The long arms of the American political “ape” have reached the Orient. Communist-based racism has now made it clear that no human being anywhere in the world shall ever be allowed to offend the American Negro. It is final. That is the dictate of Communist “equality.” If the Negro even thinks you’ve offended him, you’re out. This is a sure formula for the dissolution of nations, the Communist ideal.
It happened back in July, 2008, before the newly selected US president was selected. A Japanese TV commercial was touting the triumphs of EM, EMobile, a new Japanese cell phone company launched only four months earlier (March), and a handful of American black men in Japan objected. Here is the ad:
Here is the report to CNN, whom apparently the black men had immediately contacted after seeing the ad:
Huffington Post picked up the story, of course, probably from BlackTokyo. com. The EMobile company saw fit to remove the ad–without having been sued. So powerful is the black shakedown–especially when the white liberal world is behind it. (Jesse Jackson missed out on this one.)
Are there groups of Negroes in every country who are banded together to demand their rights around the globe now? Are they ready and waiting for publicity opportunities? This EMobile incident was truly a grand one. In one stroke, the Black band was able to discredit an ancient national icon of Japan, the sacred monkey, and successfully accuse the Japanese of racism in their own country! The mighty Negro, foreign to every country except those on the African continent, is now able to wield supreme social authority throughout the world, wherever he finds himself.
Sweet revenge for half-Japanese Negro babies left in Japan after WWII–created by American black GIs who left abandoned children with Japanese mothers. Perhaps a little-known fact, this “breed” was always the most despised in all Japan (as well as in other Asian countries, as were those babies created by Negro GIs in the Vietnam War days). Now the ‘missionary’ American Negro is fully equipped to dictate terms to all the nations. Starting with Japan, perhaps the most homogeneous country in the world, next to North Korea, which is 99% recially pure, the American Negro is well positioned to command.
You will love the Negro, you will find the Negro most beautiful, you will have supreme sexual desire for the Negro, and you will render complete cooperation with his every desire. You will be his slave. The Negro is now king, and his reign is endorsed by the alien black African Communist in Washington, DC. (Shall we chalk this one up to another phase of “unintended consequences”?)
This is true racism, a political function of modern Communism. In practical terms, all it means is, in the name of equality, the Negro is supreme. (Let’s see how this pans out in Communist North Korea!)





David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 

13 responses so far ↓
1 SheDesigns // Jan 27, 2009 at 9:13 pm
“[T]his “breed” was always the most despised in all Japan.”
David, the Freudian Slips are showing! Take caution and pay attention to abijik!
I read somewhere that all mixed bloods – of course the majority were probably white/Japanese just because of the numbers – were in constant turmoil and anguish in their Asian countries.
Plus, I think there is still grievance politics working with blacks, wherever they may be. They are always the most maligned, the most hated, the most attacked.
Hence: “You will love the Negro, you will find the Negro most beautiful, you will have supreme sexual desire for the Negro, and you will render complete cooperation with his every desire. You will be his slave.”
2 David Yeagley // Jan 27, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Most despised in Japan. I believe that’s what I said.
Going by an old documentary I saw years ago, about the fate of the half-Negro half-Japanese. It was very sad.
I get the impression that other races do not wish to become Negro. Some races don’t like any other race mixing with theirs.
My position is, each race and/or ethnicity should preserve itself. That’s a fairly simple position, I think. This means to cool it on the intermarriage bit. Certainly, black men are not the only men who carelessly mate and make children with other racial or ethnic groups. (Can we say, at this point, the American Negro is an ethnic group? I think maybe so. An American Negro is not at all like the Negro from, say, the Ivory Coast. And not every American black voted for the African, either.)
Note the Cheyenne proverb: a nation is never defeated until the hearts of its women are on the ground. It isn’t always a different race that conquers another. The same psychology was operative when the Germans conquered the French. The French women danced with the German soldiers. All white.
3 I come in Piece // Jan 28, 2009 at 4:16 am
What’s the difference?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq4KpDhFZVM
4 Kidist // Jan 28, 2009 at 9:45 am
I’m just saying that we choose our words, and writers are especially put to that task. I did say “Freudian Slip”.
Also, sorry for the change in my wordpress name – I thought I would use my proper name for a change, and keep the anonymity for the forums!
5 David Yeagley // Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20 am
I know some people think I have a problem with blacks. But
Being ticked off at the behavior isn’t the same as despising the person. I have theories of black behavior, which I will share one of these days. Can I count on your expert eye to assess those revelations, Kidist?
I say this: I was a member of a very conservative black church for four years, back in an earlier time in my life. Mine eyes have seen the glory. I know what black people can be like. I don’t accept all this other nonsense. Never.
I was in social work a number of years, too, dealing principally with black teenagers. I’m not ignorant of what I’m talking about. I may not have refined what I intend to say just yet. But, it’s coming.
6 Kidist // Jan 28, 2009 at 10:41 am
Actually, I understand what you’re trying to say, and agree with most of it.
7 johnnymac // Jan 28, 2009 at 8:06 pm
Japan and its people are some of the biggest racists on Earth. I suppose that is what would be the result of a largely racially homogenous society. Americans would be surprised to find out just how racist and bigoted most of the world really is. Places like South and central America, Mexico and a good part of Western and Eastern Europe too.
8 David Yeagley // Jan 28, 2009 at 9:38 pm
JM, can I ask you what you think racism really is? I don’t think protecting one’s race and ethnicity is racism, but, that’s my opinion. It may involve a refusal of intermarriage. Is this racism?
9 David Yeagley // Jan 29, 2009 at 9:13 am
ICIP, I just retrieved your post from the pending file. (Don’t have any idea how it got in there.)
Great video of Chief Illiniwek! It’s always been very clear, white people love their Indian. Yeah, their way, and in their style. (Black people, who loved to be white, also love the Indian.)
Okay, so there’s nothing “Indian” about the Chief except in the clothing, the image, the impact. It is a white sentimentalism, yea, an honor they bestow.
A whole lot of white people spilled a lot of their own white blood to get what they have. When they remember that Chief, they’re remembering a lot of their own blood.
So, now to your question. What’s the difference? Between the Japanese monkey and the white “Indian” chief? Is that the question? Hard to tell your question.
1. No wars between monkeys and Japanese.
2. Japanese did not take over monkey country.
3. Monkeys do no feel oppressed or wronged
etc.
But, maybe you mean something else. Is the Indian a spiritual trophy or object of adoration, emblematic of something grand, great, and priceless? Yes.
So, do you object? Or are you in agreement? I don’t understand. Are you a troll? Are you sincere?
10 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Prof Yeagley – please don’t apologize to any-one about your beliefs. “Racism” is healthy. “Racism” is natural. “Racism” is literally self-preservation.
I know that most Asians, as well as Arabs, DESPISE Blacks. With good reason. I know that there are “good” Blacks – but overall their numbers are insignificant, and they do nothing to prevent the vast majority of Blacks wreak havoc on any given human society. Blacks are overall, low IQ prognathic throwbacks. They are rarely able to control their emotions (and it can be highly entertaining to watch a grand mal chimp-out!), believe what-ever it is they hear at the barber/beauty shop, are predatory, violent, and dangerous. Even the “good ones” will suddenly, without warning, resort to TNB. They destroy every place they take over. Black rule signifies the death of civilization. They are what they are, and I am one White woman that has “laid her burden down”.
Johnnymac – as far as Japanese “racism” goes – good for them!!!! Bravo!!! Well done!!!!Their “racism” is what will keep the Japanese Japanese!
11 PearlGirl // Feb 17, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Not every Black voted for the illegal alien Kenyan Sotoero – but 95% of voting Blacks DID. Every-one should keep that in mind, at all times.
12 Grafted Devil // Jan 21, 2010 at 7:24 am
Exactly PearlGirl…..MOST blacks voted for him strictly because he was ‘one of them’…pure racism….
And Whites voted for him solely based on the color of his skin..
I will hold the 5% of blacks that didnt vote for this cartoon-clown resposible as if they did……
blacs tend to group us White folks together when one lone White does something, therefore I will play their own game against them….
The White liberals identify with the blacks and they must be treated as the enemy, not the lone counterpart in the woods…..they are the enemy..
And they need to be treated as such….
13 Grafted Devil // Jan 21, 2010 at 7:26 am
Sorry for the ‘mispelt’ words people…..Im sitting here with ice on my back, which hurts from Hell…..so sitting is rather uncomfortable, but not as much as attempting to lie/lay down…
You must log in to post a comment.