David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle. 
Democrats, like Nancy Pelosi, might seem on their best behavior right now. That’s because they know the level of disgust they provoke in responsible people. Perhaps they will actually lay low, and even feign good will, cooperation, and even Americanism. Perhaps they will try to create the impression that they care about the right values. We’ll see how long this lasts.
Nancy Pelosi, the new speaker
of the liberals?
Nacy Pelosi holds some of the most horrid, vomitable values of any politician in America. (Only Hillary Clinton can compete with such an impression.) The richest woman in Washington, the multi-millionaire hires only illegal aliens in her California vinyard empire. That’s how it works. The wealthy “commie” leaders (as Joseph Farrah calls her) feign compassion for the lowest levels of society–like illegals.
How can such a person rise to power in America? The passionate appeal to weakness. The ‘government’ image of caring for the poor. The government “savior” image. This seductive delusion not only sounds good to the poverty stricken and illegal aliens, but it appeals to indolence, irresponsibility, and general lethargy in all human nature. Hard work is painful, or so it would seem. Poverty is evil, or so it is presented. The solution? Let the government take care of you.
That said, maybe Republicans just didn’t play their cards right. But maybe people just can’t deal with the hard work of George Bush, and the ‘war on terror.’ The very safety and peace American has experienced since 9-11 has been used by Democrats to condemn the war! Why, there’s no threat. Islam is no enemy to the United States. See? Nothing’s happening. It’s all scare tactics of the Bush administration.
That’s the delusion Democrats have profited by, this time around. Republicans around the country are always too busy working, holding up the world, making things happen, to get involved in politics. The Dems, on the other hand, pay people to protest, demonstrate, and vote. (Ask American Indians about that.) Republicans find it hard to believe that the Democratic mind set is so deep and effective. They can’t believe people live and operate with such a view.
Well, maybe Republicans needed to be jolted, shook up, or some how reminded that nothing can be taken for granted. The opposition is constant, desperate, and wholly devoted–as well as perfectly hypocritical, like Nancy Pelosi. She truly does represent the Democratic Party. Yes, she will be Miss Congeniality, Miss Perfect, for a while, in the first flush of power as House Speaker (assuming she is in fact elected to that). There may actually be some good come out of it, if for feigned good will.
Pelosi with Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow Push, a moment of exemplary
liberalism and Democratic values.
But, in due time, her hideous values will show themselves. Just think of the district she represents: California, 8th District. San Francisco, one of the top ten most liberal cities in America. What does that mean? Homosexuality, illegals aliens, massive welfare, the usual. The very wealthy acting very concerned about the very poor. How quaint.
Remember Pelosi is against everything about Iraq, against the people, against their freedom, against any effort to improve them. (More important to give jobs to illegal Mexicans in her vinyards.) She thinks Bush’s Iraq war is a total failure. That’s real insight on the part of this political ‘leader.’ That’s really being in touch with the facts, the soldiers, and world reality.
I find it hard to think positively about this shift of political power. It means weakening of everything, that’s all. Rush Limbaugh thinks conservatism won. Republicans lost, but conservatism won. I don’t see that at all. Republicans failed at conservatism a long time ago. And I’ll not be duped into thinking Democrats are some how going to revive a new kind of conservatism. Democrats don’t hold conservative values. Not as a party. Not as policy. Have we forgotten everything that happened in the ’90’s already?
It’s time for a stiff upper lip, not a Pollyanna fantasy about good will. The Democrats can act like good willers all they want. The principles of the party are amoral (when not immoral) and inimical to American values. Plain and simple. That’s where we have shifted now. Too many aliens, too many liberals, and too much money put up to change American to socialism and Third World values. The Democrats may thank George Soros and the like, for their victories in these 2006 mid-term elections.
Walter Cronkite talks about American people not being intelligent? What does he think now? Do the elections bear that out? Indeed. He was wrong on the Warren Report, wrong on Viet Nam, but maybe he was right on American ‘intellegence.’
6 responses so far ↓
1 Mark // Nov 8, 2006 at 1:05 pm
I’m actually somewhat optimistic this morning because I think it’s a necessary thing that the liberals get power for a while again.
Let me make an awkward analogy: suppose that there is a terrible disease going around. You catch the disease. Is it better to get a good stiff dose of it as soon as possible, when you are strong and healthy, or is it better to struggle and struggle against it while you slowly weaken to the point where you can’t fight it off anymore? If you get it early, when you are strong, your body develops antibodies and even though the illness is terrible for a while, you will never get it again. But if you don’t get enough of a dose of it to get good and sick and develop those antibodies, the fight against it will go on and on until you have no reserves left and it kills you.
I think we need a strong dose of full-strength liberal policies while we are still a strong nation. We need our liberal fellow citizens to see the full effects of liberal policies, with no Republicans to blame for their failure. Right now, everything bad that happens, even when Democrats are in power, can be blamed by liberals on conservatives because (a) we didn’t let them spend enough money, or (b) we didn’t let them give enough special benefits to “disadvantaged” classes of people, etc etc. OK, I say let them go ahead and implement their programs now. The result will be disaster, and then we can pick ourselves up out of the dirt and start rebuilding without having to battle the liberals anymore.
With the exception of a few hard-left nuts who truly want to see Western civilization collapse as some kind of pennance for our evil capitalistic ways, the great majority of our liberal fellow-citizens are not bad people. They are just uninformed about what the true consequences of liberal policies are, and they will remain uninformed as long as liberal leaders can blame failures on conservatives.
2 ecology // Nov 8, 2006 at 1:54 pm
Nancy P. Needs to be dragged away in chains off her plantation. Her manor burned to the ground. Her vinyards raized. Her slaves deported. Then she must face the gallows pole.
3 David Yeagley // Nov 8, 2006 at 2:08 pm
Liberals can be just wonderful people. The problem is, they want to force their irreligious values on others, as if their values are religious. They are often irreligious, and amoral. They are more in to make their “religion” law than they accuse the Christian Right of being. They are way ahead, actually.
I agree with your point, Mark, nonetheless, which point I suggested also. I still find it discouraging that “people” still don’t know the different between the anti-American liberal values and true Americanism. The reason does have to be ignorant. They just don’t know what American values are.
This is why I wanted patriotism taught in public schools, an effort I started in 2001, when Governor Keating was in office in Oklahoma…
4 ecology // Nov 8, 2006 at 3:28 pm
I really wish we operated more with patriotism, love and pride in the nation and land. Im more an isolationist/nuetral thinking type. America was once just that. I know I know old and has been. But hey it be less headaches more sacrifice. Bad I know!
5 Beakerkin // Nov 9, 2006 at 6:21 am
Wrong again Doc.
The Democrats won by concealing who they are. Pelosi, Rangel, Conyers and Kennedy have been silent for three months. Now they are overconfident and in about three months the honeymoon will end.
Even in VT Sanders never says a word about his goofy Socialism off a college campus or outside of Burlington. His opponent never spoke about Sanders trips to Cuba, the Soviet Union and the closest he got was the word radical. Sanders spoke of dairy farms and peddled the myth that Bernie cares about whom and what remains unknown.
He could have tossed Willie Nelson a bar of soap and a razor blade, but Willie was too busy smoking the refer and imitating Shaggy from Scooby Doo to use it.
The only race that was a direct referendum on the war was CT where Ned Lamot got beat with ease.
Let Rangel and Pelosi talk and better yet act with over confidence. The American people will see the far left in all its ugliness.
Meanwhile Hillary Clinton is the front runner and gets defeated handily in any matchup with Rudy or McCain. However, if Rudy does not win look for Mayor Bloomberg to run as an independent. People are fed up with special interests and political hacks. Mayor Blomberg can run as an outsider and clean up DC. Unlike Ross Perot, Bloomberg has held political office and is far more capable.
6 Andie // Nov 15, 2006 at 3:11 am
I am half Italian and I thought there was something odd about Nancy – apparently her father (who to me looks more Jewish than Italian) is from a family of Argentine Morranos – she is also extremely pro-Israel – you may not like this website but it poses some interesting info:
http://judicial-inc.biz/pelosi.htm
You must log in to post a comment.