Media coverage is pathological in its distortions. Everyone knows that by now. The US mid-term elections tomorrow may reveal this in an unprecedented dimension, however. The distorted coverage of Iraq may in fact have provided a dramatic exposure of how liberals try to control the world through media.

Iraqi leaders are now beginning to decry the news coverage of the whole Iraqi story. Iraqi Kurdistan Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani recently said, “CNN International and al-Jazeera are equally bad in their coverage of the situation in Iraq.” CNN is well-known in America for being anti-conservative, anti-Republican, and especially anti-Bush. (The one exception, Lou Dobbs, and his faithful, truthful coverage of immigration issues.) But now we have an Iraqi leader decrying CNN, comparing it to anti-American Arab al-Jazeera.

Iraqi Kurdistan Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani, at recent news conference.

MoveAmericaForward.org has posted innumerable reports about the true progress and victory in Iraq. One report from CanadaFreePress describes the little known Gold Star Families who went to Iraq to visit the families of those their sons and daughters have died to free. Reuters filed a report on the group of seven US parents that went to Iraq, but a very short note. The conservative bloggers are all over the trip, of course. Here is a collection of audio clips from the US parents visiting Iraq. This is wonderful information. Everyone should know about it.

Iraq is actually a tremendous victory. Historical, and unprecedented. The media of the world will never, ever let anyone know that. Their lust for influence, for bloody stories, for political power, is vicious and unrelenting. One much always search for the truth. The truth always takes a little extra effort to know. She seems a little uppity, a little aloof. You have to show that you really want her, that you’re really interested.

So what is the truth about Iraq, in connection with the ‘war on terror?’ How do you win such an unconventional war? Certainly not by conventional means. However, the ‘war on terror’ might be made a lot more conventional, were certain measurers taken. Arab Muslims should not be allowed to travel freely throughout the world. Arab Muslims should not be allowed to live outside their own countries. Arab and Pakistani Muslims should be banned from the free world–at least temporarily. This would create propere boundaries for the ‘war on terror.’ The enemy’s disguises must all be herded together in one place. That is a basic logistic, to identify the enemy. Yes, the people behind whom the enemy hides must be consigned to their own oil-weathly countries–at least temporarily.

Islam is a proven, demonstrable menace, if but a disguise for mass murderers. It should not be allowed to be practiced in the free world. Islam is the antithesis of freedom. It does not belong in the free world. It should be banned. Never mind about all the “good Muslims.” They have countries to go to. They are not orphans. If they are oppressed and poor in their own countries, then somethings wrong with Islam, eh?

Iraqis are making the sacrifice, the effort, to change. It is not easy. Americans should vote to support them. That means supporting conservatives and Republicans. That’s how Iraqi people just may influence the American elections. American people should support candidates who support the Iraqis.

The American soldiers don’t want to pull out of Iraq. Even the liberal Washington Post reported that. For them, “victory” is a free, democratic Iraq. That is their assignment. Victory in this “war on terror” is an ideology of freedom expressed in a sociology, a working, functioning democracy in Iraq. This is a most unusual “war.” This is why victory is ill-defined in the media and in the political campaigns. Perhaps “war on terror” is in fact not the best name for the effort after all. It is an effort to spread freedom–the greatest protection for all free people. “Operation Iraqi Freedom” is indeed a good title, but it seems to have been lost in the media.

For the next two years, the conservatives, and everyone who believes in freedom, should think about a more positive term for this effort. It isn’t a conventional war, by any definition. It’s like Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” That was ill-defined as well, for not everyone born in the world is entitled to a Cadillac, and home, and a college education. Terror is not a country. Terror springs up out of a religion, Islam. Terror is not even a culture or a race, but terror is generated chiefly among Arab and Pakistani Muslims.

The slogan must become, Free the Muslims. Free humanity from Islam. Freedom for all people.