Perhaps Adolf Hitler was hoodwinked by his own Rorschach-style interpretation of racial realities.
Hermann Rorschach, a Swiss psychiatrist (1884-1922), is famous for the “inkblot” pschological test (published 1921) which presents an amorphous ink blot before a client or patient, and lets him interpret the blot however he sees it. Some patients see one thing, other patients see another. In the patient’s interpretation of the random blot, he reveals certain things about his personality. So thought Dr. Rorschach.
Dr. Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922)
An other words, any given phenomenon can be interpreted in wildly different ways.
A typical inkblot, as the
paper unfolds in halves.
In Hitler’s infamous book, Mein Kampf, there is a classic example of this kind of interpretation. Hitler made an interpretation (not an objective observation) and completely ignored a basic element in the actual phenomenon he was interpreting. Here’s the story.
“With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl [the blonde, blue-eyed German girl] whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people.” Hilter then says not only does the Jew do this individually, but also collectively. “It is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race.” (p.325, Ralph Manheim translation).
The incredibly obvious yet utterly deleted element in this scenario is natural sexual attraction. Integration always means interracial sexual relationships, and intermarriage, and mixed children.
But, aside from that, there are a number of errors in Hitler’s statement. First of all, not all Jews are dark haired and dark eyed, certainly not in the 20th century Europe; but that is a stereotype being employed. Even so, contrasting coloring is often a basic sexual attraction. Exoticism is a normal sexual dimension. It is not a plot of one race to destroy the other. Furhtermore, the plotting race stands to lose as well. Such intermarriage is self-destructive, (despite what Kevin MacDonald may theorize in his Culture of Critique).
“Satanic joy” may have more to do with Hitler’s own accusation than any remote relation to feelings of romance in the Jewish youth when he sees a pretty blonde. That would be a psychological revelation, Rorschach style. The ink blot is the Jewish-German romance, and Hitler sees it as a plot, with satanic joy, to destroy the German race. Instead, it’s probably just boy-meets-girl, in a romance heightened by contrasting colors and culture.
And the Jews certainly did not bring the Negro into the Rhineland. It was French regiments of Sudanese soldiers, brought in to occupy parts of Germany after World War I. Hitler is simply way off the mark of historical fact. To accuse the Jew is baseless, and therefore nullifies even Hitler’s Rorschach interpretation of romance between a Jewish boy and a German girl.
Black girl among the Germans, 1930
When a person of one race is romantically attracted to a person of another race, it simply does not prepresent a global plot to destroy that other race. It is simply the natural course of emotional, psychological, social integration. There is no profound motivation, no deep seated design to overcome the world, or even to survive in it.
Now, I must say, American Indians today face racial dilution to the point of annihilation. Integration, intermarriage, pose a real threat to the future of Indian people. We are a minority, we have some land base. We have our culture, our language, our religion, etc. We are separate nations, indeed. But we are being subject to all manner of integration and intermarriage these days, and it simply must come to an end. We have to begin to draw the lines, immediately.
Does this represent a plot to destroy another race? Are the people who are intermarrying with Indians trying to destroy the Indian race? No. They’re just trying to own part of it. Maybe they’re just attracted to Indians.
But it doesn’t matter. Whatever attracts non-Indians to Indians, this is no justification for the destruction of the Indian races. We have the right to preserve ourselves. That’s all it is. Self-preservation.
Romance is subjective, personal, and self-oriented. It is time to take the larger, nobler view. We mustn’t idolize our own emotions, but think rather of the people first. This is the grand vision. We must serve our people, not ourselves.
Mirror, mirror on the wall, who will serve his people, all? People first, romance second. Sound a bit barbaric? Sound ever so contrary to the “me” generation of America and the west? America needs to be reminded of the truth: America’s enemies of today do not respect the white race, nor the Judeo-Christian religion, but they do idolize their own race and religion. That precious, political religion in America, with the Leftist “equality” bit, gives our enemies a distinct advantage.
It is not racism to love and preserve one’s race. It is racism to destroy another’s race, intentionally or unintentionally.