Header Image


Bad Eagle Journal

Soros Hates Mexicans

by David Yeagley · January 18, 2007 · 16 Comments ·

The public never new it, but George Soros was behind the grand Mexican protests last March. When hundreds of thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants and so-called Mexican-Americans took to the streets to protest any resistence to their arrogant presence, and even to proclaim their right to own America, they were marching to the drum beat of the George Soros communist vision for America.

The social disruption, the racial agitation, and the intimidation through street tactics, were all straight out of the original American communist play book. Not only has George Soros mastered that book, but has come out with his own new edition: funding through “philanthropy.” The George Soros Open Society Institute funded these critical elements of el levantamiento mexicano (the Mexican ‘uprising’):

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)
American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Center for Community Change (CCC)
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA)
Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
National Council of La Raza
The Gamaliel Foundation

Soros’ Open Society contributed $648,200 to MALDEF; La Raza has received over $1.7 million. The Center for Community Change has received over $5.2 million–for the purpose of organizing community uprisings in low-income neighborhoods.

The point here is to use mass immigration as a means to overturn the economy of a region, even of a country. This is what Soros wants to do in America. It’s an old Communist game strategy, methodically and academically perfect by Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, back in the ’60’s. Cloward and Piven were Columbia University professors in sociology (socialism) in New York. The plan is to completely overload the welfare system. The aim is to literally bankrupt a city or a state, and under Soros, a country. It worked in New York, by the ’70’s. The city had been wiped out financially, by a staggering 10.8 million single-parent households on welfare.

But the street gang parades, the street tactics, that was the knock-out punch. That’s what intimidated everyone. It was all about the Marxist “redistribution of wealth” fantasy. The poor have been wronged. Morally wronged. The rich have taken from them their rights. The poor must ban together and force their will on the minority rich. It’s all based on nothing but covetousness, on greed, and on a relish for violence and excitement with a “cause.”

George Soros at the Business Council of the United Nations
meeting in Monterey, Mexico, March, 2002

Of course Soros wants to stir up the Mexicans. He wants massive immigration, as quickly as possible. It destabilizes the economy. It bankrupts the system.

Adolf Hitler with actress Olga Chekhova, May, 1939

I have to think of the brown shirts of 1933, in Berlin. The Nazi street tactics are noted by Antony Beevor, in his interesting biography of actress Olga Chekhova. On January 30, 1933, the day Hitler became Reichschancellor, the browns staged a march on the Pariser Platz.

“From the windows of the Adlon Hotel, the rich looked on as if from theatre boxes, still unable to take such a vulgar street drama seriously. But even those who could imagine what it signified experienced a sense of angry disbelief. There were many who loathed the Nazis in Berlin, a city which had always taken pride in its irreverent jokes. The Nazi vote, to the frustration of Goebbels, who had been put in charge of the party in the capital, had always been lower then anywhere else. But the parade that evening was a warning that electoral percentages were about to become as irrelevant as the rule of law.” (p.125)

Deja-vu? Hasn’t it all happened before? Class struggle, race-based upsrising, economic disaster as means of regime change–it’s all a well-established methodology. It is Communism, Naziism, fascism, totalitarianism, and yes, Democrat-ism. And if the global business minds of the Republican party aren’t reigned in, it’s also going to be Republicanism. Business men are the ones responsible for the Mexican presence. They want the supposedly cheaper labor–which ends up costing everyone ten times as much through taxes.

Street rabble. Soros is in. But does he care anything about Mexicans, Negroes, or American Indians? Of course not. They are implements. Causes. Tools. Through them, and the Democratic Party, and his “philanthropy,” he can aim for national bankruptcy, then the overthrow the current regime. He did it in Europe. Most recently, he succeeded in devaluating the British pound. He bet $10 billion on a his projected drop of the pound. It worked. English people saw their savings vanish, and Soros profited by $2 billion. The bet worked. That’s how much financial influence the man has in the world. This is beyond the ken of most readers, but, it’s true. It’s all in writing. The best source Soros is The Shadow Party (2006), by David Horowitz and Richard Poe.

Soros cares for none, while professing to be the savior of all. It’s only about power. His power. His “cause.” Power loves no one. Power cares for none, English or Mexican, American Indian or Chinese. Power only cares about power. Power only uses people.

Wars in the world are caused by power–power that uses people. I’d say the manly thing to do is don’t be used. How this translates into society is a true challenge, but the very challenge before us all.

Finally, I quote Beakerkin, the blogger, from a comment he made on BadEagle Journal entry, George Soros Hates Indians, Loves Rudy:

I tell people that Commies like Soros have no loyalty to their country or ethnicity. Many people think this is a joke. Soros, Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein are examples of Jewish Commies who put their Communism ahead of all else. Revolutionary defeatism has been the actual practice of Commies since Lenin. In reality this means siding with whatever enemy your country has and hope Communist revolution will rise from the ashes. This was of course tossed to the wind when Hitler attacked his ally the Soviet Union.

Communist have a history of class genocide that is as deplorable as anything the Nazis did. Commies also have a history of abusing ethnicities with mass deportations from their indigenous lands. Commies put Muslims on rail cars where 1/3 died on the way to Siberia. Then they turn around and scream about Israelis and Blacks in the USA.

Communism is as evil as Nazism, the KKK or Jihadism.

Posted by David Yeagley · January 18, 2007 · 11:27 am CT · ·

Tags: Bad Eagle Journal

Read More Journal Posts »

16 responses so far ↓

  • 1 David Yeagley // Jan 18, 2007 at 1:24 pm   

    To use people, a particular people, like Soros uses Mexicans, I think is a kind of hatred. At least, contempt. It is a denigrated disregard. He may say he’s working for their good, as in “philanthropy,” but he’s merely using them for larger, personal power goals.

    The practical effect of his “use” of Mexicans is to turn America against them. They have become despicable to many Americans. But Soros doesn’t care. He’s pleased to have them despised, as long as it serves his purposes in overthrowing America.

  • 2 whitetrash // Jan 18, 2007 at 4:00 pm   

    How do American businesses, large and small fit in to the issue with the Mexican invasion? How are they any better than Soros? Are they not traitors too? After all, the gap between the few who are continuing to get rich under the Clinton/Bush era benefit from cheap labor that “Americans won’t do” while the rest of us watch our jobs shipped over seas, watch companies rack record profits while middle and working class wages fall behind, and are left to compete with illegal labor for what is left over. How are they any better than the leftists who eagerly throw the American worker under the bus? At least Lefties don’t wrap themselves up in the flag and say a little word of prayer before they screw us.

  • 3 David Yeagley // Jan 18, 2007 at 4:23 pm   

    There’s a mix here. Racial struggle and class struggle. Most of the “races,” the people of color, are on the lower end of the social structure. These are the fodder for revolution.

    But there’s a third element in the mix: foreigners. Aliens. Illegal aliens. They combine with the persons of color.

    In the Soros way of thinking, as expressed in the Sundance Institute ideology, homosexuals and women are also oppressed.

    This makes the white male the last minority in the world. The only real minority.

    True, from a global perspective, there seems to be less and less difference in Americas political parties. The real differences between Conservatism and Liberalism are personal and moral. Not really economical. To the extent that self-reliance and initiative (conservative values) lead to economic success, we can say conservative values are better.

    Other than that, it’s really hard to tell. It becomes a matter of personal moral values. Sometimes, the world gets very dark. The immoral side seems to triumph…”for a season.”

  • 4 ecology // Jan 18, 2007 at 6:34 pm   

    good question whitetrash! Excellent thinking skills there. Like to see the “right” side questioned. They to me are the worst traitors of them all! Knowingly selling us out for their own globalist profits. They can rot and die for all i care. Yep suits and waifs dictating from their CEO headquarters. They know whats right and good for us. We are their little economic experiment. Kill them all i say. Drag their pathetic soft handed frail bodies into the street and hang em high! string them up! drag their cracasses down the highway!
    watch the movie The Corporation(little lefty but basically right on). Now dont get me wrong corporations can and do good. but now its overboard and past obscene.

  • 5 ecology // Jan 18, 2007 at 6:36 pm   

    doc i blame the aiders and abetters way before the poo and downttrodden simian monkey overbreeding masses. They allow it and profit off it. Soros is just another power mad egoist.
    gives these slime balls votes.

  • 6 KuhnKat // Jan 18, 2007 at 10:57 pm   

    whitetrash and Ecology,

    I believe Dr. Yeagley DID mention those you are referring to.

    I would like to point out that his post is ALL about this type of animal. People who use the Republicans AND Democrats, who are greedy, to carry their water for them. Trying to blame these types on Conservatism or even the Republican party is disengenous at best.

    During the Clinton administration your beloved ENRON “worked with” the administration to get several multi billion dollar contracts in South East Asia and India. These contracts failing were a large part of ENRON’s bankruptcy. The Republicans were NOT involved in these “pay to play” Business trips organised out of the Commerce Department by Ron Brown at the instigation of Hillary Clinton!!

    If you check the CASH FLOW you will find the BIG MONEY, that is the LARGE CHUNKS, go to the Democrats. The Republicans get their money from many more smaller donations. Soros himself spent around 20 MILLION to defeat Bush. He gives to Leftard organisations almost exclusively. He also has a number of ultra rich friends who work with him.

    Am I claiming there are NOT these corrupt, sick, individuals in the Republican Party also?? Of course not. You also are worse than disengenous when you try to pin the blame on the Republicans and IGNORE the daily perfidy of the Dhimmicrats!!

    Yes there are really poor HUMANS in both the Right and Left. Historically though, the Left has caused the failure of Nations as their policies are anti Human.

  • 7 ecology // Jan 19, 2007 at 10:26 am   

    I agree 100% there. Nothing wrong with what you said Kuhn. I see what is going on. I live in an invasion agricultural area. The treason runs up and down the pyrimid (ponzi scheme) that is America. Yes the republicans have less capital accumulated thats for sure. I also think alot of money goes back and forth between them all.

  • 8 ecology // Jan 19, 2007 at 12:38 pm   

    Sending our border agents to prison! Retreating at the border! Its absolutely obscene. There is nothing else to say.

  • 9 David Yeagley // Jan 19, 2007 at 1:03 pm   

    Eco, Soros doesn’t care if Mexicans are hated. He doesn’t care whether we hate them for their trashing of America. People at his level don’t care about anything or anyone but their own power schemes.

    Our concerns over nationality, ethnicity, these ideas are petty and passe. Globalists go for the globe. They don’t get hung up in private concerns of people, like patriotism, conservatism, etc.

  • 10 ecology // Jan 19, 2007 at 2:19 pm   

    That guy cares nothing about anyone doc! especially my types: Healthy strong educated personally responsible white males. They preferus wiped off the planet. And whites males that fit that description are the truly minorities. You speak the truth as we are the minority! I dont trust Soros cleaning my toilet bowl.
    When I was a a little younger doc I thought alot of these liberals (and conservatives) were noble. Then I grew up and found out it was all a lie. I truly believed America was different. You know a pillar of what a healthy society should be. very romantic ideas I have about things doc. I still smile and try and ctreat everyone with respect and dignity. Forgiveness. But now its so twisted that Im feeling why do I ahve to treat people that dont deserve a darn thing with any form of compassion. It seems that if you are good and innocent so to speak your taken advantage of. Im not into so I want to be a counterweight to PC. I truly believe the only way to solve this is if radical right wingers clean out the government. I think it has to be violent at this point.

  • 11 David Yeagley // Jan 19, 2007 at 2:48 pm   

    Well, the other thing is, these globalists characters think they are “saving” the world. They think they’re doing good for the world. They think their way is better.

    Richard Poe pointed out, in his expose on Soros in NexwMax May 2004, “George Soros’ Coup” that Soros is a New-Age Messiah. Soros told an interviewer that he had ‘godlike, messianic ideas.” Soros has said that his ‘goal is to become the conscience of the world.’

    I’m sure Hitler thought he was doing the world a great favor as well.

    Perhaps we’re wrong in saying these men are evil themselves. They work evil, and don’t acknowledge it. They don’t see it as evil.

    The human being is hardly capable of doing evil in his own eyes, not at the level they do it. It must be understood, in themselves, as good.

  • 12 "Greetings, my son!" // Jan 19, 2007 at 3:26 pm   

    “Soros has said that his ‘goal is to become the ***conscience*** of the world.'”

    This calls for a “Greetings, my son!” quote: THIS IS ONE OF THE BEST.
    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for THEY DO SO WITH THE APPROVAL OF THEIR OWN ***CONSCIENCE***–C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock (Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans,2002), p. 292.

  • 13 "Greetings, my son!" // Jan 19, 2007 at 3:26 pm   

    “Soros has said that his ‘goal is to become the ***conscience*** of the world.'”

    This calls for a “Greetings, my son!” quote: THIS IS ONE OF THE BEST.
    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for THEY DO SO WITH THE APPROVAL OF THEIR OWN ***CONSCIENCE***–C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock (Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans,2002), p. 292.

  • 14 ecology // Jan 19, 2007 at 4:39 pm   

    wow doc! That is making me think there.
    Great quote greetings! I never thought of it that way before. They are the worst of all! Soros is real big with the lefties. They feel he and chavez are great. God help us all.

  • 15 R // Jan 19, 2007 at 4:55 pm   

    I think all the racial divisions right now are getting insane. Charley Manson wanted to start a racial war – enough said.

    IMO, the Republicans are trying to keep the far right from polarizing alot of people of “color”, who are starting to distance themselves now due to all the racial rumblings coming from the right wing. I read recently that Senator Allen’s razor thin loss could have been avoided if he had not have made the now famous “Macaca” remark. That would have put the US Senate in Republican control (a tie with Cheney being the tie breaker).

    Dr, I realize where you are, and know all too well about the redneck racist influences in this state. But I firmly believe like Bush that racism has no place in the Republican Party. That immigration debate last year opened up a pandora’s box, just like Bush said it would, that really hurt when November elections came around. When elections these days are decided by a shopping mall full of people, Republicans can not be alienating any racial or ethnic group. Well, maybe except the Muslims. I agree that it is open season on those people, after all they have shown us.

  • 16 Adam // Jan 19, 2007 at 5:58 pm   

    I’m not sure what to make of R’s comment about the racial rumblings within the “right wing” and Republican Party.

    Racism, especially that which is decried here in Oklahoma from “rednecks racists”, is extraordinarily difficult to define, and I would suggest impossible.

    When middle-class Americans, who are predominately White, woke up one day and saw 500,000+ illegal aliens in the streets telling them to go back to Europe or be killed; when they saw a University professor calling for the extermination of White people off the planet on CSPAN, with literally no consequences; when they saw UT Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez calling for the extermination of White people, and reveling in the self-destruction of White people, again with literally no consequences…the idea of ethnic/racial self-preservation started to become a reality that has too long slumbered.

    I find it unfortunate that Dr. Yeagley is, perhaps, the sole voice amongst right-wing Republicans willing to point this reality out, though I greatly respect him for it.

    There are goals far more important than just insuring that Republicans get elected ever 2-4 years; because, if we will remember, Republicans were the ones who refused to close the border to the millions of illegal aliens pouring through.

You must log in to post a comment.