30 responses so far ↓

• 1 Sioux // Feb 16, 2009 at 8:25 pm   

  I am hearing calls from many quarters not to cooperate with any of the Obama edicts wherever and whenever possible. Don’t pay your taxe! Annie, Get your Gun! One if by land, two if by night……………

  Why would Rep. Alcee Hastings of Miami (former impeached judge) introduce legislation to build facilities on old military bases to hold thousands of Americans during a “national emergency?” I think the Dems/Commies know what’s coming and they want to be ready to do some good ol’ fashioned interring for those who will fight them– literally and otherwise.

• 2 David Yeagley // Feb 16, 2009 at 9:18 pm   

  It does seem to be a done deal. We’re all on our way.

  I think it is liberal white people who have done this. I feel it is important to say that. Important to understand what has happened.

  Liberals who are addicted, hopelessly to power. Just the lust for power.

• 3 Matilda Darquerider // Feb 17, 2009 at 10:14 am   

  It appears that the governing authority will be the United Nations although who or what force behind them is not clear. It’s been suggested that part of the force are some of the same ultra rich elitists that have had their hands in the molding of our modern day society.

  And religion; it seems that secularism is gaining ground throughout many nations. Look how politically incorrect any religion in this country has become. And political correctness has been bleeding into almost all aspects of society. Don’t make the mistake of equating political correctness with tolerance. It’s intolerance and a propaganda tool of communism.

  While I try to shy away from conspiracy nuts, this appears to be one conspiracy that is real. Each aspect doesn’t, by itself, mean much of anything, but when you start taking all the bits and pieces and start putting them together like a puzzle then the specter of the one world order materializes. What’s scary more than anything is the patience, the intelligence, and the organization of the project which appears to have spanned over decades and generations.

  History shows us time and time again that world domination by force eventually fails. Largely it’s a logistics problem, but that factor is greatly reduced when you have a population that willingly accepts its subjugation by other more subtle means.

  If you want to get an idea of what our one world government is going to be like I would hazard that China will be the model.

• 4 wtf // Feb 17, 2009 at 12:44 pm   

  Can you give me ONE example of any biblical prophesy that has come to pass as predicted?

• 5 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 2:04 pm   

  Sioux – please be careful about the “not paying taxes/Feeding Moloch” idea. The Beast WILL come after you. The best things you can do is keep well-armed, try to store non-perishable food, and medications (animal anti-biotics are exactly the same as human stuff, and much easier to get). know your neighbors, and associates, and try to go ooff the grid NOW. Try to find ways around the 666 economy. It’s being done, already. Barter, trade…etc…

  The tax-with-holding idea, while wholly Constitutional, as the current confiscatory fiat-debt money system (not to mention the “Fed”) is wholly UNConstitutional, illegal, and immoral IS the de facto Law of thje Land. Do your best to subvert the Usurper “Government” though – be careful, and Godspeed!

• 6 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 2:10 pm   

  Matilda – re: who is creating and building and implementing the New World Order – in the words of Deep Throatberg, “Follow the money”. Who owns “The Fed” – and all the other “central banks” in the world, excepting Iran, that is? Who. Look up “Amschel Meyer”, and The Talmud”. You’ll learn a lot. Also – re Yeagley’s “What’s Up With White Women” – the self-hatred inculcated into White people was cooked up in the The Frankfurt School. The founders, and membership appear to have been all born in various nations – but every last one of them belonged to the most monomaniacally exclusive, exclusionary ethnic Nation the planet has ever known. They, like Marx, merely followed, and promoted, their most ancient ethnic traditions, and strategems.

• 7 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 2:23 pm   

  Oh yes – tell every-one you know about the Mark of the Beast – and REFUSE.

  Prof Yeagley – have you ever read Jared Taylor’s explanation as to why modern Whites have accepted the fallacies, and monstrosities, of “diversity” (Displace Whitey)? He thinks, and I agree, that millions of well-meanng, kind, decent Whites are simply trying to be NICE. They have been fooled into thinking that “Every-one is alike, underneath” – and that all non-Whites really could and would “be White” if only given the chance. This, alas, is simply no so….

  Also – please don’t confuse White people with the fraudulent, treacherous Nation-Wreckers. They’ve passed as many different people, over thousands of years, and gotten booted out of 109 countries, in the process. And they always blame their victims, Always. But it’s THEM. They don’t get “persecuted” – they get CAUGHT. They’ve caused global mayhem, this time, and they are threatening to take the entire world with ‘em, if they go down. It’s called “The Sampson Option” – and it’s very real.

• 8 David Yeagley // Feb 17, 2009 at 2:28 pm   

  Dear “WTF,” when you are decent enough to remove your rude and vulgar handle, and replace it with a normal name, (preferably your own), I shall consider answering you.

  (I could change it myself, but, I don’t do things like that. I ask the posters to demonstrate respect.)

• 9 David Yeagley // Feb 17, 2009 at 2:32 pm   

  PearlGirl, I know there are many suggestions about why these race-based social conditions have come about. I do blame the heirs of the Pilgrims, the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant descendents. They have the power and the money. I’ve called it a cultural Freudian Oedipal complex, a latent homosexual aggression. It is whites denigrating whites.

• 10 David Yeagley // Feb 17, 2009 at 3:36 pm   

  Time will come when defense of the United States Constitution will be considered treason to the new foreign, black African Communist government–posing as American government. He’s already denounced the Constitution, publicly. Said it was flawed, antiquated, needed to be changed, etc. It was a radio interview. I heard it.

  This take-over of our American government is called a “velvelt” revolution, a “bloodless” revolution. It has happened before our eyes.

  Shall we bother figuring out why and how it happened?

• 11 whitetrash // Feb 17, 2009 at 4:11 pm   

  >>This take-over of our American government is called a “velvelt” revolution, a “bloodless” revolution. It has happened before our eyes.

  Shall we bother figuring out why and how it happened?<<

  It started in 1988 with the nomination of Mr. “Thousand Points of Light” George H.W. Bush. It reached it’s conclusion with Bush’s idiot son. Without this detestable and treasonous family, we would not have had Clinton, and we would not have Obama.

• 12 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 5:44 pm   

  Whitetrash (nice nice – rolls eyes) the take-over started long before 1988.

  Dr. Yeagley – WASPS HAD the power and money. They’ve forgotten who they are,and allowed power and wealth to slip away. I speak AS an actual WASP…….I should look up this quote – but I think it’s salient – an Asian leader just observed that “,,,in a multicultural country, people vote according to Race”. The last national “election” we’ve endured definitely proves that thesis. Are you familiar with the work of Arthur Kemp? He posits that when a homogenous population allows “The Other” in – the original population fades, and vanishes,due to miscegenation, and the original social order collapses. There are plenty of examples of this phenomena, through the whole of Human history. Now – your position has merit, but it’s a part of the whole picture. We must always, in any event, ask fearlessly “Why?” We MUST bother to ask, and determine causation. Always. You can’t cure a disease, if you don’t know the cause.

  Re: resistance to the American “ANC Government” – I know. I know that the illegal alien Kenyan loathes Whites, Americans, and the USA. (Michelle is even worse. Have you read her AA Princeton thesis?) I know he desires to “correct” the Constitution. Most people still live in ethnic enclaves. Most Whites have NO idea what real Blacks are actually, like, in reality. They only know the carefully crafted images they’ve seen, on TV. The Soetero Administration will give White Americans a taste of real-world TNB. The coup may have been bloodless – but the resistance will not. There are many sovereignity movements occuring. The legislature of NH is really laying down the gauntlet. As in for REAL. MT is ready to secede, entirely, due to the gun grab attempts. I don’t believe the corrupted Federal Government, and US Military, will be able to quell every-one, once the Average American realy understands what’s happening. We are headed to very interesting days ahead……

• 13 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 5:46 pm   

  Finally – to any, and all, reading these words – stay the HELL out of the cities. If you are living in a major urban area – GET OUT NOW.

• 14 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 5:58 pm   

  Well – not Finally – as far as either accepting the Mark (VeriChip), or refusing, and facing execution – this is about one’s immortal soul.
  I have no fear of mortal death. I want to live as long, and as well as I can, but I know the life of my Eternal Soul is infinitely more important than my current mortal guise. The way we live and the the way we die MATTERS. If I am faced with chossing the Mark – I will refuse. Should I be killed for doing so (provided I am caught, and forced into such a choice) I am LOT more concerned with answering to God, for Eternity, than facing some rotten, soul-less little functionary of the Satanic order, for a few painful moments, in this world. Hopefully, I’l be able to take a piece of the functionary with me, before I draw my last breath.

• 15 Matilda Darquerider // Feb 17, 2009 at 6:38 pm   

  PearlGirl,
  You’re speaking to the choir with me. I followed the money a long time ago.

• 16 NoName // Feb 17, 2009 at 7:12 pm   

  I don’t get the [EDITED] using a nom de plume.

  “Matilda Darqurider”
  “PearlGirl”
  “Sioux”

  Sorta sound like made for web names to me. But I guess the rules are different for Natives, huh?

  And you needn’t bother with answering my question, I know the score ( 0 ).

• 17 David Yeagley // Feb 17, 2009 at 8:35 pm   

  Mr. NoName, So, if you know the score is 0, why did you ask?

  And why do you expect anyone to consider you “Native”? with such a hackneyed term used by liberal whites who do sweats with professional “elders”?

  You presented yourself in a very crippled, ineffective way. If you’d like to try again, please do. I’ll even give you an opportunity.

  What kind of prophecy are you talking about? A prediction with chronological points? A social outcome based on moral behavior? Be specific, and I’ll give you an honest answer–at least about what I believe.

  But, if you don’t really believe, then it’s all a waste of time. If you want to believe, that’s different.

  You sound either very young, or very disappointed, or very strung out (like, substance abuse problems now or in the past?). The elders are all Christian. If you were “Native,” you’d know that. You sound very, very alientated from Indian life and Indian people.

• 18 NoName // Feb 17, 2009 at 8:40 pm   

  “Censorship feeds the dirty mind more than the four-letter word itself.” – Dick Cavett

  wtf = where’s the fire?
  bfd = big FAT deal

  “What kind of prophecy are you talking about?”
  Any…

• 19 David Yeagley // Feb 17, 2009 at 9:46 pm   

  And a jokester to boot, eh? Fine “Native.”

  1) Do you believe the scripture were written when they say they were written? Like, Isaiah, 745-600 BC, generally. Dead Sea Scrolls, for example, the oldest manuscripts known of Isaiah (250 BC- 68 AD) are word for word as the modern scholarly texts.

  2) If you’re not into the validity or authentiticy of the texts, I can’t make any convincing statements. I don’t know your position.

  Isaiah, for instance, prophesies (in the late 8th century) the coming of the Persian emperor, Cyrus, calling him by name, predicting his overthrough of Babylon, and restoring the Jews to Israel (who were captive in Bablylon–as of 586 BC). Persians took over in 538 BC.

  This is all very taxing to grasp. I just don’t know what you want here, in the way of facts. Isaish predicted something ca. 150 years before it happened. I’d say that is a prophecy that was fulfilled. Isaiah 44:24-28; 45:1,2.

  There are arguments against this, that Isaiah was written by three different people, at three different historical periods. But every sentence of the Bible is under professional dispute by the “scholars.” That’s the academic world. I’ve been there. I have a Master of Divinity from Yale. I’ve seen all sides of these things.

  You, and anyone else, are free to believe whatever you want, and so am I. It isn’t about superior logic or intelligence, or even nececessarily facts. Belief is an act of the will, not the verdict of logic. This is extremely important. The will. Belief is about what you want. Anyone who says differently is deceived. Scholars belief what they want. The uneducated also believe what they want. We all owe it to ourselves to inquire, and to pursue.

  Are you still with me?

• 20 NoName // Feb 17, 2009 at 11:29 pm   

  Yup. I’m pickin’ up what you’re putting down.

  But I beg to differ on your statement “Belief is an act of the will.”

  Isn’t any belief in the spiritual a leap of faith rather than a willful act? Some may willfully take that leap yet there are others who have faith thrust upon them. If belief was as simple as making yourself believe would there be any need for a church or temple?

  Are you still with me, este hvtke?

• 21 paxvoyager // Feb 17, 2009 at 11:29 pm   

  Hey, Dr. Yeagley

  I think you have hit it on the head. I can say the same for Matilda Darquerider as well.

  If you put the pieces together, it cries out, that a multi-generational plan, involving many influential families, groups and duped individual – from within America and around the world, have pulled off something mind boggling, and scary.

  This takes a tenacious will, information power, money power, and a contempt for a humanity, the Constitution, and Christianity – that compels them to believe, that they have to deceive – and the right to deceive – in order gain power.

  I see three moves that they may be provoking in order to bring about the end of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

  1. Provoke the American people to loss all faith in our governmnet and culture.

  2 Induce civil unrest. American people will willingly let Obama save them from fear and disorder at the expence of the Constitution.

  The next three are possible scenarios ;

  2. Civil strife or war takes place allowing Obama to fulfill a Lincoln Action of saving the Union – which in this case, would be through martial law. But by this time, America would already be in the grip of the oligarchic dictatorship which we see unfolding now.

  3. The North American Union will be declared.

  4. States will start to secceed. This succession hypothesis may also be induced by the oligarchy in order to further divide and conquer. But it may be, for a time, a blessing, from God; hidden within the oligarchy’s own machinations. We will see.

  But I think the main point is to make us hate our governmnet and be willing for something else to take its place. The Bible clearly states that in the end times people ; will cry out for peace; and believe the Great Lie,

  This passage from 2 Timothy 3:1 sums up the climate of the times – this kind of people will do anything to survive at the,even at the expence of humanity itself:

  1 But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.

  This oligarchy has attained power in America, because they induced a 43 year long bender of license and selfishisness, lust, over-entertainment, electronic distractions,de-education, and de-cultruation.

  Now, my final thought about the worship of the state, The mark of the beast, and the Christian responce. To preface, many times we Christians talk about the mark and what it means to refuse it – or to take it. It is a truly compeling and scary topic.

  I was scared of failing it most of my Christian life. But then, one day, I read the passage below in a new light, and it gave me hope. This hope is: That there is an insentive plan for believers, who run afoul of the mark, that are beheaded or die in some way. These refusing people will rise with again to life and to rule in the Millenium Kingdom With the Lord Jesus.

  I don’t like the way this world and the way it has been courrupted by the global oligarchy. Obama is just their front man, he’s not the real boss. I would rather be shown the way out by them than to have the pitance that they might allow me to have. I would rather be with Jesus in the millenium than hang on to this world and life that I no longer want.

  Revelation 20:4

  4. I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.

  Take heart all!

  God will see us through, if we will listen, and seek him. He does, help us in our weakness if we are real with him about such things. He has, provided incentives, and, most importantly, His Holy Spirit’s Presence, and Power.

  Your Friend,

  Paxvoyager

• 22 David Yeagley // Feb 18, 2009 at 8:03 am   

  NoName, an act of faith is an act of the will, is it not? Yes, people can be brought up with certain habits, and appear to believe something, but really are just going through the motions, the social, cultural motions. But, if you distinguish between faith and will, I’d say that’s a hard call. St. James says,

  “Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.” James 2:19

  The verse just before was talking about showing faith by action. In in the Greek text, it is the same word for both faith and belief: pistis (from whence we get the words epistomology, epistemic, and even epistle (testament).

  But, in a clear sense, faith and belief are functionally different. You’re right. People can profess a belief, but not really having active faith in it, never really acting upon it.

• 23 David Yeagley // Feb 18, 2009 at 8:06 am   

  Paxvoyager:

  The matter of states seceding from the union, that may come about solely as the result of financial necessity. Laura Ingram addressed the issue yesterday morning. Should solvent states be affected by the debt and extravanance of other, less wise states?

  We shall perhaps see strange things in the future. Obama appears a freakish nightmare, to me. Bill O’Reilly’s trying to be all positive about him. I can’t believe it. How disappointing.

• 24 Matilda Darquerider // Feb 18, 2009 at 8:17 am   

  Will the states secede from the union? I’ve hear that at least 21 states have declared, or are in the process of declaring, their sovereignty, but I don’t see that as a step in secession; only that they’re telling the federal government that, more or less, it’s exceeding its authority and they’re not going to stand for it.

• 25 David Yeagley // Feb 18, 2009 at 8:20 am   

  MD, good point. The question is, can the states do that? Will the federal government allow it?

  In other words, What if the federal government uses force to enforce? Force of withdrawing all federal funds from the state?

  Then the state should withhold all federal taxes. It could become a financial war, first. That’s pretty heavy force, to say nothing of arms. The prophecy of Revelation seems to emphasize the economic battlefield, at least in the process of coming to the globalist worship scheme.

• 26 PearlGirl // Feb 18, 2009 at 10:06 am   

  New Hampshire is laying down the gauntlet re: declaring State’s Soveriegnity, and other States are following suit. MS is moving legislation that Federal Authorities have NO RIGHT to disarm citizens, as they did in NO, after Katrina. These are all the beginning stages of rightfuly limited Federal power.

  I do beleive that the crazed loonies infesting DC WILL order the US Army round up rebellious legsilators, and to fire on American Citizens – but I also believe the Armed Forces are totally depleted, demoralized, and corrupted. I believe there will be a rebellion IN the Armed Forces, themselves….and there will be all out Civil War. Everywhere. On all sorts of fronts. The Demons in DC cannot kill every-one. It’s gonna be absolute chaos. So get ready.

• 27 David Yeagley // Feb 18, 2009 at 10:53 am   

  Well, I certainly hope it’s not going to be as you describe!

  But I know more and more people are thinking this way, and this is exactly what the anti-American Democrats and “liberals” want. Overthrow. True tyranny and Communism cannot come without chaos first. That weakens everything so that they can take power. This is how all dictators take power. In our case, they are creating chaos where there wasn’t any.

  They’re taking over, but they know there will be uprising against them, so, the more chaos, the better for them.

  Something like that.

  No foreign country is taking over. It is white liberals within our own. And the world–so dependent on the US, is happy to see the US fall. Isn’t that nice? Biting the hand that feeds you. That’s gratitude.

• 28 paxvoyager // Feb 18, 2009 at 12:58 pm   

  Dr. Yeagely.

  The Constitution acknowledges that the States are a voluntary association and that they can secede if they want to. What Lincoln did was essentially unconstitutional however well meaning he or the North may have been.

  Slavery should never have been sanctioned in the first place. Slavery is a crime against any person and any people. It was against several forms of slavery that many people came here to escape from in the old world. The prominent ones were religious; political; and class.

  Part of what we are seeing happening now under the guise of tolerance and globality – and using economics as a surgical tool – or a blunt tool – is a return to these forms of slavery. The rights in the Constitution that true Americans and all lovers of responsible freedom all held dear, were beaten out on the anvil of tyranny, and blase autocracy, for thousands of years.

  That some, have no respect for the great accomplishment of a document like the Constitution and a nation formed from it, does not mean that the document and that nation are worthless and should be ended – and ended by those who have use every trick, lie, and conceit, to accomplish it. I am not for civil war or brute violence – but I believe they are; if it comes to that for them.They have subverted nearly every major public outlet of dissent. and there are seeming Republicans who have helped them.

  We are dealing with a major conspiracy, and it will take every fiber of ourselves, our resources,and our hearts, and real faith in the Constitution, and real faith in the living God, to overthrow them in the political, cultural, and media arenas; without brute violence. However, fighting for a noble cause, against those who are destroying that cause without clearly stating so, is noble, and is good.

  Below is the Declaration Of Independence; the essential preamble, and basis, for the Constitution and The American Republic of the United States.

  The first paragraph is the rallying statement, and cry of a people, and of all humanity. That they do not believe in the Creator that is a primary inspiration for the Constitution, puts everything in a stark and essential relief whereby: We are dealing, truly, with barbarians at the gate, and our resolve must be clear to us, even if it is not, to them.

  IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
  The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

  When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

  We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

  He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

  He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

  He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

  He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

  He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

  He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

  He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

  He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

  He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

  He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

  He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

  He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

  He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

  For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

  For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

  For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

  For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

  For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

  For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

  For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

  For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

  For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

  He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

  He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

  He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

  He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

  He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

  In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

  Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

  We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

  — John Hancock

  New Hampshire:
  Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

  Massachusetts:
  John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

  Rhode Island:
  Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

  Connecticut:
  Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

  New York:
  William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

  New Jersey:
  Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

  Pennsylvania:
  Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

  Delaware:
  Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

  Maryland:
  Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

  Virginia:
  George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

  North Carolina:
  William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

  South Carolina:
  Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

  Georgia:
  Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

• 29 Mitchell // Feb 18, 2009 at 1:05 pm   

  Dr. Yeagley,

  My first post, but I wanted to preface my comments with a great appreciation for your perspectives and honesty. Thank you for being a true American.

  Regarding Bill O’Reilly, I have followed him closely throughout the election process and was also very distressed at his constant shilling for the One. I suspect O’Reilly is a stealth liberal as Michael Savage has suggested.

• 30 Mitchell // Feb 18, 2009 at 1:28 pm   

  I would also like to comment on the suggestions that state secession is a possibility along with the potential for in insurgency against the government.

  I work in a supermarket where I have the opportunity to speak with many people. It is compelling to me to hear so many people discuss this topic and to hear how many of them are purchasing guns. While I do not necessarily believe an armed confrontation is imminent, trust me, there is a tremendous amount of talk out there amongst the populace about just such possibilities. A lot of people know what is going on with Obama, a mere front man for the insidious radical liberal agenda, but just do not have any organized plan of action to fight what is happening before our eyes. Some groups are forming but none of them have any national presence at this point. We certainly can’t count on the current Republicans to take any meaningful actions since they are jostling with the liberals to feed at the trough. The entire system is rife with pork and fiscal irresponsibility.

  Finally, one point on the liberals and their agenda. Most people in this country are simply too stupid and ignorant to compreheand what is happening to this country. They have been indoctrinated in our government schools and dumbed down to the level where our educational system ranks in the mid twenties against other countries when I last checked. They do not read, except People magazine or Soap Opera Daily, and when they do read it is the local newspaper which is permeated with liberal brainwash. Point; the liberals are a very intelligent and nefarious group of people. They are very patient and have planned this agenda for decades. There is an entire generation of kids coming into the workforce now who are, in my humble opinion, brainwashed into the liberal mindset and that will be extremely difficult for us to overcome as a nation.

  God bless you and keep up the good fight.

You must log in to post a comment.