Remarkably, a major American newspaper has called for the impeachment of Barry “Obama” Soetoro, acting president of the United States.

Well, columnist Jeffery Kuhner has called for impeachment. In an article published July 22, over a month ago, the headline of Kuhner’s opinion/editorial read “KUHNER: President’s socialist takeover must be stopped.”

Good enough. Some of us have called for impeaching a while ago. BadEagle.com said it on September 18th, and again on the 24th. Perhaps these weren’t terribly sophisticated protests, but, reasons were given, and explanations for why impeachment is unlikely. WorldNetDaily said the “I” word the next month, October 8, 2009. Michael Savage called loudly for impeachment back on February 4, 2009, two and a half weeks after the alien, lying black African Communist traitor took office.

Michael Savage radio broadcast, “Impeach Obama!”, Februrary 4, 2009.

Sher Zieve (Canadian Free Press) suggested the same at the end of the year, December 9, 2009.)

So, “mainstream” media is in the act now, the Washington Times, if even just an op-ed piece. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington think tank, so, he’s no slouch, or shall we say, crack pot. He is the host of “The Kuhner Show” on WTNT 570-AM (www.talk570.com) from 5 to 7 p.m. Perhaps this is significant.

The cultic forces who created “Obama” are waning, obviously. The man has a forelorn look in his face these days, too. (Or is it my imagination? Is he just growing tired from all the vacations? What about his continued “campaign” speeches across the country? That must be exhausting. The man does not know how to be president, but only how to give speeches and to make a show.) The American people have rejected him. That seems fairly clear. But will that lead to impeachment?

Kuhner calls for an immediate investigation of Barry’s bad boys just as soon as Republicans gain control of Congress, or at least the House. As BadEagle.com pointed out, however, the Speaker of the House decides whether or not impeachment goes forward. Until Nancy Pelosi is removed, there will be no impeachment. It’s her call.

It is important to note that Kuhner recognizes that Barry is not incompetent. He is decidedly accomplishing his appointed purpose–to destroy (”change”) America.

The common misperception on the right is that Mr. Obama is another Jimmy Carter: an incompetent liberal whose presidency is being reduced to rubble under the onslaught of repeated failures. The very opposite, however, is true. He is the most consequential president in our lifetime, transforming America into something our Founding Fathers would find not only unrecognizable, but repugnant. Like all radical revolutionaries, he is consumed by the pursuit of power – attaining it, wielding it and maximizing it. Mr. Obama’s fledgling thug state must be stopped.

This has been the position of BadEagle.com all along. Incompetence will be the “excuse,” the defense, when Barry’s bad boys com under legal scrutiny. Inexperience will be the main explanation, not treason, intentional overthrow of all American principles.

It is somewhat refreshing to see that such a call for impeachment was made in the Washington Times. Of course, Republicans blew it, badly, the last time they had power; so, there is no cause for any-too-hopeful dispositions presently. Even Sarah Palin can’t tell the difference between RINO Kelly Ayotte and solid conservative Ovide Lamontagne in the New Hampshire senate race. Palin endorses attorney general Ayotte, despite her liberal and otherwise misrepresented rulings on abortion and immigration–at least according to Laura Ingraham. New Hamshpire abortionist Dr. Douglass Black even supports Ayotte! (BadEagle.com was not able to confirm this.) Ingraham is quick to pounce on Ayotte for this duplicity, and also on Palin for such blind politics as “year of the woman” notions. Of course, Lamontagne is a staunch Catholic, so that means Ingraham (a convert) is certainly going to support him.

From Laura Ingraham’s site, Dr. Black’s property sign.

The point is, impeachment should never become a mere rally cry for a political party, not when the party is confused over its foundations. (Cao’s Blog recently assessed Republican Party problems and how Michael Steele epitomizes them.) But, in the case of Barry, it would seem any motivation would worthy, should it effect the same ends–the removal of a traitor from office.

Sound like a harsh, unkind notion, to impeach a United States president? Who wants to be harsh and unkind? Why, who wants to be accused of being judgmental, prejudiced, bigoted, and worst of all, racist? Most people flee from such accusations as the frown of God. The dominate white race just seems determined to prove itself above such tarnished motives. The white race really cares about standing for the right way when it comes to race. This is remarkable, really.

But, there is a limite to idealism and professed purity. Sometimes, you just have to get down and get dirty–if you want to keep what’s yours. As I used to tell my students in ancient humanities classes, If you have anything valuable in this world, you must be willing to fight to the death for it, or it will be quickly taken from you. This is world history. People take from other people. That’s just the way it is. It can be done by subterfuge, intrigue, and deception, or by the old fashioned way: force.

I don’t know that Obama will be impeached, or even if that is possible. I do know that I personally believe the country would benefit greatly were he out of office.