just a lot of nonsense stirred up by the left to earn evermore grievance capital.
At the end of the day, Gay this-an-that, and a bunch of people having silly tea-parties is what America has come too.
Wine and Circuses for the sheep, while Mexican invaders roam our nation by the millions, and Communist China owns our government. Yet the Sheeple still believe in this Liberal versus Conservative dog and pony show. Amazing. As if Bush, Clinton, Bush were something other than the work of one, singular, political class.
8 Perez Macho-Ma'am Hilton // Apr 22, 2009 at 8:06 pm
[...] feel bad for this hissy, sad man, Mario Perez. He’ll never be the woman he wants to be, and traditional marriage will [...]
9 kschwantz // Apr 22, 2009 at 9:07 pm
“KS, come now. Aren’t you just broken-hearted when a beautiful women says, “I’m gay!”? I know you care what they say!”
Maybe, But at least getting to watch is a pretty good consolation, unless her girlfriend looks like Rosie ODonaldd!!!!!
I think all the beautiful “gay’ women are actually probly just bi.
Then again, being the married man I am I hardly notice other women anymore! Are there really other women out there?
10 Robert Smalls // Apr 23, 2009 at 6:42 am
These people who promote this “gay” lifestyle are hypocrites, most of them.
Anytime a straight person, especially a dude, tries to back the :gays” I tell him to service a man or tell him to grab his ankles before another man!
You see that look of horror on their face! That’s when I call them out! “How can you support something you yourself find sick and repulsive?”
It works every time. And if it doesn’t repulse them, well you just opened the closet for them!
Even the left uses “gay” rumors to trash people they don’t like.
Why do they use the term “straight”? That implies “gays” are “crooked”?
“Crooked” usually denotes something is wrong, right?
Whitetrash nailed it, no pun intended, with this:
The whole “Gay Rights” thing is just a lot of nonsense stirred up by the left to earn evermore grievance capital.
I gotta a cousin who’s “gay”. When he wants to get on my nerves he yells “Obama! Obama!”.
My response is “Amendment 2! Amendment 2!”, that was an amendment to ban gay marriage!
He’s still dumbfounded I voted for it. He feels betrayed, I told him you voted for Obama, we’re even!
Now I can shout “Miss California! Miss California!”
Next time you’re around libs and the “gay” issue comes up do this:
Grab two electrical PLUGS and bang them together over and over! When asked “what are you doing?” just say you’re trying to get electricity!
They’ll laugh and tell you “silly man, you need to put that plug into an outlet to get electricity!”
That’s why “plugs,prongs or extensions” are called the “male end” and outlets,holes or anything that receives a prong is called the “female” end.
Only those two ends can CREATE something useful.
11 Robert Smalls // Apr 23, 2009 at 6:47 am
And by the way how a “gay” man can look at Miss California and not leave the pageant straight or wanting to be straight just shows you how sad that lifestyle really is!
I usually find pageant contestants a little too waif for my tastes, I’m more of a JLo and Kardashian kinda build myself, but this woman is a stunner!
12 David Yeagley // May 5, 2009 at 6:44 pm
In case people haven’t heard, Miss Prejean has had more recent problems–attacks from the Liberals. Word is she had breast implants, which were paid for by the pageant.
In addition, she posed topless (from the back) when she was a teenage model.
These things are supposed to be important; they are supposed to demean her, devalue her opinion, and mock her. Well, as I said, “I’m quite sure Carrie is a very fine Christian girl. However, she is in a ringer with the ungodly. And she placed herself in it, willingly.”
13 David Yeagley // May 5, 2009 at 6:46 pm
The conscious use of the woman’s body (any aspect of it) to attract men, to earn social power, etc., is something that Christians are generally quite ambiguous about.
You must log in to post a comment.