BadEagle.com Header Image

 

Bad Eagle Journal

The Great White Throne

by David Yeagley · March 7, 2007 · 54 Comments ·

Who rules the world? Or, who created the present world?

White men. European white men. Western European men. Christian men–at least nominally Christian, with Christian social values. That would include ancient Hebrew (Jewish) values. This should be obvious to anyone looking on the world from a historical perspective, and from a practical view of the present. Things could have gone Arab Muslim at one point, but the Mongolians prevented that, in the 13th century. From that point, Europe was on the rise. Europe survived the Muslim onslaught, and grew to dominate the world.

The seat of power, economic, military, social, ideological, is white. European white. Judeo-Christian, “Bible” white. This throne, in this world, will not change. It is secure. White man will not be de-throned. The position is permanent.

The issue is therefore not whether whites will rule, but which whites. They vie with one another for power. In the last century, the 1900s, the white divide became established and clear. It was merely a class struggle. The wealthy against the less wealthy, or the poor. Yet, even this is illusionary. The whites that vie with other whites for power are also wealthy. It is the wealthy against the wealthy. Nothing more or other. Conservative vs. Liberal, Republican vs. Democrat, patriot vs. communist, it’s still white against white.

The strongest, the true creators of the present world, are the conservatives–the takers, shakers, and makers. Their competitors, the wealthy whites who somehow missed their power slot, profess to represent the weak, the poor, and the masses. Obviously, “democracy” fits right into their plan of attack. Votes, elections, and campaigning for the common man, this is their traditional mode. Today, they have been quite radicalized, with the tools of media, violent and semi/violent social disruption, demonstration, etc.

And finally, racial agitation–the use of non-whites as a force against the whites in power, this is their grand swan song. Racial agitation is the rues and throes of a desperate and dying cause. Wealthy whites who don’t have the complete, dictatorial power they want, have resorted to marshalling the races as pawns against the other whites in power.

But be there no mistake, it’s still the Great White Throne, and there will still be whites occupying that throne. There will never be a non-white President of the United States. There will never be a black president, a Spanish president, or an Asian president. The white liberals and leftists themselves will never let that happen. They toy with the idea, as a socially disruptive element. They use race as an emotional threat, as racial terrorism. Ethnic terrorism–that’s what Barak Obama is all about. There is a certain mockery underneath this supposed “white guilt.”

There is no white guilt. That is an illusion itself. There is only white power, and whites trying to use the races to intimidate the other whites in power. Whites threatning other whites with racial terrorism. That’s all it is, and all it will ever be. The non-white races need not deceive themselves with some naive notion that the liberal whites care about them. They’re merely using them.

But I propose the idea of guilt, alright. Only not white guilt. Indian guilt. American Indian guilt. That’s right. The United States of America was shaped by American Indian encounters at every step, at every stage of developement. American Indians are responsible for whatever misanthropy exists in the United States government. We are the fathers of this country, really. We didn’t ask for it, true, but it happened. We allowed the bastard child of Europe to grow up in our midst.


Heap Wolves, Comanche Warrior, 19th century

It is time we owned up to the responsibility which was ours. It’s time we acknowledged our role. It’s time we took up again the lead. We need to correct the wayward left, and rebuke his abuse of the races, his deceptive, lying fraud. The throne is white. The whites built it, and anyone who tries to deceive the races into thinking that throne belongs to all people is a psychological criminal, a moral thief, and an ideological terrorist. The best American Indians can do now is act as advisors, reminders, consultants. We actually helped shape that throne, by default, yes, but the reality is ours. And the responsibility is ours. We must partake in the American political process. We must let our voice be heard. We must tend to our wayward step-son, grand and mighty as he is. I believe he needs us, still.

Posted by David Yeagley · March 7, 2007 · 10:19 am CT · ·

Tags: Bad Eagle Journal




Read More Journal Posts »

54 responses so far ↓

  • 1 concha // Mar 7, 2007 at 11:26 am   

    David Yeagley,
    It would be great to have an Indian prez, but he/she would have to be awfully strong, as leftist whites always try to manipulate and control the “minorities.” How do they manage to hypnotize everyone? And yes, leftist whites intimidate other whites through claims of “racism,” the oldest ploy in the commie book.
    This is interesting, your claim of Indian guilt. Is that why some Indians join the freemasons, the European secret society? Is that why many drink, or do drugs? (I know, it is in all races)
    See, illegals have no guilt, neither do most legal immigrants, which is why they are taking over.
    I recommend a collective seven-day fast for those of us who have white and Indian blood, in order to purge ourselves of useless and destructive emotions. It is time for clarity!

  • 2 David Yeagley // Mar 7, 2007 at 3:24 pm   

    “Illegals have no guilt, niether do most legal immigrants, which is why they are taking over.”

    Very good!

    And I will fast with you.

  • 3 Nadine // Mar 7, 2007 at 3:49 pm   

    You forget, the white man built his so-called “throne” (as you call it) upon the idea of the Iroquois Confederacy, which was already in place.

  • 4 David Yeagley // Mar 7, 2007 at 3:53 pm   

    I forgot nothing.

  • 5 whitetrash // Mar 7, 2007 at 3:55 pm   

    Powerful Whites in America have played the race card since before the Revolution. Just a little research reveals that Black chattel slavery required land owner whites to elevate poor white slaves, or indentured servants, to a position of authority over black slaves. It’s the oldest game in America, and it is at work right now.

    Ever wonder why white working folk are Repubs, while black working folk are Dems? Divide and conquer. Now we are suddenly overrun with poor, uneducated Mexicans here to do jobs “Americans won’t do?” You said you read “Founding Brothers?” Review the chapter on the slavery issue and note the politician who claims that slavery is needed because there are “some jobs a white man just won’t do.” Hmmm….

  • 6 David Yeagley // Mar 7, 2007 at 4:39 pm   

    Hmm. So two people now think I’ve forgotten something. Interesting.

    Well, consider the 13th Amendment, which specifies no color or race whatsoever. Slavery is for punishement of crime. Perfectly allowed by the United State Constitution–TODAY!

    So which group of whites is going to advocate that now? I don’t know that “slavery” is meantioned anywhere else in the Constitution but the 13th Amendment, where is it lawful as punishment for crime. It has nothing to do with race.

    Article I Sec.2 uses “free persons,” implying the obvious existence of slaves.

    The abolition of slavery was about “freeing blacks,” not absolving punishment or crime. Slavery was not a crime.

    And you wouldn’t be particularly offended at this White Throne post, would you? It’s not meant to be offensive at all, I’ll say that.

  • 7 David Yeagley // Mar 7, 2007 at 4:51 pm   

    Nadine, sorry to appear vague.

    My whole point was that American developed into what it was (and is) by virue of it’s encounter with Indians, step by step, at each stage.

    Obviously that would include knowledge of the Iroquois Confederation. But that is one of the more obvious, tactile examples. I’m talking about much more visceral concerns, like, how many guns do we need? How do we get them? Whites had to think of how many Indians they were going to encounter, when,etc. Every angle of American development is intimately connected with the Indian encounters, all through the development of the great West.

    I know this seems like an odd, unusual view of things, but I say Indians may take great pride in whom we considered our enemy. We made him, in a very real sense. We should be proud of him.

  • 8 concha // Mar 7, 2007 at 6:23 pm   

    David Yeagley,
    This is great if some of us with healthy blood sugar levels and a strong heart to fast together!! People forget that as Christians, we are instructed to fast, it is a must if one is healthy. Jesus said that fasting together with prayer is the most powerful thing in this world–can you find these quotes in the bible? Jesus speaks of fasting on a few occasions, and to do it humbly and without fanfare.
    I will fast this weekend starting Friday morning, but will probably eat on Monday.
    Water with lemon and lime juices only.

  • 9 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 7, 2007 at 8:09 pm   

    “Things could have gone Arab Muslim at one point, but the Mongolians prevented that, in the 13th century.”

    Actually one could argue the The Age of Reconnaissance which lead to the Europeans discovery of their “New World” was the fault of “The Great Khan.”

    It was he that for the first time in history linked the white man to the yellow man and all their goods and services from Eastern Germany to the Sea of Japan.

    Blame Genghis Khan for a good part of the motivation Columbus had to discover a westerly route to the goods of the Orient.

    It’s Barbarian Week on the History Channel — It’s fantastic!

  • 10 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 7, 2007 at 8:09 pm   

    “Things could have gone Arab Muslim at one point, but the Mongolians prevented that, in the 13th century.”

    Actually one could argue the The Age of Reconnaissance which lead to the Europeans discovery of their “New World” was the fault of “The Great Khan.”

    It was he that for the first time in history linked the white man to the yellow man and all their goods and services from Eastern Germany to the Sea of Japan.

    Blame Genghis Khan for a good part of the motivation Columbus had to discover a westerly route to the goods of the Orient.

    It’s Barbarian Week on the History Channel — It’s fantastic!

  • 11 KuhnKat // Mar 7, 2007 at 11:55 pm   

    Greetings My Son,

    the old world knew slightly about the East even before the Khan. The Khan encouraged trade which gave the west more reason to trade with the east.

    We can blame Columbus and the search for a Western Route to the East on the Muslims who continually overcharged for right of passage or simply wiped out caravans taking all the goods. They made it an economically interesting project to find a different route that would be more cost effective!!!

    Dr. Yeagley,

    there is an old belief that you are defined by your enemy. Military types tend to believe in the strength of their enemies. Losing to a weak enemy is, of course, shameful and nothing to improve you. Losing to a stronger enemy is not shameful and CAN improve you.

  • 12 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 1:46 am   

    Kuhnkat,

    it was the Pax Monglica that made trade with the East a part of the European economy in the first place. All previous West—East trade was small potatoes. Take away this dynamic and the Moslems had nothing to cause the West’s circumvention.

    The influence of the Mongols on Western Civilization and their New World is undeniable, and much, much stronger than what you state. And let us not forget the part the Mongol “Timor the Lame” plays with his conquering of Islam and then the Mongols conversion to Islam.

  • 13 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 1:46 am   

    Kuhnkat,

    it was the Pax Monglica that made trade with the East a part of the European economy in the first place. All previous West—East trade was small potatoes. Take away this dynamic and the Moslems had nothing to cause the West’s circumvention.

    The influence of the Mongols on Western Civilization and their New World is undeniable, and much, much stronger than what you state. And let us not forget the part the Mongol “Timor the Lame” plays with his conquering of Islam and then the Mongols conversion to Islam.

  • 14 whitetrash // Mar 8, 2007 at 1:37 pm   

    I’m not offended by the post at all Dr. Yeagley. I think it is an interesting piece that correctly tags Liberals for playing the race card as a way of perpetuating their ideology. I think you are right on to state that whichever side prevails at any given time, the White Throne remains the constant.

    Which side advocates slavery now? Strictly speaking? Neither. In reality? Both. We call it ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION now. The race card is the oldest gambit in America, and it comes up a lot when discussing jobs a “white man won’t do.” In 2007, if a white working joe hears about a bill that has “bi-partisan” support… he can bet it will not be good for him.

  • 15 ecology // Mar 8, 2007 at 2:07 pm   

    Awesome we get to sit on the white porcelain throne that is America 2007. Yep filling up with urine and feces pretty darn quick. Awesome! Wait the handle is broken! Cant flush! Thank you greedy, treasonous, seditious and back stabbing whities. Thank you. Good article doc.

  • 16 grayfoot // Mar 8, 2007 at 5:51 pm   

    This is such a asinine, radically right collectio of half thought out propaganda I honestly don’t know where to begin!

    We will never have a “non-white” president”? Says who? Says you? You sound suspiciously like a white supremicist. Your so called essay is thinly veiled hate speech. You could not be any less of a warrior, much less call yourself a Comanche, if you tried. You are weak, a spineless lily livered, propagandist, and a bad one at that! Only the truly intellecually undernourised would fall for this claptrap? The liberals are to blame, the liberals are to blame, the sun is the moon, up is down. The liberals are for racial agitation.

    How about those of us who are not blind and conservative and are tired of the current state of corruption and the world hating us and no longer trust our word, well, how about those of us who are for non blind are actually just for truth, justice, equality, peace, and not for taking, stealing, assuming, threatening before one should, offending, hating, and how about some of us are decent human beings are not for profiteering against all costs, be they human or otherwise?

    It’s about being a decent human being jack, and not being ego/ethnocentric. It’s about respecting each other and trying to leave the world a better place than you entered it, and not just using people and resources to make yourself fat.

    Ah Yeagley, will you ever come out of it? You are beyond brainwashed! It’s a sad thing.

  • 17 David Yeagley // Mar 8, 2007 at 6:25 pm   

    Pretty weak response, indeed, Grayfoot. Well, let’s just say, Democrat.

  • 18 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 7:38 pm   

    Athletes foot said,

    “This is such a asinine, radically right collectio of half thought out propaganda I honestly don’t know where to begin!”

    See now this is Freudian; Toe jam footjam really, sincerely does not know where to begin based on what the Doctor has written, because he is not wired for this kind of advanced thought — and yet, he does begin and ends with a less than zero comment.

    A comment totally and completely void of anything worth while, other than what I believe is a jealous rage.

    When one starts a comment with, “I honestly don’t know where to begin,” for now on, I will instaneously stop reading.

    I will call it the grayfoot rule.

  • 19 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 7:38 pm   

    Athletes foot said,

    “This is such a asinine, radically right collectio of half thought out propaganda I honestly don’t know where to begin!”

    See now this is Freudian; Toe jam footjam really, sincerely does not know where to begin based on what the Doctor has written, because he is not wired for this kind of advanced thought — and yet, he does begin and ends with a less than zero comment.

    A comment totally and completely void of anything worth while, other than what I believe is a jealous rage.

    When one starts a comment with, “I honestly don’t know where to begin,” for now on, I will instaneously stop reading.

    I will call it the grayfoot rule.

  • 20 DNR // Mar 8, 2007 at 9:28 pm   

    Dear Grayfoot

    You are wrong. How do I know? I once thought exactly as you do.

    Yes, I thought Dr. Yeagley was a turncoat Indian, an Apple and a white supremicist. His rants against blacks, women, muslims and liberals made me want to puke. I was sure he was a revisionist historian, an Indian holocaust denier and that he was pandering to the jews because he wanted to get on frontpage.

    But yes I was wrong. I saw the light. Well not really the light but an article on the good Dr.’s website. I read his posting on his early life and Indianness and it made everything oh so CLEAR and RIGHT! All the pieces suddenly fit and I saw the error in MY ways!

    The Dr. is not a self-hating Indian. The self-hating Indian was his MOTHER! The Doc is just acting according to his raisin’and carryin’ on the legacy of mommy dearest.

    He just can’t help himself, this way of thinking is the only way he knows because that’s how he was taught to think.

    You see Mom Yeagley was a product of Indian boarding schools. Yup, the very same cultural boot camps where Indian kids were snatched from their homes and made to hate Indianess and love Whiteness! Beaten for speaking their native tongue, forced to believe in the goodness and mercy of Jesus and sometimes raped for their own good. Most kids held on to their Indian ways but some gave in to the pressure and ¬°tah dah! Mom Yeagley!

    So you see grayfoot it ain’t the Dr’s fault. He just trying to please his mommy.

  • 21 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 10:21 pm   

    And what became of all those white Christian children that were taken by the American Indian after their parents were murdered and raped?

    Years later when they surfaced from American Indian captivity, were they still Christians or did the American Indian shove the American Indian culture down their throats?

    I wonder what the historical record would show if the American Indian had a sophisticated writing system like the white man had for centuries? — frankly, I question a word of mouth hand me down history.

  • 22 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 8, 2007 at 10:21 pm   

    And what became of all those white Christian children that were taken by the American Indian after their parents were murdered and raped?

    Years later when they surfaced from American Indian captivity, were they still Christians or did the American Indian shove the American Indian culture down their throats?

    I wonder what the historical record would show if the American Indian had a sophisticated writing system like the white man had for centuries? — frankly, I question a word of mouth hand me down history.

  • 23 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:44 am   

    Do you actually have a point whatever your name is?

  • 24 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:47 am   

    I think I made my point quite clear screaming eagle. The other poster seems to agree.

    And yes, it IS from a Democrat, i.e. someone who did not vote for this imbecile, someone who has not supported this PRE-EMPTIVE war OF terror, someone who is sick of the current corruption and the fat getting fatter and tired of getting lied to in the name of oil and it’s various companies making money off the poor, the middle class and the broke of this country, i.e. the soldiers.

  • 25 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 9, 2007 at 2:37 am   

    You have the nerve, you of all people, to ask me twice if I have a point?

    All races when it comes to rapine are lepers. Some within in each race simply have more fingers left.

  • 26 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 9, 2007 at 2:37 am   

    You have the nerve, you of all people, to ask me twice if I have a point?

    All races when it comes to rapine are lepers. Some within in each race simply have more fingers left.

  • 27 kuhnkat // Mar 9, 2007 at 9:44 am   

    Grayfoot,

    apparently you support the Islamists who slaughter innocent men, women and children just to make a POINT??

    Or are you going to accept that we must fight them because they will not stop killing until they have subdued, enslaved, or converted everyone on the face of the earth?? That it is a PLAN and not just random HOMICIDE?!?!?!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    You ignorant FOOL!!!

  • 28 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 10:21 am   

    Ummm I consider Indian to be a Crazy Horse or a Sitting Bull. Not these bloated greedy guts or drunken addicts that parade around today. The ones I witness just throwing their trash right out on the street. also Hunting and not paying attention to any game laws or conservation ethics becuase its “their” resources to do with as they see fit. Yeah like the drift nets they just leave in the rivers. then we find them years later. carnage. BS. I call out these “new” indians as nothign but flotsam. Also they talk about how its their spiritual culture. Then I see piles of perfectly good salmon they just leave rotting. Killing elk all year long. the list goes on. Im not fooled by these new “Indians”. Now whities arent much better but we have done alot of good. There are alot of decent people o0n this planet.

  • 29 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 10:25 am   

    This is the year 2007. World pop 7 billion and rising. The old Indian ways have to be adapted. One cannot just go live off the land. There will be nothing left and you will starve in a few years. Learn to grow organic crops. Build inground greenhouses, earthships, etc.. That is the new “indian” way. New urbanism (which is old urbanism) as well. There is not enough to hunt and gather anymore.

  • 30 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 11:07 am   

    Again and I ask, what is your point?

    You have made a completely irrevlevant argument whatever your name is.

    Your argument seems to be more defensive is anything.

  • 31 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 11:09 am   

    And you kuntkat, you make the idiotic and simpleminded assertion that the way we are doing things now is the only way to defend ourselves from terrorism when in fact we only managed to inflame more islamic radicals to hate us.

    The radicals on either side don’t seem to see past their noses. It’s often that way with the uneducated and/or hubristic.

  • 32 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 11:49 am   

    I never agreed with the this BS “war on terrorism”. I have been p[aying attention to the border issues for years now and knew it was just an orwellian fear tactic. Possibley for profit motivation. If the war on terrorism was so important our borders would be secure and immigration ceased. as is the government uses tax payers dollors to build infrastuture on the border to make in easier for them to come in. Like making sidewalks for them. the yeallow brick road right into the country. Also building the culvert pipes for them as well. So your put downs and scream of uneducated are that of a lost soul. I am, far more edcuated and understanding of the natural order than you claim. I ahve never tghought the path we took post 911 was correct. But its better having us in control of Iraq than say the russians and chinese. This what ever your name is thing is also very Stalinesque. Elite. Tyrannical. The war on terror is absolute joke. Its proven by the wide open borders and our gubmint and treasonous citizens aiding and abbetting. In fact Im not happy about the path America has taken since Post ww2. But I understand its too late. One must adapt. Disneyland (America) has officially ended.

  • 33 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 11:53 am   

    Uneducated and hubristic? Nonsense! I despise Hubris and I am very well educated. especially in REAL world science. Biology and ecology. Ecosystems. Systems ecology. Ecological economics. Not thsi hubristic flat earth society garbage that has beenn ingrained in us. One of the biggest reasons its as screwed up as it is. Old world education. Flat earth society education. Deevolution. Just plain old and crotchety. Very very old. Worn out thinking. But hey keep beating the dead horse. Eventually their isnt anything left to beat out of it. Insanity is doing things over and over and getting the same results. Hmmmmm. reminds me alot of todays world.

  • 34 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 11:55 am   

    wasn’t referring to you any of of my posts ecology, only to kuntkat and the pill whose name is a phrase.

  • 35 David Yeagley // Mar 9, 2007 at 12:14 pm   

    Grayfoot, all you have expressed is disagreement, the fact that you disagree. you haven’t presented a single argument.

    DNR’s post is an attempt at something, though only theoretical. It it not really an argument at all.

    People that disagree with this post have not made any true arguments. They simply state that they disagree. They have not encountered the truth of the history.

    This isn’t about white supremacy. This is about history, the obvious, the facts. Yes, there is some speculation, but, who made the throne? Who is on it? Isn’t that obvious? It requires no thought or imagination to see it. Why deny it? One’s response to the obvious has nothing to do with race or racial experience.

    This is where Grayfoot and DNR are weak. THey have not presented an arugment, period. Just a gut level protest. That’s all. Fine.

  • 36 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 12:20 pm   

    Your essay is pure right wing propaganda and and attempt to manipulate and twist actual truth into some sort of bizarre alternative universe where Indian country is made to believe we are responsible for the waywardness of the current state of the country. That is not our fault. That is Bush and those that support/vote for him and his line of thinking.

    On the contrary it is you who are in severe denial and are weak. You cower to this “white throne” bs. I don’t recognize lame archtypes made by undisciplined thinkers. I have my own set of rules of how to live my life, based in REALITY.

  • 37 David Yeagley // Mar 9, 2007 at 12:50 pm   

    So you don’t have the strength to take the role of a guardian after all. The land is not yours, you have no interest, and you are solipsistic, eh? You call that strength? I call it Randian self-absorbtion. Typically white American, I might add.

    So many Indians are so white in their thinking, but don’t see it. I’m the one thinking like an Indian here. Not you.

  • 38 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 12:53 pm   

    But I think Doc is right in many ways on this. I know many decent white Americans are looking for the “father” figure. Our fathers have betrayed us. We have no sense of place or nationhood. Lost so to speak. The Indians I do look up to as fathers of this nation. I put crazy Horse over George Washington. They have failed us whites and their own. and its not strength to blame. One must deal with what is handed to them or what they have worked for. I know the current Indian leaders do not impress me. WE are screaming for this paternal guidience. Many have no clue and turn to the materialism. Others are just not bright enough or strong enough. I mean I look at my white people and they are deeply demoralized and broken. Not the ruling elite mind you. but all of us that toil under their “leadership”. America is demoralized deeply. Broken. The red light district for the world. We do the dirty work for others much of the time. We just dont have the connections to the land. We are the automobile fast food throw away society. That is so obvious. I think the Indians have failed us. as have our own. It did not help we killed off the best and brightest back in the day. Its also is not true to think we are a terible race. We are more compasionate and accommidating than any other i know of. This stuff would never fly in other countries. They would just cut off your head or shoot you outright. Or throw you in a prison to rot. Or scalp you.

  • 39 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:04 pm   

    I mean just look how soldiers resign for Iraq multiple times! #rd world hell hole over this land of gluttony and plenty. They(I) would rather have a sense of brotherhood, mission and meaning then to be here in our maternal gynocracy of antiseptic monculture called America. America has been paved over litterally and figuratively. There is nothing mysterious or exciting here. No sense of brotherhood or adventure. a 9 to 5 6 day a week business run enterprise. BORING! get up. shower. get dressed. have breakfast go to work all day. rinse repeat. Blah. Its obvious TRUE MEn are not made for this gynocracy. We need to run the hills and pound our chests. Thats why a good civil war and border slaughter will be a great thing.

  • 40 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:04 pm   

    Ah Yeagley, it truly is laughable that you of all people would profess to think “Indian”. Do you even know what that means?

    And exactly what type of Indian are you thinking like? My guess is like the old Illini mascot Indian …oh wait, he isn’t real is he? Ah but don’t you support such stero…well that’s another issue entirely.

    No what you are thinking like is a right wing conservative white man who wants to trick all ethnics into hating themselves, “pulling themselves up by their bootstraps” because it is our fault that the contracts we signed with America were broken after all, forget our languages (because English is the “offical language right)and forget our culture (and subscribe to fake mascot versions of our culture)

    These are your solutions?

    I’ll take the alternative thanks.

  • 41 ecology // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:33 pm   

    And I did not mean a war is a great thing. its not its horrible. But it be great for the brotherhood and unity of the nation. In that context only. Its not great that its going to happen. people dying is not great. war is all horror. Just wanted to clarify that. I am pro peace 100%.

  • 42 concha // Mar 9, 2007 at 1:43 pm   

    ecology,
    We are far too accomodating with everyone–why?
    In many ways, Mexicans are the least of our problems as far as foreigners go–Mexicans, by and large, have manners and are not too pushy. It’s the others who are truly lowering are quality of life with their abrasiveness, arrogance, rudeness and disrespect for our history. These leeches are from all over the globe, including the middle east, Eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia. They are here to rape and pillage this country, and hope that we all die off to make room for their horrible splooge-spawn with their wierd, contorted expressions and foul behaviors.
    Go home already, foreigners. We don’t want you here. Not the average American–quit tormenting us with your old world ways and cutthroat mentality.
    Our ancestors know who you are, and they are watching you, and their spirits will get you from beyond the grave.
    EXTRA: Today’s fast is dedicated to the spirit of our ancestors, Amen.

  • 43 David Yeagley // Mar 9, 2007 at 2:05 pm   

    Grayfoot, you confirm every accusation of non-thinking that liberals are accused of. You either won’t or cannot deal with an actual idea. you cannot frame an argument.

    You merely try to present some demaning theory about me, personally.

    This is not thinking, and not arugment. This is nothing. So far, you are a “nothing” poster. You have not address the subject.

  • 44 grayfoot // Mar 9, 2007 at 2:16 pm   

    I have posted plenty, perhaps things above your head or things you refuse to acknowledge, but enough to the point that I’m tired of making my points over and over.

    I’ve made my argument, said my say. What you choose to do with that at this point is your perogative, and it looks as if you are going to act typically condesending, as you do with anyone whom you cannot argue with.

    A typical day in Yeagly universe. You are the only one in it.

  • 45 concha // Mar 9, 2007 at 2:36 pm   

    Back to the subject of Indian guilt–is it because they “lost.” What is it about? Is this real?
    I have never considered that Indian people were troubled with guilt–in that case, you should become Catholics–we are loaded with it! It is not a sign of weakness to have irrational guilt, I think it is a sign of a strong value system and shows sensitivity and depth. It makes one an artist, a poet, a humanitarian.
    We the guilt-ridden will never step on others to achieve wealth, or fame, so the world needs us more than ever.
    We are the best, we are the meek who shall inherit the earth.

  • 46 DNR // Mar 9, 2007 at 3:26 pm   

    “A typical day in Yeagly universe. You are the only one in it.”

    True enough Greyfoot.

    But you have to understand that this is the only way the Dr. knows how to express himself. He has to be himself.

    “Yeagley’s Comanche mother did not raise her children within Indian culture. She felt that culturally, socially, and professionally, this was a dead end…She also disagreed with many Indian ways and customs. Therefore, her children were raised with the values of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants.”

    You see GF Mom Yeagley didn’t see anything good about being Indian. She probably was ashamed of being Indian. And she didn’t want Indianess to corrupt her happy conservative home with her white husband so she raised her kids to be white.

    Comanche families are matrilineal so mom probably ruled the house. There the good Dr. heard nothing but negative things about Injuns. And in conservative households a kid cannot get love and acceptance unless they live by the party line(as an example think about the preacher’s kid).

    Little Dave was a good son who loved his mother so he listen and he did as he was told. And he recieved love in return.

    Now GF you ain’t gonna get any straight answers to any arguments you make because to do so would violate the Yeagley mother/son bond. The good son and Dr. will not go against the teachings of Mom. If he has to evade, lie to or ignore you in order not to dis Mom’s memory then so be it, it’s all for good.

    GF you’re banging your head against a tree.

  • 47 Ray // Mar 9, 2007 at 3:31 pm   

    With all due respect to the many non-Indians that post here, if you disagree with what one Indian poster says, keep that in mind. It’s one Indian poster. The responses to grayfoot seemed a little to eager to incorporate racist trash about Indian peoples. Whites aren’t the only ones that get to be seen as individuals, right?

  • 48 DNR // Mar 9, 2007 at 4:35 pm   

    Dearest Ray

    You don’t really have a clue to what you are dealing with, do ya?

    Read some of the archived posts. This is a white “culture” blog.

  • 49 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 9, 2007 at 8:00 pm   

    DNR stated

    “Read some of the archived posts. This is a white “culture” blog.”

    Actually, you’re trying to turn it into a mental case blog, when you have nothing, and then stoop to bringing ones mother into the debate and thereby try to gain some kind of sick, ignorant, debating advantage — Who raised you? Have you absolutely no shame — I would have to say you do not respect motherhood!

  • 50 "Greetings, my son!" // Mar 9, 2007 at 8:00 pm   

    DNR stated

    “Read some of the archived posts. This is a white “culture” blog.”

    Actually, you’re trying to turn it into a mental case blog, when you have nothing, and then stoop to bringing ones mother into the debate and thereby try to gain some kind of sick, ignorant, debating advantage — Who raised you? Have you absolutely no shame — I would have to say you do not respect motherhood!

  • 51 grayfoot // Mar 10, 2007 at 2:50 am   

    phrase person, i’m sorry you’re an idiot.

  • 52 bob // Jun 19, 2007 at 8:49 am   

    yes we do still need you. we need to be reminded of the warriors you taught us to be. that the cost of freedom will always be paid in blood. unless you sneak in from texas, of course.

  • 53 OhFortunae // May 28, 2013 at 3:15 pm   

    But if the White Throne is *set* (and all will fall if it will be darkened due to mongrelizing and genetic replacement) *for ever*, is it then not also set that the ”advisers of Judea” will always surround the White Throne?

  • 54 LonesomeDove // Oct 28, 2013 at 10:12 am   

    Dr. Yeagley

    I’ve read your words here, and I agree. I have also read the comments from the opposing view, and I’ve seen those comments before…..many times.

    Right or wrong, you—at least—offer explanations for what you believe, while the opposition only offers disagreement with no evidence except that the truth of what they say is…….that they say it.
    I even saw one poster take it to a personal level with an attack on your family…..an all too common tactic of the left.

    In all of this, I notice one thing in particular. None of the detractors have honestly asked you “why” you believe this way.
    Why is that? Because they don’t care.
    They only know that they don’t like what you said and they have to attack it……or more to the point….they have to attack ‘you’.

    I’ll give you something you may already be aware of, but it’s a good read.
    http://battalions2.wordpress.com/2006/06/21/good-old-liberal-debate-tactics/

    In essence, it boils down to this:

    –The Leftist’s Circular Shuffle–

    Step one: Tell them how smart you are; how sophisticated you are; how well educated you are; how enlightened you are, and how superior you are……THEN…tell them how stupid THEY are (without provable examples, that is); how much better you are than they are; for example…….how Christianity is a myth and you are too smart to believe, or how conservatives are pure evil while the left is the epitome of all that is good and righteous in the world.

    —–When they refuse to bow to your will:

    Step two: Call them names; insult their education, insult their job status, insult their cultural background, insult their upbringing, attack their character no matter how unfairly;,and even go as low as attacking their family.
    Then deny their facts as nonsense while proclaiming your facts to be the Holy Truth carved in stone.

    —–When they STILL refuse to be in awe of your greatness:

    Step three: Whine like a teenager, claim they just don’t understand you, scream that ‘they’ are the ones insulting ‘you’ (when in fact it’s the opposite), and demand that they stop returning your insults and shriek about how unfair they are; how they’re being stubborn because they refuse to accept what YOU believe to be facts.

    —–When they laugh at you for being a juvenile:

    Step four: Repeat step one.

    I see this everyday, and I’m reminded of what a man told me over 40 years ago….”If you are successful or correct concerning anything, you will be an SOB, because that’s what they will call you.”

    I debate every week on the Internet, and I have even been accused of murdering my own wife and mother, merely because I dare to express the conservative view before those who cannot tolerate it.

You must log in to post a comment.